Home Blog Page 38

Brief review: Blow Your Own Horn! Horn Heresies

0

Originally published in 2011, Blow Your Own Horn! Horn Heresies by Berlin Philharmonic hornist Fergus McWilliam (website here) has been out in a second edition since 2013. “An anti horn-method method,” this book certainly deserves to be read widely by horn players.

On page one he lays out his reasons for writing the book.

Huge amounts of traditional horn pedagogy are often misunderstood and misapplied, not only by students but also by their teachers, and what numerous successful professional hornists teach their students is frequently not even what they themselves actually practise. To make matters worse, too frequently neither teachers nor students recognize and admit to the situation.

Quite a few points in the book go against conventional wisdom, and he explains them well as they come up in the text; straight talk presented clearly.

I recently quoted the book briefly in this Horn Matters article, which gives some flavor of his content.

Two more brief quotes, again for flavor:

  • “I am a musician first and only secondly a hornist” is a very politically correct statement.
  • Playing safe causes more accidents than taking chances does.

There is so much in this book, it really is very worth reading in full by every serious student or teacher of the horn. Some commentary, such as on auditions, is slightly Eurocentric, but still every chapter has points any player can apply.

That said, I would only offer one slightly negative comment. It is not that hard to find things generally from the table of contents, but still I do wish that this book had an index, especially considering it is in a 2nd edition.

Brief review: Kelly 6V mellophone mouthpiece

0

To kick off a series of short reviews this summer, first up is the Kelly 6V mellophone mouthpiece in lexan plastic. A few years ago I reviewed their horn mouthpieces, and it bears repeating right off that the MC horn mouthpiece, especially in the crystal material, is surprisingly good. Likewise, the mellophone version also is quite good compared to a standard, metal example of this type of mouthpiece.

Fact: legions of horn players play the mellophone every summer and fall in the United States. One of the first things we have to cope with as a group is the topic of mouthpiece choice, and in this review I will touch on comparisons between some of the options and the Kelly 6V.

First off, why use a plastic mouthpiece? There are two big reasons. One would be metal allergies, discussed further in this article. The other is temperature. One vivid memory from my freshman year of high school was the football team advanced to state, the band went, it was COLD and my mouthpiece was so cold, and finally my valves froze. A plastic mouthpiece won’t solve the frozen valves but it will make for more comfort at the lip contact point.

IMGP5444In the photo are seen a lineup of mouthpieces you could use on a mellophone. Left to right, we have the Jupiter hybrid horn/mellophone mouthpiece (reviewed here), the Kelly 6V, the IYM M-2, a DEG Mello 6V, a Curry 1HTF, and a Kelly MC with a mellophone adapter. Note that I have placed them in order by overall length.

Of course the is some ideal length for any mouthpiece in relation to an instrument, but what it is exactly for Mellophone I could not tell you. I can tell you the Kelly 6V is a little shorter than the DEG 6V which I think is pretty standard for this type of mouthpiece. Comparing these two directly my initial impression is the Kelly has a better sound and plays better. Of course it still has that “third trumpet” sort of sound typical of mellophone rather than a horn sound. The Curry 1HTF is not really a mellophone mouthpiece but is commonly used, it has a bit bigger/better sound, and then you get to the other options all of which have a more Flugelhorn related tone.

The rim on the Kelly 6V is a trumpet rim with a lot of cushion, similar to that on the DEG 6V but I feel a bit more rounded. Would not be my personal first choice (I would rather play something like the Jupiter hybrid in terms of the rim) but seems to be the type of rim that brass techs for marching bands and drum corps think have to be on a mellophone mouthpiece.

To close, the Kelly did in fact work well on my test instrument, a King. These are certainly worth a look. With the horn mouthpieces I found the colored mouthpieces had a deader tone than the crystal mouthpieces, so on horn I would say go with the crystal version, but the colored ones may be worth more of a look on mellophone, they should cut a bit more of the harsh edge out of the tone.

On the single F horn, part IV: Fun with crooks

As part of ramping up toward the F horn recording project (series starts here) I realized that the crook I was using certainly left the main slide too close to pushed in all the way to be comfortable – and the venue for the recording is going to be cooler than my home, likely I won’t be able to push in enough to get the horn up to pitch. Not acceptable!

