Home Blog Page 47

A key to horn success: “Hook up” your Low Range

Every year after ensemble placement auditions at ASU thoughts will come to mind. I was really happy overall with the quality and results of the auditions, but as I reflect on them a theme has been low range power.

In short, you have to have some power in the low range and it is a topic that comes up with every student. I even put together a book on the topic, Ultimate Low Horn, with great materials to use in lessons.  

Not to take anything away from my own teachers either, but lessons on etudes and excerpts are a great start but only get you so far. Actual experience playing a lot of low horn in good groups is what gets you there.

Tchaik-4-snipIn my own case the place I really got my low range hooked up was during my Doctoral studies at IU, playing Fourth Horn for two seasons in the Evansville Philharmonic on quite a number of standard works like Tchaik 4. And I was a good low player by then, but what I remember most was finally completely sorting out my break playing these works, figuring out how I personally had to approach that range. Those two years were an essential piece of the puzzle toward winning Third Horn in Nashville near the end of that second season playing in Evansville.

In my teaching I find that this range is very individual in terms of technical specifics, and where you get the power to finally go will probably be unique. Some decent power in the low range is not optional, work on it, play in that range in ensembles, hook it up.

Alphorn World Record!

Yesterday a world record was smashed! The old record was 366 alphorns, but according to Reuters, “508 players broke a record set in 2009.” Read the full story here, with a great overall photo of the world record group. I got to the article via Facebook (hat tip to TM), and was particularly interested see besides all the standard alphorns performed by players in native costumes there is one giant alphorn visible that has to be seen.

alphorn-snipOr heard! There is also a video from the BBC, which may be seen here that I found linked from the commets above. I don’t see a way to embed it so you will have to click over to their article for this version. The group sounds quite good and there are some huge booming bass notes in particular that would have been great to experience live.

Surfing around a bit more, pay dirt, found another a video from an English language service of the NHK in Japan. The photo here is a screenshot from the NHK video — and look at that bell! This is not photoshop. Wow. The big one makes all the standard alphorns look like toys.

UPDATE: That video seems to be offline now, but the below is another view of the same event.

Mellophone Reality Show: DCI Horn Cam 2013

One part of the horn world we like to peek into periodically at Horn Matters is the mellophone world. The DCI season just ended and I was very intrigued by this reality video, produced by DCI, of the 2013 Carolina Crown victory encore. The video was posted on Aug 11, 2013 and as noted on YouTube you can “Experience the Carolina Crown victory encore performance from behind the horn of 5th year age-out, Tim Malone.” The video is below (direct link here, with a hat tip to Scott Ditty and the Mellocast group on Facebook), and I have a few more comments at the end.

The video starts a bit slow (the show starts for the mellos without instruments) but you do very much have the feeling of being there on the field and of the show itself from the perspective of a player in the mellophone line. Which is the essence of reality TV, peeking into a world that you can’t experience or at least are unlikely to experience.

mello-reality

The marching when they get going is much more intense than anything I ever did in high school or college. The screen grab here gives the flavor of the show.

And there are a few more things that can be gleaned, in particular that the mellophone line of Carolina Crown aims for a big and fairly dark sound out of the mellophone, I never sense the hard edge you sometimes get with poor mouthpiece choices and such. Even if you just watch a couple minutes this is a very interesting video, a good model for what can be done on mellophone.

Technique builder: Take the Clarke 120 Challenge

Back last year I posted a technique packet PDF, and among the exercises it contains a version of the Clarke second study, a Classic exercise which passed into the public domain recently. I have used this exercise for years but have at times left it for periods of time.

I realized as I was getting in shape for the IHS symposium that I was struggling to play the Clarke study absolutely clean at even 104 with a metronome! My personal target tempo for this has long been 120 and when I am in top form I can do this easily. So these few weeks it has become a goal and it is a goal I invite readers to aim for as well.

Clarke-snipInstructions:

  • Use a metronome; don’t cheat on this point as you will find some keys harder than others but they all need to be 120 at the end, and a bit part of the point of this is to develop your finger timing perfectly in each key.
  • Do the entire exercise several times daily. There is much benefit to be had from playing it slowly with a metronome, and I usually play it slowly first in all keys then quickly in all keys.
  • You can vary the articulations, but it is probably the most challenging as written, under a big slur.
  • A minimum initial target tempo would be the tempo that you can play it on one breath (take a large breath!).
  • Aim to learn it clean at 120!

