Home Blog Page 149

Is the French Horn the Hardest Instrument to Play?

I can’t say how many times I have heard or read this phrase. The presumption being that because horn players make mistakes and “crack” notes that the instrument is difficult to play.

And almost every time I hear people claim that the French horn is the hardest instrument, I think, “no, not really…” While I would agree that the French horn can be a difficult instrument for beginners to start out with, there is very little in the Horn repetoire that can compare in technical difficulty to something … say, like a Sibelius Violin Concerto.

A few months ago I was teaching beginning band at a local elementary school. Next door to the band class was the beginning orchestra. The orchestra teacher was playing piano accompanying the students in their studies. They were sounding pretty good.

One of the band students asked, “why do the strings sound so much better that we do?” I thought about this for a second. I responded that at least at first, beginning strings sound better as an ensemble because they general play only open strings or first position fingerings and that their instruments are tuned by their teacher.

A beginning wind ensemble is comprised of a variety of instruments from several different families. Each instrument has unique properties that at first, do not blend as easily as a string orchestra.

This aside, the main point that I made to this class was that “good” and “bad” is all about time and perspective. Comparing one instrument’s difficulty level to another is not a simple game of apples and oranges.

The same might be said for tagging the French horn as the “hardest” instrument. In reality, it is no more difficult than learning any other instrument; it is just different. This myth needs to be busted once and for all.

How to Practice, Part I: An Overview

The basics of the basics.

An integral part of the daily practice ritual for any musician is calisthenics – the process of building physical and mental strength and flexibility though the concentrated study of the basics. This process is given many different names and terms including the “warm-up,” routine, exercises or daily ritual.

Rather than giving specific suggestions in this post, I would like to begin this series with the basics of a comprehensive practice routine. Many students I find, neglect to keep these basics in mind when developing their daily routine.

In short, a daily regime should  include, in one form or another, these three elements:

  1. Long tones
  2. Arpeggios
  3. Scales

Because these elements in one form or another constitute that vast majority of the music we play, it is crucial to work on them daily at the rudimentary level.

Long tones in their basic, most simplistic form are held, sustained notes. Their main purpose is to focus on and build tone production and breath control. Long tones – or “quality” tones as one of my former teachers put it – can be accomplished in many forms; from slow sustained melodic patterns played in various dynamic ranges, to isolated, sustained notes performed with crescendos and decrescendos.

Arpeggios (for brass players) involve breath control as well, but also involve embouchure control and strengthening throughout the range of the instrument. Arpeggios utilizing open harmonic series – in whole or parts – are of particular benefit because the player must rely solely on air and embouchure control to execute them, without any aid from valved fingerings.

Scales are beneficial in many ways, but as I get older I find that they are particularly helpful for finger dexterity.

It also is quite practical to occasionally combine these elements to add interest to variety to the daily routine. Scales and arpeggios done with crescendo and decrescendo patterns, for instance, can have tremendous benefits.

Most teachers, including myself, advocate the daily routine to be done in the first practice session of the day. I look at it as a return to what is fundamental in everything we do as musicians.

As the title of this post suggests, balancing these three elements is an art and not a science – one size does not fit all. Some people only require 10 to 20 minutes while other may need a full hour or more. Some may require a more concentrated focus on long tones while others may need more scale or arpeggio study.

The journey in discovering what is best for you is an ongoing process highlighted by regular experimentation, exploration and evaluation. Working with a private teacher can be a valuable and integral part of this process.

Be flexible and honest with yourself – delusion and denial are easy pitfalls to fall into. As time marches on you will find that your needs may change.

Continue to Part II

4 Issues that point to a composer not knowing how to write for the horn

As horn players we see a lot of horn parts written by composers who don’t really know how to write for the horn. First, the point of this post: if you are a composer and you are not sure about your horn writing, talk to a horn player. We really can be friendly and helpful, and can help you avoid problems like these:

sound-of-hornToo high. Yes, sure it sounded great on the midi, but really horn can’t play hanging around above the staff for very long. There is a heart of the range that sounds the best; get it defined clearly and horn parts will sound great. Very high, technical parts will sound much better on trumpet or saxophone.

Too much bass clef. At the opposite extreme you have parts that are too low. Part of it is the composer did not realize that horn players can read the full octave below treble clef in ledger lines easily. The larger issue is why are they in this range so long? Because the composer must be totally afraid of the horn. Again, get familiar with what is the characteristic heart of the range.

