Home Blog Page 49

Two Quick Tips to Improve Accuracy

0

Following up on recent end of semester juries and lessons, two thoughts came to mind related to improving accuracy.

1. Get a BERP.

I have not had my BERP on my horn much in the past few years and I realize that some of my students have certainly never heard of or used this device. A BERP fits on your horn in such a way that you can buzz on the mouthpiece with a very similar position and resistance sensation as that of actually playing the horn.

A big usage of buzzing I would encourage is to test passages you chipped right after the chip to see what was really going on inside the mouthpiece. You will hear scoops and burrs that were the obvious sources of the chipped notes. Buzz them correctly several times and accuracy will improve on the horn.

2. Adjust your concept of “good enough.”

The other point I would like to bring up today is the concept of in brass playing what is good enough?

One of my fears hearing people play that have problems in their playing is that they are so used to having those problems that they seem normal to them. They live with them thinking they are playing well enough. But actually they could, I think, correct the problems with some very focused effort and hit a higher level.

In short, if you think your tonguing or tone or range or accuracy is “good enough” it is probably not good enough. Be honest with yourself and put effort into solving those problems.

A Farkas Signature

Cleaning out some old boxes from the garage today I discovered this signature from Philip Farkas!

Farkas-signatureFarkas should need no introduction to regular readers of Horn Matters. When I was a Doctoral student at Indiana University in the late 1980s he was retired but still living in Bloomington, and I took several lessons with him. I remember working on excerpts and talking about my embouchure and warm-up, and just to take in his teaching studio in the basement was a treat. After one of these lessons, on June 16, 1989 specifically, he gave me this signature.

Farkas-check-1989-crop

As you might have already guessed, the signature is on a cancelled check.

And how much would you have guessed Farkas would have charged? I know there were big name players back then that charged over $100 an hour, but Philip Farkas charged me only $50 a lesson. For a long time as a younger professional I struggled in fact to charge more than that — how could I charge more than Mr. Farkas charged me?

Eventually I got past that hurdle (inflation helped me out a bit, too), and it was neat to stumble upon this item today. Who knows, I might even frame it, a neat memory of the brief contact I had with one of the great horn teachers.

Horn Repertoire Week 15: Final!

Congratulations! You have made it to the end of an epic year.

As I wrote when this was first posted in 2013, it was a great exercise for me to put together the full year under the University of Horn Matters banner.

I believe it remains a strong overview of all things French horn, with tons of information for anyone who takes time to read it.

And actually you don’t need to read it! Search engines have certainly thoroughly indexed the University of Horn Matters, with presently (2026) our content strongly influencing such things as the AI Overview in Google Chrome.

The future of the French horn

As to myself, editing the course over the years, I have been thought a lot about the state of the French horn world today. One central point of my 2017 commentary article, “The Future of French Horn Playing,” is that the horn world is very complacent and needs to demand better products.

This portion of that article (below) gets at part of the problem in terms of repertoire specifically:

A final big topic area I would like to point out, that the horn world is entirely too complacent about, is technical materials for horn study. Our typical etude materials are, you guessed it, dated and stuck in the 19th century. Of course, it seems like there are no options besides Kopprasch? Actually, there are surprisingly few choices from the past 90 years published for the horn, certainly not many at all that are easily purchased. I have attempted to fill this gap even myself with a series of contemporary etudes (an E-publication, more here), but the bottom line I have concluded is that it seems virtually impossible to get teachers to use new materials (or buy E-publications, either). It really is past time to give serious consideration to teaching from some different materials. In my own case, one possible solution I see is to make more use of contemporary solo horn literature, something I plan to explore in my teaching going forward.

Back in 2013 when this portion of the course was put together I was working on big drafts of big books, which eventually led to my group of publications that are available now.

Do your part to encourage the use of some new materials, and to play new music

While a number of recent solo works are getting performed, there is a huge need for fresh teaching materials. As I say in the article linked above, the Farkas book is very dated, a lot has changed since 1956, and it is up to us now to actually develop and demand better products.

