Home Blog Page 9

Accuracy Encyclopedia: Well Duh!?! and More

0

Continuing our look at accuracy and the letters D and E, our first topic is the descant horn, which can certainly help accuracy in many situations.

Descant horns

But backing up a step, in recent years the triple horn has had a lot of attention, overshadowing in many respects the descant. A descant is most typically constructed as a double horn in Bb/high F, and a triple is most commonly in F/Bb/high F.

The triple horn is a great, all-purpose instrument for an established orchestral high horn player, as you have the big sound we associate with a double horn but also the high F side available for improved accuracy.

But the descant certainly still has its place in lighter literature in the high range. For just one example, while you could play the Berlioz Queen Mab excerpt on a standard double, it would be better on a triple and better still on a descant. Why? With the descant you not only have the high F side but also it is a lighter instrument, you can really dial the dynamic down and float out the high notes. The only time I ever got a solo acknowledgement on a series concert when I played Third Horn in Nashville was after the Queen Mab Scherzo – which I played on a descant.

Oh, and I have a book on descant and triple horns. More on that here. 

Don’t be a hero

The next topic in my book draft was the simple thought to not be a hero. I still think you will generally be the most accurate if you trust yourself and go for it, but if you know it is not going to come out, as my dad used to say, “discretion is the better part of valor.”

Dynamics

There are some variables that come in with playing at various dynamics which it is worth considering in relation to accuracy.

In particular, pitch level can vary at different dynamics and this element must be under control. This is one of the reasons why long tones with crescendos and diminuendos are absolutely essential exercises; if the pitch drifts at different dynamics, accuracy will suffer. Related to that, when you are in the center of the tone on the horn will have the best tone color. Focus on this tone color, as when you are drifting sharp the tone will get thin.

Well Duh!?!

Some years ago, I posted an article (here) on Horn Matters with the title “Well, Duh!?!, a Key to Accuracy.” The article is one I believe I have considered cutting from the site several times (it is early Horn Matters content, written more like a personal blog post), but the thought it gives on articulation is a solid one that could be expanded upon considerably.

Short version for now is that tonguing is quite impactful on accuracy, and “D” (“Duh”) is a much better default syllable than “T.”

The Ear

A final topic for this installment is the Ear, one touched on already and one that will be touched on more.

This time I would like to highlight that the ear controls your overall pitch level in ways you may not recognize, and may lead you astray. One big example is that you can pull slides out on a horn almost indefinitely and still be sharp if you are simply used to hearing the notes sharp and are using your ear to guide the embouchure to place the notes sharp. A tuner is a great investment! Use it often as it really doesn’t lie; it can be a great tool to retrain your ear.

Related to that thought, I find it interesting that players will tend to drift up in pitch level when playing by themselves as opposed to playing in an ensemble. Holding pitch level well is an important skill to master – you need to stay on pitch and in the center consistently to play the most accurately.

Continue reading in the series

This is an installment of a series on accuracy, drawn from notes developed for a book on the same topic. The series starts here.

AI Recordings of Mozart Horn Concertos

0

This year I’ve been listening mostly to LP recordings in my office. In my collection, I have a number of different Mozart concerto recordings, including multiple versions by Alan Civil. Seemed like everyone recorded them in the LP era.

Following the lead of my Horn Matters colleague Bruce Hembd, in the fall I was fiddling around on the Bing AI image creator and had the idea to make LP album covers for various fictional artists. One of them apparently feeling the need to record them twice, but that way we can enjoy his early and later interpretations.

There are some quirky horns and spellings to be sure, AI images have limitations, but I still think an interesting project. Enjoy.

P.S., This first one, if only we could really hear Leuitgeb play Mozart …

 

Vienna Horns, part II: Playing this Vienna Horn

In Part I (here) I mentioned that I only recently have had the opportunity to play a Vienna horn that, to my feeling of responsiveness, plays well. It is borrowed from a local collection, and I’ve played on it for the majority of my practice in recent weeks.

A key thing was I rebuilt a crook that had been left incomplete by a prior user. The horn itself is a Haagston Pizka model. With the original crook the horn was just stuffy no matter what mouthpiece I used, but the new crook brought things much more into focus. The story of that new crook and rebuilding it is told more fully in my personal blog (here).

