Home Blog Page 58

Developments in Horn Mute Design in the 20th Century

In working on the Hornmasters series article on Mutes (which may be read here) I was reminded of just how far we have come in terms of horn mutes in the twentieth century. There is a great online resource on the topic by Nicholas Smith, The History of the Horn Mute. He starts out in the Baroque period and covers a lot of ground (this lengthy article is based on his 1980 dissertation), but toward the end gets to some more recent history.

There are two main types of non-transposing mutes frequently seen today in the United States: Rittich style mutes (shaped like a tall cone) and also the standard “Stone-Lined” type seen so frequently among students, shaped like a smaller cone on a cylinder. These designs were both products of experimentation by fine hornists of the 20th century. Early in the 20th century, however, mutes were not commonly owned or used.

The late Wendell Hoss, one of America’s well-known hornists, mentioned to the writer that non-transposing mutes were little used and that players chiefly depended on hand-muting or the transposing type mute. Mr. Hoss mentioned that the first big innovation in non-transposing mutes was a design by Parduba in New York. A set of these mutes was made for Bruno Jaenicke and the Schultz brothers, who were all members of the New York Philharmonic horn section during the 1920’s.

As noted in the quotation, the first important mute design in the USA was the Parduba mute. Conical in shape and tunable, it was made of brass and weighed about four pounds! From the article,

With the adjustable inner shaft, these mutes were supposed to be able to produce a mellow, plaintive quality as well as a coarse, raspy sound. However, Mr. Hoss mentioned that they tended to be coarse, loud-sounding mutes. Despite their sound quality, they were a big innovation and seem to have affected the design of all succeeding mutes. Gunther Schuller mentioned to the writer that these mutes were still being used by horn players in the Metropolitan Opera as late as 1960.

I don’t have a photo of one of these to share but did find one online, check here to see one of these vintage mutes. This drawing is reproduced with permission from the Smith article.

Next up historically is the de Polis mute. Frank de Polis studied first in Italy and after coming to the United States studied with Anton Horner before WWI. His career included time performing with the Cleveland Orchestra and the Philadelphia Orchestra. According to Smith,

He began making mutes after experiencing dissatisfaction with what was then available. He experimented with various designs until he got the results he wanted. His colleagues were impressed with the quality of his mutes and began requesting them for themselves. The mutes can generally be described as being a cone on top of a short cylinder with an inner shaft running from the open top to the bottom of the mute. They were all made of fiberboard with a thin wooden bottom….

The mutes became very popular with orchestras such as the Philadelphia Orchestra and the NBC Symphony which had their entire sections use them. At the time of his death in 1962, de Polis mutes were probably the most popular of any in use and the design has been widely copied.

Speaking of copies, this design is the inspiration for the familiar Stone-Lined mute. According to Smith,

Horn mutes by the Humes and Berg Company are some of the most popular mutes sold. Their availability and very reasonable cost have made the mutes one of the most widely used in America, especially by younger students. According to Milan Yancich, Carl Geyer designed this mute which was first manufactured in 1942. The Humes and Berg mute has the same basic design as the de Polis mute, although its upper cone part is made of molded fiberboard. Like the de Polis mute, it also has an inner shaft and a wooden bottom.

Skipping ahead a bit in the text, the most standard, professional mute, the one that is used by the most advanced players today in the United States are Rittich style mutes, one of which is seen at right in the photo, along with a brass stopping mute. What is the origin of this design?

In surveying today’s professional players as to what their mute preference is, the name Eugene Rittich of Toronto, Canada seems to be mentioned more than any other. Mr. Rittich has been for many years Co-Principal of the Toronto Symphony and his experimentation with mutes began as a result of his dissatisfaction with what was available.

He began working in 1962 to try and achieve better intonation and response from the then popular cone on cylinder mute shape. This failed to produce the results he wanted, so he experimented with a simple cone shape which achieved better results. Before long, he was receiving so many requests for copies of his design, that he decided to produce them for sale. Since that time (1967), he has worked to find the best combination of the many variables found in a mute’s dimensions. These include taper and length of the cone, top hole diameter, diameter of the inner cylinder, placement, width, and thickness of corks, and the materials from which the mute is made.