Progress will be incremental day to day but should be steady toward the goal. With this worked out many things in horn playing will certainly be easier. In particular I feel a percentage of accuracy problems involve finger coordination; this exercise will certainly improve that aspect of accuracy.

Finally, if it is really impossible for you past a certain speed it could in part be your horn is a tank and the valves won’t do it! Have your horn in top shape and if needed try another horn to see if you have really hit a wall or if the horn is holding you back (for example, a poor trigger throw can slow things down). Good luck!

Epstein on the Horn and Summer Vacation

Eli Epstein, besides publishing a new book on horn playing, also has started answering reader questions on his Facebook page. His first post was on the topic of summer vacation, and he offered it to Horn Matters readers as a follow-up article to the interview recently posted

Since summer is almost here, students often ask me about taking time off from playing. Should they take any time off, and if so, how much? If I take a break, how should I approach getting back in shape?

After the intensity of school, term papers, finals, and juries everybody’s ready for a break. The same is true for professionals. Symphony schedules can be grueling and nobody wants to get burnt out. In all walks of life it helps to take a break, catch our breath, and then, renewed, go back to our endeavors with freshness, excitement and energy.

However, playing a brass instrument is different from most endeavors. While we need to take breaks, we need to do so with mindful planning. Facial muscle tone weakens rather quickly if it’s not regularly exercised. Since so much of what we do requires minute movements regulated by the firing of specific neurons in the brain, when we take a break, the myelin that insulates those neural pathways and helps them fire quickly and automatically, starts to atrophy. In The Talent Code, Daniel Coyle describes how the worst thing for a cellist like Yo-Yo Ma or a basketball player like Shaquille O’Neal, would be to stop playing for a month cold-turkey. If they did that, all of their exquisitely tuned neural pathways would deteriorate. The movements that they took for granted as automatized, would become quite rusty and unfocused. After such a long break, it would become hard for them to regain the ease and good feeling that they were used to.

The common wisdom is this: on a brass instrument, for every day we miss, it takes two days to get back to where we were before. I’ve found this formula to be quite true for me. So I’ve learned to calculate how much time I can take off, and still be totally back in shape by the time I need to perform again. For example, if I know that I have ten days off until my next rehearsal, and I’m on a family vacation, I can take three days off, and then have six days to get back into shape.

That said, the way I get back into shape is always quite gradual. For each day I take off, I recognize that I lose significant range. Through experience, I now know that if I take one day off, instead being able to play to high C, I will only attempt to get up to G at the top of the staff on the first day back. If I miss two days, I won’t go higher than E at the top of the staff. Three days, third space C. Over three days, second line G. My goal is to stay healthy and not hurt my facial muscles. I always practice in front of a mirror to make sure that my embouchure set looks healthy and natural.

I’ve heard about professional brass players who were critically injured by taking three weeks completely off and then coming into a strenuous major orchestra rehearsal as if they had practiced those three weeks before. For them, this way of operating resulted in long term disability, loss of confidence and esteem, and fear of never being able to play again.

Mindless practice is our enemy. If you read The Horn Call, there are many references to how horn players are a unique and thoroughly dedicated bunch. We need to have more discipline than most in terms of daily mindful practice. We should never “just go through the motions.” When we practice without focus, bad habits can creep in, and become “myelinated,” that is, entrenched before we realize. I’ve found that practicing the warm-up in my book is a very easy and efficient way to maintain muscle tone and healthy habits during a vacation. Even if you just do a warm-up for 45 minutes a day, practice that warm-up in a very discerning, mindful way, in a quiet place without distractions. Whenever I practice, I play everything knowing full well that myelin is wrapping around my neural pathways. I feel that I have to be very careful to continually reinforce the habits of my playing that I want to reinforce.

Timing is very important when contemplating a break from practice. If you’re in conservatory, probably the worst time to take a week off is in the middle or end of August (historically when most families go on vacation). Usually conservatory placement auditions occur at the end of August or beginning of September. If one takes a week off in August, that means it will take two weeks of gradually getting back into shape. If one takes two weeks off, it will take a month to get back into shape. Often in that situation, we might panic practice and not remember to have discipline to get back into shape gradually and healthily.

Epstein-bookI hope you enjoy your summer vacation and take time to get a break from the horn. But I encourage you to plan well so that you can truly enjoy your break and feel confident that you will be able to gradually build up your strength and agility on the horn in a timely, healthy and complete way before your first performing responsibilities.

Cheers!

Eli

Thank you Eli for these insights! For those looking at a longer break of playing I would also point readers to this article, an interview with Laurence Lowe of BYU on the topic of coming back to horn after a long break.

