Home Blog Page 12

Geyer Dreaming, III: Let’s Visit the Geyer Shop

Ever visit a horn makers shop? I have been fortunate to visit several, but never the shop of Carl Geyer. Fortunately, Milan Yancich and Thomas Bacon both have stories that paint the picture for us today of his original shop and the later shop.

The shop at 218 S. Wabash Ave.

Most Geyer horns were produced at this location, as he was here the longest, from ca. 1918-1955. Continuing his story as started in part II, Yancich recalls,

Painted on his shop door was the sign Carl Geyer – Horn Maker. The anteroom to his shop had a showcase displaying such items as mouthpieces, mutes, oil, cases, and instruments. Pictures of famous horn players hung on the walls. His desk was littered with hundreds of unanswered letters and hanging on a peg above the desk was a hunting horn …

An odd assortment of tools covered three work benches. Only Geyer knew where to find a tool in that disorder. The yellow flame of his torch burned from morning to night. Many a visitor had the sorry experience of burning his coat or jacket while engrossed in Geyer’s work. Over in one corner of the shop sat the machine lathe. Although most of his work was done by hand, the lathe was an indispensable tool, for on it he turned out mouthpieces for countless hundreds of performers, both French horn and trumpet.

I’ll return to the topic of mouthpieces in a later installment. Resuming the description of the shop itself,

In the rear of the shop was a cold buffing machine for polishing instruments. Beyond that was a small room which contained a wash basin. We called this room the Cellar – here we kept such staples as bread, butter, and coffee. Cups hung on pegs – enough to accommodate extra guests. There were also two ten-gallon crocks. One crock held acid for cleaning metals …. The other crock contained liquid of another sort. This was the alcoholic-type used for emergency medical and entertainment purposes.

That second crock would have been rather handy during prohibition, 1920-33! Yancich describes his typical working day.

Geyer’s talent for repairing and improving instruments gained him such a reputation and kept him so busy that time was of the essence in his shop. His day began at 7:00 a.m. There were very few days he left his bench before 7:00 p.m. Yet, whenever a customer came into the shop, especially if he were an out of towner, Geyer always laid aside his work to visit.

Ethel Merker and Carl Geyer in his shop

Interlude: How quickly could he build a horn?

Geyer is quoted in the IHS website bio saying that each horn took three to four weeks to build. But he could go faster in certain situations. Yancich left Chicago to play in the Cleveland orchestra for a season, when, unfortunately, his contract was not renewed. Continuing the story,

After my adverse Cleveland experience I returned to Chicago and it was then I discovered the true measure of his friendship. My horn was stolen from my automobile in 1953. When I telephoned Geyer about the tragic event, tearfully explaining my predicament, he calmed me by saying, “Don’t worry, I will make you another in a week.” He was true to his word. He put aside all his other work, he closed his shop to all customers, and after a frenzy of activity and work, he presented me with a new horn. It was a work of dedication and love.

Yancich further elaborates that “What always impressed me about Carl Geyer was his genuine interest in the person playing the horn, no matter whether that person was amateur or professional.”

The shop at 228 S. Wabash Ave.

Geyer turned 75 in 1955! Perhaps in relation to that, in 1955 he sold his business to the Kagan & Gaines Music store. He continued to build horns in a small shop in the back of their store until he retired in 1970 at the age of 90! The arrangement of them taking care of his business affairs suited Geyer, giving him freedom to keep building.

As a high school student Thomas Bacon was looking for a new horn, but could not find what he wanted. At that point he was told by his band director to “go to Kagan and Gaines downtown, ask for Joe, and tell him you want to meet Mr. Geyer. If they’re not too busy, maybe he’ll take you back to Geyer’s shop.” Continuing his story as shared on his Hornplanet website,

If I had been a string player, I would have known that Kagan and Gaines was the place in Chicago to go for instruments, accessories, and repairs. And Joe, it turned out, was the guy who worked the front of the store and took care of Mr. Geyer’s business. Carl Geyer, German born and living in the United States since 1903, had somehow become affiliated with Kagan and Gaines as a maker of horns. And tucked away back in a forest of dust covered string basses was the small workshop where this elderly artisan made “the best French horns in the world.”