The Rittich mute has an adjustable length inner cylinder for fine tuning the mute to any horn. Although this feature isn’t new, it is probably the most successful application of a tunable mechanism on a mute to date. The success of his design is evident by the large number of copies being presently produced by other manufacturers.

Makers continue to experiment today, but it is very interesting to me that the leading design today is the result of experiments that began just 50 years ago!

To larger and smaller degrees all non-transposing mutes for horn today follow the designs outlined above. Thank you Dr. Smith for putting this online, and for much more on the horn mute see his full article and linked PDF files.

Hornmasters on Mutes

Mutes are not a new invention, as they have been used in works since the time of Beethoven (his sixth symphony being especially notable).

Don’t worry, play muted

It took me years to figure out that most brass players (other than horn players!) harbor lots of concerns about playing muted. It really is interesting, as playing muted horn with a good, modern mute is typically just as easy playing open.

In general the topic of muted horn also appears to have been of no great concern for Farkas from a technical standpoint (“with proper practice, the change in resistance caused by the mute will not be upsetting”), but certainly the mutes of the 1950s must have required more adjustments of corks than we expect to see today.

In older works it can be confusing what the composer wanted you to do

But there is a big elephant in the room on the musical side of things to address as well. Quoting from The Art of French Horn Playing,

First let us clarify the myriad terms used to denote muting or hand-stopping. The is a distinct difference between the sound of a muted horn note and a hand-stopped note, as most composers are well aware; but players are inclined to treat this difference lightly and use whichever method suits their convenience. I believe that this is a rather serious mistake and, to some composers, a downright affront.

Farkas gives an overview of some of the more confusing notations of Ravel and Debussy and offered a short list of terms related to muted and stopped horn.

(I have a longer PDF list at the link below, with the most important terms related to muted and stopped horn marked).

Farkas also explains that the terms schmetternd and cuivre “refer only to the player’s ability to get a hard, brassy sound on the open horn by unduly tightening the embouchure with a ‘smile’ and forcing the tone.”

Reality is some composers didn’t/don’t understand the effects they request in their own music

While he has several practical notes on muting (“It is not necessary to jam or grind the mute in” for example) Gunther Schuller in Horn Technique is especially concerned with the musical side of the horn mute question in the orchestra. In explaining this he takes the opportunity to chastise composers who don’t understand the effects requested in their own music.

Many composers are not very clear about the difference in the sounds produced by using a mute and that of hand muting (or hand stopping). Not knowing the difference, they write in their scores simply ‘muted’ or the equivalent in their own language. Often they write ‘con sordino’ when they really expect hand muting; and vice versa. Many players also assume that the composer and the conductor do not know the difference, and therefore do whatever comes easiest, which is usually to put a mute in the bell. A few composers, however, like Wagner, Mahler, Ravel, Debussy, Respighi, and Stravinsky, do insist on the differences between the two forms of muting.

Just say “no” to plastic, cardboard, or metal mutes

As to non-transposing mutes Harry Berv in A Creative Approach to the French Horn feels that mutes made of fiber produce “a more mellow, descriptive sound” than do mutes of plastic, cardboard, or metal.

On finding a good mute

Barry Tuckwell notes in Playing the Horn that

A really good mute is exceedingly rare: most produce altogether too open a sound. This may sometimes be improved by cutting down the corks so that the mute can be fitted further into the bell.

I believe speaking generally that the consistency and quality of horn mutes used by professionals has gone up over those used when the above books were written. As to my recommendations, this is what I had posted in an article in the old Horn Articles Online site:

There are a lot of mutes on the market, each with a unique shade of tonal color and slightly different playing qualities. If you can, try the mute before you buy it–especially try the low range, which on some mutes is quite poor. In general many professional players in the USA prefer “Rittich” style mutes, the ones that look like a tall cone. I would by choice recommend a tunable version of this type of mute. While it may make sense to purchase a cheap mute for a school program, for personal use always look for something up the ladder in terms of quality.

On the history of the “Rittich style mute”

Many students today wonder what is a Rittich style mute, or why this name became associated with this type of mute, such as seen in this photo. Nicholas Smith offers this background in an article based on his 1980 dissertation,

In surveying today’s professional players as to what their mute preference is, the name Eugene Rittich of Toronto, Canada seems to be mentioned more than any other. Mr. Rittich has been for many years Co-Principal of the Toronto Symphony and his experimentation with mutes began as a result of his dissatisfaction with what was available.

