Home Blog Page 94

Hornmasters: The Exhale and Points of Resistance, Part I

In this series of Hornmasters articles a topic I have honestly not looked forward to addressing is that of the points of resistance. It is topic I generally hope to never have to speak to a student about as it can tie a student up in knots. It is also however a very important topic that we can’t shy away from and for some may be a key concept for working out playing problems on the horn.

Disclaimer: if you feel you have the breathing cycle down and have no other problems with your tone quality please feel free to skip this article. I would almost prefer that you not read what follows, as it can lead to over-conceptualizing the points of resistance.

Additional Note: To avoid the long quotes that will be seen in Parts I and II of this series (which honestly don’t always make sense if you read them critically) I will get to my personal bottom line in Part III.

Perceptions and mechanics

I was once assigned to read this portion of the Farkas book (see page 29) by a teacher specifically to address how to eliminate a “twa-twa.” I read it closely then and was like many readers a bit mystified. Certainly however Farkas was trying his best to explain difficult to explain perceptions and mechanics.

As this specific section of the Farkas book is one that has confounded many readers, in our Horn Matters discussion the topic will be broken up for clarity into three parts. Part I will present the original Farkas texts on the topic (he takes two stabs at it), Part II will look at other authors of other classic horn methods on the same general topics, and Part III will present my personal take on all of it.

A normal exhale outside of brass playing involves simple relaxation. Farkas noted in The Art of French Horn Playing that “This gentle pressure, however, is not sufficiently strong to motivate a brass instrument, so we have to apply certain forces to expel the air with greater pressure and steadiness.” For Farkas the motivator of this steady pressure was the contraction of the “abdominal muscles and all the muscles going completely around the body….”

Introducing the concept of resistance

The next section focuses on several closely related mechanics of the exhale, what Farkas referred to as the “four points of resistance.” He recognized that it was impossible to produce a steady pressure without anything to blow against.

If there were no resistance somewhere between the lungs and the end of the horn bell, the least pressure put on the diaphragm would send the air rushing out of the lungs in one great, shout burst. In attempting to avoid this effect, many players make their first mistake in the use of the diaphragm. Instead of putting resistance somewhere in the air column, they leave it completely free and merely avoid that rush of air by putting little or no pressure on the diaphragm. …the air literally dribbles out and the result is a very uncontrolled, fluttery tone.

Two of the points of resistance Farkas views as being relatively fixed–equipment choice (horn/mouthpiece) and the lip aperture. [The aperture also being somewhat defined by equipment, in particular the inner diameter of the mouthpiece.] He continues to describe the two last points of resistance, the tongue and also the throat. The latter he recognized right away might be considered controversial so it is presented very carefully.

We are left, therefore, with two points at which the resistance is completely controllable. One is the base of the tongue, quite far back, where the letter “K” is formed. In fact, the resistance is formed by approximating the actual formation of “K” without closing the space completely. It might also be described as a very constricted “E” formation, created by arching the back of the tongue higher than would be needed in speaking the sound “E”. The other controlled resistance point is the one I consider the most useful, although some players will probably disagree. Many of our finest players use it consciously, and I believe that even those who disagree with it in principle nevertheless use it unconsciously. We have the ability to completely control the opening called the larynx or “voice box”…. The resistance to which I refer can be observed when coughing. Just before the actual cough, notice that the air passage is completely shut off and is only partially opened during the cough. This furnishes the resistance necessary to “clear the throat”….

Practice controlling this valve by completely closing it off so that no air can go through it….

When it becomes fully automatic, it will be used somewhat in the following manner: on any given note, starting pianissimo and making a crescendo to forte, one should feel the diaphragm pressure increasing. In fact, the air pressure should increase quite rapidly, as a moderate increase in pressure is necessary to merely sustain a note evenly. As the pressure increases, the resistance of the larynx and the arched tongue (and also the lip-aperture) gradually relax to accommodate the increasing volume of air.

Although avoiding the word “support” Farkas seems to be getting at the concept when he discusses performing at low dynamics.

Most players use the diaphragm correctly when playing forte. It is in piano and pianissimo that one must be sure to use the combination of good diaphragm pressure plus the necessary resistance in order to obtain a smooth, controlled tone. When done correctly, the power of this air pressure (plus careful limiting of the amount escaping) will result in a soft, ringing tone which “floats” on the air with remarkably little effort on the part of the player.

And he adds this caution: “The only danger involved in learning this control of the larynx might be in confusing this valve with the external neck and throat muscles. These should never be tense.”