I’m enjoying playing this horn, but there are a number of almost “elephant in the room” topics worth looking at one by one. The first one having already been touched on, you need a good crook, it can make a huge difference. Related to that we have

Intonation and fingerings

So, with a modern horn, you pick one up with the very reasonable expectation that if you have the slides adjusted correctly and an appropriate mouthpiece the horn should play in tune.

On the original crook and the new crook there are a couple rather bad notes on this Haagston/Pizka horn. The A on the second space, it is pretty out fingered 12 but is good fingered 3, so that I can work with. (I was interested to see a video of the Vienna Philharmonic playing the opening of Mahler 3, some players fingered the note 12, some 3, must be dependent on the horn what is better).

The really bad note is D on the fourth line. Fingered open it is incredibly sharp and every other alternate fingering is very flat. And you play D a lot! The solution seems to be to play it open (which is very stable) but either bend the note down with the lip or cover it more with the hand (or a combination of both). When it goes by quickly you don’t notice the intonation, most of the correction is done on more sustained, key notes.

Why this note is so bad I have no idea but it must be something to do with the construction of the horn body. This joint being a bit suspect, the ferrule is a bit off, it makes one wonder what is going on inside there acoustically.

For more on the topic of fingerings, see this article for the fingerings used by the great Vienna horn master Roland Berger.

The F on the top of the staff

On this horn the F on the top of the staff is really quite good. Back a year ago I had another article related to Vienna horns, inspired by a quote in an article in the May 2022 issue of The Horn Call on Vienna horns. In a section of tips, authors Kulmer, Dorfmayr, and Nuzzo present a potentially useful trick:

Wire. A trick commonly used on the Wiener Horn is to insert a wire in the tube, just a normal electric wire you can buy in any electrical equipment shop. The reason for this is to adjust the note f” [written F at the top of the staff], which is played by pressing the 1st valve on the Wiener Horn, making it much more centered. This trick, although used by many players, is usually not supported by manufacturers. The fun fact is that it not only fixes the precision of f”, but inexplicably, the sound of the whole instrument is just better. The theory is that the wire helps the soundwave float (or floating knots). As weird as it sounds, but also the fact that the wire is harder, softer, with or without the internal metallic part has a big influence. It is also likely that the induced physical change is actually minimal, yet enough to give the player a better feeling of playing, leading to a better sound.

Again, I feel that F is pretty good on this Haagston/Pizka horn, but I tried the wire anyway, who knows, would it be even better? An electrical wire with the insulation on placed in the first valve crook was really not good, but a wire with the insulation stripped was pretty decent on the F, maybe better. But every action has consequences, the high Bb became very unstable. So, for this horn, no wire is best, but for yours, who knows? They are pretty emphatic about this being helpful.

Adjustments I make (automatically)

The key thing in my personal bag of tricks would be an adjustment I make automatically at this point in how I tongue. This was really perfected when I made my CD on the single F horn and played nothing but that horn for months; I have to tongue lighter and higher in the mouth in the higher range. If I approach it like I would on a double horn, the articulations will be nothing but rough. Related to that, overall, on historic horns I tongue lighter, adjusting to the horn, listening for the results I want.

[The CD is of course on YouTube, the full album is here.]

There is one other adjustment I make automatically that works against me on this horn. Most of the historic horns I use have Seraphinoff tapers in the crooks and have a similar feel and intonation tendencies. Both of the crooks I have for the Haagston/Pizka horn have similar but very different tendencies compared to my other horns, and I have to use a tuner a lot as I sort out those different tendencies.

Valve feel and action

Here is another topic that is a difficult one to describe. When you change valves in slurs, the feel is excellent in terms of the sound. But the valve action itself is slow and heavy, which may be why people have made rotary valve versions of Vienna horns.

If it was all you ever used I’m sure you would get used to it, but I’d really rather not play anything very technical on Vienna valves.

Tone in the upper range

This horn has a lovely tone with the better crook. A common feature I think of all vintage single F horns is that in the upper range the sound is distinctive and unmistakable – it is different than the modern horn for sure.