He began working in 1962 to try and achieve better intonation and response from the then popular cone on cylinder mute shape. This failed to produce the results he wanted, so he experimented with a simple cone shape which achieved better results. Before long, he was receiving so many requests for copies of his design, that he decided to produce them for sale. Since that time (1967), he has worked to find the best combination of the many variables found in a mute’s dimensions. These include taper and length of the cone, top hole diameter, diameter of the inner cylinder, placement, width, and thickness of corks, and the materials from which the mute is made.

The Rittich mute has an adjustable length inner cylinder for fine tuning the mute to any horn. Although this feature isn’t new, it is probably the most successful application of a tunable mechanism on a mute to date. The success of his design is evident by the large number of copies being presently produced by other manufacturers.

A tunable mute

One thing that needs highlighted from the quote above is also you should have a tunable mute. The whole concept is unique to the horn, and allows a mute to be adjusted for ideal intonation in relation to your bell size and hand position.

You need more than one mute

Besides keeping a mute in the trunk of your car, my only other small note would be that it is worth having several mutes. In particular I find that for brass quintet a mute with a brighter tone is desirable, brighter than that of the typical orchestral horn mute.

Next up in this series is the topic of stopped horn.

Continue Reading in Hornmasters Series

Horn Pedagogy Week 5: Breathing, and a bit on Dystonia

Breathing is a very important topic! In looking at this topic in terms of horn publications — and this approach is probably not the best one — the focus is typically on the inhale and on resistance points during the exhale.

Readings this week

This is the focus of the first readings from Hornmasters series:

Low brass have the topic of breathing much more figured out

Low brass teachers and players tend to be much more tuned into the physical side of breathing. On the other hand, high brass teachers are less focused on the topic and may have frankly odd ideas about how to breathe. For horn, for sure there is an active, physical side of breathing that you do need to improve as a part of your studies.

For those following online only…

If you are reading this online only, I would highly suggest looking into two different, recent publications, as they look at different aspects of breathing.

  • The Breathing Gym Daily Workouts, a highly practical resource on DVD
  • The Breathing Book by David Vining

These are both excellent supplemental resources. A sample from the Breathing Gym Daily Workouts may be seen on YouTube here. 

Focal Dystonia

Also, turning a corner, David Vining is also a resource on the topic of Focal Dystonia. A topic not addressed in any classic horn method, it is an important one to understand as it impacts a surprising number of brass players, including Vining. There are also a number of articles in Horn Matters related to the topic, and I would suggest these two articles by Bruce Hembd as another great starting point for some initial understanding of the topic.

From the first article,

Dystonia is a neuro-muscular disorder that causes muscles in the body to contract or spasm. “Focal” dystonia is generalized to one region of the body. For musicians, it typically affects the specific area of the body that is used to play the instrument.

A failure to communicate

The connection between the specific muscles for playing and its corresponding area in the brain — for some unknown reason — short-circuits itself. Something goes awry with muscle memory.

It is not something that occurs overnight.

If you are active in brass playing long enough you will meet people struggling with this condition, it is one to be aware of.

Next week we turn to the topic of actually playing the horn.

Continue to Week 6 of Pedagogy Course

This is week 5 of a fourteen week course in horn pedagogy. The introductory article is here, and the series is presented for the educational purposes of our readers. 

Xavier Reiter and Alphonse Pelletier visit the King Factory in the 1920s

Tucked in an old copy of the Oscar Franz Method that I was given years ago was a full page advertisement for King horns. Featuring photos and signed testimonials by horn players of the early 1920s, the featured photo was this one, showing Xavier Reiter visiting the King factory. Standing from left to right in coats we have Alphonse Pelletier, Xavier Reiter, and the president of King, H. N. White. Of the three, Reiter is the most impressive character.

Xavier [Xaver] Reiter (1856-1938) is not exactly a household name today, but he was one of the biggest name horn players of his time. There is a great bio with great photos of Reiter on the Richard Martz website. He towers over his contemporaries in many ways, check out the full bio, but from it I would glean these facts to catch your interest

  • Was a student of Franz Strauss
  • Followed his lead on equipment, and performed on the single B-flat horn
  • Performed co-principal horn on the premiere of Parsifal in 1882
  • Joined the Boston Symphony as Principal Horn in 1886
  • Ultimately performed Principal Horn in the New York Philharmonic and in the Metropolitan Opera Orchestra
  • In the press was called “the greatest French horn player in the world”
  • In the off season had a large farm at Valhalla, New York

And he was clearly a colorful character with long hair and a sense of style! See the Martz article for much more, and for a larger version of the image above click here.