Explaining it all again a few years later

Confused? In The Art of Brass Playing Farkas again turned to the topic of the points of resistance, with the hope I believe of clarifying and expanding upon the thoughts above. Setting up his discussion he notes

Perhaps before considering the various points of resistance, this is a good time to warn of a bad habit prevalent among wind players which is particularly detrimental to their soft playing and which again points up the need for resistance somewhere. The general pressure of the abdomen and intercostals muscles can be made very light, resulting in an exhalation of a little “push”. In my opinion, this principle of using very little pressure from the diaphragm for the production of soft volume is a serious error. All of us will instinctively support a long tone quite correctly…. The real danger of blowing a brass instrument incorrectly occurs during soft passages.

Farkas suggests the concept of the “slow leak.”

Here is another analogy which might clarify this concept. If one wished to trickle a tiny stream of cold water into his too-hot cup of coffee, he could phone the pumping station and request it to slow down the pumps, and then proceed to turn on the faucet on full force. This would possibly result in the desired trickle. But … the thing that amuses us with this idea is the incongruity of doing a simple act “the hard way”. How much easier and simpler to let the pumps go ahead in their efficient way and simply “crack-open” the faucet a tiny bit….

The points of resistance are keys to this concept. In The Art of Brass Playing Farkas expands his list of points of resistance to include 1) the glottis (larynx), 2) the back of the tongue, 3) the tip of the tongue, 4) the lip aperture, 5) the bore of the mouthpiece, and 6) the instrument itself. The most extended discussion is about the glottis, where he tries to clarify the relationship of the glottis to the throat, a topic to which other brass teachers must have reacted negatively, based on the way he presents his concepts.

The glottis, being the opening between the vocal chords, is not a tangible thing, but simply the space between these cords which is completely adjustable in size from wide open to absolutely shut…. For instance, the glottis is completely closed during an act such as lifting a heavy weight. It is exploded open during a cough, or when clearing the throat. It is partially open for whispering, and wide-open for a rapid exhalation…. In this way, the glottis is used as a natural valve, and not for the purpose of vocalizing. I mention the fact that this is a perfectly natural, everyday function of the glottis, because many brass players react in horror when I suggest using this valve for purposes of playing our instruments. They evidently feel that I am advocating the use of a “tight throat”, a condition all teachers have carefully avoided from the inception of brass playing. To me, the bad habit of playing with a “tight throat” means the forcible tightening of the neck muscles…. The proper use of the glottis is natural and effective and is quite likely being used by most successful brass players, either consciously or subconsciously.

Farkas certainly inspired other writers of horn methods to address the general topic of the points of resistance. More from them soon in Part II of this series.

Continue in Hornmasters series to PART II

Professor Hubley Recommends a Horn — Memories of Horn Calls Past: My First Issue of The Horn Call, Part VII

0

In the “Afterbeats” section of the October, 1979 issue of The Horn Call we find the article “Dear Professor Hubley.” It is an advice column similar to the more famous Dear Abby column except that it is of course all things horn! While related to horn personalities of the time the questions and answers are pretty timeless and a final good example of the content that lurks in back issues of The Horn Call. The second question addressed to Prof. Hubley is

Dear Professor Hubley,
I want to get a new horn, but have been very confused as to what to get – there are so many brands and models on the market. What do you suggest?
– Wondering

Dear Wondering,
I’m glad you asked that question. As far as I am concerned there is only one possible choice for you (or anyone): the new Hubley Horn, made by the Frack Mfg. Co. of Kicks, Minnesota, specialists in the manufacture of brass instruments and precision plumbing accessories. This horn has everything: mouthpiece … bell … valves …. I designed this horn to be all things to all players. You can order your choice of bore sizes, from weensy to unbelievably gross; metals: from aluminum for those light French numbers, to cast iron (must be greased inside and out regularly) for those big romantic muthas.

Skipping ahead a bit (the instrument was convertible to everything from a single F to various types of double horns!), we get to the mouthpiece.

Each horn comes equipped with three mouthpieces: the Hubley Screech Owl High Chop for high hornists, the Hubley Windflap Big Bore for low players (a No. 2 pencil will pass through it easily), and the Hubley Middler (measurements are the averages of those of all known mouthpieces) for those who don’t mind being laughed at by the highs or lows for being a sissy for not using what they do. Optional accessories: the Hubley Bulldog Stopping Mute, guaranteed to stop a runaway horn at 100 yards; Hubley Valve Oil (120 proof, guaranteed to make your valves unsticky and you pretty loose as well). Finally: the Hubley Rhino Hide Horn Case.

I think there might actually be a market for that “Middler” mouthpiece. Skipping ahead again a bit, Hubley has a deal for the reader and in the end a confession.

If you order directly from me, I will give you 20%off list price. (You see, the factory gives me 40%off, I give you and all my students 20% off, and everybody is happy. You didn’t think I got my pool table, sailboat, and new wing on my house selling Christmas cards, now, did you?)