No time for mute changes. These are very annoying. On other brass instruments players can have a free hand to make a mute change with no rest. But not on horn. We have to take the mute out then put our hand back in the bell. At a minimum we need a couple beats of rest and would prefer more. Sometimes you can get the same effect by asking for stopped horn instead of muted, and there are a number of examples of famous works where horn players normally play stopped instead of muted as marked because there is no time to remove or insert a mute.

Stopped notes in too loud a context. The final item for now is related to the above. While I certainly can imagine a stopped horn sound soaring over a large orchestra, in reality the loudest we can play stopped horn even if marked and playing what feels like FFFF is about MF out in the audience. Stopped horn does not project, use it with caution. A stopping (brass) mute helps with a bit more volume, but we have to have time to put it in.

This list could go on and on. There are great resources for composers out there, especially the wonderful publication Extended Techniques for the Horn by Douglas Hill, check them but also just ask a good horn player and get some feedback, it will make your music more successful.

UPDATE: For even thoughts and examples more see this article.

The Issue of Weight and Different Horns

0

This summer I have several projects and performances in preparation. Besides presenting on the Wagner tuba at the IHS event in Denver I will be performing a work on Wagner tuba and a work on horn in recital there, and I will also be performing the last movement of Mozart 3 the week before. In relation to that and also working on a natural horn project this summer, these past few days I have been playing the Mozart on three different horns back to back to back, a natural horn (mostly the ASU McCracken), a double (Paxman 25A), and a triple (Paxman 83L).

I touch on this topic in my high horn book, the topic of weight. I have been playing the triple more than 90% of the time for several years, and I often say to people that it is hard to go back to a double from a triple. The triple is a great type of horn for a pro, especially a high horn player in an orchestral situation. But, at the same time, every horn is a compromise with good and bad points, there is no perfect horn. My triple is about as light as they come but after playing natural horn for ten or fifteen minutes it feels really, really heavy. There is also a way that notes speak on a lighter horn that a heavy instrument just can’t produce.

Switching around between all three horns the double horn really feels rather nice again; it hits a comfortable middle ground. It is the instrument I recorded both of my solo CDs on as well, so in that sense it is like an old shoe that feels right.

Further complicating things for me right now is the Wagner tuba. It is an instrument that feels very open and free blowing, and I will be playing horn and Wagner tuba on the same recital in Denver. Switching back and forth again the double seems to feel more like Wagner tuba than does the triple, it is the weight thing again I think, plus probably the fact that my Paxman 25A double is large and quite free blowing, more so than almost any other horn I have tried.

I recall at a horn event a few years ago Lowell Greer saying that he played a descant normally because it felt more like a natural horn. I can relate to that thought better now, I am sure that weight was a part of the issue for him. I love his recording of the Brahms Trio especially, it is on natural horn, on which he sounds very comfortable (Brahms and Beethoven: Music for Horn–HMF Classical Exp.).

In short in the next few weeks I will need to make a weighty decision as to what horn to play on at the IHS Denver event, a decision certainly influenced by instrument weight and the perception of the blowing qualities of each instrument.

UPDATE: I stuck with the triple. It was interesting to explore the double again but, as I said in the post, when you have played a triple horn a while it is really hard to go back.

UPDATE II: But in the bigger picture I ended up going back to a double horn as my main horn for lessons and general playing, it just feels the most comfortable in hitting that middle ground. It is a custom Geyer style horn.

The Non-measured Preludes of Jacques-François Gallay

0

One of the most recognized nineteenth-century horn teachers is Jacques-François Gallay (1795-1864). Gallay studied with Louis-François Dauprat (1787-1868) at the Paris Conservatory, entering his studio at the relatively late age of 25. In addition to performing as an operatic and chamber musician, Gallay succeeded Dauprat at the Conservatory, serving on the faculty from 1842 until his death in 1864. He wrote a great method for the natural horn that is little used today (I will be including a number of exercises from this method in several upcoming publications), solo and ensemble works, and quite few etudes. Of those, the Op. 27 Préludes méasurés et non méasurés are perhaps the most widely loved and used today, although I also own and use to an extent the Op. 13, Op. 43, Op. 53, Op 57, and Op. 58 studies as well. Of those, I believe the Thirty Studies, Op. 13 and the Twelve Studies Op. 57 for Second Horn see the most use.

