Home Blog Page 63

Brief FAQ: From the Natural Horn to the Triple Horn

Back at IHS Denver one of the sessions I presented related to comparing the natural horn and the triple horn. This photo was for the handout, and shows my Seraphinoff natural horn and Paxman model 83 compensating triple side by side. They are interesting to compare!

How did we get from there to here?

It took a long time but one of my all time favorite quotes gets at the basic facts. It is from an article by Richard Seraphinoff, where he wrote “Job security has always been the mother of all invention.”

Which one do teachers talk about more often?

While a lot of professionals are making use of triple horns today, the natural horn may actually be the one that your teacher is more likely to have talked about. It can be a very valuable part of your training to be sure, to improve the ear and general accuracy, but familiarity with descant and triple horns is equally if not more important today.

What are the differences?

More than not having valves, an authentic natural horn has a smaller bore and bell than the modern horn and should be performed with a deeper mouthpiece. It can only be crooked in one key at a time; in the photo it is in F. And it is harder to play accurately.

What are some of the specific changes seen between the two instruments?

Triple horns are most often constructed in F/Bb/high F and have valves! The thumb valve is arranged so that you can get the horn in any of the three keys. In many respects the triple is perfect for general high horn playing, providing many alternate fingerings that are more secure for accuracy. However, the low F side will probably be disappointing. A triple will not easily replace a double horn for low horn playing or a descant for very light high range work. And also a natural horn is a light as a feather and very responsive! It can be a lot of fun to play after blowing through all the weight of the typical triple.

For more info: I have publications related to both topics! Articles leading to more info are below:

 

Mailbag: On Warm-Up Patterns Using the Flat Harmonic

An interesting question recently came in from a reader, on the topic of the arpeggio patterns used in warm-up exercises. An early teacher of the person writing the question had basically instilled into their mind to never ever play arpeggios using, if you were playing open F horn, the Bb on the middle line (or A fingered with the second valve, etc.), as it is out of tune. A later teacher however made use of exercises that included that note. Who was correct?

My short answer is I have used exercises with that flat harmonic for years but I can also see the point the early teacher was making.

I have observed two schools of thought on warm-up exercises in general. Some people use patterns on harmonics which use fingerings for notes that we don’t normally use. The idea is it makes it harder and when you shift to normal fingerings it makes it easier, and you will be more accurate for the effort. A pattern such as the one here is an example of this.

The other school of thought is always use your normal fingerings, never use non-standard fingerings because it will make you less accurate, you need to always play on the normal fingering to really get the feel of the note and where to put it.

Then we get to the Bb question on the open F horn. The teacher had a point because it is out of tune and playing that note could train you to place notes incorrectly. But personally I do harmonic series patterns with that note almost every day in my most typical warm-up at present. It is early in the routine and I use those exercises to focus in on the embouchure and control early in my warm-up. Then I switch to real fingerings on other patterns.

Hopefully I get the best of both worlds, but again I can see the point. Ultimately either tactic gets at development of accuracy through the warm-up, and it will be one to be decided on an individual basis where you are most comfortable in terms of F horn versus standard fingerings and also the Bb harmonic or no Bb.

Review: MB “UltraLight” Horn Case

0

In preparation for travel this summer I wanted a new case. Last summer I saw my first Marcus Bonna “UltraLight” case and knew it would be a great choice for the small airplanes I encounter, plus it should help save my back. After a little delay on my part, eventually one was ordered and arrived in May of this year; having used it nearly two months now the time is right for a review.

First up we have the size comparison. This photo is of the new case next to my previous “go to” MB case (MB4 model), and it is clear that it is in round figures about ¾ size. From the logo you can see that I purchased mine through Ken Pope, but other dealers can obtain this same MB model. From the Pope description,

Leave it to Marcus to come up with another groundbreaking design! This MBsoft top case has a hard bottom and side shell, but the top is simply cordura with padding – thus allowing for a VERY small profile and light weight.…

Like all of Marcus’s cases this is a backpack styled case made of Ballistic Nylon Cordura with a music pouch on the back.