Dear Professor Hubley,
What kind of horn and mouthpiece do you play yourself?
— Still Wondering

Dear Still Wondering,
A pre-war single Bb Crumbley with a mouthpiece my teacher gave me (I also have a Hubley model around here somewhere which I use for circus gigs, Wagner, and supermarket openings). If it’s any of your business.

Return to beginning of series

The Double Major, Music Education and Performance

0

One question that comes up pretty frequently is the topic of being a double major in college, especially the topic of being a double major in music education and performance. I have addressed this question partially in prior articles, for example in my article on choosing a school for advanced study.

Music education is a great program and I do enjoy working with undergraduate music education students. For students considering this program I have one standard thing I tell them; the reason to be a music education major is because you would like to be a music educator. At ASU I expect all horn players to reach a high level as a hornist with the hope that you will contribute to musical life wherever you are and that you will teach high level students. But in terms of entrance level it is somewhat lower. Many students audition for me for the performance degree that play on a level acceptable for music education but not for performance. But realize that if you don’t show that you have a good ear and some potential you will be rejected for music education. It is not enough to love band and want to be a director, you have to individually show that you have made the effort to reach the highest level you can as a player.

The central point, and the catch

Expanding a bit, the essential thing is to be a double major involves completing the degree requirements of two degrees. The catch is that you have to be accepted to both programs and also you have to complete both programs which will very likely take extra time. The more closely related the easier it is in general to complete both programs, but expect that it may take you an extra year.

If you feel being a music educator is among your interests and you also want to strive for a high level as a performer I think generally you are best off just doing the music education degree but with the idea that you will practice hard and achieve as high a level as you can, equal to that of a performance major, and aim to continue with the horn in grad school. It is very possible to do, and certainly among the Master’s and Doctoral students I have had many held music education undergraduate degrees.

Be ready to be busy

That being said, music education is one of the busiest degree programs there is. If it is not something you want to actually do then music education really is not a good program to be in. You would be better to aim at a performance degree if your level is high enough going in or perhaps a BA if a music degree is important to you.

Also please note: if you have the performance degree you can always go back and complete the extra course work for the music ed certification later. You can always teach lessons with a performance degree but you can only teach public school music with proper state certification.

To close, in general I like music education as a program–if you are interested to teach public school–and I don’t in general suggest the double major, but if you feel it important to do both then feel free to go ahead! There are many out there who have done both. Good luck!

‘Radical’ Embouchure Experiments, II – Lip Rolling and Debunking the Farkas ‘Bible’

0
The mad heretic at work.

My decision to change my embouchure and try some new things as described in Part I was not a blind or reckless choice. I was not driven by a mad desire to probe and experiment.

It was actually a return to something old and more reliable. Looking at old practice journals from about 15 years ago, I discovered a few interesting things.

  1. My playing felt free and easy (so I wrote)
  2. There was little or no mention of breaks
  3. After very long practice sessions, I would sometimes get abrasions or cuts on the inside of my bottom lip. I would sometimes put a piece of paper over my bottom teeth in order to cushion that area.

This was a time in my life when I remember feeling very confident and secure with playing the horn, so these points caught my attention. Looking around the internet, I started to see a pattern that looked familiar – a bottom lip that is rolled over the bottom teeth.

Here is one example, pictured at left.

This is more-or-less what I used to do 15 years ago. Somehow over the years I had migrated away from this lip rolling and after looking in the mirror one day,  I wondered why.

Again my old practice journals came in handy.

The U-shape

About 8 years ago I became quite obsessed with the U-shaped chin as described by Philip Farkas in The Art of Brass Playing. To roughly sum it up, this involves a concentrated effort on stiffening the muscles below the lower lip.

This was something that for many years I regularly taught all of my students too.

With this preoccupation I slowly over time had unrolled my bottom lip into a position where embouchure breaks had became more prominent and difficult to circumnavigate. My embouchure, while it looked a lot like Farkas’s, was giving me problems.

A method to the madness

The methods described in Part I were a stepping stone to revert backwards, to a more reliable method – rolling the bottom lip over the teeth. I am happy to report that progress has been very good and that this technique really works for me. The rolled lip also gives me a nicely-angled downward air stream.

I have no one to blame but myself for letting my embouchure go defunct, but I am glad that during this time of reflection and introspection I found out a few things:

  • Journaling your practice sessions is the gift that keeps on giving.
  • Human beings are not the same, and no one method works for everyone
  • The Art of Horn Playing and Farkas’ other books are not the Holy Grail of ‘how it is done’

Debunking the Bible thing

The popular Bible moniker for The Art of French Horn Playing – that it is the ‘Bible for horn players’ – is a great catch phrase. This is something that I also mentioned on the Horn Matters Facebook page and it is worth re-iterating here.

Put bluntly, Philips Farkas is not Moses. The Art of French Horn Playing was not dictated by God and was not etched in stone atop Mt. Sinai. This is not to say that Philip Farkas and his legacy do not deserve a tremendous amount of respect and accolade. His books and writings are without a doubt, incredibly valuable to the horn world.