On the modern double horn, at least as typically used in the USA, we play on the F horn mostly from second line G down, and above that note we play on the Bb horn. The Bb horn has also a very distinctive sound in that range and we are totally used to hearing that as it is normal to us.

You can get some of the impact of that distinctive F horn sound on your double horn by using the F side, but it is not the same as the instrument is heavier and your articulations will have a rougher quality.

To experience this F horn sound is one of the reasons to seek out a Vienna horn or any other quality, crooked horn from the 19th century.

Volume

A final playing topic I’d bring up is volume. It is difficult to quantify exactly in just personal practice in the spaces I use. But I’d offer these observations.

This Vienna horn, relative to my rotary valve single horns, it can also put out a lot of sound without breaking up. I would credit that to the heavy bell present on this horn and the wide nickel silver garland.

That having been said, my perception is that my Patterson Geyer double puts out a LOT more actual sound. Which is to say, there are reasons why you don’t see Vienna horns mixed in sections with conventional double horns or even single horns of different designs. The sound I think would get lost in a conventional, modern orchestral horn section.

Is it a Vienna horn?

This photo brings me back to a topic mentioned in Part I and touched on again above, is a Vienna horn with rotary valves a Vienna horn? This photo is a well-known portrait of the horn section the Johann Strauss orchestra in 1869. From left to right the horn players are Morawetz, Sabaz, Radnitzky, and Schantl – the great Josef Schantl (1842-1902), Principal Horn of the Imperial and Royal Court Opera and the Vienna Philharmonic, credited also with founding the Vienna Waldhornverein. Among many significant performances he performed on the premieres of Brahms second and third symphonies, and also the third and eighth symphonies of Bruckner. Look closely at his horn in the photo – it is one of those rotary valve horns made on the pattern of a Vienna horn. I believe he had no issue blending with these colleagues. And I should add, other portraits of Shantl show him holding a conventional Vienna horn, he made use of both types. A horn merely being a tool in the hands of the artist.

[There is a nice article on a horn of this general type in the R. J. Martz website, which also credits this photo to the Pizka collection, published in the April 1984 issue of The Horn Call.]

In any case, I’m enjoying playing this Vienna horn. Drawing inspiration from Schantl, I’ve been playing his etudes often (especially the ones reprinted as the Pottag Preparatory Melodies and the additional ones I included in my publication, 35 Melodic Etudes) and also excerpts from Brahms and Bruckner. When the series returns, we will look more at where the Vienna horn fits in the musical world of the 19th century.

Continue to Part III of the Vienna Horn series

Vienna Horns, part I: What is (and isn’t) a Vienna Horn

Astute readers of Horn Matters might have noticed that I have rarely written about Vienna horns. Not that there is no content, but relative to the deep and continued interest in the Vienna horn I have not written much at all.

Like most Horn Matters readers, I first noticed the unique design from videos of the Vienna Philharmonic. A Vienna horn is a single F, but much more exciting than any standard single F you might have played as a beginner.

Blame my dissertation

By the time I was thinking about dissertation topics I had decided to focus on the early valved horn in Germany – which means I was focused mostly on horns with rotary valves. I looked at it all pretty deeply in “The Development of Valved Horn Technique in Early Nineteenth-Century Germany: A Survey of Performers and Works Before 1850 With Respect to the Use of Crooks, Right Hand Technique, Transposition, and Valves” (Indiana University, 1995).

Eventually I recorded a CD on a rotary valve single horn with crooks (more on that here), and I have modified several horns to imitate 19th century rotary horn designs (especially during my sabbatical), including horns with crooks, that I use often and enjoy playing (more here).

So, what is a Vienna horn?

Visually, it is a very 19th-century design. There are a number of features to consider, including the use of a crook, pitch level in F, and the bore and bell size. But when you get to it the most central feature is that a Vienna horn has Vienna valves.