He spoke with a thick German accent and had a sparkle in his eye that enchanted everyone who came into his shop. He was surprised to be visited by such a young player, he was used to dealing with all the pros from the Chicago Symphony and any visiting orchestra that came to town. Seldom did young students come to him wanting to try out one of his horns. He must have been amused by the chubby little high school kid that had come to visit, so he took pause from his work to introduce me to his latest creation.

Of trying that horn Bacon recalled,

What happened then was a feeling that could only be described as love. The horn played like a dream, had the most velvety smooth sound I had ever produced on any instrument. I knew that I had found what I was looking for and told Mr. Geyer so. I asked if I could buy one of his horns. He said that he had a lot of orders to fill, but if I would wait six months he would make one for me.

As to the shop itself, Bacon paints a vivid picture.

At the time, Mr. Geyer was 83 years old, and his shop was extremely disorderly. It was a tiny room with high ceilings. Brass tubes, leadpipes, old horns and horn parts, valve casings, tools, mouthpieces, and lots of other things lay about in seeming disarray. I never once saw him use a more sophisticated measuring device than a frayed and dirty old piece of string that had several marks on it indicating different lengths. He would take a valve mechanism (which he called “die Maschine”), and solder onto it various little tubes which he extracted out of the mess surrounding him. He would eyeball the curves in the tubes he had to shape, and with an air of disdain for “modern” engineering and construction practices, he would instinctively put together, with remarkable consistency, an instrument that was also a work of art. When, on occasion, an instrument turned out with bad notes or a stuffy tone, he seemed to know intuitively where the trouble lay, and would simply take off the leadpipe or valve mechanism or whatever, replace it with another, and presto, the horn was made well.

So that is what things looked like in 1962-63! That is really part of the magic of the Geyer horn today, one man making artist quality French horns in his own small shop, largely to a design he had created, for a lifetime.

When the series returns, we will look a little more at the topic of building a horn in the context of the Geyer shop.

Continue reading Geyer Dreaming series

**The photo of Geyer with Ethel Merker in his shop was found on an inactive Facebook page, Carl Geyer Horns. If you have photos of Geyer in his shop, of early Geyer style double horns, or of mouthpieces that you would be willing to share with Horn Matters readers contact me at my ASU Email.

Mental Health and Horn Playing: The 5-4-3-2-1 Grounding Technique

I think that it is rather common for people to turn inwards when having anxious thoughts. For horn players, this might translate to internal dialogues, such as:

  • My chops are tired – I sure hope I make it to the end of this concert…
  • I am not prepared to play this piece. What is going to happen?
  • Here comes that big solo. I better not miss any notes.
  • Why is the conductor looking at me like that?

The anticipation of an event going badly can often be much worse than the actual event. For some, this kind of thinking can spin out of control and trigger a panic attack.

The 5-4-3-2-1 Technique

An excellent grounding exercise to help with anxious thoughts is the 5-4-3-2-1 technique. It is a standard technique known in the world of psychology and behavioral science, that traces back to a program designed for people afraid of flying in airplanes.

According to a Behavioral Health Partners article from the University of Rochester:

“Anxiety is something most of us have experienced at least once in our life. Public speaking, performance reviews, and new job responsibilities are just some of the work-related situations that can cause even the calmest person to feel a little stressed. This five-step exercise can be very helpful during periods of anxiety or panic by helping to ground you in the present when your mind is bouncing around between various anxious thoughts.”

The 5-4-3-2-1 concept is very simple. Sit quietly. Out loud or in your mind, identify:

  • 5 things you can see
  • 4 things you can feel
  • 3 things you can hear
  • 2 things you can smell
  • 1 thing you can taste

For example, 5 things you can see:

  1. my horn
  2. my music stand
  3. the floor below me
  4. the ceiling above me
  5. the music stand in front of me

Take your time and make thoughtful, conscious choices. As you identify items, inhale through your nose and exhale through your mouth. Repeat this exercise as many times as needed.

What does this technique do?

As you engage this technique, pay attention to your thoughts and how your body responds. The goal is to quietly shift your mental focus away from internal dialogues, and focus instead on your present surroundings.

The 5-4-3-2-1 technique may not make your anxiety magically disappear, but it can help. To learn more about this technique, please see the recommended resources below:

Geyer Dreaming II: The Development of his Horn

Continuing our look at Carl Geyer and his horns, as noted in part I he had his own shop running by 1918. At that point he still was making double horns on the Schmidt design, with the piston valve for the thumb valve, but he was experimenting.