As to Alphonse J. Pelletier, he was also visiting the King factory. Details on his career are harder to locate, but besides being “former Detroit Symphony” a quick Google search shows that he also was a member of the Cleveland Orchestra and the Philadelphia Orchestra in the 1920s. And to his endorsement, who would not want a horn that plays easily with a wonderful tone and even scale?

Thirteen other players from orchestras and theater companies are quoted with testimonials and portraits in this ad, and I may feature more of them in a future article. The best known today of the artists probably being Louis Dufrasne, the teacher of Philip Farkas, listed as being with the Chicago Opera Co. “Allow me to express my sincere appreciation of your King Horns.” More on Dufrasne and his warm-up routine may be found here.

I framed the full advertisement years ago, but it was not a good frame and I had never hung it in my office. Now it is reframed and in a prominent location, a neat collection of photos of American horn players active 100 years ago.

UPDATE: The careers of Xaver Reiter and his brother Josef are highlighted in a recent book by Norman Schweikert, Horns of Valhalla – Saga of the Reiter Brothers. For more on this book see the product listing here, and thank you again to Richard Martz for the link.

UPDATE II: My review of the Schweikert book is here.

Ask Dave: How much will it cost to fix my horn?

0

It never fails. One week into school I get a call from an over-wrought parent. “My daughter’s French horn isn’t working. She has class tomorrow and needs it. How much will it cost to fix it?”

And this year, I think I lost a customer because of my response. “Well, when your car is broken, do you call up your mechanic and ask the same question?”

The horrified parent stuttered for a few seconds and said, “Will it cost THAT much?”

“No,” I said in a reassuring and less peeved tone, “I was making a point. Just like your mechanic has to inspect your car to tell you how much it will cost to fix, I have to look at your child’s horn to give you an estimate, too.”

I think at this point in the conversation, despite my conciliatory tone and explanation, the customer realized I had made a joke of her predicament, said something about me holding the phone while she took a call, and I got disconnected. I called back twice, but no return call and no answer.

I was wrong, and I shouldn’t have let my frustration with that question get in the way of taking care of my customer. But customers should understand that there is no pat answer to this kind of question. I know nothing about the instrument, and neither does the parent. I should just have said, “You’ll have to bring it in.”

Tools, time and the trade

Many factors go into the cost for repairing an instrument: the technician’s time and training, the tools and supplies, the cost of the shop space including rent, utilities, and insurance.

Another customer brought in a trumpet under pretty much the same circumstances. He came in that evening and needed it right away. I inspected the entire instrument, and immediately figured out that a small dent in the valve casing was hanging up the valve piston.

I pulled out my casing mandrel for this model trumpet (you have to have a mandrel that’s ground to .001″ tolerance), put the trumpet on the mandrel, and tapped the dent three times with a drumstick and mallet. Done.

I reassembled the instrument, lubed it, and discussed maintenance with him. I charged him $40. He didn’t complain at all, but I did explain the charge to him: “You have to have the skills, and you have to have the tools.”

Horn Pedagogy Week 4: Embouchure Overview

The embouchure is a big topic and one that will require not just reading but critical thinking to understand on any high level. And it is an evolving topic, our understanding of the embouchure has actually grown quite a bit in recent years.

The MRI studies

How has it grown? One critical way to note this will be seen in 2016 and later updates to this course related to the recent (and ongoing) MRI studies. If you want to start out with a bit of a fresh perspective (and you should!), start here:

A quote from the giant book

Before getting to readings from classic method books I would offer the following as well. Occasionally I have mentioned in this website a large book project. It went through several drafts and helped organize my thoughts, but I actually broke up most of the text and used it in my series of publications now available on Amazon. The text below is from the last draft of the giant book, and lays out a couple critical, needed pieces of the puzzle toward making the readings that follow make sense.