For those unfamiliar with the non-measured preludes, they really are very different than anything else in the horn etude literature. Much is left up to the performer in terms of interpretation. Teachers write music to fill a need; I have heard that these were composed to prepare students for a barrier exam in musicality at the Paris Conservatory, but I don’t know if that is a completely accurate statement, as it did not come up in the recent dissertation on these works. But they are excellent for developing control and musicality.

Which leads us to the link of the day, the recent dissertation on Gallay is online! The History and Pedagogy of Jacques-François Gallay’s Non-Measured Preludes for Horn, Op. 27, Nos. 21-40 was completed by Scott Russell in 2004 for the DA degree at Ball State. [NOTE: The file is a PDF of the complete document]. It is a very interesting project and worth looking over. I particularly found the full text (in the appendix) of his interview with Richard Seraphinoff to be of interest, a number of insights are presented.

In terms of modern editions, the Sansone edition from 1960 (currently published by Southern) is one of the most accurate. Russell notes that it “is basically a [mechanical] reproduction of the Gallet/Colombier edition,” the earliest available, dating to 1933/36 but most likely based on the original printing plates of the first edition. As explained by Richard Seraphinoff in the interview,

… that was the way printing was done in those days. In the Dauprat Method book, his first edition which was what this music was re-printed from [for the new Birdalone edition] was by a company Dauprat owned a share in. It was called Souder & Company, and then they sold the plates to somebody called Schoenenberger. The plates made the rounds again until they were just so worn out they made bad prints. I think the same thing happened with a lot of these etudes ….

If you don’t have enough summer projects going already, becoming familiar with the Gallay non-measured preludes would be a great one. The other thing to note, and many modern hornists find this hard to believe, is that these were written for natural horn! If you are up for an extra challenge, doing these works on natural horn is worth the effort.

Friedrich Gumpert, Master Teacher of the Horn

Often hornists will look back on their “genealogy” in terms of who their teachers were, the teachers of their teachers, etc. A number of my teachers were Farkas students and I took several lessons with Farkas directly, so this would be a major influence if I had to choose, but I also was certainly influenced by teachers who studied with Chambers and others.

Going back one more generation, in terms of horn in the United States many players can look back to three major players of the early 20th century, Max Pottag (1876-1970), Anton Horner (1877-1971), and Max Hess (1878-1975). All of them had an impact. Hess was principal hornist in Boston and Cincinnati, Pottag put out a number of publications that are still in print and was a long time member of the Chicago Symphony (performing with the orchestra for 40 seasons), and Horner performed in the Philadelphia Orchestra from 1902-46 (serving as principal hornist until 1930) and taught at the Curtis Institute from 1924-42. And all three all studied with Freidrich Gumpert at the Leipzig Conservatory.

I was recently asked about Gumpert by a site visitor. In his publications his name is curiously always spelled incorrectly (see the addendum at the end of this article), his print name is Gumbert with a B. And, notably, his nephew was instrumental in the invention of the double horn in 1897 (more on that here). But who did he study with? Where is a good bio to be found?

Gumpert still has many publications in print to this day, editions of etudes, excerpt books, solos, and he also wrote a method. In 1999 I gave a presentation in Paris on Gumpert at the Historic Brass Society event, the text of which was recently published in Brass Scholarship in Review: Preceedings of the Historic Brass Society Conference Cité de la Musique, Paris 1999 (Pendragon Press). The main text opens,

The name of Freidrich Adolf Gumpert is today one of the more widely recognized of all the horn players and teachers of the nineteenth century—at least among hornists. Gumpert was born in 1841 at Lichtenau (Thuringia) and studied horn under the town musician Hammann at Jena. He was first engaged as a horn player at Bad Nauheim, St. Gallen, and completed his military service in a band at Eisenach. Gumpert performed at Halle from 1862 until 1864, when the composer Cark Reinecke (1824-1910), then conductor of the Gewandhaus concerts, engaged him as principal hornist in the Gewhandhaus Orchestra in Leipzig. Gumpert held this position from 1864 until 1898 and was concurrently professor of horn at the Leipzig Conservatory, remaining in Leipzig until his death in 1906.