Vienna valves are a type of piston valve, sometimes referred to as double piston valves. They operate as pairs of small valves that are connected together, as seen in this illustration. The historical summary of the design I included in my dissertation (as subsequently posted in Horn Articles Online) is as follows:

This valve design, patented [see endnote] in 1823 by Viennese instrument maker Joseph Riedl (d. 1840) and hornist Josef Kail (1795-1871), had actually been produced as early as 1819 by instrument maker C. F. Sattler (1778-1842) of Leipzig and possibly earlier by Stölzel and Blühmel [Dahlqvist, 111, 114, and 123. Leopold Ulhmann of Vienna also held an 1830 patent on an improved Vienna valve]. The use of two pistons for each valve loop made for a more consistent bore and eliminated the potential problem of back pressure found in the single-piston Stölzel valve. However, when a Vienna valve is depressed it introduces two sharp 90-degree angles into the windway, and also introduces two sudden constrictions of approximately 8% in the bore, neither of which assist in the response of the instrument [Merewether, 31]. It should be noted that the Stölzel valve shares these same defects of design. German players favored the Vienna valve until the 1850s [Carse, 222], while Austrian players continued to used it throughout the nineteenth century and beyond.

SOURCES:

Adam Carse, Musical Wind Instruments (London: Macmillan, 1939; reprint, New York: Da Capo, 1965).

Reine Dahlqvist, “Some Notes on the Early Valve,” The Galpin Society Journal 33 (March, 1980), 111-124.

Richard Merewether, “The Vienna-Horn–And Some Thoughts on its Past Fifty Years,” The Horn Call 15, no. 1 (October, 1984), 31-35.

Reflecting now, I’m a bit skeptical of that final statement drawn from Carse, it would be one that could be researched out more. And reality is you don’t notice the 8% constriction that Merewether mentions.

Are there Vienna horns with rotary valves?

Worth also mentioning, there are horns built with the same layout as a Vienna horn, but with rotary valves. They have been around since the early years of valves and are interesting horns for sure. I’d love to own one or build one someday.

Without the distinctive Vienna valves they are not considered by some to be Vienna horns. Vienna horns have Vienna valves! Personally, I would call them a type of Vienna horn, as so many of the other design features are the same — only the valve section is different — and historically these rotary instruments existed alongside the Vienna valve instruments.

However, if the layout of a rotary valve horn is otherwise different, it is not a Vienna horn. It is a crooked, rotary valve horn, of the type that I have worked with the most personally. A rotary valve Vienna horn would certainly have the valve section placed in the same location as the Vienna valves and take exactly the type of crook used on a Vienna horn. If the crook is larger or smaller, the design has clearly diverged significantly away from that of the Vienna horn.

Finally, I would add that this is a topic on which opinions differ, but for sure the pro players of the Vienna horn today all use horns with Vienna valves, and you are safest to stick with that as what we call a Vienna horn today. I’ll have a bit more on this in Part II.

And I didn’t have a Vienna horn

Another reason I have not looked at the Vienna horn that much is I did not have a Vienna horn to use beyond very limited testing.

When one became available to me recently I was also initially not very impressed. I’ll talk about that more in Part II, as I was able to rework an unfinished crook for that horn and it plays rather better on the finished crook! A good crook is a necessity! Made a huge difference. A sneak peek look at that crook may be found here. 

Another introduction to the instrument

To close Part I of this series, Anneke Scott presents a great introduction to the Vienna horn in this video, and I’ll be back soon with Part II.

Continue to Part II of Vienna Horns series

Accuracy Encyclopedia: Centering and More

0

We now come to the letter C. There are several entries under the letter C in the book draft, thoughts to consider that will help with accuracy, which I will bundle together.

Center the pitch

One thing that will help accuracy is to play as much as possible at the center of the pitch.

This may seem like an obvious statement, but it should be mentioned that there is an alternate school of thought that says the secret is to play slightly below the center of the pitch. In a sense both schools are correct, they are just defining the center a bit differently.

On any horn, you have some freedom to bend the pitch, some horns more, some horns less, a freedom that is also impacted by mouthpiece choice. There is a range of motion over which you can bend the pitch sharp or flat without it breaking or jumping to another note. The upper limit is somewhat firm; on the downward side, you can normally bend the pitch somewhat further, especially in the lower range. Within the range that you can bend each pitch there is a central portion of the range of motion that is more stable, that is to say, there is a boundary at which you cannot bend the pitch easily down or up but you can pass this point if you force the pitch hard. Speaking very generally, the location you want to place the pitch in is at the lower end of this central, more stable area of the pitch for any given note on the horn.