IMG_0397Crooks are an interesting part of the equation with any horn that takes crooks. The topic came up in this article a few years ago as well. I came up with five combinations of crooks/couplers that put me in F with at least ¾ inch of tuning slide showing, as seen in the photo.

The winner? It is the one at the top in the photo, the smaller double coil crook with the ½ step coupler. That crook was a cousin to the one I had been using and has similar playing qualities but as a bonus has a better high range. So with that I think I have the setup set! Recording next week. Now my practice focuses on intonation….

Also, while not formally part of this series, see this article for a few notes on working on articulations and accuracy on the F horn.

Continue reading series

On attention to detail, accuracy, and tonguing problems

0

This week a legendary figure in the horn/music world passed away, Gunther Schuller. His name has come up in Horn Matters quite a few times, and I have over the years come to appreciate several things a great deal from his classic publication, Horn Technique.

Regular readers know that presently I am working on a project, preparing to record a group of forgotten horn and piano works from around the turn of the century on a period F horn (information on this project starts here). F horn is not easy to play at all on a high level. Playing this horn successfully has required a great deal of attention to detail, and my present warm-up greatly resembles the one advocated by Gunther Schuller in his book. More on that in a minute.

At an extreme horn teachers advocate one of two approaches to solving playing problems. One approach is to visualize what you want, get inspired and let the body adjust to make it happen! This is kind of a fun way to try to practice, it sounds great on paper, avoids paralysis by analysis, but in terms of mastering difficult articulations on the F horn it does not work.

Instead, my best progress on the topic of tonguing on the early valved horn has been to really try to pay attention to the “bubbles” at the beginning of notes, using that word concept from Schuller (more on that shortly) and thinking a lot as well about tonguing as described by Eli Epstein in his book.

Warm-up is an interesting topic. As I sometimes tell students, my sense of the Schuller book is he had a copy of the Farkas book, thought to himself most of this is wrong, and wrote a very different book without directly attacking Farkas in any way. This article on Farkas and Schuller and the warm-up is a great place to ponder this point. The Schuller warm-up is focused almost entirely on articulations and first note accuracy. It is not at all a “captain warm-up” type routine like that seen in most warm-up publications.

Back in 2004 we were honored to have Schuller on campus several times at Arizona State. He confirmed his warm up ideas then, and this article recalls the two key details he was most interested in opening our ears to in the horn master classes, bubbles and clicks. Bubbles really are the enemy on the single F horn, and in that article I note,

“Bubbles” (his term) are a big concern for him, probably his biggest concern. Most players are not even aware of the somewhat uneven quality of attacks as they are just not really listening to them closely. We get used to how we sound. Open your ears! The cause of “bubbles” can be several things but in my opinion it boils down to two items. One is choice of mouthpiece and horn; some mouthpieces in particular will by nature produce an attack with a bubble. This is however compounded by choice of syllable for the articulation. We are taught so often to articulate a “TA” articulation, but in reality I rarely if ever really articulate “TA.” My normal articulation is something closer to “DA” or even “DUH,” and varies by range (very high is “DEE,” for example–“DUH” is more of a mid-range articulation). The best light articulations are made with a distinctly brushing stroke of the tongue to be sure.

IMG_0393Turning to the Epstein part of the puzzle, for me I find in the upper range on the F horn it is not just that brushing quality of articulation it is also very location oriented, it must be very precise to eliminate the bubbles. Epstein addresses this in great detail in his book, Horn Playing from the Inside Out. My review of the book starts here and is worth reading in full; in short, Epstein talks at length about the location of the articulation point in every range. As I ascend on the F horn I certainly have to think of the articulation location differently (or more precisely) than I would by default on a double horn, an instrument that really is much more technically forgiving overall to perform upon.

To that point, the truly freaky thing is that right now, when I occasionally pick up a double horn, I literally feel like I can’t miss notes. I think the attention to detail of figuring out how to articulate well on the F horn will totally pay off, performance will be on a higher level.

I should note for readers what my default articulation location is/was. In the high range Epstein recommends a position that puts your tongue up on the gums for the contact point, but normally I would tongue a bit further forward in much the manner recommended by Anton Horner in this article.