The case itself weighs only four pounds, with a width of 14 inches, height: 20 1/4 Inches, and a depth of 8 Inches. What that means for us is the case is significantly lighter and smaller than most other case options out there.

The main difference between this case and prior MB models (check their website for descriptions of their entire line of cases) is the top of the case is soft, as in it is just padded cordura. In fact, in the MB website they call this their “Soft Case.” This may concern some potential buyers as the horn is less protected. But that said, the bottom section is solid fiberglass and there is a lot of protection for the horn in every direction except from the soft side. If you have small children that might jump on the case it is not for you! But for flying or general daily use this case is a great option.

As to the flying part of the equation, this summer marks my second summer on the faculty of the Interlochen Arts Camp in Michigan. To get here from Arizona involves a flight on a small airplane into Traverse City. This case fit easily in the small overhead bins on an EMB 145 and has a nice small look visually that would not cause a flight attendant to worry that it would not fit. The flights I took here and also to the IHS symposium with the case were both very smooth in terms of the horn and case.

As to general use, I would only add that a lot of people struggle around with cases that really are heavier/bulkier than they need to be using. Especially if you have any borderline back problems, you need to think about a lighter case as it will make a difference.

In short I am very pleased and here is the best part; it is a very affordable case choice among options in the MB line. Ken Pope currently lists it at $295. A quick Internet search shows other dealers have it as well, with Houghton Horns selling it as the “Soft Top” model in leather at $429 for example.

Finally, of all the names I see out there for this case I would tend to vote for “UltraLight” as conveying best the character of it. Yes, the top is soft, but it is light and offers certainly better protection than a conventional gig bag. It is for sure a model to consider if you fly on small airplanes or are looking for a lighter option.

Hornmasters: Even More on the High Range

To close the topic of the high range we have quotes and tips from six more classic horn texts.

Two quick tips

William R. Brophy in his Technical Studies for Solving Special Problems on the Horn points out that “Generally speaking, the more work that can be done with the air stream, the less work there is to do with the lip.”

A slightly different approach to aperture control is proposed in Practical Hints on Playing the French Horn by David Bushouse. He suggests “moving the bottom lip and jaw” to close the embouchure.

Some unclear suggestions, perhaps including anchor tonguing

Farquharson Cousins brings the air and tongue into play as he notes secrets to the high range in On Playing the Horn. But exactly what he is thinking in regards to the tongue is a bit unclear…. I’m not sure that is how it works really for anyone, certainly he is not describing the “eee” position seen in MRI horn studies, it is more like one of the old school ways of playing which involves “anchor tonguing,” where the tongue is set against the lower teeth and articulations are made further back on the tongue (this article has a bit more on that topic).

The main secret of making high entries is to keep the air pressure dominant to the physical tongue movement. This is only a description, not a scientific statement, as there is no way of correlating the units of energy involved….

It may well be found that the high notes come out most easily and safely when the tongue is braced with its tip curling downwards and pressing forcibly outwards against the inside of the bottom teeth; the sides of the tongue likewise pressing, but against the upper teeth. This is the ‘de’ or ‘doo’ position and the mouth cavity may feel almost non-existent.

Five physical factors

Frøydis Ree Wekre in Thoughts on Playing the Horn Well offers a list of “five physical factors that will help improve the high range if they are used correctly.” They are:

1) Quantity and speed of AIR
2) SUPPORT in the lower abdominal area
3) FACIAL MUSCLES, especially inside the mouthpiece and around the lips
4) The TONGUE which may be lifted somewhat towards an ee-position for higher notes. Attention to the sound!
5) PRESSURE (WARNING) is a last resort when everything else is gone or not working…

Let’s look at that list a little closer. Number 4 is very critical and has not yet been mentioned. The MRI horn studies clearly show that in the high register the tongue does go to an “ee” position. This is very consistent among elite horn players and is certainly not a “may be” item, it must be lifted to an ee position. This topic is expanded upon much further in Eli Epstein, Horn Playing from the Inside Out

Be aware of how your playing overall impacts your embouchure any given day

Verne Reynolds notes in The Horn Handbook, that “For young embouchures, the high register is especially sensitive to what and how much one played yesterday and how carefully one warmed up today.”