University-of-Horn-Matters-StoreThank you again for following this course, and I hope that it has made a positive difference in the horn world. And remember, if you followed it all the way from the beginning to end you certainly should purchase some University of Horn Matters gear to celebrate.

Return to the University of Horn Matters

This is final article of a fourteen week course in horn repertoire, the second semester of a broad overview of horn repertoire, performance, and pedagogy. The introductory article is here, and the series is presented for the educational purposes of our readers.

Tone is what makes a Great French Horn

0

First, a quote from a former student of mine who is now helping people looking for upgrade horns: “…most people will talk far more about how equipment feels than how it sounds.”

The full article is [update 2019 — was] on the Houghton Horns website, and the former student is Derek Wright, currently a freelance player/teacher in Texas and working as well for Horn Matters advertiser Houghton Horns. But that is not why this article is linked; instead, I think what Derek notes in the article gets at a very important point that I would like to restate in a bit different way.

I have worked with a lot of people at this point, been to a lot of horn shows, etc. A mistake people make is choosing a horn for how it feels and getting stuck on that feel. So for example an advanced student or serious amateur player is playing “a popular model” student horn and looking for an upgrade horn. They end up shopping for a horn that feels like their student model horn and don’t get what they really need because they focused on feel instead of sound.

Tone is what makes a great French horn. That great horn may feel a bit different than your present instrument (more “open” for example, whatever exactly “open” is), but reality is you can adjust to the horn pretty quickly if it really is producing the tone.

Derek suggests recording, and I would add that there are several other methods to employ. One is to have others listen to you (horn players, please!), but a better one is to when you are testing in a big room try to focus your attention on the sound coming back at you in the room. It is not like you can actually project your ears into the corners of the room, but you can focus on the sound coming back rather than the sound as it comes out of the bell. It gives you a bit more information on the real sound.

Some of the best horns ever made are out there on the market, and for tone there are some GREAT doubles out there in particular.

So, what factors give a horn a great tone? The biggest one has to be the bell. There are many variables to balance that include the thickness and temper of the metal, the taper and depth of the throat, etc. Following close behind are the other tapered sections of the horn and the valve section and the quality of the assembly of every component! When it comes together you begin to get that “X-factor.”

In short, tone is the big headline and starting point. And a part of that always involves finding a better horn and/or mouthpiece.

Horn Repertoire Week 14: A Course of Study

One of the goals of this course as actually taught to my students at Arizona State is to prepare graduate students for comprehensive exams. Which means, also, that the course is in fact taught somewhat differently than what you see here.

For those reading online only, I would suggest that you aim for …

A comprehensive overview

An ideal outcome of this online course is that you might form in your mind a comprehensive course of study for the horn, putting teaching materials together in an effective order in relation to making progress on the horn.

To do so involves tracking through materials (solos, etudes, excerpts) in some logical fashion. In reality, however, we all tend to repeat the patterns put forward to us by our own teachers.

An aside: Who was my most important teacher?

By now if you are reading along online only you would I think guess that Verne Reynolds was my most important teacher. He left a mark for sure (ouch!), but he was not the most important. Strangely, the most important one I realize I don’t talk about nearly as much. It was my teacher for my Doctoral studies, Michael Hatfield (who had also been a student of Reynolds). It is hard to explain, but I know a number of elements of his teaching and teaching methods are deeply embedded in my teaching and playing. Consider it an optional reading, but if you are curious to know more, read on below:

A course of study, as presented by Verne Reynolds

To close out the year in terms of quotations, I would offer this final one from Verne Reynolds in The Horn Handbook, closely related to our topic of developing a course of study in your teaching.