There is more I could go into, as another line of recent experimentation has been inserts. Without giving away all my secrets they do more good than I expected on single F horn. Dennis Brain famously had “match sticks” across key locations in some of his slides before he turned to playing a modern Alexander horn; I can see why.

There is a final point any reader can apply from this article. Years ago, as a younger student, I did an accuracy routine religiously on the F horn — a similar exercise may be found in the Singer book and the Schuller book. Try it! Work this exercise out perfectly over many weeks on the F horn at quarter note = 60, you will see a difference when you use standard fingerings.

On the single F horn, part III: Gearing up for a recording project

It took over two months but at this point I am fairly comfortable with playing a period single F horn.

In part I of this series a topic was my being inspired by the discovery of forgotten horn repertoire that I think has potential — quality works aimed at low horn players of the late 19th and early 20th century who still used single F horns. The horn solo works we usually perform from that era strike me as being centered on high horn players and more suited to single Bb (and later double) horns.

Part II of this series addressed among other things the mouthpiece issue. Besides just learning the music a big part of the puzzle has been figuring out the horn and mouthpiece question. I can’t right now say for sure I won’t adjust things further, but I think I have them.

IMG_0265After quite a bit of serious practice I am back on the horn that was made for me by Richard Seraphinoff, described in part I. The alternate instrument I tried was a King F horn that Seraphinoff helped me convert to take crooks, also mentioned in part II. Each instrument has a personality and individual intonation issues, more so than on modern horns. The bottom line at the moment is the Seraphinoff has better valves (especially in slurs vrs. valve changes) and overall it sounds better, it has a bit less of that rough natural horn edge (“bubbles”) on the articulations. A very German horn perfect for the German music on the recording.

(So what is better about the valves exactly? It has to do with “clicks” when the valves move, the way they affect the flow of the airstream blowing through slurs. For more on where I learned to use the term “clicks” in this context, and for an explanation of “bubbles” see this article.)

Of the mouthpieces I have (mentioned in part II), the modified Atkinson H-10 did well on the King conversion horn, and is seen on the Seraphinoff in the photo, but I am leaning toward the Moosewood LGC being the mouthpiece of choice on the Seraphinoff horn. Sound has a bit more “life” and it is easier to play.

(Easier to play? The reason this is an element is kind of along the same lines as the typical discussion in the Horn People group about Geyer/Knopf design horns compared to Kruspe/8D type horns. If you are going to play a horn for hours week after week you need something that plays easily, especially as you get older, rather than expending great physical effort to produce some idealistic sonic concept. On one mouthpiece the horn is a bit more “smoky” and on the other it is more in focus. A topic for a different article, but relevant to current equipment choices for this recording project, as I need to record everything in a three day window of time.)

So the plan as of now is to use the Moosewood LCG on the Seraphinoff horn for the recording. And I now have recording dates set in early July, the recording project will happen! I also have nearly all the literature picked as well. I will hold off on describing it for now to be sure nobody else records them first to undercut my profits (LOL). But seriously, rep is about 90% picked now, almost all of it has never been recorded before and I feel certainly deserves to be performed more often. More on the repertoire as we get closer to the recording date.

UPDATE: I also now am using mostly the E crook described in an earlier article, from when I was preparing to perform this same horn on a recital. Never underestimate the power of a change of crook, it does help sort the overall intonation out better. The only thing that worries me is I have to have the horn main slide pushed in nearly all the way with this crook; I hope the recording studio is not overly cool, it could cause problems.

Continue to Part IV

Copyright week, part V: On dissertations, exercises, and other closing thoughts

Creative enterprise comes in many forms, and research/scholarship is certainly a type of creative enterprise impacted by copyright.

“Back in the day,” writing my DM dissertation, my committee did not raise any copyright concerns with me. All of the music itself was in the public domain clearly, but some examples, in those days before the popularity of music notation software, were actually clipped from fairly recently published editions. My understanding at the time (right or wrong) was this use only became a concern if it was submitted to what was then known as University Microfilms for publication, which I did not have to do and did not do. So as a result you can’t buy my dissertation in any form! Copies are only found on the shelf in the library at IU, on loan from the IHS lending library, or on the shelf in my office. About half of it is online somewhere or became published articles … and it is probably time to think about those remaining materials, there is an article or two still in there for sure.