However when calling any non-religious book a Bible, an air of religiosity and infallibility can cloud and confuse the message. If we continue to refer to The Art of French Horn Playing as our Bible, it should absolutely be taken with a grain of salt.

In Part III, next week

Lip and mouthpiece buzzing.

‘Radical’ Embouchure Experiments, I – Breaks and Tricks

0

Along with the recent upgrade of my stock French horn, I made some changes to my embouchure in the attempt to overcome some long-standing issues.

Socrates has said that in order to begin understanding a thing, you must first give it a name. For lack of a better term I am calling these handicaps I have embouchure breaks.

John Ericson has written about this topic recently and I for one strongly identify with his observations. For years I have had two tricky areas that I would call breaks – one just below the treble staff and another around the first-line G. Over the years it has become a matter of how to minimize these trouble areas so that most people do not notice.

I won’t get into the details here, but rather I want to focus on my new approach. I wanted to affect a real change instead of continuing to mask a problem. For myself these were radical things to try but I thought, why not?

The regimen

I had two goals: to smooth out these breaks and to come up with something that could be done while in the office at work.

The routine consists mainly of contractions and isometric presses. Let’s call it embouchure resistance training for the moment.  It is all done away from the horn and the regimen consists of three basics:

  • muscle contractions
  • the pencil trick
  • embouchure pulling

Disclaimer:

  1. This is an informal diary with many details left out.
  2. This is not a treatise nor is it meant to be.
  3. If you attempt this on your own, you do so at your own risk.

Contractions

It doesn’t look like much, but I am squeezing very tightly.

This technique involves contracting the embouchure muscles tightly like a drawstring, as tightly as possible without tensing the jaw muscles or clenching the teeth, and holding a position in timed intervals.

The picture at right illustrates one position I hold with the lips tightly puckered and rolled inwards. I aim for the appearance of a lighter ring at the edge between the soft and firm flesh.

This can be difficult without clenching the jaw but it is possible.

Typically I will hold a position for 20-30 seconds, release and rest, then repeat – anywhere from 5 to 10 times. Usually by the end a nice tingle is felt.

Interval training like this is how muscles get built in other parts of the body, so this routine seemed logical as a warm-up. It also serves as nice preparation for the next step.

The pencil trick

A multi-purpose tool. This is the US nickel heavy-weight version. Click for a closer look.

Forming the embouchure as above, I open the jaw a bit and roll both lips inward over the teeth. I insert the eraser end of my homemade tool and close down a bit.

This is otherwise known as the pencil trick, which has been around since 1942. My variation on this theme is made with a pencil, a coin and a very teeny-tiny drop of superglue.

(You read my disclaimer, right?)

The routine is the same as above, holding a squeeze position anywhere from 10 to 20 seconds, followed by resting. This cycle is repeated 5 to 10 times.

This device pictured at right has a two-fold purpose and for the pencil trick, the coin acts as a small counterweight. Being a total geek, I have a set of three that vary in weight – nickels and dimes, and Mexican centavos.

As much as possible I try to support the pencil with the lip and facial muscles, but of course because the lips are rolled, the teeth are involved to some degree as an underlying support. The basic idea I think is to avoid biting down on the pencil as this defeats the purpose of the muscle workout.

Embouchure pulling

Embouchure pulling involves the coin end of my home-made device. This is of course modeled after a commercially available device, but at a fraction of the cost.

So much so that I could afford to experiment.

I found that the US nickel worked the best for embouchure pulling exercises, for example. And too, I found by trial and error an effective routine that worked for me.

  1. Insert the coin end of the device between the lips and teeth.
  2. Form the embouchure in the same manner as under Contractions above.
  3. Gently pull and hold the pencil away from the face – only a few millimeters.
  4. With the embouchure muscles, resist the pull and squeeze the lips tightly around the pencil

I do two variations: small-interval repetitions and non-stop squeezes that I hold until my muscles start to wiggle and give in. This is all done with plenty of rest in-between. Sometimes too I roll the lips tightly inward to really clamp down on the pencil.

Does it work?

The entire 3-stage routine stands at about 5-6 minutes. At the end of it I feel strong sensations – tingling around the entire facial area. I found that much beyond 5 minutes was too much, a 10-minute routine left my chops feeling too fatigued when playing horn later in the same day.

The routine is repeated 2-3 times throughout the day, with plenty of rest in-between exercises and sessions. It may not look like much but this is a fairly concentrated muscle workout.

It all sounds crazy right? (Shall we burn this HERETIC at the stake?!)

In short, I would answer quite emphatically that yes, this routine is doing something positive. My embouchure feels stronger and seems to recover much faster after a heavy session or gig.