I have come to call the ideal pitch placement the “resonant center” of the pitch. This location can be found either by “feel” or by listening to the tone color. There is a “sweet spot” where the tone is the most resonant and beautiful, a “pocket” that is a stable location you can place any note in.

Chops

The chops are certainly important and intimately related to accuracy. You must keep fresh physically and mentally to play at your best! If my chops feel good I feel that I should expect to play well, but if they feel bad it is like I already have two strikes against me and plenty of reason to feel anxious. Chops for me also relate to the buzz behind the notes; if you are buzzing on center you should not miss.

Clear mental picture

Part of hearing the note clearly is having a clear mental picture of what you are trying to play before you play it. One of the most important foundations to this is listening to music. It may seem like an obvious aid, but you have to have that mental model in place to know if you are getting the desired result or not. For more on this topic see Audiation

Conductors and cues

There is a short series of articles in Horn Matters related to the topic of conductors and horn players (here). Conductors like to try to help you, but they can really make accuracy difficult. The big cue is especially not a good idea. A conductor should give a cue that shows trust for the hornist, communicating that they feel you can do it.

Confident playing

I say this to students often. Years ago, I figured out that I tend to be more accurate if I just go for it. It is counterintuitive, but when you play on the careful side you tend to miss more. If you are a teacher, you need to encourage students to play confidently – GO FOR IT! – they will be more accurate. Trust that you will get it – with a trust based on practice, good chops, etc.

Connections between fingerings and sounds

There is certainly a connection between fingerings and sounds built up over time. This can really become obvious when you try to play another related instrument with different fingerings such as a descant horn or with no fingerings such as a natural horn.

You can embrace this and make use of consistent fingerings to enhance accuracy. It is probably also a function of repetitions, but when you can hear/feel for example 4th space D (T12!) in your heart, your accuracy will be enhanced.

This is an installment of a series on accuracy, drawn from notes developed for a book on the same topic. The series starts here.

More Memes for Horn Players and Teachers

Some more memes from my fall meme project. Brief comments after each one.

My story with Kopprasch 1. You?

This is a quote from the Farquarson Cousins book.

Sometimes it feels that way.

This is a quote from the Farkas book. Personally, this is about the funniest one in this article, but it may just be a horn teacher thing.

Kind of random but sometimes the trills are a bit much.

This is based on a quote in the Harry Berv book on building endurance.

This might be another Verne Reynolds quote.

This is based on something a friend had requested of them in a lesson. Playing Neuling that way would be quite the low range workout.

And something a little brighter close. Ahh, about time for some Maxime-Alphonse. Oh, and I’ll add one more — I think I’m past the meme making for a while now.

Memes: Updated Verne Reynolds Memes

Back in 2014 I posted an article (here) comprised of “Hornist Hamster” memes that were all Verne Reynolds quotes. It is kind of a niche type of meme, but in any case this fall I got inspired to revisit them and apply the Reynolds quotes to a variety of meme templates. A group of them are below, enjoy! Some were heard from friends or are quotes from his book. When appropriate I’ve added brief notes on them as well.

UPDATE: Added way at the end is one new one, hat tip to Horn People group for a quote from page 71 of his book. It applies really to any etude number 10.

Hey Vern! I mean Verne.

I know he liked my very fast single tonguing.

Very wise words.

This next one is inspired by something he said in a lesson, he considered Strauss 2, Gliere, and Gordon Jacob to be the 3 big concertos for horn.

He said the below in one of my lessons.

Oh, said this too.

And this.

This next one, I’m not sure if he was quoting someone else or not (Farkas said something similar), but it was said in a lesson of mine and probably to other students. It was meant ironically/negatively, not as humor.

Finally, this last one is based on a quote I wrote down in my notes the very first time I met Reynolds. He was giving a master class at Wichita State and I was a senior at Emporia State, I went to Eastman for MM study the following fall. The actual quote is he was listening primarily for “Accuracy, Intonation, and Rhythm.” At the time I wrote in my notes what about musicality? Remember, that is exceedingly important too.