Interview: Kovach on Triple Horns. Part III, a Horn is Born

0

JE: Can you share a bit about your other horns in general and what it was that you were looking for to directly achieve in the new Patterson model?

GK: That really is at the heart of this entire project and how it started. When I first met Jim it was to adjust some issues on that current triple that I was using. I realized we were just trying to reengineer things to fit my taste. So before we went too far down that rabbit hole, I pushed and maybe begged a little for Jim to make a triple based on his current models of horns. I was very excited about what he was currently making and his horns hit a chord (no pun intended) with how I like an instrument to feel. I don’t think I needed to do much convincing. Anyway, my first triple needed something that gave me more of a return on the energies I was putting in to the instrument. It did everything right, nothing wrong but still left me wanting more from it. I like to say that I was looking for something with body and character. I know that sounds like such a vague nothing statement but sometimes those descriptions are better felt then put to words. Also, that first triple was primarily used in smaller orchestras and smaller halls. When I brought it to Phoenix and a full orchestra and 2100 seat hall is when I really felt what I was missing. So the search began for my next horn.

JE: So it sounds like mostly that instrument was too lightweight to suit the orchestra and hall in Phoenix. Then you switched to another horn …

GK: As I moved on to triple #2 I felt at first that I was there. I had used the next horn for close to 2 years. But, from the beginning the one issue that was a constant was a speed issue, it really felt awkward in my hands and disconnected. It had the life and drive and sound but I could never get past the horn feeling slow in my hands. And, for faster technical parts of the repertoire I always felt like I couldn’t catch up to what was happening around me. I preface all this by saying that I really took years to address and come to these conclusion. It’s not as if I picked up the horn and dropped it after a week. We’re talking 10 years on one, 2 years on the next and 3 years on the following instrument. I really wanted to be conscientious between what issues were mine and what which ones were inherent in the horn. Again, my search was continuing forwards. As I moved to the next instrument I started to miss the previous ones. I know, we are never happy as performers and sometimes hindsight allows us to see the bigger picture. But still, I was very happy to have moved on to triple #3. My largest issue on #3 was that the 3 horns didn’t feel balanced as a whole unit.

JE: Explain for readers what you mean by balance in this context.

GK: I mean separately they felt like great horns, but from top to bottom I felt like I was missing that consistency that we spoke of earlier. Playing on the descant side alone was very nice. Playing on the double mid range of the horn, again very nice. And playing in the bottom register of the horn, very nice. However, as you would transition between the horn and use it as a full chromatic instrument it felt like it had 3 distinct personalities. I was much happier with this horn then my previous two triples for a multitude of reasons. But still the issues of having to work a little too hard for this horn to line up as an entire unit kept me pursuing another instrument.

Patterson-Triple-3When Jim and I met and we started to talk about all this, I knew we were seeing eye to eye about these various issues. And, it is a great luxury to have him only six hours away by car.

So the process began. His horn is so well balanced from top to bottom, feels wonderful in the hands and has that soul and character that I have been looking for. I don’t know how he took my vague words and brought them to reality, but he has. This is a real gem to have out there and the hope is that it gets the distinction it deserves.

JE: The horn will be on display at the IHS Symposium in Memphis, I look forward to trying it there!

Photo courtesy of Patterson Hornworks; for more see their Facebook page.

Return to part I of the interview with Gabe Kovach.

Interview: Kovach on Triple Horns. Part II, Goals

0

JE: Some specific things I like just looking at the new model are the location of the high-F tuning and also the hollow rotors and overall weight.

GK: Not only High F, but a dedicated Bb, and F and a dual F/Bb. All three sides can have their own main tuning slide. Which means less pull on all our slides and making our horn even longer! I think it helps for an even more well balanced horn from top to bottom. As for the rotors, it’s hard to imagine that they are lighter then the solid double rotors that Jim uses but they are! And that does not mean that there is a sacrifice on playability. Jim has built a natural feel and response in the horn that you feel no issues within the valve cluster. Also, the rotors have a wonderful feel and response in your hands. The benefit is no lag time in the return of the rotor regardless of the fact that you are now turning a rotor with 3 ports instead of 2. It feels as smooth as you would expect any horn to feel.

JE: Another thing to ask about is the ergonomics of the new Patterson triple overall, and does it stand in low F or Bb?