Nearly every freshman entering college has played at least one of the Mozart horn concertos. Nonetheless, beginning the freshman year with one of the Mozart concertos is not unreasonable. The third concerto, with its emphasis on lyrical playing rather than technical display, is a perfect choice because the teacher can insist that preparation begins with notes but does not end until every element of performance is mastered. During the freshman year, teachers and students should not be hindered by deadlines on the preparation of solo works. Within reason, teachers should take whatever time is necessary to perfect the first solo work, since this will set the pattern for the future. Much of what is learned by studying the Mozart Concerto No. 3 will be applied to other classical works.

There is not much in the solo horn literature to suggest that a chronological order of study is of particular value. A Mozart concerto could well be followed by one of the Hindemith sonatas with the hope that the same care and understanding will be applied to both works….

…Not every solo work that is practiced will be performed in the semester or the year that it is assigned. Some works – Richard Strauss’s Concerto No. 2, Schumann’s Adagio and Allegro, Gliere’s Concerto – can be worked on during the sophomore year and performed in the senior year….

In the chapter on etudes we established a sequence of Kopprasch, Maxime-Alphonse, Barboteu, and Reynolds, augmented by Hill, Schuller, and Decker. In the orchestral studies we followed the alphabet. The solo literature for horn does not lend itself to such an orderly approach….

Mozart-3-snip

As I studied with Reynolds (for my MM) and five of my other horn teachers (!!) had been students of Reynolds at some point, I read the quote and can see that elements of his underlying course of study are seen in my teaching, but hopefully in a more practical form tailored to individual students.

Theory compared to reality

Looking at the Mozart 3 suggestion specifically in the quote, when I was in school Reynolds typically would assign Mozart 3 to all of the freshman horn students. He demanded perfection on the assignment, and I always thought it in a way a bit cruel, as, in reality, he pitted students against each other.

I avoid assigning the same solos to students at the same time as much as I can. But then again, in an audition everyone will be playing exactly the same music; his Mozart 3 assignment did, I suppose, make students face that reality, right away.

We’re almost done

With that thought, there is one more class on the online schedule, but it’s also finals week, so we have only a few final notes to close an epic semester.

Continue to final session of Repertoire Course

This is week 14 of a fourteen week course in horn repertoire, the second semester of a broad overview of horn repertoire, performance, and pedagogy. The introductory article is here, and the series is presented for the educational purposes of our readers.

A Matter of Scale

Very recently I saw a quote posted that relates very much to a topic on my mind. It read,

When you play your instrument you should always wear the hat of the performer. When you teach you’ll wear the hat of the investigator. Don’t mix those up. —Arnold Jacobs

No teacher is perfect but certainly we aim to be effective, and the best teachers investigate problems using their skills and senses over a period of time. Private teaching is not a performance! It involves exercising problem solving skills with an individual student.

In terms of the problems I hear in lessons often I find myself for example thinking in terms of scale, as in how to scale the dynamics and nuances correctly for the work at hand and the performance space. Having performed virtually every major horn work in professional situations helps me a lot in this regard, as does a good set of ears and a great teaching space.

This gets me to a point I have made elsewhere (for example here) but still concerns me, that of online lessons. On some basic level they are better than nothing. But really you need the ears of a skilled teacher in the room with you; there is just no way to really get at the matter of scale of dynamics and articulations within the limitations of an online connection. Some things you can hear, especially rhythm, but the critical “big picture” is absent.

Mendelssohn-3-snipAn excerpt that comes to mind as a great example is third horn on Mendelssohn 3, the excerpt that begins with this snip being the example. It is marked FF. How loud should it be? An online lesson will never get you to the answer, and someone without significant orchestral experience won’t get you there either, because it is a two part answer. In orchestral context it has to be quite loud. However, for an audition you have to scale it back a bit. How much is a good question and it is a topic again to work with an experienced horn teacher who has actually won an audition.

Then you get to the topic of the articulations and tempo. Many written words won’t do the topic justice, a video won’t do it justice, you need to work on it live in a room with a real horn teacher.