The full text of the presentation gives a number of insights into the secrets of his teaching but in short he certainly placed high importance on the development of lyrical playing and in the study of orchestral excerpts. He was an important and influential teacher, one that virtually every major player in the United States can trace back to among their own teachers.

BONUS: Many readers may know the name Irwin Miersch, for his melodic studies — he was also a Gumpert student.

ADDENDUM:

Formerly posted on Horn Articles Online, this is based on materials published in The Horn Call 27, no. 2 (February, 1997) and The Horn Call 28, no. 2 (February, 1998).

It is a most curious fact that every published work of the famous Leipzig horn teacher Friedrich Gumpert (1841-1906) misspells his name as Gumbert with a “B.” Norman Schweikert in his article “Gumpert, not Gumbert!” (The Horn Call 1, no. 2 [May, 1971], 45-46) relates that his former students theorized “that there was a well-known song-writer, poet or the like” named Friedrich Gumbert, and that “he did not seem to mind being mistaken for him.” As a refinement of the theory as to why this presumably intentional misspelling occurred, an examination of a typical nineteenth-century musical handbook (such as Fr. Pazdírek, The Universal Handbook of Musical Literature [Vienna: Pazdírek, n.d.], vol. 11, 657-664) will find an entry and many published works by Ferdinand Gumbert (1818-1896)–perhaps Gumpert’s publisher was banking on this name recognition to help sell music?

Exercise for Till Eulenspiegel: Till the Cows Come Home

An exercise for Till Eulenspiegel

> Download Till Exercise PDF

On practically every “high horn” audition – and even on some low horn auditions – the opening solo from Richard Strauss’ tone poem Till Eulenspiegel will be asked. For any aspiring orchestral player, this excerpt must be known backwards and forwards.

Taking this literally, I once came up with this little exercise to help conquer this solo. Begin practicing this exercise SLOWLY and take advantage of its different rhythms and articulations. Gradually speed it up over time.

This exercise illustrates a very practical practice method, namely:

  1. Be honest with yourself and admit you have a problem.
  2. Isolate that problem and develop a calculated, logical plan to fix it.
  3. Engage – get busy and practice.
  4. Evaluate and fine tune as needed.

This slow repetition technique of isolated problem areas – “cell” practice – done in multiple key areas is key to improvement. Attacking problems haphazardly only leads to bad habits and even injury.

Other online resources to investigate:

Alternative Hand Positions for Beginners

Compromised right hand positions

In my experience as a substitute band and orchestra teacher in the Phoenix area, I see a huge shortage of student horn players. Most high schools are lucky to have even the bare minimum of four horns. At the elementary and junior high school levels, I witness many young and enthusiastic students that start out eager but over time get discouraged and quit band altogether.

In a previous blog (“Get a Grip“) I wrote about how most beginning French horn students have extreme difficulties holding the instrument and how this is a major factor as to why many of them quit. That article focused on the left hand position; this article will focus on the right hand and will propose alternative hand positions for beginners.

I often wonder – what is the logic behind designing a student model Horn at adult proportions? This makes no sense! Even single-F horns intended for beginners are built with proportions too large. Horn makers should pay more attention to the examples set by string manufacturers.

As a music educator, I often teach string orchestra and I love how string instruments are made in different sizes for beginning players. 3/4-size violins, violas and cellos are common and are a great boon to younger students. While the tone production is not ideal, the reduced size helps the youngster to become familiar with the fundamentals of string technique. These 3/4 instruments take some of the burden out of what is otherwise a very steep learning curve.

On the French horn, the positioning of the right hand inside the bell is a huge stumbling block. Horn methodologies that teach an adult right-hand position to children are not being very practical.

Students with small hands have difficulties maintaining the traditional close-fingered, cupped-hand position – especially in combination with an awkward left-hand grip. Their natural tendency is to use the right hand to grip the bell in a more practical manner, like for example on the outside edge of the bell.

I teach two alternatives that I call the “cradle” and the “crutch.”

They are meant to help young students hold the instrument more securely yet help keep the horn’s intonation somewhat in check. Like the compromise of 3/4-sized string instruments, the tone production of these hand positions is not ideal. However, they help tremendously with comfort and most importantly, confidence. Of course, they are temporary solutions only, and as the student ages they will need to adopt the more standard hand position.

The choice of “cradle” or “crutch” depends on the hand size of the student.