UPDATE: This is in reference to Maxime-Alphonse book 6, but applies to any etude book really.

Looking back: How did I learn to play short notes and single tongue quickly?

0

The related topics of playing short notes and tonguing quickly come up in lessons all the time.

At some point every horn player must learn how to play very short notes, a very dry and pointed staccato. I know some of the ways I go about teaching these skills, and I know how some other teachers do it, but thinking back now it is an interesting question to me — how did I actually learn the skill? And also, fast single tonguing?

Somehow, I figured it out on my own

I had to go back to my cassette tape collection to find the oldest audition tape that I still have. It was recorded in the spring of my freshman year of college, and on it I played the third movement of the Ralph Hermann concerto. It is not a very well-known piece, but it was on a James Chambers record in our listening lab, and there was sheet music in the main library at Emporia State.

The recording was made as an audition tape for the Kansas Bandmasters Association Intercollegiate Band. At the time I was playing a Holton 177 horn with a MDC, and it was before I had any lessons with a horn playing horn teacher! (And I was still on my original 2/3 lower lip embouchure, and maybe even before I read the Farkas book). I was very green. While my high school band director (Mr. Hodges) was a horn player, I never had any lessons with him (although he did show me how to hold the horn, etc.). By the middle of high school I was taking lessons – and my first two “horn” teachers were both trombonists (!), including Mr. Nixon, who had become my major professor in school. I started college as (of all things) a music business major.

Mr. Nixon had been the band director at Emporia State for some years, but by this point was teaching music education classes and the horn studio. Of his instruction, I only recall low-key, low-pressure instructions. I don’t remember him emphasizing short articulations, dynamics, fast tonguing, etc. But clearly, I was doing them rather well on this recording in my freshman year. I suspect he wanted me to do those things well, too, but had non-demanding tactics to get them, honed from his years of being a band director.

Don’t over teach

Which is to say yet again, “over teaching” of certain skills can lead to having problems doing those same skills. I try to be very careful of this in my teaching, but, of course, when someone has trouble with skills you have to find ways to try to make them better. But I’m glad that Mr. Nixon did not push me real hard with tons of suggestions — he let me work it out myself.

“Normal Kopprasch”

I worked through Kopprasch etude by etude as an undergrad, starting during my freshman year of college. I still have (and use) my original copy.

I would add that Mr. Nixon had me do Kopprasch 1 in exactly one lesson and I’ve never gone back to it ever again with a horn teacher. Teachers that are extremely demanding with Kopprasch 1 in particular puzzle me a little, but I’m sure they have specific things they are looking for (attention to detail, etc.).

The very demanding teacher and “extreme Kopprasch”

I could name names, but certain teachers pride themselves on being very demanding in Kopprasch. I’m not convinced this is the best use of time, but certainly within some studios a Kopprasch Club does become a thing that unites them (against a common enemy!).

Returning to the demanding teacher topic, I have shared before how for me Verne Reynolds was the very demanding teacher. He certainly fine-tuned my ability to play very short articulations and extreme dynamics, but we never did Kopprasch in any lessons! I used Maxime-Alphonse book 4 with him and the Barbeteu Vingt Etudes Concertantes Pour Cor. And he very much liked my very fast single tonguing — at one point he told me (and this is a direct quote) “John, you tongue like a one-eyed black snake.”

The effective teacher

I try when I can (in the big and small picture) to teach prescriptively, to use materials that relate to problems that need solved. All teaching is with individual students, and so many factors relate. It often takes a while to peel down the layers of the onion to try to find the most natural and effective approach. But then again, often enough you can make a lot of progress in the right direction quickly with just simple suggestions. Because,

Learning styles do vary

Fortunately for me, Mr. Nixon was very low key on all of this and with only gentle instructions and encouragement I got a great start. For others, this might not work – a more direct approach with very specific instructions and demands could be the answer. In any case though, I was intrigued to listen again to freshman John Ericson playing horn. Some rough edges for sure (and no low range!) but I could certainly tongue short notes and single tongue quite fast (and get up to a high C#!) before I had had regular lessons with a horn playing teacher. Makes me kind of glad in a way that I did not start traditionally, and in a time with no social media.