A quick look at Geyer serial numbers

Jumping ahead for a moment, Geyer did have a system for serial numbers. As related by Tom Bacon in his Horn Planet website,

Over his lifetime, he made about 1,400 horns, but never did he complete more than one on the same day. It wasn’t until the day my horn was finished that I noticed Mr. Geyer’s interesting way of numbering his instruments. He finished work on my horn on April 9, 1963. The inscription on the bell was:

Carl Geyer
Chicago
4963

I know from private correspondence that a Geyer style Geyer double horn exists with the serial number 223. The system would suggest that it was completed in February of 1923. Where this fits into the experiments that developed the design is unclear, but for anyone with an early Geyer double out there, you should give that serial number a look, it could help pin down the year that the design was perfected.

UPDATE: Geyer however did not consistently follow this system. Please see this article for more. 

Geyer looks back in 1972

According to a July 12, 1972, interview included in a 1975 thesis by Gary Gardner Fladmoe “The Contributions to Brass Instrument Manufacturing on Vincent Bach, Carl Geyer and Reynold Schilke” (major hat tip to Jonathan Ring for posting excerpts on the Horn People group!), Geyer changed the design of his double horn “by the mid-1920s.” Fladmore summarized their conversation as follows.

Geyer’s design was unusual in that he located the change valve after the main valve section instead of in its customary position ahead of the valve section. The valve was operated by the thumb by means of a long rod which connected the thumb key to the valve by bridging the main valve section. Geyer believed the design offered two advantages over the traditional placement of the change valve. Placing the valve after the main valve section simplified the overall design of the horn by eliminating some of the coiling of the smaller tubing. Geyer also believed that the design made the instrument less crowded in the area ahead of the valve section and provide the player with increased leverage in the operation of the change valve.

He then turned to the issue of the Knopf horn being of the same design.

At about the same time that Geyer placed this design on the market, Knopf, a German manufacturer introduced a horn of almost identical design. Geyer maintained that Wunderlich, who had observed Geyer working on the design while he was still at Wunderlich, had taken the idea to Knopf upon a trip to his native Germany.

So, the roots of the design date to before World War I. But…

Who had the patent?

Continuing in the Fladmoe thesis,

Geyer applied for a patent on the design, but probably because the Knopf instrument was in production, calling Geyer’s claim on the design into question, the patent was not granted. … Instead of seeking patents, Geyer’s approach was to indicate that he had applied for a patent on the new design.

In short, the design was not patented by Geyer or Knopf. As Jonathan Ring commented in Horn People, “Many of the large German firms like Kruspe, Alexander, and Schmidt took out patents on their designs for a period of time. I find it interesting that Knopf did not patent the design in question, possibly because it was actually Geyer who came up with it as he suggests in the thesis. I’m not sure we will ever actually know the answer for sure.”

Introducing Carl Geyer

As mentioned in part I, Milan Yancich spent many hours with Geyer in the years during and after WWII. He offers the following introduction.

Geyer was a man of slight build, lean and with no trace of fat on his body. He was physically powerful. There were times when he asked me to take over a task in his workshop. He seemed to be able to work effortlessly at a job that I strained and quickly tired from in the same endeavor. His formula for good health was eating oatmeal every morning for breakfast and it had to be prepared a certain way. … I once asked him why he thought oatmeal was good for one’s health. He came up with the old line that “Horses are strong because they eat oats.”

One thing you might wonder at this point is did Geyer play horn? According to Yancich,

He learned to play some trumpet and he was able to get a few sounds out of a horn; it was his tradition to always play the first few notes on a newly made horn. I had the privilege of testing many of the new horns that he manufactured.

In those days of World War II I never missed the opportunity to visit him when I came into Chicago from Ft. Sheridan [where Yancich was stationed]. It was to be the beginning of a long and meaningful friendship. … Despite some political differences, Carl and I trusted each other about many things. Several years after the war was over, and I had become a member of the Chicago Symphony, his workshop became like a haven, a refuge, my second home.

We will continue that story when the series returns.

Continue reading Geyer series

Mental Health and Horn Playing: The Impact of Private Lessons

For many years, I struggled with performance anxiety. When exposed passages came up in ensemble rehearsals and performances, I would get noticeably nervous. It wasn’t until years after graduating from college that I realized something – my performance anxiety was rooted in past experience.