Patterson-Triple-2GK: Regardless of any instrument that one chooses to use, ultimately the instrument needs to feel connected to the player. It’s a marriage. And now we are adding another thumb level to that relationship. So the question of ergonomics was at the forefront of the design. Good ergonomics are essential to allowing the instrument to function and do what it needs to for the performer. The thumb levers are easy to access on Jim’s horn and feel natural in the hand. He has them well placed so that the instrument doesn’t feel uncomfortable and awkward for the left hand position or put your hand in any kind of tense position. We worked hard to make sure that the ergonomics of this instrument are one of the first things you will notice. And yes, you can have it stand in F or Bb depending on your preference.

JE: That is great, to stand in F as an option is I think essential to a horn intended for the market in the United States. Personally I have owned two different triple horns and when I won Third Horn in Nashville in 1991 I used a double and a descant horn in the audition, a setup I continued using as long as I was in the orchestra. Then I used a triple for several of the summers that I was performing first horn in the Brevard Music Center Orchestra. It is a topic that any serious aspiring professional player must confront in relation to auditions and a career, and could you share with readers some of your personal thoughts to using one horn instead of bringing 2 on stage?

GK: Well, I bet you can tell I am partial to using one triple horn. Personally I don’t feel the need to have to get used to 2 instruments during the course of a stressful audition or for a quick high solo on stage. Some people feel that you can hear the High F too easily on a triple and find it to be distracting. Personally, if the artistry in the player delivers the wanted affect to the piece, I could care less what instrument they choose to achieve it on. As for triples specific, it’s my personal avenue that best suits me for the job at hand. I like to have the consistency on the stage. So learning my triple, knowing its tendencies and having them be in one instrument is my personal choice. I understand the mentality towards descants and switching. But, for me it becomes more of a distraction to use 2 horns. Such as needing to warm the instrument up, making sure we are using the correct fingering for the different instrument, the instrument is going to blow differently then what we are used to. I like having it all built in to one. And what this new triple has achieved is all there for my personal taste in making music.

Part III will continue with more on the development of the new horn design. Photo courtesy of Patterson Hornworks; for more see their Facebook page.

Continue to Part III

Interview: Kovach on Triple Horns. Part I, the Search

0

Patterson Hornworks has introduced a new triple horn, and their initial (summer 2013) newsletter tells us 

This triple horn is a culmination of a 2-year project requested by Gabriel Kovach, principal horn of the Phoenix Symphony. Gabe has owned 4 triple horns and gave us valuable feedback on the weaknesses of each of their designs. Our design dramatically improved all of these weaknesses and may be the first triple that truly plays in all registers of each key.

We are happy at Horn Matters to be physically located so close to the developers of this new horn, and Kovach agreed to an interview on the topic of the new horn and triple horns in general.

Patterson-Triple-1JE: First, congratulations on being able to design a horn! This is something many horn players dream of.

GK: Thank you, it really was a fun thing to be a part of and indeed an honor to be thought of by Jim in regards to my own thoughts on making a triple or what I’m personally looking for.

JE: In the Patterson newsletter it mentions that a driving factor was to correct the weaknesses of the designs of prior triple horns you have used. Without being specific about brands, what sere some of the major weaknesses, especially ones that triple horn buyers should be aware of?

GK: This is a great question to start with, especially for those who are just getting in to or considering their first triple horn. For me it was from a point of departure in regards to how I was personally using the first triple I owned to what I was looking for in Jim’s new triple. The road has spanned almost 15 years of using triple horns. To give you a little background. When I purchased my first triple, I was still in school and about to play in Ottawa Canada on a one year position as principal horn. My goals at that immediate time were to pursue a career revolving around small ensembles, chamber music, and chamber orchestras. I was moving back to Philadelphia to be Principal Horn of the Chamber Orchestra of Philadelphia and the Opera Company of Philadelphia. Both of those ensembles are 35-45 members. I had also just finished 3 summers at the Marlboro Music festival and just founded a woodwind quintet at Marlboro. Basing myself in Philadelphia and also wanting a freelance career, I needed an instrument that day in and day out I could take in and not worry as to what music I was going to see on the stand. Do I need a descant horn today, my Conn 8D, should I be using a small bell horn, etc. etc. etc.? All the questions that go in to an instrument making us comfortable to properly serve the music.

JE: Right, so you were looking for a horn that would “do it all.”

GK: Yes, versatility was serving the function in my case. I stayed on my first triple for nearly 10 years.

JE: So this brings us back to what things to look for, and what limitations you felt there were with that first instrument.