For students with smaller hands, I recommend a “cradled” hand postion as pictured at right. If you picture the horn bell as a clock, the more traditional hand position lies somewhere between 2 o’clock and 6 o’clock with the fingers and thumb together, the back of the hand flat against the bell and the palm exposed. For the “cradle” position, the hand is positioned somewhere between 9 and 12 o’clock, with the palm cupped against the bell. The back of the hand is exposed.

By experimenting with how far in or out the hand goes, an acceptable compromise can be found between comfort, tone quality and intonation. Once the “right” position is found, a piece of duct tape adhered inside the bell just under the fingertips makes an excellent guide.

For students with larger hands, I teach a “crutch” position. This hand position is based on the more traditional approach, but with one difference: the thumb is extended at a 90 degree angle from the hand and touches the opposite side of the bell. This is the hand position in fact, that I first learned as a beginner, and it helped me tremendously. In time, the thumb can be moved to join the other four fingers.

Without a doubt, the ivory-tower educator will cringe at these recommendations and will insist that teaching these alternative hand positions is akin to blasphemy against all that is holy and traditional in the Horn universe.

While I agree that there is a whole host of rational reasons to begin students with the traditional hand position, the stark realities far outweigh these textbook arguments. Bottom line – Horn students that feel uncomfortable holding their instruments are much more likely to quit playing.

Ifor James in a “hornchannel” YouTube video in fact, advocates beginning horn students to not even bother with putting a hand in the bell at all! He emphasizes a proper angle of the mouthpiece and lead pipe, and argues that because beginning horn players start in a limited, middle range, the hand does not need to be in the bell at the start. It has little impact on this limited range.

The French horn world needs more student model instruments for smaller hands. I would encourage and applaud any efforts that horn manufacturers take towards this goal.

In the meantime, I advocate sensible and practical right-hand positions – the “cradle” or the “crutch” – to make up for these design flaws.

Lips, the Mouthpiece, and Aging

In the most recent issue of The Horn Call (May, 2008) there is an interesting article by Frøydis Ree Wekre on horn playing and aging. I recommend the article, but one topic not addressed was that of the mouthpiece and aging. It was a topic I was thinking about a lot back when I made the following post to the original version of my blog on 9/17/06.

We had a horn day event at ASU yesterday (which went well!) with guest artist David Wakefield of the American Brass Quintet. Many great topics were covered but one in particular that I believe is rarely talked about was the mouthpiece lips interface and the aging process. This is a topic we spoke of outside of his main sessions. I have heard this elsewhere and he confirmed as we get older there is a point where we need a little more space inside the mouthpiece for the lips to work well. He shared his experience with this over the past few years. I have made small changes over the years and feel I am right at the point I need to move on to another rim that gives a even more space for the lips to vibrate. I will probably wait until my recital is over Oct. 8, but I feel clear that I am to the point a change is in order.

After the recital mentioned in the post I did make some changes. In short I had been playing an inner diameter smaller than 17.5 MM for years, but now play an 18 MM inner diameter Laskey 80J. Things just work better! 

Two footnotes/tips. One is that you should as much as possible always use the same inner diameter, horn players are very sensitive to changes of this dimension, when you make a change stick with it. The other footnote/tip would be that as you try mouthpieces you should be able to find one that is equally good in the high and low ranges.

UPDATE: I would add I ended up going back to my “regular” inner diameter, but still like the feel/sound of a slightly bigger diameter. The other thing I would mention, for what it is worth, a well-known, now deceased, player told me his lips began to feel “leathery” at the point he really got up in years. I hope I don’t have that happen! I wonder though if he may have developed a metal sensitivity? That feeling is a possible symptom. More on that topic here. 

Oddities: The Bass Horn

The first in a series of oddball horns

This monstrosity – resembling a French horn on steroids – is a Bass Horn, built for the renowned tuba soloist Roger Bobo. A collector of low brass instruments, Bobo proposed the idea to Howard Lockie who wrote out the preliminary blueprints for the instrument.

The project was given to George Strucel who held on to the project for six years. It was later turned over to Larry Minick who completed the construction.

Bobo used the instrument in a few studio gigs, but it may be heard on a 1981 duet recording – “Prunes” – with Bobo on the Bass Horn and Norwegian hornist Frøydis Ree Wekre. The recording features the music of Roger Kellaway.