The Mind of the Horn Player. Click for a closer look.

I won’t go into detail about my childhood, but it is worth saying that I have some history there. The seeds for anxiety were planted at an early age.

When learning to play the French horn and how to become a professional, I sought out teachers that were role models.

My first horn teacher was a very kind man, who was very supportive. I would get nervous and fall apart sometimes in lessons, but it was never a problem. He did his best to spin in it into a more positive direction.

My second teacher was a well-known Professor with a stern, academic mindset. A strict regimen of etudes and orchestral excerpts were assigned weekly. You were expected to perform them in lessons perfectly (the first time), but figure out how to do that on your own.

This approach did not go well for me. My anxiety skyrocketed and I would sometimes freeze up or crash in lessons. When this happened, the Professor would shrug his shoulders, offer tidbits of generic advice, and reassign the same etudes for the next lesson.

Weekly lessons became less about learning and more about jumping through hoops. Over time, I grew to dread my lessons and fear my teacher.

This experience had a long-lasting impact on my psyche – as a musician and as a person. Here are some thoughts to share in response, for both teachers and students to consider:

Lesson Materials

Teachers – think deeply about your lesson materials. Are they set in concrete? Is there room for flexibility? Do you rely on predetermined rubrics and standards to get through your day? Are you keeping the student’s best interests in mind when doing this?

Students – if you are feeling overly-challenged by lesson materials, speak up! It may feel awkward at first to admit a shortcoming, but this is the entire point of taking music lessons. You are there to improve!

Lesson Gestalt

Teachers – pay attention to your student’s demeanor during lessons. Do they appear calm and relaxed? Or do they appear withdrawn, tense, or nervous?

Students – talk openly about anxiety with your teacher. If you feel dismissed by this dialogue, it might be time to think about studying with a different teacher.

Teachers – is your lesson studio a warm and inviting space that inspires dialogue and learning? Or is it a dull and drab room that “does the job?”

Students – do you feel comfortable in your lesson environment, whether it be a university studio, school practice room, or home studio? Do you feel that your teacher is competent in what they are doing and has your best interests in mind?

Mental Health

Teachers – think about the impact you are having on your student’s confidence and well-being – not just as a performer, but as a human being. As a mentor, you may need to devote extra thought for students who:

  • come from, or currently live in, difficult living circumstances
  • remain silent (or are overly rambunctious) during lessons
  • cannot focus on performing for one reason or another
  • appear to need help with their mental health
  • have no idea how to practice

Students – do not ignore feelings related to your mental health. Keeping it a secret can make matters worse. If you are feeling like a failure, please consider:

  • talking to your teacher
  • talking to a trusted friend
  • talking to someone about your teacher
  • talking to a counselor or therapist
  • trying medication (under medical supervision)
  • taking a break from the horn
  • switching to a different teacher
  • switching to something else entirely as a creative outlet

For more on this topic, please see:

Geyer Dreaming, part I: The Best New Horn Design of 1923 …

In 1923, “after much experimentation,” Carl Geyer (1880-1973) made the first example of what we would call today a Geyer style double horn. Our source is pretty authoritative; this date and information is found on page 115 of the 1995 memoir by Milan Yancich, An Orchestra Musician’s Odyssey: A View from the Rear. Yancich knew Geyer very well, and presents a number of fascinating details on his horns and the man.

Before getting to quotes, this book is a great read and is still available from Wind Music Publications. Treat yourself to a copy! (Website link here). 

Without question the Geyer style horn is the horn most in demand in the USA horn playing market. And 2023** will mark the 100th anniversary of the design! Geyer is very worth a closer look. Compared to other early and iconic double horn designs — the Alexander 103, the Kruspe Horner model, and the Schmidt – the Geyer is the newest type by some 20+ years.

UPDATE: There are several updates to this article series to be found here, please reference this first before reading on

At 15 Carl Geyer had begun an eight-year apprenticeship to an instrument maker. By age 23 he was experienced in the craft, and saw an advertisement in Leipzig for work as an instrument maker in Chicago.*** He decided to follow the opportunity, entering the United States in April of 1904 to work for the firm of Richard Wunderlich. Geyer became a US citizen in 1915.