GK: What was apparent to me was the limitation of being able to change things on an instrument that’s made in oversees. It’s not that simple to make wholesale changes on an instrument, beyond bells and leadpipes, when the maker is in Germany or Britain. It’s not economically easy to get on a plane, hotels and go to Europe to change anything that a player may want for his/her own sensibilities. It’s a great resource to have an American made triple.

Specifically to the drawbacks on triples, first off we need to change a bit of our own mentality towards them. I think we all need to be aware that we are sacrificing something, somewhere on the horn. It’s not going to have the same setup as a full descant, or the same setup as a full double. So the combination of the three horns means that we have to divorce ourselves from an expectation or a comparison to what may be “missing” from it. And evaluate what we need it for and our own expectations of use of the horn and what we want out of it. I try to think of the instrument purely as it own entity and not try to label it compared to double horns or descant horns. Seeing that there are more and more Triples available, it’s easier now than it has even been to use the comparison tests to what else is out there and not what our doubles feel like. All that being said we have to realize that the rate of tapers on our lead pipes is also going to be inherently different. Instead of a double or descant with one dedicated leadpipe, we now are creating a horn that has it leadpipe either serving the double and descant simultaneously in a shortened pipe (that tries to occupy that same amount of taper in a shorter space) or a leadpipe that splits in 2 different directions to give a separate leadpipe for both horns. In either situation, again we need to treat our mentality towards it as a separate instrument and not a comparison to the other standard double/descant models.

Part II will continue with more on the goals behind the development of this new instrument. Photo courtesy of Patterson Hornworks.

Continue to Part II of Interview

Interview and Video: Epstein on Finger Breathing

Earlier this year I was very pleased to be able to post an extended review (in three parts–part I is here) of Horn Playing from the Inside Out — A Method for All Brass Musicians by Eli Epstein. As noted in that review I feel this book is “one of the most substantial and significant horn method books to be published in years,” and I was also excited to see a video was recently released by Epstein that goes beyond topics in the book. Oral cavity shape is a hugely important topic in horn teaching and playing. Epstein agreed to a short interview on the topic of finger breathing and the related topic of oral cavity shape. The full video may be found at the end of this article.

JE: Finger breathing in concept is very familiar as it is closely related to a basic concept presented in The Breathing Gym, but extended for a focus on pitch level. In The Breathing Gym the general idea is to have a low sound when breathing in, this reflects an open oral cavity with low resistance to the air stream. When you breathe in for normal playing do you aim for a low sound?

EE: The way I understand the basic finger breath is that since the low sucking sound is produced outside the mouth, psychologically we’re satisfied that we’re taking in a deep breath, and therefore we reduce the constriction inside the mouth and pharynx on inhalation.

I hesitate to say, “Yes, aim for a low sound on inhalation.” In his master class, Keith Underwood seemed to indicate that the less sound we make on inhalation the better, since less sound means less constriction inside the mouth and pharynx. The idea is “how we inhale is how we will exhale.” So the unconstricted quality of inhalation creates the conditions for unconstricted exhalation, producing a freer, clearer and more resonant sound.

Barbara Conable, noted Alexander Technique teacher and author of The Structures and Movement of Breathing, A Primer for Choirs and Choruses, writes the following: “Air does not need to be swallowed, and pharyngeal muscles are not active in bringing in air, unless their function is mismapped. Some singers tighten pharyngeal muscles, believing them to be inhaling muscles, resulting in audible inhaling because of the constriction in the pharyngeal space. When singers correctly map the area as digestive, not respiratory, they no longer constrict on inhalation. They inhale quietly, and as quickly as they need.”

So, yes, when finger breathing, produce a “haunted” low sucking sound outside the mouth. But when inhaling to play the horn without the finger, I suggest producing very little sound, while taking in a full breath.

By practicing the finger breath many times everyday, we gradually train ourselves to use much less constriction inside the mouth on inhalation. The more we practice the basic finger breath, the more the feeling of healthy unconstricted breathing is reinforced and automatized. It can help to take a full finger breath, and, even though it’s awkward, hold the breath while we bring the horn to playing position and then play the phrase we’re working on. After a period of training ourselves this way, when we breathe normally for horn playing, we’ve developed a very open, quiet habit of taking full breaths.

JE: I can totally make the pitches of horn playing happen when finger breathing as described in the video. However, if I reverse engineer the process and play horn then hold the position and finger breathe I don’t at all get the same pitch as playing horn. Do you feel there should be a close relationship of the two, or is finger breathing more of an exercise or a visualization of a process?