Among the most noticeable improvements are my break areas – they have improved significantly. While I could not begin to even explain or understand what is going on, there has been a noticeable change. Everything feels smoother and more in control.

As I continue to experiment with this training, I become more convinced that there is something to it and that it is not just some kind of placebo-effect. Of course regular practice sessions on the horn are not excluded – this method is by no means a substitute for playing the horn.

In Part II

I found that the lip rolling aspect of this routine – at least for the bottom lip – went a long way towards improvement in many areas. More on this on Friday.

Part II

John Clark, Song of Light–Memories of Horn Calls Past: My First Issue of The Horn Call, Part VI

0

One feature of The Horn Call for many years has been reviews of new books and recordings. My first issue had a special, guest record review by Douglas Hill of Song of Light by John Clark. I bought it and this jazz horn recording certainly remains one of my all time favorite recordings. Of it Hill wrote,

John Clark, a New York free-lance musician … has just produced one of the only jazz horn recordings which no one need make any excuses for. There is little, if any, hint of the clumsiness which so often plagued the earlier jazz hornists. John is a refined and agile player with a wealth of feelings and messages to convey.

The several tunes on this recording are all his original compositions and are generally quite varied with a bent toward the jazz/rock idiom. There is an abundance of multiple track over-dubbing and electronic manipulation of the horn sound, including a wah-wah pedal, phase shifter, and use of analog delay. None of this detracts but is all used to heighten the incredibly impressive improvisatory abilities of John Clark.

So I bought it! I listened to it over and over, the screaming high notes, the overdubs, etc. all caught my attention for sure, and even now I pull the LP out probably once a month. He is playing a descant horn in it so the sound is a bit different than a standard double horn but great for the type of jazz on the album.

There were other reviews as well, but this one for me stood out from the crowd. So far as I can tell there are no samples of this album online and it is not available as a download which is a shame, it really is a fine album. For more on John Clark visit his Wikipedia page or his website.

When we return to this series it will be to conclude with some notes from Prof. Hubley.

Continue in series

Horn Improvement Surveys and More–Memories of Horn Calls Past: My First Issue of The Horn Call, Part V

0

Any good horn player has their eyes out looking for a better horn. In recognition of this,

In the Fall of 1978 the I.H.S. inserted a Horn Improvement Questionnaire Survey in the Horn Call. A total of 175 were returned covering 20 different brands of French Horns.

Thus begins an article titled “Horn Improvement Survey Report” in the October, 1979 issue of The Horn Call. The results were tabulated by a committee consisting of A. Kendall Betts, Walter A. Lawson, Robert Osmun, William R. Cook, and Dr. J. Milton McKnight. Twenty manufacturers were represented in the results and it is interesting to see what the top five were among IHS members back in 1978 in relation to brands we see in use today. All other brands were at the five or less mark in returns.

  • Holton—54
  • Conn—43
  • Alexander—15
  • King—14
  • Paxman—12

The results were divided into general observations made by the committee and also quotations from the survey. People liked having a water key and also separate B-flat tuning was a plus. As to committee observations, much of it boiled down to fit and finish concerns.  These paragraphs were especially diplomatic but clear about some of the problems of horns made in that timeframe.

An interesting trend emerged about the two largest manufacturers. The Holton horns were divided into two groups—the average age of the instruments that had good comments about their construction was 7 years and the average age of the instruments that had adverse comments was 3.8 years.

There were 4 Conn French Horns built since 1973 that were evaluated and all received adverse comments as to their construction.

It appears that while the two largest manufacturers are producing many horns each year, the quality of their construction has deteriorated from what it was several years ago.

The quotations from the survey bear this out generally. In a personal statement from committee chairman Walter Lawson that concluded the article he explained that the above was in part a result of the stress on “high volume sales to a mass market.” He continues,

You can buy any brand of American French Horn for less than $1,000. In order to factory build a consistently first class instrument and to offer many models; the materials, time and expert labor would cause the price to be $1,500-$2,500. But many players already have paid that price for a fine European horn; and some used horns sell for more than $2,500.

Nearly everyone can drive a Chevy but the same manufacturer makes Cadillacs. It would be nice to have available a top grade professional quality instrument that would last a lifetime.

[As an aside, did you notice that in the quotes from this article that in The Horn Call they used the term “French Horn?” The horror!]

Immediately following this article were the “Results of a National Survey of Professional Horn Players” by Wilbert Kenneth Kimple, Jr. This survey focused on equipment and he received 29 replies to his survey which was sent out to some 270 professional horn players at the time. Of those, the top five horn models among respondents were:

  • Conn 8D
  • Paxman descant
  • Schmidt
  • Kruspe
  • Geyer

Many of the results of this survey mirrored comments in the horn improvement survey report. For me looking back the most interesting question was “Which teacher had the most positive effect on you playing?” Of this Kimple wrote,

The answers to this question, or perhaps the non-answers, were somewhat surprising to me. Dale Clevenger received five votes, while his teacher, Forrest Standley, received four votes. All other teachers, including such highly thought of people as Farkas, Reynolds, Chambers, Shapiro, Jacobs, and Barrows received only one or two votes each. Most of those replying had studied with at least three “quality” teachers of national reputation.