In those years Geyer built single horns and double horns with the Schmidt-style piston thumb valve. Wunderlich retired during WWI, and Geyer took that opportunity to set out on his own. He had his own shop operating by 1918 at 218 S. Wabash Ave.**** Quoting Yancich,

Musicians began to try the Geyer horn and they discovered a French horn of superior quality. By listening to a person’s tone quality and the manner in which he performed, he was able to construct an instrument that fitted that individual’s needs. Perhaps this is one of the reasons why Geyer’s horn[s] have been so popular with his clientele and the reason why today a Geyer horn is considered a collector’s item.

Jumping forward a few years, we get to the key quotes from Yancich about his 1923 innovation.

Simplicity of design was the feature that struck the eye of the player viewing it for the first time. The tone quality of the horn, both in brightness and richness, was due to Geyer’s selection of the finest imported brass….

During those many years with the Wunderlich firm, Geyer made horns designed on the Schmidt model horn and those horns were called Wunderlich horns. Eventually Wunderlich returned to Germany with the newly designed horn that Geyer had built. The horn was then manufactured by the Knopf firm of Germany and also called the Wunderlich horn until the death of Wunderlich. Europeans know of the design to be the Knopf model, but Geyer insisted that he had invented the design; because of the patent laws in the United States there was no way he could protect his horn. This particular designed instrument has now become the most popular of all French horn models. It is used by practically all the major horn manufacturers in the world.

The very next sentence in the Yancich book might then surprise you. Yancich states that “I was surprised when Geyer affirmed the Schmidt horn, even with its awkward piston valve, was the greatest horn ever designed.”

My Patterson Geyer

However, the market today would confirm that the 1923 Geyer design was in fact the greatest double horn ever designed. Especially among higher level players in the United States, it is absolutely the dominant design today

During WWII and after the war when he was in the Chicago Symphony, Yancich spent many hours with Geyer in his shop. When this series returns, we will look closer at the development of his horn design.

Continue to Part II of Geyer series

Several details updated

**So far as I am aware, Yancich is the only source to give a specific date for this design. He does so in this book and also in a 1961 article (in volume 3, no. 11 of Woodwind World, — which is the basis of the text in the book, with additional information). I welcome readers who have access to any other sources that address the topic, as 2023 would appear to be the 100th anniversary of the design.

***Yancich says he came to the USA in 1903, but the bio in the IHS website gives this date as 1904, as does the Geyer timeline that may be accessed from this page in the Horn-U-Copia website. Horn-U-Copia is very specific in fact, that he emmigrated on April 13, 1904.

****This information is also from the Horn-U-Copia site, citing a “WWI draft listing.”

Kruspe Dreaming, III: A Very Big (and Early) Kruspe

0

In this series I’ve focused on my ca. 1948 Kruspe, but I have also been able to spend some time with another, older Kruspe Horner model.

This example is from I would guess around WWI. (UPDATE: Unfortunately, I did not make note of or take a photo of the engraving. As elaborated on briefly in this post, there are clues in the engraving to the general period of manufacture of Kruspe horns). One of the most visible differences is It has the “upside down” thumb valve. The only mainstream double horn made today with a thumb valve with the action on top is the Alexander 103 (and copies of the design). One thing nice about the design compared to my Kruspe is it takes a standard horn valve spring (I had to modify a tuba spring for my Kruspe). On the other and, you get the feeling that players then did not use the thumb valve as much? The action is not as facile as you would expect.

The horn itself is in beautiful shape, it has rebuilt valves and “only” two patches. Hand hammered bell and nickel silver slide tubes. Many details are different between the horns. Compared to my post-war Kruspe double, mine plays circles around the older one.

A really big bell

The old one has a HUGE bell throat, the largest I have ever seen on any horn, makes my Paxman 25A seem much more reasonable. The photos below show the comparison of how far a mute fits in both horns, with the end of the mute just barely visible on the big, old Kruspe.

A notable thumb valve

Finally, more close ups of the thumb valve area. The postwar horn has a larger (“full size”) thumb valve, but the older one has a smaller diameter valve, like one like on a Conn 8D.

Postwar comparison

Finally, the same view of the 1948 horn. Many details differ, as to be expected by horns built probably 30+ years apart.

This series is probably not over but will be on hiatus for a little while! But be watching for a Geyer Dreaming series soon.