Accuracy Encyclopedia: Breath Attacks and Buzzing

0

There are two entries under “B,” the topics of breath attacks and buzzing. Both have positive and negative points to consider.

Breath attacks, a risky strategy

There is a section in the Hornmasters series on the topic of breath attacks. It is a somewhat controversial topic, as it can be risky.

How so? I think what happens is people get afraid of their tonguing setup and shift to trying not to tongue at all. This is not the reason to do a breath attack!

Breath attacks, a helpful tool

How breath attacks help is they help you better define your synchronization overall. Tonguing of any attack needs to be done in just one motion, nothing stops. The breath attack should be exactly the same overall motion, with just the addition of tonguing to give even more definition. But you should be starting the note essentially the same way as a breath attack, the only difference is you don’t articulate with the tongue.

Try it! You may be pleasantly surprised how breath attacks are a valuable practice technique. But I would suggest avoiding breath attacks in any real musical context. (Although the opening of Oberon overture might be, for example, a good passage to start as a breath attack, depending on your comfort).

Buzzing: Not like horn playing

Over in the Hornmasters series there is information to be found on Buzzing from the Brophy book. Brophy was a fan of buzzing, but not all horn teachers are.

My own teachers ranged from neutral to negative on mouthpiece buzzing. For some for sure part of the problem was that they understood that a buzz that sounds good on a mouthpiece does not sound good on a horn, and that a buzz that sounds good on a horn sounds hollow and unfocused on a mouthpiece alone.

Buzzing as a practice technique for accuracy

That being said, for years I have found buzzing on the mouthpiece to be a great tool toward accuracy. It confirms clearly if you have the mental picture of the music correct, and if you have the physical control to make that mental picture happen. If you find yourself missing a note in a passage, buzz the passage and it will be clear why you are missing it.

Testing a first note pitch before the entrance on the mouthpiece is another great tool to apply to accuracy. A BERP can be a handy tool in this regard too.

This is an installment of a series on accuracy, drawn from notes developed for a book on the same topic.

Continue in the Accuracy Encyclopedia

Accuracy Encyclopedia: Audiation and Autopilot

0

Finishing up the “A” topics, we have audiation and autopilot

Audiation, or, hearing what you plan to play before you play it

It is harder to accurately play music that you can’t “pre-hear” in your head. One angle on understanding this is audiation, for which The Gordon Institute for Music Learning offers this helpful description. Audiation is

… a cognitive process by which the brain gives meaning to musical sounds. Audiation is the musical equivalent of thinking in language. When we listen to someone speak we must retain in memory their vocal sounds long enough to recognize and give meaning to the words the sounds represent. Likewise, when listening to music we are at any given moment organizing in audiation sounds that were recently heard. We also predict, based on our familiarity with the tonal and rhythmic conventions of the music being heard, what will come next. Audiation, then, is a multistage process ….

The part about predicting what will come next is an especially important one in relation to accuracy. Even in unfamiliar music, if it is predictably tonal, you can anticipate the chords and where the voice leading might be going. Also, by repetitions of music in personal practice or rehearsal, you have a stronger feeling of where the music is going (not to mention if you have listened to recordings!).

This only scratches the surface of an important topic. For more, check the Gordon website already linked.

Autopilot

This seems like bad advice, but there is something to be said for playing on autopilot, not particularly thinking about anything related to accuracy. Just play and trust that automatic processes will allow you to be accurate.

But how? Actually, part of it is our previous topic, audiation. You know how the music goes because you know or anticipate how it will go. And another part of that was also just touched on, if you have played many repetitions of something, you will tend to reproduce it more accurately over time due to a combination of many factors.

For a practical angle on this, to have audition success you need to be able to play excerpts very well on sort of a high-level autopilot. The mind is quiet, you are simply just playing in the moment and allowing your automatic process to produce the music. Again, it sounds like bad advice but I relied on this for sure when I was taking my 30 professional auditions back in the day.

And put another way, when has trying to be more accurate helped? There is a point where you just have to trust yourself that you know it as well as you can – and then just play it.

This is an installment of a series on accuracy, drawn from notes developed for a book on the same topic. The series starts here.

Continue reading the Accuracy Encyclopedia