I can’t imagine seriously trying to teach this excerpt (and many others) online. For the teacher many senses are involved to really get things scaled right. As to students considering online lessons realize a teacher needs not only the experience level to teach the excerpt at a high level but also the space to do the teaching. An Internet connection is not that space.

Horn Repertoire Week 13: The Modern Horn

As we approach the end of the semester it is again very clear that a course of this type cannot possibly cover it all. But we will hit a few highlights and point to the fact there is much more out there.

What recent works will stand the test of time?

A big challenge of this course for the teacher is looking at the horn repertoire composed in the most recent 50 years or so. Further back from that rough date it is fairly clear which works have become standards. Some more recent works have been recorded more than once and are performed fairly often (such as The Glass Bead Game of James Beckel, for one example), but will it become a standard? Only time will really tell.

One focus this week (and next) will be on a group of solo and chamber works that are performed frequently on student recitals and in professional contexts. One good example is the Britten: Serenade, Op. 31 for Tenor, Horn, and Strings; it is not on student recitals often (in part due to it not sounding as compelling with piano), but is scheduled regularly by major orchestras and has been recorded many times. We will cover as many works as time allows in class at ASU — there is much to attempt to cover — from standards by Bozza, Hindemith, Wilder, etc., on to many other possible works.

For those reading this course online only I would offer the following works as examples of ones you might not know yet, highlighting some of my favorites briefly in the following short articles:

But there really is more that needs highlighted

Over years of teaching this course I realized that I was spending hardly any time on the content you will see presented in the online course next week.

Instead, what you would find to be a better use of time is to take extra time to examine some less performed but significant works from recent composers and in genres outside of the Classical music scene.

Topics which you should explore include:

Women composers

For one very prime example of a topic that could have filled an entire semester, visit and skim over the women composers and the horn website linked below:

Within any sub-topic, as well, the question would still be which works are the best? In terms of women composers I would particularly point readers to this article by Dr. Lin Foulk as a starting point, and please consider learning on your own something from her list. Also consider that you could be using etudes by women composers as well!

At ASU we have Doctoral students, and I’d highlight for readers online two recent projects that relate to works by women composers:

Also, in this article I talk about two more works by women composers which have recently been showing up in grad school auditions:

Non-western music

Another piece I love to highlight in the physical class is a work for horn and gamelan by Lou Harrison. Intrigued? More about it here.

Jazz and the horn

A final figure I want to be sure to spend some time with here is the jazz horn legend Julius Watkins. His name and music is, sadly, fading from memory. It is a clear reminder that there is some really great music out there beyond the traditional, standard horn music that has been the focus of this semester.

The topic of chamber music

And then we have chamber music, there are so many works that could be mentioned that have been composed in recent years. One I would highlight online is Table for Three at Chez Janau for horn, bass trombone, and piano by Paul Ferguson. I commissioned this four movement work, and I feel it came out great! Below is the first movement.

So much music, so little time

Next week we wrap things up. Everyone reading this online should certainly make a point to explore some of the more recent works written for the horn, I am sure there are gems out there that will be considered standard works in the future.

Continue to Week 14 of Repertoire Course

This is week 13 of a fourteen week course in horn repertoire, the second semester of a broad overview of horn repertoire, performance, and pedagogy. The introductory article is here, and the series is presented for the educational purposes of our readers.

Horn Repertoire Week 12: The Wagner Tuba

Continuing our look at some of the standard works horn players perform often from the nineteenth century, our next topic is the Wagner tuba. (NOTE: I always include this topic in our physical course at ASU, but it does not necessarily fall on this week in the course).

Amazingly, just over a week after this article was originally posted in 2013, the Wagner tuba was the topic of a feature article in of all things The Wall Street Journal!