Later he added,

I feel that question number seventeen was quite revealing. Dale Clevenger and Forrest Standley were listed as the most influential teachers. Their style of playing and teaching tends to be more delicate, refined, and more of the singing style than that which is often called “the New York Style.” In fact, several people said that they preferred the small bore, brass horn sound. Perhaps band directors should take note of this style, as they teach most of the beginning horn students in this country. I’m certain that some players would like to see conductors re-educated in the true concept of horn sound.

The end result of these surveys was that Holton and Conn certainly got the message and were back to making horns of more consistent quality within a few years. Both articles have in general more entertainment value than real statistical value but again give a feel for some of the interesting things you can find hidden in back issues.

When we return to this series it will be to look at some of the reviews in this issue, an important service The Horn Call provided to the horn community.

Continue to Part VI

Elliott on the Brahms Horn Trio–Memories of Horn Calls Past: My First Issue of The Horn Call, Part IV

As noted earlier in this series, it is very interesting to me to look back and see how several of the articles in my first issue of The Horn Call really caught my interest. One of those certainly was the article by David G. Elliott on “The Brahms Horn Trio and Hand Horn Idiom.”

The Brahms Horn Trio should need little introduction for many readers. The 1979 article on the work by Elliott is one that I later analyzed and picked apart in my Doctoral studies when working on my dissertation and it held up well. To give readers today a taste, the article opens,

The Johannes Brahms Trio in E-flat Major for Piano, Violin, and Horn, Opus 40 was completed in the summer of 1865. From 1862 to 1872 Brahms spent his summer months with Clara Schumann and her friends in the Black Forest at Lichtenthal in Baden-Baden. Each morning after coffee he would go for a long walk in the surrounding woods. In this beautiful setting he received inspiration for the composition of the Trio. Albert Dietrich, a close friend of Brahms and a student of Robert Schumann, relates that Brahms once showed him the place “on the wooded heights among the fir trees” where the theme of the first movement came to him.

The death of his mother on February 1, 1865 was probably a major factor in Brahms’s writing of the Trio. The choice of instrumentation is a souvenir of his life at home in that it includes three of the four instruments that he studied as a child. Only the cello is not included.

The article goes on and covers many more detailed points on his use of the natural horn in this work with quotations and musical examples. Many years later, at the IHS Kalamazoo event, I presented a session where a question came up from the audience that related to the Brahms trio. Recalling this article I spotted David Elliott at the back of the room and was able to defer to his expert opinion to answer the question.

For more on the Brahms trio we at Horn Matters are happy to host the DMA paper by Joshua Garrett, “Brahms’ Horn Trio: Background and Analysis for Performers.” It is one of the towering masterworks of our repertoire and one every serious hornist should know.

UPDATE: For another view of the Brahms Trio see this article.

When we return to this series the topic will be a report on the results of an IHS Horn Improvement Survey.

Continue to Part V

Karl Stiegler, Vienna Horns, and a Viennese Bass Horn–Memories of Horn Calls Past: My First Issue of The Horn Call, Part III

One of the things my name has become associated with over the years is scholarship into the horn in the nineteenth century. Even in late high school I was already interested in horn history, and a prominent article in my first issue of The Horn Call was on the topic of Karl Stiegler (1876-1932). A brief bio of Stiegler may be found at present in the IHS website (this photo linked from their article) and also a more extended article with more photos may be found in the website of Hans Pizka, who wrote The Horn Call article I first read. To offer a bit of brief info on his career, the version on the current IHS website opens,

Principal Horn Wiesbaden State Theatre (1895-1899) Solo Hornist at the Vienna State Opera (1899-1906), principal Horn of the Vienna Philharmonic (1906-d.) and professor at the State Academy for Music and Art in Vienna (1917-d.).

He was a very significant Viennese player and teacher. This photo (click link to view) was included in the article, showing Stiegler with his Vienna horn in a woodwind quintet.

Among the instruments on my personal bucket list of horns I would like to own someday is a Vienna horn. I believe a lot of players have this same thought. The image below [from a fingering chart published ca. 1830/31] is one I used in my dissertation. The central characteristics are the double piston valve and the crook (UPDATE: More on Vienna horns in general here).

Hans Pizka later in the issue advertised, and in the advertisement included this information on a Vienna horn available new at that time.