If you remember nothing else from this chapter remember this underlying point: neither of two major systems concerning formation of horn embouchure is right or wrong. Regardless of how expertly and convincingly your teachers may have presented their types of horn embouchure, at the extreme ends of the two possible systems only a limited number of players can achieve success on the horn. It is important to have a clear understanding of both systems and to realize that somewhere within the range of possible variants is where most hornists find success….

So, what exactly are these two systems that I speak of? You might guess from reading older sources that they might be “smiling” and “puckering.” Incorrect. Although many teachers caution at least in print against a smiling embouchure, the fact is that hardly any players actually smile excessively. Maybe it was a big problem among players back in the day, but my observation is that players don’t tend to smile too much because it does not work and they do not tend to pucker excessively either as it also does not work. There is a very different element of the geometry of the embouchure that defines the two systems.

To describe the different approaches I am going to use two terms: one system I will call the “square” system and the other the “downstream” system. Of the two, I believe many horn players think that they are aligned more toward the square system because Farkas was a big proponent of it in his publications. But, if most proponents of the square system could step back and see how they themselves have actually positioned their faces and jaws, they would notice that they as a group tend to play more toward the downstream system, which in reality is the more correct of the two. The term downstream is an accepted term used to describe this type of embouchure in other brass instruments. The term “upstream” is also used in other brass teaching, but it refers to a type of embouchure generated by playing 2/3 lower lip, an approach we do not often see in the horn world, especially among players who perform at a high level.

The more upper lip you have in the mouthpiece the more that the upper lip vibrates relative to the lower lip. High speed video of the embouchure in motion confirms that those vibrations are based on a flapping motion dominated by the upper lip. With the larger upper lip effectively hinged at the top, the motion of the lips directs the airstream downward. This stands contrary to one traditional understanding of the flow of air through the lips, which proposes that the air flows straight through the lips, which in reality could only occur with a true 50/50 setup which is very rarely seen in horn playing. The effect of the downward flow or deflection of the airstream is more pronounced the higher you are in the range of the instrument and is certainly driven not only by mouthpiece placement but also by jaw position.

Farkas laid out one approach to the embouchure but as you will see it was not the only one.

Related, important tip: Try the opposite of what the book says

This may sound like bad advice, but reality is there are radically different approaches that work well on the horn. If a book or a teacher says one thing, you owe it to yourself to actually try the opposite also. Don’t be a sheep blindly following an embouchure guru.

Readings this week

With that perspective established, we have a group of readings from the Hornmasters series.

For a bit more perspective, these two articles below introduce one more topic, that of an embouchure concept called the balanced embouchure.

This week we have one more required reading and a video to at least watch the first half of, found here:

[The image at right is from the video linked above.]

And while an officially an optional reading for students in the course (too many readings this week! Sorry), I would also offer this article for context on Farkas and brass pedagogy outside the horn world:

Keep looking for reality over visualizations

Embouchure remains a big topic, big enough to easily spend weeks on, but to leave with one final thought as we start the discussion, above all you want how you think of the embouchure to be rooted in physiological reality such as seen in the video or the MRI studies, not in visualizations and one-size-fits-all concepts.

Continue to Week 5

This is week 4 of a fourteen week course in horn pedagogy. The introductory article is here, and the series is presented for the educational purposes of our readers. 

Hornmasters on Trills, Part V: Wekre and Hill (and a very important element that people don’t often consider)

To close our look at trills we hear from two more recent publications, and I have an important note to add at the end.

Facial movements will be visible

Frøydis Ree Wekre feels lip trills are an excellent way to build strength, and has exercises to develop trills in Thoughts on Playing the Horn Well. She encourages attention to the following points.

Be sure to keep the upper lip free (no pressure or minimal pressure) to vibrate and change pitches easily.

Some players recommend a conscious use of syllables with help from the tongue: da-i-a-i-a-i-a. However, I think that the lips, with some help from the jaw, can do most of the job.

For louder dynamics, more facial movements will be visible.

That last point is one that is an important one in relation to reality. Some students struggle trying to follow conventional wisdom on keeping the face still, but a bit more movement can solve the problems.

The best trill exercises are not the traditional ones

As to what exercises to use to practice trills Wekre emphasizes “Avoid the type that starts with slow notes (quarters) and only gets to the fast action when you are out of breath.” HMMM, sounds a bit like a lot of the exercises in a lot of the books … which in reality tie some players up in knots. I often call what she recommends “lip flips,” and this approach is certainly worth a try by anyone working on trills. Lip flips? If you wish to see what they are, you will need to buy the book!