For your trip to Valhalla…

So this week the readings will start for a change of pace with a quote from “It Takes Brass to Play the Wagner Tuba,” where we read that,

The Wagner tubas are most closely identified with the regal music for Valhalla, dwelling place of the gods. Highly versatile, their sound has been variously described as “smoky,” “metallic,” “unearthly” and “majestic.” “There’s more clarity than in a horn,” said Jeff Fair, principal horn for the Seattle Opera, whose Stephen Wadsworth “Ring” returns in August, “but more resonance and darker sounds than in the trumpet.” Anne Scharer, fourth horn in the Metropolitan Opera Orchestra, called the composer’s eponymous instrument “louder and more rustic than orchestral horns, even strident” at times—qualities in evidence, she added, in passages for the crude, menacing Hunding. By contrast, they lend a solemn presence to the funeral music for Siegfried. And their “husky, rumbling tone,” writes William Melton in his comprehensive history, “The Wagner Tuba,” aptly depicts “the inextinguishable hatred and envy of the Nibelung Alberich.”

The whole article is very nicely written and researched but [UPDATE: 2017] it is now behind a paywall.

Introducing the Wagner tuba

Quite a number of major orchestral and operatic works call for a section of four Wagner tubas, an instrument which looks at a distance like a German Euphonium but is built to take a horn mouthpiece and is performed by horn players. Constructed in two pitch levels (tenor in B-flat and bass in F, the same as horn–double Wagner tubas are also available) I first encountered the instrument as a graduate student at The Eastman School of Music, when I first performed the fourth Wagner tuba part on Bruckner 7 with the Rochester Philharmonic, and the next year again the same part on Bruckner 8. To this day that Bruckner 8 series, conducted by Jerzy Semkow, remains to my memory as one of the highlights of my early career.

So while I started out with great experiences on the Wagner tuba, this is too often not the case. The parts may be oddly notated (most tenor parts are in B-flat with terrible key signatures), intonation can be very rough, etc. In relation to this, traditionally the instrument is given to a talented player whom it is hoped will “figure it out.” This was very much the case for me. I was at the top of the Rochester Philharmonic low horn sub list and was given the fourth part specifically because you need a strong player to lay down good intonation on the bottom. Also I was interested enough in instruments to figure out how to take advantage of the fourth valve. Since that time I have performed on Wagner tuba many times in groups including the Indianapolis Symphony and the Phoenix Symphony and have always enjoyed the experience. Great parts on great works are a joy to perform with a great orchestra.

A book and a video

And of course I have my book (and E-book) out as well (with transposed parts for Bruckner 7!), which I describe in a short video here:

If you are reading online only, use that book (which, as an aside, started as a paper I wrote for this same course when I was a Doctoral student!) to focus briefly on several major works of Wagner, Bruckner, and Strauss that make use of these instruments.

Also, if you are following the course entirely online, the link below will offer some useful content, especially on the topic of what music you might actually play as you practice the Wagner tuba:

Help! I need a Mouthpiece! I need a mute!

While the Wagner tuba is made to use a standard horn mouthpiece, specialty mouthpieces have been made — for an example see this article:

When you need a mute for a Wagner tuba, you really need a mute. Balu has one:

Introducing the Chinese Wagner tuba

Finally, if you are on a budget and want a Wagner tuba just for fun, the Chinese ones really are not bad:

Continue in Horn Repertoire Course

This is week 12 of a fourteen week course in horn repertoire, the second semester of a broad overview of horn repertoire, performance, and pedagogy. The introductory article is here, and the series is presented for the educational purposes of our readers.

Brief Review: Wedge Mouthpiece

0

A reader who switched to the new wedge mouthpiece, and is enthusiastic about it, recently sent me his spare mouthpiece to consider for review. After a bit of brief trial I can offer some initial reactions.

The basic thing to know is this is a very unique horn mouthpiece. The cup is not round and the rim is not flat, such that if you spin the mouthpiece and look at the rim end you can see the oval shape of the cup and if you set the mouthpiece down on a table, rim side down, it will rock as there are high and low points. A standard mouthpiece is flat and round and can be manufactured on a standard lathe with relative ease. This mouthpiece requires more sophisticated, modern equipment to produce (at least in quantity) and is something that those interested in the latest ideas will want to look at.