Nowadays of course every Doctoral project goes to ProQuest (UMI successor firm) for publication, and has to have proper copyright notices and permissions for musical examples from copyrighted works or editions. Faculty is also much more up on the facts.

Which is to say though, if you received a Doctorate some years ago, you may have slipped through with materials in your dissertation that actually can’t be there today, and you need to be careful how and where you post those materials now. Lack of proper copyright clearance could come back to bite you. And even if it was a more recent project, your permission to reprint copyrighted musical examples was most likely specifically limited to your actual dissertation, you can’t unilaterally extend that permission for other uses without putting yourself at legal risk.

One bottom line of all of this is that we all must set a high standard in regard to copyright, and that horn teachers in particular need to be setting good examples for their students.

Clarke-snipA point should be added on the topic of warm-up routines and exercises. These tend to get photocopied, passed around, and posted online. If they appeared in a printed source before 1923 (such as this Clarke study) they are public domain, but if published later they would be copyrighted exercises. Even if an excercise was only written down and no copyright notice is present they could be copyrighted, as noted in the last quote in part III.

I hate to be real specific but there are certainly warm-up materials and routines by famous teachers posted online in PDF format that are based on exercises from recently published resources. But the fact is that actually the only legal version to use for study is the original book from which they originate. You can of course post recommendations and guidance as to how to use those materials, but the exercises themselves should really only be referenced from a legally purchased physical copy. By posting or copying those exercises (even by hand) you are depriving the copyright holder of income they are entitled to; the exercises are in fact the copyrighted creative enterprise of their creators. You should not be undercutting them or their heirs of income that is legally deserved.

As a part of writing this article I have done a bit of self-evaluation as well. I have made a few changes, including tossing out a bunch of music photocopies and I will be getting rid of more this summer. For example I had some Bach chorale Xerox pages in the horn choir folders. Those had been copied out of a theory book years ago, but now have been tossed in the recycle bin, replaced by selected pages of Bach chorales from a free online, legal public domain resource.

A final bottom line to mention is this. Teachers and pros should never post or share copyrighted materials online if there is any question of it being legal or not. We need to set a high standard, following the letter and spirit of copyright law, to ensure that we support the ongoing creative enterprise of our peers and colleagues.

Return to Part I of copyright series

Copyright week, part IV: So where can you legally obtain horn excerpts from Shostakovich 5?

Perhaps cramping your creative enterprise as a horn player is the fact that some music is not actually in the public domain and likely won’t ever be public domain during your lifetime.

At this point an aside is appropriate. While it is now out of print, I included one Shostakovich 5 excerpt in the original version of my high horn book. The licensing fee for that excerpt was a flat rate, and there was a similar fee to be paid to the publisher of the Ravel Piano Concerto in G excerpt also included in the book. The total cost reached into four figures, and as a result I don’t know if I ever made any money on that book. But I did offer to buyers a legal source for these excerpts.

Turning to IMSLP for a little more context, they note that the music of Prokofiev, Shostakovich, and Stravinsky was once in the public domain but in 1995 returned to being copyright protected. The money quote from their article: “In fact, the music of these three composers was public domain before URAA § 514 restored copyright in 1995.”

Looking again at Shostakovich 5 and horn resources specifically, I used this text in an article on excerpt books in Horn Articles Online (UPDATE: no longer posted):

A note on legally obtaining excerpts from Shostakovich 5. This popular work, frequently asked on horn auditions, was in the public domain in the west for many years but the copyright was restored in 1995 and upheld in a case that went all the way to the United States Supreme Court in 2012. Any new or newly revised excerpt publication (since 1995) will need to fully comply with copyright law for this or any other work under copyright (such as for example some works of Ravel that are frequently asked on auditions), including paying significant fees to the copyright holder accompanied with the required copyright notices with the music.