Eight necessary actions to play in the high range

Finally, Douglas Hill in Collected Thoughts on Teaching and Learning, Creativity, and Horn Performance has an extended discussion of approaches to the high range. The necessary actions for high-range success include:

1. A progressively smaller, more focused aperture opening.
2. A faster, more concentrated airstream.
3. A higher tongue position (more towards the vowel sound eh).
4. A descending airstream (in tandem with No. 3).
5. A slightly descending mouthpipe angle (pressure off the top lip).
6. A focused top lip, with more muscle towards the center (like a beak).
7. Consistently firm (but not tense!) cheek and chin muscles.
8. A bit more mouthpiece pressure anchored on the bottom lip.

Note number 3 on his list, this is a very important point confirmed by the recent MRI studies. Expanding on points three and four above Hill notes that

Directing the airstream downward as if across the chin, combined with progressively higher vowel formations within the oral cavity, always seems to help. The vowel ah may be your desired mid-range setting. Gradually allow the tongue to raise upward but never back towards the throat, into an eh moving towards an ee. Combined with a rapid air stream through and open throat, this change of vowel formation can help to support and secure a relatively strong high range.

Equipment choices are important too

And of course descant and triple horns are a part of this discussion, they can certainly enhance security and ease production in the high range. I recently made available a book on the topic, Playing Descant and Triple Horns, which is based on my earlier print publication Playing High Horn. It is available now through Horn Notes Edition. Appropriate used of descant and triple horns is a key element to understand for the very advanced student hornist and young professional.

When we return the topic is the low range.

Continue Reading in Hornmasters Series

A new edition of Morceau de Concert: An interview with Travis Bennett

0

One item that caught my eye at the horn symposium in Denton was a new critical performing edition of the Saint-Saens Morceau de Concert, a standard of our rep with a very familiar old standard edition. Very recently also editor Travis Bennett put a short post related to this new publication on his blog. There we read from the foreword,

This critical performing edition of the Morceau de Concert, op. 94, by Camille Saint-Saëns (1835-1921) is the first to be based on the composer’s manuscripts housed in the Bibliothèque Nationale de France in Paris. It addresses literally hundreds of discrepancies found not only in the manuscripts themselves, but also in the scores most widely used today: the Durand edition of 1893 and the International edition of 1956.

And also we learn

Saint-Saëns first wrote a version of the piece for horn and piano in October 1887, and then completed the version for horn and orchestra one month later. When you look at the two manuscripts, it appears that the piano version was more of a rough sketch, and the orchestral version is a more thoroughly thought-out work. Most of the current editions are based solely on the piano version. Our edition could be called a piano reduction of Saint-Saëns’ orchestral version, but it really is more than that. We looked carefully at both manuscript versions, and tried to faithfully represent the composer’s intentions.

There is a bit more information in his blog post (from which this image of the cover was linked) and much more in the foreword. As this new, critical edition obviously brings new information out of interest to Horn Matters readers, Bennett agreed to a short interview with more details about this work and edition.

JE: What were some of the most interesting things you found looking at the manuscripts of the piano and orchestral versions of the piece?