Wedge-and-standard-rimsThere is a dot on the outside surface of the rim that lets you know which side to place up. The photo shows the rim end of the Wedge mouthpiece as compared to what I normally play, noting that the Wedge is “sideways” in the photo — the oval shape actually goes up and down. As to the roots of the design, the maker states

The Wedge mouthpiece is based on the observation that the shape of a brass mouthpiece has not dramatically changed in over 100 years, and the conviction that it could be improved upon. The Wedge was designed by a trumpet playing physician who set out to challenge the rules that a brass mouthpiece rim should be round and flat. It incorporates concepts of how dental structure affects playing, and knowledge of human anatomy and physiology, to produce a more biomechanically efficient mouthpiece.

To learn much more about the mouthpiece and options you should go to the website, but I will quote this portion below as well, as it relates to my experience actually trying it.

Experience is demonstrating that there are two types of players – Wedge “Responders” and Wedge “Non-responders”.

Wedge Responders usually know fairly quickly that the mouthpiece will work for them. The rim feels quite different when first tried but feels as comfortable or more comfortable than their current mouthpiece. Within a short time the new Wedge rim feels “normal” and a conventional rim feels uncomfortable and restricting. This can take as little as a few minutes or as much as a week or two. Many players report an immediate and sometimes dramatic improvement in performance. The initial level of comfort and improved playing tends to evolve quickly over the first week or two. Advances in players with previously stable abilities are still evolving after six months….

A small group of “Non-responders” find the Wedge uncomfortable or not as good as their current gear.

Unfortunately, I personally clearly am one of the non-responders. I can’t play for any length of time on this mouthpiece. I know it has to do with how I set up my lower lip and is not a direct reflection on the concept or execution of the design. I set the rim in the red of my lower lip (a good photo of my setup is in this article), so I am very sensitive to changes of rim width and shape. The Eric Reed rim is too wide for my embouchure setup, and that combines with the peak of the rim being there and the setup of my lower lip in sort of a perfect storm. My embouchure is incompatible.

But if you set up more typically than I do, on the white, this is a very interesting mouthpiece and the machine work is impressive. The reader that loaned the mouthpiece to me really likes it, and it is an innovation that will be of interest to some in the horn world.

Horn Repertoire Bonus Week: Stuck in the Nineteenth Century

We are not actually stuck there, but there is a ton to cover and, due to a quirk of the semester schedule at ASU the original year that I laid out this class we had an extra Tuesday I had not planned for. That was good news, though, as there is certainly more to cover in the nineteenth century, and it is the era about which I have the most expertise.

What about Franz Strauss?

A figure we owe a lot to in terms of horn rep is Franz Strauss (1822–1905). Besides being a leading horn player of his generation, he composed several works that are part of our standard rep (I recorded a CD of his works!) and was the father of Richard Strauss. Especially if you are following this course completely online, I’d encourage a closer look at this PDF timeline:

and these five articles of special interest:

A very important excerpt

I don’t think too many would argue against Till being a really important excerpt. But how to play it correctly? It’s worth listening to a few different versions, but Farkas had it correct I think:

The Villanelle topic

As time allows this class session inevitably edges into looking at some early 20th century works that fit closely with our discussion, including in particular the Dukas Villanelle. With respect to that work there are two more short readings to scan before the class discussion.

And if you are following the course online only, I’d very much highlight the video in this article:

Even more you could skim over

Yet another article to read or at least skim over (sorry! I really am into the topic) is this recent article on the use of the single F horn (and Bb horn) in the late nineteenth century, and the series that follows, relating to recording my recent Rescued! CD. And for a more focused view of an interesting composer featured on this CD, see the following article:

Continue in Horn Repertoire Course

This is a bonus week in a fourteen week course in horn repertoire, the second semester of a broad overview of horn repertoire, performance, and pedagogy. The introductory article is here, and the series is presented for the educational purposes of our readers.