The ideal time to learn to trill is…

Douglas Hill has an interesting personal aside on lip trills as he begins his examination of the topic in Collected Thoughts on Teaching and Learning, Creativity, and Horn Performance.

For some reason, this particular technique causes a great deal of grief for many students. I learned it before anyone told me it was difficult to do. That, I believe, is an important point. To believe something is difficult causes one to try too hard. I believe that lip trills are some of the most relaxing physical gestures that we do, or at least they should be.

I’m pretty sure I also had largely worked out my trills before I knew they were hard. Working somewhat in isolation at a small college in Kansas was in fact a helpful thing, I did not pick up the dread of trills being difficult that so many seem to have. This is where what books say and what teachers say can lead you astray. You will try hard to do something, but actually the suggestions won’t necessarily work for you and can simply give you a complex.

Introducing the tongue as a key element

Hill continues,

A key component in understanding how they need to work should involve a rethinking and renaming. They should be thought of as “lip/tongue/air” trills. The procedure involves all three aspects of your playing in coordination with each other, so that none of them have to work too hard. The biggest problem is usually when the student exerts extreme lip-flexing between two neighboring notes. Notes which are usually a breeze to administer when slurred during a scale passage.

Hill suggests a method of practicing trills that begins with aiming at the note between the trilled notes, feeling the break between the notes, and moving to longer and longer series of flips of “tah-eh-yah” figures. At the end of his discussion he suggests another possible new name for the lip trill, “flip trills.”

Hill goes into more detail in terms of text and exercises in his later publication, From Trills to Tremolo to Vibrato. For those interested in more of his approach, this is worth tracking down. This book is available from the publisher.

Another very important element: your horn and mouthpiece

There will be a point for many that trilling becomes a frustration. They try everything, nothing really helps.

The element that might finally help is try to trill on a different mouthpiece, and also on a different horn. Some horns and mouthpieces and combinations of horn/mouthpiece are just stiff, much too “slotty” to produce a good lip trill.

As to finding that perfect horn and mouthpiece, there are certain etudes and exercises that can be very helpful and revealing. I would highly suggest reading and considering what I have to say in this recent article:

This serving again as a reminder that sometimes it is not you, sometimes it is actually a physical equipment issue that is the problem.

In the end, each player is an individual and will have to sort out trill technique, and hopefully the ideas in these articles will be of help.

We are near the end of this series! The next topics are muting and stopping.

Continue in Hornmasters Series

Hornmasters on Trills, Part IV: Tuckwell

One book that is not that well known today is Playing the Horn by Barry Tuckwell. It was written by Tuckwell in much the style of being his version of The Art of French Horn Playing.

A master of the lip trill speaks

As his recordings attest, Tuckwell was a master of the lip trill. In Playing the Horn he offers great advice and more on the topic. Starting very practical, Tuckwell notes that

…the fact is that a trill is only a rapid movement between two notes. Every player can move from one note to another and back again; however slow this may be, it is still a lip trill. The task is to try to increase the speed. There is no secret formula to produce lip trills…. The time-honoured lip trill exercises still hold good today…. Most important is to know exactly how fast to play a trill—this will always differ according to the dynamic level, the register, and the length. Lip trills are not produced by the lips alone; every note we play requires a different tension of the face muscles and a different pressure of air. Therefore it must be remember that, even in a rapid lip trill, the upper note needs more air pressure. Thus a basic physical problem of trilling is that the difficult progression, that which requires greater effort, is from the low to the high note. Here one has to think differently from the way one would behave instinctively. It is therefore of great benefit by way of contrast to practise trills starting with the upper note. A common misconception on how to practise trills is the dynamic level. If played softly the trills can frequently be respectably fast, but although this may be adequate at home it is soon found to be insufficiently loud for practical use. The amount of effort required for a loud trill is much, much greater. Therefore trills should also be practised as loud as possible.

Experiment with non-standard fingerings

Tuckwell also notes that you should experiment with different fingerings for trills, in particular fingerings that might at a slower tempo be unusable. For example a trill on written third space C might normally be fingered open on the F horn; taken as T12 “The D will be slightly sharp and the C definitely flat, but at speed the narrowing of the gap between the intervals will make them in tune.” He notes that this system may be “adopted in many places” and also that “A good half-tone [lip] trill also can be made out of a three-quarter-tone interval.”