TB: I’m always fascinated by looking at a composer’s hand written manuscripts, especially when you can find clues about their working process or the piece’s evolution. In this case, I was surprised to find that the original title was “Fantaisie pour Cor”. This title was clearly written on the title page, then crossed out and replaced with “Morceau de Concert pour Cor.” Also–and even more interesting–the main theme was originally quite different. Before Saint-Saens changed his mind, the horn part began with a stepwise melody rather than the arpeggiated figure that we all know. In the foreword to our edition, we also describe some of Saint-Saens’ shorthand techniques, which partly serve to bolster our assertion that the piano version was more of a preliminary sketch than a complete composition.

JE: One question I have had as well is what was the original instrument that this was composed for? It is obviously not natural horn.

TB: The piece was written for the omnitonic horn, which was a generic term for many different horn designs during a time when horn makers were trying to develop a system that allowed players to play in multiple keys without changing crooks. Saint-Saens dedicated the piece to Henri Chaussier, who had invented his own design for an omnitonic horn. Claude Maury, at the Paris Conservatoire, has written an extensive article (in French) on Chaussier and his horn. There are great pictures and musical examples showing the fingering system of Chaussier’s horn.

JE: So, where can you buy this edition?

TB: It’s published by Faust Music. I approached Randall Faust about publishing it, because he was the host of the 2009 IHS Symposium, where Andrew Adams and I first presented some of our research about the piece. I’m very happy that he added it to his catalog. It sells for $15.

JE: Thank you for your work to bring new light to an old standard!

A new horn for Ewan

0

A new horn for Ewan
Among horn players, this video of a young Ewan McGregor playing a French horn is fairly well-known.


According to Daily Record, the actor purchased a new horn recently.

FILM star Ewan McGregor has finally bought a new French horn – 27 years after borrowing one for his TV debut.

And, after blowing £3000 on the instrument, the actor paid tribute to his former music teacher.

(More.)

 Bonus: Random meme

[Extracted from a “Random Monday” post, 2021, JE]

Hornmasters: Yancich and Fox on the High Range

Continuing our series, we have more ideas for developing the high range.

Breath accents?

In A Practical Guide to French Horn Playing Milan Yancich suggested when warming up to apply the concept of breath accents to aid in high register production.

In applying the breath accent… one’s attention is drawn to the source of his breath power in playing the horn. It is important that when going for the higher notes and especially the top note of the arpeggio, the force of the air in the breath accent rather than a squeezing of the lips or a violent pressing of the mouthpiece should help attain the note. It is far better to make the correct approach to the high note and miss it than to get the note by squeezing out a tight, small tone. Eventually one develops the feel of securing the high notes by having the tone ride on the air.

A different way to think of aperture control

This series has been looking in each installment at books in chronological order by date of publication, so next we turn to Fred Fox. Fox has much to say on this topic of quite a bit different nature than other authors. In a chapter titled “The Key to High Notes” in Essentials of Brass Playing Fox points to a way of visualizing aperture control, inside the mouthpiece, to focus high range production.

The embouchure consists of two pairs of separate control muscles. The corner pair, the ones used when pronouncing “eeeeee,” and the middle pair, the ones used to pronounce “mmmmmmmmmmm.” It is possible to tighten the corner pair and keep the middle pair relaxed. Conversely, it is possible to tighten the middle pair and keep the corner pair relaxed. Try it. Notice that you can control the corner or middle muscles separately. If the embouchure consisted of one muscle only, the corner and middle muscles could not be controlled independently of each other.

The tendency, as one goes to the upper register, is to tighten the corner muscles and increase the mouthpiece pressure. The lip area inside the mouthpiece remains comparatively relaxed. Obviously, beyond a certain point, there can be no high notes possible with the vibrating area inside the mouthpiece too relaxed, no matter how much the corner muscles strain, and no matter how much the mouthpiece is pressed into the lips. The “safe” won’t open unless the middle muscles are tensed properly.

The middle muscles must be exercised and developed consciously for high notes….

Changes of notes are made with the middle muscles spearheading the action, the corner muscles acting only as secondary support to the middle muscles. If the middle muscles do not tighten properly, then at a certain point, no matter how much mouthpiece pressure is applied, no matter how much the corner muscles tighten, the flaccid lip vibration inside the mouthpiece will not give you higher notes. Nothing will occur.

