Home Blog Page 21

Julius Watkins, jazz French horn pioneer

Talking with colleagues recently, a topic that came up was how some great players of the recent past are unjustly neglected today. In terms of horn, whenever a discussion turns to the French horn in jazz, soon you recognize that Julius Watkins (1921-1977) literally created the genre, and is very worthy of a closer look.

Watkins has been the subject of scholarly research, but before looking at that, let us look at Watkins in action. While you are listening to this 1960 performance below, observe how effortless it all looks for him, and also make a mental note of what exactly are the highest and lowest notes he performs?

His discography is extensive and can be easily accessed for reference in the Wikipedia article on Julius Watkins.

Patrick Smith, in his 2005 dissertation “Julius Watkins and the Evolution of the Jazz French Horn Genre,” offers this on why Watkins choose the horn, a story which many readers can relate to easily.

Julius was nine years old when the horn6 lured him away from the saxophones, trumpets and drums; instruments which were significantly more popular than the horn amongst beginning bandsmen. He was considering tutelage on the guitar or trumpet when Francis Hellstein, Principal Horn in the Detroit Symphony, presented a guest performance at Julius’ school. He finalized his decision upon hearing the horn’s call. “I liked the sound,” said Watkins. “I don’t know exactly why, and I still can’t explain it satisfactorily. But I fell in love with the sound and with the instrument.”7

Watkins was later able to study with Hellstein, and had his foundations in a traditional horn background. He attended a technical high school, which allowed him besides playing in the orchestra to take courses in harmony, music appreciation, and piano. Smith states that as part of his studies with Hellstein “Certainly Julius was familiar with Mozart’s four horn concerti along with Richard Strauss’ ‘First Concerto.’” But then Smith relates that, in recognition of the difficulty of developing an orchestral career as an African-American,

By the summer of 1937, Julius had determined that his musical career path would be different from that of any other performer of his instrument up until that time. “I wanted to be a soloist,” said Watkins in an interview with Downbeat Magazine. “There is very little repertoire in Classical music for solo horn. So, I learned to jazz.”13 Known for being a stubborn individual,14 Julius was obsessed with becoming the first great jazz horn soloist ever. His thirst for listening to jazz and playing jazz was unquenchable.

The Smith dissertation gives extensive background on his life after he left high school, at which point he started his career in Detroit and then made his way to New York.

To continue this concise look at Watkins, we now turn to the liner notes for the CD Next Mode by Vincent Chancey. I would especially like to highlight this CD for two reasons. One, it is a wonderful CD! I’ve listened to it hundreds of times. But also this CD, so far as I can tell, is not on YouTube, Spotify, etc. You really should track down a copy, and Chancey still has it listed for sale on his website. Chancey shares that

Next Mode is a contemporary extension of a group that existed in the mid-fifties called The Jazz Modes or Les Jazz Modes. Julius Watkins was the musical director as well as French hornist. Charlie Rouse played tenor saxophone. The Jazz Modes were a quintet that used various rhythm sections. According to a conversation I had with Charlie Rouse, they recorded seven albums; one master was lost, so only six were released.

Of course, Julius Watkins was a big influence on me. I first heard him at the age of 15, after which I collected any album that had his name on it. He played and recorded with many people other than The Jazz Modes….

Upon receiving my degree in music, I moved to New York to find this incredible jazz pioneer of the French horn. After much hesitation, Mr. Watkins accepted me as a student. He had not taken any students before then, probably because nobody was interested, but after that he did. He imparted some very valuable information to me about playing horn in jazz. Things like alternative fingerings to use for different instrumental pairings, one with strings, maybe another with brass or woodwinds. Also how to project in large ensembles. This may include choice of register or note voicings. We would have lengthy conversations about his career as I battle to begin one myself.

With the recording Next Mode Chancey was attempting to recreate the sound of The Jazz Modes. The first track is a work composed by Watkins for The Jazz Modes, Linda Delia. Below is Watkins performing this work.