Turning to your options for legally obtaining this excerpt today, among “old standard” horn excerpt publications the LaBar book, Thompson Edition, volume 2 of the Chambers excerpt books, and volume 2 of the Pottag excerpt books contain legal versions of Shostakovich 5 (with Pottag not including the critical low horn excerpt). All of these were published prior to 1995. Among newer publications, the Randy Gardner low horn book and the Eli Epstein book contain legal versions of Shostakovich 5 complete with proper copyright notices indicating they paid the appropriate fees to the copyright holder. There are “other sources” out there, but if it was published after 1995 and does not have the copyright notice published prominently with the excerpt it has in fact been published illegally, be it a print or an online publication. Some may argue differently, but the fact is that there is no “fair use”** for excerpts of copyrighted musical works in books that are for sale or for online publications that reduce in any way the value of the copyrighted work to the copyright holder.

Directing this final comment toward horn teachers out there, it is up to each of us to set a good example for others in regard to copyright law. For this reason I would particularly commend and recommend the use of the Gardner and Epstein sources for study of Shostakovich 5, they are completely legal and follow the spirit and letter of current copyright law.

[**”Fair use” was discussed in part III.]

I know of at least one printed publication dating to after 1995 that contains Shostakovich and Ravel horn excerpts which appear to me to not be legal, as no copyright notices are included of the type I was required to include in my high horn publication. But, as noted in the long quote above, there are clearly legal sources out there, including recent sources. We at Horn Matters highly recommend their use. Set the right example and insist on supporting the good guys who follow the rules.

The series will close with a few thoughts on dissertations and more.

Continue to conclusion of Copyright Series

Copyright week, part III: The inconvenient truth

Want to kill creative enterprise? One great way to do this is to illegally reproduce copyrighted music and recordings.

One of the ways people will justify reproducing portions of copyrighted materials is via the doctrine of “fair use.” There are four pillars of law regarding fair use, and you can’t cherry pick the most favorable three and think you are doing OK! The Wikipedia article on Fair Use quotes the relevant law statute:

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

-the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
-the nature of the copyrighted work;
-the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
-the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

Or click here to see the actual statute in full. You can’t cut corners on this topic; almost any “fair use” you can conceive of actually would impact the fourth pillar, as it will have an effect on the potential market for a copyrighted work (as in you won’t buy a work or a properly licensed portion of a work if you can get it for free). Also, selling portions of a copyrighted work in any form is a problem, one that really can’t be whitewashed over. Just as “borrowing” [stealing] images from a website can be illegal, actual music or recordings that are under copyright need to be treated very carefully, lest some company with lawyers and deep pockets go after you.

Turning to sheet music, one composer that shows up on horn audition lists is Ravel. His earlier works such as the Pavane are in the public domain now, but later works are not such as the Piano Concerto in G. With that work ISMLP posts this notice:

Since this work was first published after 1922 with the prescribed copyright notice, it is unlikely that this work is public domain in the USA. However, it is in the public domain in Canada (where IMSLP is hosted), the EU, and in those countries where the copyright term is life+70 years or less.
IMSLP does not assume any sort of legal responsibility or liability for the consequences of downloading files that are not in the public domain in your country.

There is a practical reality that you can put short musical excerpts from copyrighted works in a handout or power point, but if you then go post those same things online it becomes problematic.

kopprasch-Op5Speaking generally though, if it is a published edition and it was published before 1923 it is in the public domain as of now in the U.S.A. and you can do anything with it (post it online, reprint it, etc.). For a little broader picture of the topic the Wikipedia article on public domain is as good a place to start as any.

But digging a little deeper, turning to the Wikipedia article on public domain in the United States, the lack of a copyright notice does not necessarily mean that the publication (or manuscript) is in the public domain. There we read the following:

Until the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988, the lack of a proper copyright notice would place an otherwise copyrightable work into the public domain, although for works published between January 1, 1978, and February 28, 1989, this could be prevented by registering the work with the Library of Congress within five years of publication. After March 1, 1989, an author’s copyright in a work begins when it is fixed in a tangible form; neither publication nor registration is required, and a lack of a copyright notice does not place the work into the public domain.

What about orchestral excerpts you need that are not from public domain works? The conversation will continue in the next installment.

Continue reading Copyright Series

Copyright week, part II: Are you a pirate, or a thief?

Students need to clearly realize that creative enterprise is funded by copyright protection, and that sharing musical files (print or audio) is really a bad idea.

Photocopy machines have been around for years. The next step beyond photocopying copyrighted materials, seen widely today, is to scan them and share the files.