Tighten the lip area inside the mouthpiece consciously. Use that action in all registers primarily, and you are on your way to greater facility and better higher notes.

Try the “eeeee” and “mmmmm” idea out, it gets at a bit different concept of aperture control than that presented by Farkas.

Getting toward the idea of “support”

Fox also offers the following suggestion to obtain the best sound on the highest note in a phrase. First, Fox reminds us that for his purposes he calls “the abdominal muscle above the belt line the upper diaphragm, and the abdominal muscles below the belt line the lower diaphragm.”

It is common for high notes to tend to sound somewhat strained. The cause is a tight throat. This tightness can be overcome.

…The upper note will sound freer when you harden the lower diaphragm at the moment of attack. The vowel sound does get smaller with the upper note. The lower diaphragm kick is only used to keep the throat open….

If the lower diaphragm is hardened before the attack, there is no beneficial effect. If the lower diaphragm hardens after the note is played, there is no beneficial effect. It must harden at the moment of the attack, like a tug on a rope to be effective….

There is one physical act that opens the throat. That is sudden tensing of the lower diaphragm. This action causes the throat to open up more, sympathetically.

…The basic purpose of the downward kick is to neutralize the throat, keeping it the same opening on the high not as when the lower note was played…. Simply enough the kick is used to keep the throat from tightening.

I call this “the accordion effect.” Visualize an accordion being squeezed together, then expanded. Imagine the same accordion being played in a vertical position….

Rule: The lower diaphragm kick can be used for the highest note of any phrase in any register. It sets the best and fullest sound for the high note, which is the most important note of a phrase. The lower diaphragm relaxes after the highest note is played and thus can be used again whenever the next highest note occurs. With some practice the “accordion effect” will keep the throat open at all times. This is one of the most important factors in effective wind playing tone production.

Of course, as presented in the preliminary article to this topic, elements of what he is saying are clearly only visualizations. Any good instruction, taken to extreme, can lead you to problems. But hopefully his instructions will still be helpful ones for readers, and to his credit I like that he is willing to talk about the throat at all. A lot of teachers studiously avoid the topic, with the idea being if you even mention it you will create problems by thinking about it too much.

When the series returns we have even more tips on the high range.

Continue in Hornmasters Series

Ask Dave: How Do I Fix the Cork on my Water Key?

0

Tyler asks:

Hey Dave! The cork on my water key is leaking and needs to be replaced. I’m not seeing anywhere to buy a pre-shaped cork online, only small discs in various diameters. Any advice other than getting a wine cork and carving it down?

Thanks!

Dave replies:

Worn corks leak air until they leak water, so replacing a worn cork is important.

Your problem seems to be that you want a cork of a certain shape. Corks may be made of several different materials, from actual cork to synthetic materials of various types. They have three basic profiles: discs, tapered, and shaped (or “mushroom”) corks. Decide which profile you need to replace your current cork.

They also come in various diameters, which is usually the smallest diameter of the cork. You will need to measure the inside diameter of your water key, which presents a problem: how to do this without destroying the cork you depend upon to seal up your instrument? Don’t destroy it. Just order several sizes.

MOST water key corks for horn water keys are 8.5mm, 9.0mm, or 9.5mm in diameter. If you don’t know the diameter of your water key, I suggest you order one of each size. If you’re not sure which profile to order, I suggest you try the tapered corks, first.

Order your corks from a repair shop.

Almost EVERY repair shop can supply you with one or more type of water key cork in small quantities, which should be inexpensive enough to be affordable. You may have to call to order, because few repair shops bother putting water key corks for sale on their web sites.

To remove the old cork, stick a pin in the side of the cork. Gently heat the back of the pad cup that holds the cork. I use a butane grill lighter, eight to ten seconds. Open the water key and gently pull the cork out using the pin. It should just come right out.