I personally really enjoy the entire Next Mode CD. As noted earlier, this is only available now in hard copy, but if you go to the Chancey sales page you can hear the beginning of his version. The call to action here being, if you still listen to CDs (and you should!), buy a copy! Only one of his four recordings as a leader are currently on Spotify, a reminder that there is a lot of great music out there if you put in a little extra effort to find it.

Finally, for a more recent performance set from Vincent Chancey, this last video is also well worth an extended listen. I have not posted on jazz much in Horn Matters, but in reality I am a big fan, and will be looking at the topic more than normal in my teaching this fall.

 

Making the most of your [COVID] horn playing, and a brief review of a bell cover

0

Before getting to the brief review, I would like to open by noting that, as of the fall of 2020, COVID protocols are all over the map for schools and ensembles.

I think the setup we are using at Arizona State is as good as anywhere, in terms of being a good learning environment and relatively safe. The basic initial protocol we have for brass playing in a practice room is that after a practice session the room has to be empty for an hour. There is an online sign up system and so far it is working well. Students are also responsible to clean the room after their session, and only certain rooms are allowed for brass/wind/voice practice.

My office has the same basic restriction, after a lesson where a student plays the office has to be vacant for an hour after the lesson. I am starting the semester rotating students that want live lessons (not all do) through the last lesson slot of the day. When it gets cooler outside I will open up another live lesson slot before lunch a couple days a week too, when I can vacate the office for an hour after a lesson (eating lunch outside, or taking a walk). There is also an air purifier, and we wear masks when not playing. In addition, my office is big enough that I am sitting a full 16 feet away from the student! We have space.

What is great about this from my perspective is I can get an accurate feel for the playing of a student live in a room. This is all that made the spring work, really; I was very familiar with all the students before we shut down for COVID. Rotating live lessons with the Zoom lessons will help me a lot as a teacher, as will students being able to practice in practice rooms.

[Also, note in the photo my spittoon! People are concerned about our condensation, and I have collection of condensation covered in my office.]

Ensembles here are starting online with recording projects, hopefully moving live later in the semester. Not to give away too many secrets, we are making use of the Bandlab platform to do collaborative recording projects at ASU. If you are looking for something like this to enhance a teaching or ensemble experience, this one is worth looking at.

As our ensembles are starting online, the topic of bell covers has not been an issue yet. However, I did get one, from Houghton Horns, purchased on my own without thinking I would review it, but it is a product of current interest. In terms of horn playing you hardly notice it for sound or feel of the instrument. What you do notice is that your hand in the bell gets warm; the hot air of your breath is held back to some extent by the bell cover. I do not know how much it really works, but if health protocols require it in your situation it has no negative impact on your playing.

A final note being you can make tons of progress as a horn player this fall! Do not give up without trying for sure; you can make much good use of your time if you choose to.

Review: The Versus M1T mellophone mouthpiece. The one everyone has been waiting for

A new product on the market, and a game changer, is the Versus M1T mellophone mouthpiece.

Mellophone is, sadly, a hugely polarizing topic of the horn world, but certainly a reality that is here to stay. Among the biggest typical complaints for the horn player is the mouthpiece. Marching mellophones come with a mouthpiece that resembles very much a trumpet mouthpiece, with a trumpet rim, small inner diameter, and a shallow cup. As a result, the experience of playing an instrument with one of these is more like playing a trumpet than a middle brass instrument (such as a horn or an Eb tenor horn).

In addition, of course, marching band directors are not fond of using a horn mouthpiece with an adapter on F mellophone. Perception is that it does not sound as good, and intonation is worse.

I have long advocated for the development of something that blended a horn rim and cup into a backbore and shank that fits right into a marching mellophone receiver. These have been produced, but only on a limited basis. I am thinking specifically of the horn/mellophone hybrid mouthpiece supplied with the Jupiter Quantum mellophone (reviewed here, and also mentioned in the 3rd edition of my mellophone book) which so far as I know has never been offered for separate sale.