Requests are often seen online (such as in Facebook) for scans of musical works that are not in the public domain, perhaps out of print but more often in print and available for purchase. Bruce Hembd recently wrote in a note that “File sharing is a tricky issue when it comes to works that are under copyright.” It is tricky for a variety of reasons. People sometimes really do need music in an emergency situation. But the fact is that “With good planning, legally-acquired music can be bought or physically borrowed.” Continuing, he noted that “the right thing to do when acquiring printed music materials” would be to:

– Plan ahead.
– Buy the music in time for when it is needed.
– Support the composers and editors who put this stuff together by buying legal copies.

Otherwise we end up cannibalizing ourselves by discouraging people from creating the materials and rightfully profiting from them.

Fortunately, the administrators of the Horn People group on Facebook have been pretty on top of this issue. Legit emergencies can come up, but really there is not that much reason to legitimately file share music that is under copyright. Sharing of copies online in any form is a slippery slope for sure, and “your bad planning” is no reason to become a pirate and thief.

Some recent publications are in E-Book format, including several of mine. These you could file share really easily but I would like to think I can trust the honesty of the horn playing community that they would not undercut me as author/publisher in this manner.

In a closely related topic, one thing you will need to learn about if you record or arrange music is the topic of mechanical license. As noted in the Wikipedia article on this topic, “In copyright law, a mechanical license is a license that grants certain limited permissions to work with, study, improve upon, reinterpret, re-record (etc.) something that is neither a free/open source item nor in the public domain.”

Many people seem to think if you are a non-profit you don’t need to pay for or obtain the mechanical license to publish or record an arrangement. As a non-profit the copyright holder may give you a free license, but you still have to apply for and obtain mechanical license. There is no free pass because you are a non-profit on any of this. Without mechanical license you are a pirate and a thief in reality.

Another related concept thrown around a lot is “Fair Use.” There is more to it than “it is only illegal if you get caught.” More on that in the next installment.

Continue reading the copyright series

Copyright week, part I: Never take Xerox music into a lesson

0

“Creative Enterprise” is a major buzz phrase in the musical world today, and relates generally to the idea that you want to actually make money from your musical work. That income can be from a variety of sources and copyright law is potentially a very important element of what allows financial gain from your creative enterprise.

Copyright is a big topic and one that really needs talked about more widely. This series will explore a number of angles on this topic as experienced in the French horn world today.

This series is in five parts and grew from a series of E-mail conversations. To begin, we learn on a basic level about copyright from our teachers and how they approached this topic. Among all my teachers, Verne Reynolds was perhaps the most clear about following copyright law. Bruce Hembd and I both attended Eastman at the same time and he recalled that “I remember Verne not liking Xerox copies one bit.” I remember the same thing and basically I would not have dared to take photocopies of copyrighted publications into a lesson with him.

Which really should still be the reaction of any modern student to any horn teacher today.

Part of the creative enterprise of Verne Reynolds was composition and he had many publications to his name. He was certainly OK with a Xerox page to facilitate a page turn (bad page turns are really a publisher error), but I hesitate to think what fate would have come on some sophomore who walked in with a Xerox copy of anything from the 48 Etudes!

Students today it seems to me have much less inner clarity on the topic of copyright than they would about a topic like “borrowing” permanently (stealing!) a mouthpiece from a teacher.

While social media contains many great resources for the horn player, at the same time those very resources have erased some of the clarity that might have existed in regard to copyright law for printed music and recordings. There are a lot of videos with easily notable copyright problems, seeming to teach a new generation that “there is no copyright law.”

Going back to the topic of sheet music, when I was a student we often shared physical Xerox copies of orchestral parts, which was the only way to get them in those pre-Internet days. Then along came the big Thompson Edition collection, which was legally produced and widely used. And then we get to today, with new go-to resources to consider.

Jumping way ahead, while we do host PDF public domain resources at Horn Matters, we also have a lot of content here that people can access for free but it is not public domain. Readers can’t do anything they want with our words without permission, such as for example compile our writings into an E-Book. A “Best of Horn Matters” E-Book is not a bad idea actually, but it would be our project to do, not something an unauthorized person or group can or should ever do on their own.

When the series returns the topic will be piracy and theft.

Continue reading copyright series