Continue reading about Kruspe horns

Kruspe Dreaming II: The Tuckwell Kruspe

0

Years ago, I remember one of my teachers saying that Tuckwell sounded better on his Kruspe. By the time I heard him play live he was on his modified Holton 180, which was I believe the main horn you hear on his recordings that achieved wider circulation. For the early ones, however, he performed on a Kruspe, and he is seen with it for example on the cover of the recording he made with Vladimir Ashkenazy, Music for Horn and Piano.

It was also obviously a horn he had a special fondness for, as it was used for the photos in his books.

What vintage was his Kruspe?

What I noticed right away was that the photos confirm that his Kruspe is almost identical to my 1948 Kruspe, and I believe it had to have been made within a few years of 1948.

The color photo above is on the cover of Horn. From this we can see two major differences. One is that his Kruspe has nickel silver slide tubes, and the other is his has a garland on the edge of the bell. My horn is seen for comparison below.

Other differences?

Any other differences between my Kruspe and the Tuckwell Kruspe are pretty subtle. One visible one is a brace is in a somewhat different location. Can you find it? The below is the photo on the cover of Playing the Horn.

There are more differences to spot between the two photos. I think the locations of the three water keys are interesting, especially the one on the tube that leads into the thumb valve.

And a look at the back

Finally, what I wish I could see in the book photos (and you might wish it too) is the back of the horn. That is where you can see more of the differences that are characteristic of a Kruspe Kruspe. Noting also, there are some differences between Kruspe horns of different time frames due to availability of parts and design evolution.

There is a squareness and tightness to the bends (especially the F horn tubes on the back) that is distinctive, as is the construction of the F horn tuning slide. Also, if you had a Conn 8D handy and could compare the horns directly, you would see that that the throat of the bell of a Kruspe of this vintage is distinctly smaller than a Conn, certainly in a range that would be described as medium today.

But not all Kruspes are medium! Some older Kruspe horns are among the largest horns ever made, we will look at one of those when the series returns.

Continue in Kruspe Dreaming series

Kruspe Dreaming, part I: A Concert on a Kruspe

0

In several posts I have talked about how just before the pandemic I was able to obtain a low milage 1948 Kruspe horn. This is not just a Kruspe-style horn, it is an actual Kruspe made by the firm that originated the design (more here). Getting it ready to play has been a slow process that involved a valve rebuilding by Patterson and other work. On my end that especially included rebuilding the thumb valve lever (which had been modified for the prior user).

Particularly in this article I make a case that the medium bell Kruspe is a horn that could come back in fashion, if a good enough example was being produced. I have seen the article come up repeatedly in the site stats, I am sure people out there are thinking about Kruspe style horns. There is a playing comfort X factor that is different than a Geyer style horn.

UPDATE: It’s linked in the paragraph above, but worth mentioning again that my 2020 article is, in effect, the real start of this series, and is worth going back to for a quick read.

My original Kruspe dream

Years ago (as a Doctoral student) I remember wondering what the result would be if a maker would take a horn like this one and make a fine copy of the same type and high level that Rick Seraphinoff copies a historic horn design. I have long thought if I was ever to make a double horn that is an idea I’d like to explore.

Finding a mouthpiece

To more practical matters, to play any horn you have to find a mouthpiece that matches it. That took a while and some experimentation, but I finally settled on a Houser San Francisco Cup 14-0-3 as being a good match. The larger (#3) backbore opened things up a bit, needed as the horn does not “feel” large. It certainly has a medium bell and a sound that is closer to what you think of a Geyer than a Kruspe.

Intonation seemed like it was quite good after things cooled off a bit too — in the summer, when it was hot (and warmer inside, too, especially where I practice at home), I could not pull the main slide out enough.

Deciding to use it

The thing that helped me finally go big and try it was I was able to play it briefly for Gabe Kovach, Principal Horn of the Phoenix Symphony, who came by ASU to judge our horn concerto competition. It is really hard to hear your own sound objectively, you need to play for someone with a strong sense of horn sound. His reaction was that the horn really sounded great. So I pushed through my mechanical concerns and gave it a good try.

It sounds like this

The clip below is keyed to start right at the piece that best demonstrates the sound. This program was a repeat of one earlier in the semester, for more on the piece (and a performance on my Paxman) see this article.