A practical approach to camouflaging a weak lip trill

A final note from Tuckwell is again extremely practical.

A good way of camouflaging a weak lip trill is to start very slowly, finish in a slow, deliberate fashion as at the beginning, and incorporate a turn at the end. However dull this may sound, it is better than the disastrous mess that misguided over-enthusiasm will produce.

With Tuckwell we finally have some great insider information from a master! So far as I know this book is long out of print (his publication Horn is much easier to locate) and it is certainly one to look for in an academic library or among the books owned by an older horn player. Next time the series on trills closes with notes from two more recent publications.

Continue reading in Hornmasters series

Ask Dave: When Should My Daughter Move Up to a Double Horn?

0

Susie asks:

My 5th grade daughter will be playing the French Horn in the orchestra this year. We were wondering what the normal time frame is for playing a single French horn before moving up to a double French horn? We are debating between renting and buying.

Dave replies:

I think the decision as to when to move to a double horn from a single horn is very much dependent on what your child’s teacher recommends and what you can afford to do. So, I’m not going to answer that part of the question.

But the question of whether one should rent or buy is a persistent one. Most parents don’t have a clear idea what to do when faced with such a large, unexpected financial commitment.

Many school systems have larger instruments to lend or rent at low cost to students. I recommend this as a good place to start, especially if you are on a tight budget.

However, if the school cannot provide a horn and you are forced into the “rent versus buy” situation you have to weigh several financial considerations. Renting a horn is usually a costly expense both on a monthly basis and over time. Even a single horn can be double the monthly rent of a trumpet, and is often more. Over time you will likely pay full list price or more for the horn that you are renting, when you can usually buy a new one on the open market for around 60-70% of list price and a used one for much less than that.

So, it would seem that buying is a better deal than renting. But even a moderately priced double horn is going to cost thousands of dollars brand new. It’s only a better deal if you can afford the money to buy.

If the parent is unsure or confused or does not have the money to buy a new horn, then I recommend renting for a short period of time, usually about one school year. If your child still has the desire to play and you have the money to buy a horn then consider buying a good condition used horn instead of a new one, especially if your child needs to continue on a single horn for a while. A new single horn is the worst investment overall because it retains so little resale value.

The finances of buying a horn are much the same as those of buying a car, only on a smaller order of magnitude. Your best deal is always a used horn that has had light use and is in good condition. Consider the value you are getting for your money, and stay within your budget.

The Persistence of Humor and Living it Large

Salvador Dali with fish and French hornArtist Salvador Dali was a unique voice in the world of art and he is arguably one of the pioneers in what we today call “performance art.”

His artistic flair for creating dramatic imagery spilled over into his public life too. Dali was known for flamboyant public appearances, including this photo of him walking an anteater and high-profile appearances on television (see his game show apperance in What’s My Line?). 

The man knew how to live large outside of the art museum. The world was his stage and canvas.

Small in size, big in stature

Dali’s work explored the absurd and nonsensical world of surrealism and dream imagery, and a number of his paintings have reoccurring themes and symbols.  Abstract objects (shapes, places, people or animals) are typically set upon wide-open landscapes as a backdrop.

The worlds in his paintings are large and vast. Scenes like The Persistence of Memory register in our minds as massive dreamscapes, and in-person we expect a physical size of equal weight and mass.

In reality The Persistence of Memory is smaller than the dimensions of a modern iPad.

The first time I saw Salvador Dali’s The Persistence of Memory at the Museum of Modern Art (MOMA) I was surprised at how tiny it was, especially when compared to the paintings of a contemporary like Pablo Picasso, whose single canvases can fill an entire wall.

I had never taken the time to take note of its true dimensions – a mere 24 cm × 33 cm (9.5 in × 13 in).

Living large on the horn

Steering this observation towards music education and playing the horn, an argument could certainly be made that it is not the physical size of a person that determines their inner spirit, their potential or the size of their heart.

Sometimes good things come in small packages, packages that are deep and full of mystery.

This Photoschlopping of Dali’s famous painting captures this thought as applied to the French horn (with tongue held firmly in cheek of course). Click on the image below for a larger view.

Salvador Dali, Persistence of Memory parody

* * *