The Vienna-F-Pumpenhorn manufactured by Hermann Ganter in Munich is ready. We are glad to announce, that one of the first 6 instruments is now in the use of a solo-hornist of the Vienna Philharmonics [sic]. The horns have improoved [sic] valves, the fascinating velvet sound, perfect intonation, incomparable. The horn comes with the extra slides for B-flat and the A-crook and a soft shoulder-strap-case.

Note that his model comes with the B-flat slides and A crook in addition to the F crook. I gather that these shorter crooks are rarely used today but they have always been available as options on the Vienna horn.

Back to the Stiegler article, another thing that caught my eye in the context of the issue was the bass horn. In a photo in the article but not online at present Stiegler is seen in the “1st Vienna-Concert-Horn-Quartet” with two other horn players and another player who is described as playing a “bass horn.” What it looks like in the photo is the bass horn is a standard Vienna horn but with a modified crook or mouthpiece. What it allowed was for a player to use a mouthpiece that looks to be sized similar to a trombone or Euphonium mouthpiece on the horn, evidently to provide a more powerful bass line. According to Pizka in the article this group was “Later enlarged to a Quintett, with bass-horn for the fifth part.”

Speaking of Vienna horn quintets, a final quick plug for a group we at Horn Matters love, The Matterhorns. I was not able to find a video that could be embedded but this one on Facebook is a lot of fun and worth checking out. The Vienna horns start about 40 seconds into the video, a window into a different musical world and one that a lot of outsiders are interested to know more about. Their Facebook Fan Page is here.

The more substantial historical article in this issue was on the Brahms Trio, and when we return to this series that will be the topic.

Continue to Part IV

Hornmasters on Inhalation

Inhalation is a big topic. Before turning to this installment of our series of articles of quotations from classic horn methods, I would like to point to a recent article by David Wilken. In “A Culture of Ignorance?” he points out clearly one thing we really have to develop more in our brass community; the skill of critical thinking. He divides his article [UPDATE: The article is no longer online] into the following topic areas:

  • Argument From Authority/The Myth of the Lone Genius
  • Argument From Ignorance
  • It’s All In Your Head/The Goal Is the Method
  • The Natural Approach
  • Anecdotal Evidence
  • The Straw Man/False Dichotomy

While we as readers have to assume that the sources quoted below, published from the late 1950s into the 1970s, accurately reflect an element of the teaching of a master horn player/teacher, at the same time it is often not too hard to pick apart elements of these quotations. For sure there are statements made below that don’t line up with accurate physiology, but they at least must have felt that they worked as visualizations for a general reading audience. My hope is not to confuse readers but instead to present a bigger picture of not only the inhale but also of thinking critically about things they read and have been told.

He tries to explain it

One thing Farkas did in The Art of French Horn Playing was to try to explain breathing in a physiologically accurate manner. If he was successful is another question, but at least he recognized that it was hard to visualize how to breathe if you are imagining muscles doing impossible things.

There is a common misconception which claims the diaphragm to be a ring of muscle, like an automobile tire, all the way around the middle of the waist. No wonder so few singers use it correctly! The diaphragm is actually a strong, resilient muscle which lies horizontally across and through the body above the waist. It completely separates the heart and lungs from the organs lying below it.

The inhale is controlled in his view primarily by a combination of the diaphragm and chest expansion. His checklist: “…a deep breath is taken by simultaneously (1) contracting the diaphragm, (2) pushing the abdomen forward, and (3) expanding the ribs outward.” More on this checklist at the end of this article.

The inhale as it relates to attacks

Gunther Schuller in Horn Technique takes a very different general tactic in regards to the inhale. He is very concerned about the relationship of the inhale to the beginning of the phrase that follows.

Since a secure attack is one of the most difficult things to achieve on the horn, let me dwell for a moment on the inhaling and exhaling process which controls the success or failure of an attack. Inhaling should be done, especially at phrase beginnings, in a very relaxed yet lung-filling manner….

In general—and this is one of the most important factors in correct breathing—the taking in of air should always occur in time to the music being performed. This will insure relaxed inhaling, and will give the breathing process a musicality specifically identified with the music being played.

He also notes that in general in horn playing

… the process of inhaling and exhaling is actually a more or less intensified version of normal everyday breathing, which even the casual observer will note as a slight alternating in-and-out of the abdominal muscles. In horn playing these movements are larger and more intense. But beyond this intensification, it is well to remember that the basic procedure is exactly the same as in normal breathing.

In explaining this intensification Schuller notes that the lungs are filled from the bottom first (is that possible?) and that there is considerably more expansion than in ordinary breathing. He was not concerned with the noise of the inhale and actually encourages that it be audible.

Often students feel that this is wrong and try to inhibit this audible intake of air. It stands to reason that if the lungs are to be filled, and if the inhaling process is to take only a short moment, the ‘rush’ of air through the lips will produce a sound. Students should therefore not shrink for this, and should rather cultivate reasonably audible inhaling. …in actual playing, if the breathing is musically timed and not too jerky, it will not disrupt musical phrasing unduly. The breath will become a part of the music.