Synthetic corks often have an adhesive backing. Natural corks need a tiny drop of cement to hold them in place. Press fit may work, but it’s best to have adhesive to secure your cork in place.

Dry fit the cork to be sure it fits the pad cup, then apply a tiny drop of adhesive if necessary, and push the cork into the pad cup. Put the small side into the pad cup. Test your water key to be sure the cork fits and that it’s not leaking.

Open the water key and make sure there is clearance and that the cork does not fall out. Done!

* * *

Image credit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wine_Corks.jpg

Hornmasters: Farkas and Schuller on the High Range

High range development is nearly universally a major goal of students of the horn. There are a lot of approaches out there to consider carefully.

An embouchure focused approach

Philip Farkas in The Art of French Horn Playing felt that the most critical element in developing the high range was the embouchure.

The very highest notes demand, above all else, a strong, well-developed embouchure. This muscular strength is gained, as in all physical endeavor, by constant exercise of the muscles involved. Therefore, the first requisite of a good high register is to play in it often enough and long enough.

Besides reminders about avoiding mouthpiece pressure and to use plenty of air, he presents the following as his central embouchure related idea.

As it is of utmost importance in obtaining a free sound in the high notes, let me again reiterate that the tension comes in toward the center from the corners of the mouth and not from a clamping together of the upper and lower lips. Keep the lower jaw and chin down!

The diaphragm is very important in this high register. The lip opening is of such small size and the tension of the lips so strong that there is considerably more resistance to the air-stream than is found in the middle register. Therefore, in ascending to the highest notes, one has almost to make a crescendo with the air in order to avoid making a diminuendo in sound. This is accomplished by steadily increasing the pressure underneath the diaphragm. At this time, good use can also be made of the definite striving to allow the air to escape through the lips with very little impedance.

A folksy analogy

Farkas was a firm believer in this approach and explains it further with a typical folksy analogy later in the chapter, where he states

Finally, but very important to the success of obtaining high notes easily, there is the knack of lipping the notes up or down with almost a “flick” of the lip … inside the mouthpiece … a “mouthing” such as a goldfish makes; a “mouthing” similar to saying a series of the letter “P”, P-P-P-P-P, however, without ever closing the lips entirely. The result, when properly done, produces a slur from note to note which jumps into place so easily that there is almost no effort connected with it….

Airstream direction as a key element

Other teachers would react to this advice as certainly his advice goes against the idea of rolling the lip down or in, including for example just a few years later Gunther Schuller. He states in Horn Technique that

The direction of the air stream is controlled by the jaw and teeth positions I have described…. Obviously, a slightly forward position of the lower teeth will direct the air more horizontally, while a receding jaw position will point the air stream correspondingly lower. Such jaw movements also alter the angle of the mouthpiece in relation to the air stream. It is in this connection that I have found a slight ‘riding up’ on the upper lip for the extreme high register very helpful. It too helps to direct the air stream in a more vertical line, at a reflection point in the cup which is closer to the rim than to the bore.

I believe that Schuller is getting at a more physiologically accurate approach in his desire for the air stream to hit a more vertical position as you approach the high range.

However, there is more to high range production than muscle and air. When we return to this series we will have more on the topic from Milan Yancich and Fred Fox.

Continue Reading in Hornmasters Series

A Very Ornate Reynolds Horn

From Ray Noguera’s Musical Instrument Engraving page on Facebook, we have pictures of a very ornately engraved Reynolds French horn from the 1970’s. According to Mr. Noguera, it was a “show” instrument built to attract attention at trade shows. The horn was engraved before and after assembly and has engraving over 80% of the instrument.

Click on any image for a closer look.

If you are on Facebook, be sure to check out Ray Noguera’s Musical Instrument Engraving for many more pictures of engraved instruments.

[Extracted from a “Random Monday” post by JE, 2021]