Finger-breathing-snipEE: That’s a very interesting question. I tried the same experiment, and found that when I reverse engineered the process, I got the same pitch on finger breathing as when I play the horn. Yes, I believe there’s a very close relationship of the two.

This is how I understand it: It’s certainly possible to get the pitch one wants on the horn without using the optimal oral cavity shape and size. But, one would then have to compensate with another aspect of the biomechanics. If I produce a finger breath sound lower than the desired pitch, then my oral cavity size becomes larger than optimal; when I try to play the desired note on the horn, I find myself working harder than usual to make the aperture smaller to compensate for the larger than optimal oral cavity volume. Conversely, if I produce a finger breath inhalation sound higher than the desired pitch, when I try to play the desired note on the horn with a smaller than optimal oral cavity size, it sounds out of center on the high side of the note, and I find myself lipping the note down. Neither is optimal and requires more exertion from the facial muscles.

As I wrote in Horn Playing from the Inside Out, “The air stream, breath support, elevators, vowels, and finesse in articulation all work in concert with the embouchure, making it possible for us to use the facial muscles to make only minute adjustments…when one or more of these components is missing, the embouchure and facial muscles become overtaxed, draining our stamina and compromising the quality of our sound.”

I believe that finger breathing with pitches is not just a visualization but is a very practical technique that helps us easily find the optimal oral cavity size and shape for each pitch on the horn. When the oral cavity size is optimal, the aperture can remain supple and the sound becomes more open, ringing and beautiful. The idea is to strive for the most optimal equal work load among all the biomechanical components of sound production. Finger breathing is a simple and intuitive means for our bodies to adjust to a more streamlined way of playing the horn.

JE: My oral cavity sensations when finger breathing are very similar to those of whistling. Would whistling accomplish the same general result in terms of learning the skill?

EE: I’ve experimented with that. I imagine there are many different ways to whistle. When I naturally whistle, while it’s true that my jaw position changes in similar ways as in finger breathing with pitches, I sense that the back of my mouth closes a little and holds a certain amount of tension. However when I finger breathe the way I demonstrated in the video, the back of my mouth feels more open. I’ve also tried plain whistling with my students. Empirically, I’ve found that finger breathing helps my students produce more beautiful and open sounds than whistling.

JE: Any other points you would like to make about finger breathing?

EE: Last week I was playing principal horn on several recording sessions of contemporary music which the orchestra was sightreading. I found to my delight, that I could discreetly practice finger breathing certain difficult slurs or small articulated passages and that really helped me “get it” on the second take. I liken this pre-emptive checking to violinists and other string players who, before an entrance, will find their note by quickly pressure-testing their finger position on the string and finger board to make sure the note will be in tune on their entrance. This practice increases confidence.

As I mention in the introduction of my book, “Violinists can see their fingers on the fingerboard, and pianists can see or feel the octave spread of their hands. Brass players also have to use spacial thinking, though we’re not usually trained in that way.” In my view, finger breathing provides an intuitive and kinesthetic method to train our bodies to play the horn more efficiently, easefully and beautifully.

The video is below, which may also be viewed directly on YouTube here. The photo in this article is a screen shot from the video. Thank you again to Eli Epstein for sharing these additional insights and tools for working on and understanding oral cavity shape.

For information on how to purchase his book visit the website of Mr. Epstein 

Trompes de Chasse vs. Telemann

Recently a video link was posted to the Horn People group that caught my attention, a group of  Trompes de Chasse performing Telemann with organ.

logoHMThe horns sound pretty extreme by modern Baroque interpretation standards on the work, and I can only imagine the actual decibel level in the venue. But it gets at a point that is made periodically and very correctly: we have no idea how the horn really sounded back in say 1720.

The video is worth sticking with for a few minutes before you decide if you like it or not; they do play with a lot of character, and it looks like a lot of fun to play this work on Trompe. Consider this video a palate cleanser!

UPDATE: That specific video is off YouTube now, but the version below is very similar, featuring the Rallye Louvarts de Paris & Orchestre de Chambre, dir. Jean Francois Paillard (Erato, 1967).

The stylized rhythms are extremely interesting to me, and overall the performance really says again that we have no idea what this music might have actually been played like in Telemann’s day. At some point things changed, but initially the out of tune notes and tone color could have simply been seen by the audience as “that’s just how horns sound.”

For more on Telemann and the horn see Telemann Wrote a Lot of Music for the Horn, and for an overview of the horn in the Baroque see University of Horn Matters: The Horn Before 1750.