Deep, silent, rapid inhalation

Farkas returns to the topic of inhalation in The Art of Brass Playing. He recognizes that it is an extremely important part of the process of brass playing, one that students can miss.

Certainly proper and copious inhalation must precede successful blowing. Obviously, if the player does not first inhale a generous quantity of air, he cannot, a moment later, project a large sustained air-column. Childish as such an observation may seem, it is at this point in the breathing cycle that the student frequently fails. In my opinion, his shallow breathing is often due to his honest conviction that he is precisely emulating his teacher’s inhalation. The teacher should be aware of this tendency and be ready to correct it. For the advanced player and teacher can become so efficient and apparently casual with his deep, silent, extremely rapid inhalation that the observer gets the distinct impression that only a shallow breath was taken.

After suggesting exercises to improve the inhale he concludes “All the foregoing could perhaps be summed up by calling our brass playing inhalation a sort of a huge, silent, rapid gasp—the kind of gasp caused by the reaction of stepping suddenly into an ice-cold shower on a hot day”

More tips

In A Practical Guide to French Horn Playing Milan Yancich simply notes that “Asking a student to yawn is a good way to demonstrate how to take a breath for an attack.”

In the addendum to Essentials of Brass Playing Fred Fox does not suggest this as a correct type of inhale but he does note it in the context of a discussion of the rim contact point.

To further emphasize the importance of the non-moving contact point of upper lip and mouthpiece, try the following experiment: Pick a note and play a series of eighth notes on it, but between each note drop the lower jaw and remove the lower lip completely from the mouthpiece. This will generate a lot of ridiculous lower jaw movement, yet despite all of this excessive movement, you will find that you can continue hitting the note with amazing accuracy! …If, upon trying the experiment, you too find an amazing consistency, it should pinpoint the need of keeping a perfect, unmoving contact between the upper lip and the mouthpiece in all registers.

I do not suggest the extreme dropping of the lower jaw as a habitual way of breathing.

This type of breathing it is worth noting again has actually had advocates in the horn world. The idea is that “guppy breathing” opens up the mouth and throat for free inhalation of air. I am very hesitant to call it wrong, but Fox was not a fan clearly.

Airflow discipline

Harry Berv has a bit different take on breathing in A Creative Approach to the French Horn. He is concerned with good airflow and discipline in breathing practice. As to the inhale

I long ago discovered that, when inhaling through the mouth, you must channel the air so that it flows in towards the bottom of the mouth, not the roof. You will find that the lungs become filled more directly and completely.

One larger question is do you fill the lungs full on the inhale or intentionally inhale to less than full? Berv comes down on the side of not being overly full of air when performing.

Filling the lungs with an excessive amount of air will greatly hamper the evenness of the airflow. If the lungs were not filled quite to capacity, however, you will have greater ease and security in performance. …(It’s much the same as with eating habits: If you gorge yourself with too much food you feel very uncomfortable, but if you leave the table feeling as though you could eat a little more, you will feel much better.)

Visualizations, and diplomacy

I have said elsewhere one of the nice things about our horn community is that we tend to not attack each other. If you read between the lines in the above quotes for sure some of these teachers really did not agree with each other. Even without reading between lines I hope that readers caught for example that you can’t actually fill your lungs from the bottom first and you can’t channel air through the bottom of your mouth; those are visualizations only.

Digging a little deeper, I think underlying the discussions in these older texts of not being over-full of air is a male-centered approach; horn players with smaller lungs will need to use their full capacity much better and more consistently than a tall player with large lungs. Adding on to the checklist from Farkas quoted early in this article, for sure the shoulders should rise as a part of full expansion of the lungs. More modern resources recognize this, especially in the low brass world; if you are thinking they should not rise you are actually not using all of the full, natural lung capacity available to you.

What really happens with an inhale

For those wishing to dig even deeper, go to 13:35 in the video below to see MRI images of Sarah Willis breathing a large breath. It is really worth 3 minutes of your time to see accurately how things actually expand (literally in every direction) in breathing.

Going back to the quotes to conclude, I wish, in a way, that they had explained their position better in relation to the other methods out there. But they may not have been in a position to really comment on the other approaches and again there has always been more of a diplomatic element to what we say about other horn teachers. All the more reason to develop your critical thinking as you think over the big picture of not only the inhale but all you do.

The Hornmasters series has been generally following through topics in the order presented in The Art of French Horn Playing. Thus, when we return the next article will get into the exhale and the points of resistance, two of the most difficult topics in the book and topics that many subsequent authors attempted to explain differently with varying degrees of success.

Continue in Hornmasters Series