A major positive thing was that I found no troubles playing it in tune. That was a concern, as I have heard that vintage Kruspe horns basically always have quirky issues. The fact that this horn was built after WWII and also was not played hard by Perry Yaw, the prior player of this horn, probably helped a great deal.

Further modifications

I don’t plan to modify the horn significantly, but I do need the left hand mechanics to work better for me. Since the performance I have replaced the spring in the thumb valve and I’m pondering more slight changes.

As the series continues periodically I will look closer at this particular Kruspe, compare to an older vintage Kruspe, look at the Kruspe that Tuckwell used (of exactly the same vintage as my horn) and more.

Continue to Part II

Routines, and the Better Horn Players

I recently had a thought, that playing the French horn well favors people with a strong sense (and need for) routine. Let me explain.

I have mentioned at various times in this site, my son has Down syndrome and autism. It is at times a challenging combination, with a central need of his being that we have routines and we do those things consistently. Many elements of life are the same from day to day. Recent family conversations have only emphasized how his need for routines has impacted our lives in the entire family in various ways.

Routines and me

I grew up with parents that were also very much into routines of life. Both of them grew up on farms in the 1930s, and they knew what was called a routine – with the chores to do every day, and the various seasonal routines of life.

The benefit for me as a horn player was that I also got into various routines in life. Practicing being one of them!

If your life is on the other hand very free form, very spontaneous, I suspect that you are not likely to be so consistent with practice.

Angry Arnold

Did you practice every day over the entire pandemic?

A little story. My son has his routines, and part of his routine is for me to practice after dinner around the time of his bath every day. Over the entire pandemic I think I practiced every single day other than about 10 days. 6 of those days I was on a road trip with my son. I did not have much specific that I needed to practice, so I had to come up with projects for myself. Thankfully, I also enjoy the process of warming up as well; many days were just an easy warmup and a few random etudes. The benefit of all that pandemic practice was my chops came through in great shape.

Is it the “spectrum,” or just routines?

At one point someone asked me very seriously if I was on the Autism spectrum. I really don’t think so, but then again, the spectrum is a very broad term. I do have some preferences in various areas of life — but I really don’t think any of them are serious enough to put me on the spectrum.

As a horn player though I can see some potential benefit of being on the spectrum or at least the fringes of it, as part of the diagnosis of Autism involves a deep need for routines. My son can melt down badly when his routines are too far from normal, and that is not the case for me, I am pretty flexible. But I do in the big picture have life routines, and that is good, as I think a case can be made that you really do need a good sense for and need for routines to excel on the horn.

And to the bigger topic of horn player personalities

It might end up being a little hard to study, but I’d still be interested to see if some motivated DMA student would study this general topic, that of high-level horn players and the spectrum. I think some general trends of horn personalities would come out, in perhaps unexpected ways.

To close I will go back to the opening thought; good horn players likely also have a strong sense of routines in how they organize their life. I’m sure there are exceptions, but I suspect that many of the top horn players do crave routines on some level.

The Upper Lip and your Low Range

0

Hidden way back in the site in articles from 2009 and 2010 are two articles that show something important about how the low range works — at least how it works correctly.

Vibrating with no interference

The 2010 article (here) shows high speed video of a low C on a horn, but the video is not nearly as clear as the 2009 article (here), which is of trombonists. The key spot on the trombone video is starting at the spot highlighted below, and watch it for the first 30 seconds that follow.

The player was a leading studio bass trombone player. The key thing to observe is that the lower lip is down and out of the way (and hardly vibrates), and the upper lip moves freely with a large, flapping motion.

What this means for you

The short answer is that if you have a buzzy, reedy sounding, or low-power low C, you are not getting to an optimal position for the low C.

I cover a lot of options toward a better low range in my Low Range Boot Camp book, but not the visual angle that you can observe in this video. Because if you are otherwise in the ballpark for a low C, most likely there is some interference from your lower lip making it so that upper does not freely vibrate.

I did not set out to focus on the low range…

A final item for today is that with perspective on now many years of teaching I am sure I focus on the low range more than most teachers. Certainly more than I did as a younger teacher. This is out of a sense of this is the key area most players need to improve, and it certainly is critical toward moving you to the upper tier of horn playing. If your low range needs work, be honest with yourself, get resources, get advice from good teachers, get to work!

My book is available here.