Finally, on the market for easy purchase is a mouthpiece of this type, the Versus M1T mellophone mouthpiece, sold by Houghton horns. I was sent this mouthpiece and the companion M1H (which is meant for Bb marching French horn, but would work fine F marching French horn or any horn really) for review, at no obligation.

I especially like the M1T on my King mellophone. Sound wise it hits a nice place, some color to the sound but with depth. The cup of this mouthpiece is shallow for a horn mouthpiece, and provides nice focus and articulation. The rim is comfortable and supportive, wide but not overly wide like a trumpet rim.

For those more interested in the nuts and bolts details, my example of the M1T mouthpiece has a #9 bore, while the companion M1H has a tighter bore at #17. Inner dimeter perceptions will vary with any rim depending on the shape, but I would put it in the 17.75-18 mm range, which should produce a big sound out on the field. The shallow cup seems to me to be a great acoustical match to the high F horn. It plays easily.

I also think this might be the first mouthpiece of this type that has been offered for separate sale.** Finally! This is such a game changer. If you are a horn player who marches mellophone, or a horn teacher with students who march, give this model a look, priced very affordably at $89. For more information on this new product, check the Houghton Horns website.

**Another mouthpiece some might think of is the Moosewood T-Rex. This was a hybrid mouthpiece intended for horn players to use on the Eb tenor horn, which is so far as I know off the market now. It is deeper yet, with a larger bore, and not very suited to the mellophone.

Lessons in Vienna, part IX: Lasting Impact on a Career

This series of articles expands on notes taken by Nicholas Smith in lessons with Roland Berger in 1977. This is the concluding article.

Most players would probably not believe that I could remember the above experience from almost 40 years ago. For me, the experience working with Berger will be burned into my psyche until I die. That, plus all the notes I took after each lesson allowed me to have such vivid recall. I still feel working with Professor Berger all those years ago, to be one of the most, if not the most influential experience of my musical life. I only hope anyone reading this narrative might have a similar experience in their own musical lives.

Sooooo, I can hear people wanting to know if I always used Prof. Berger’s suggestions in my own playing and the answer is both yes and no. There is no way I could get away with telling any conductor that I wouldn’t do the acceleration in the opening calls of Till Eulenspiegel. Besides, that accel. Is almost a universal technique. I did incorporate some of his musical ideas into the Tschaikowsky 5th solo which weren’t a terribly big change from what I had already been taught.

Berger’s use of an assistant on Ein Heldenleben, especially from Reh. # 107 was especially helpful when I had to play the work less than a year after his coaching. And then there are the Brahms excerpts. Even when I was in the “prime” of my playing years, I never had the lung capacity to follow his directions for the extended phrases he recommended for the solo in the third movement of the Third Symphony. I continued to use the breathing directions of Mr. Farkas for that one and the other Brahms works as well as for some things in the Tschaikowsky 5th Symphony solo. While I have never advocated for students to work with as many different teachers as possible, I do believe an occasional lesson beyond their regular teacher can often open the student to new “break-throughs” in their playing. However, students should be advanced and mature enough to be able to make a judgement as to which suggestions work for them and which won’t. Hopefully, readers of the above narrative will be able to use at least some of Professor Berger’s ideas for their own playing.

Many thanks to Dr. Nicholas Smith for sharing this article with Horn Matters readers.

For a bit more, there is a very nice video on YouTube where Berger talks about Vienna horns and more, it may be viewed here.

Author’s Biography

In 2016, Nicholas Smith retired after a forty-five year career teaching and playing at the university level. Forty-two years were spent at Wichita State University where he was Professor of Horn, as well as Principal Horn of the Wichita Symphony. He was also a member of WSU’s Wichita Brass Quintet and Lieurance Woodwind Quintet producing that ensemble’s highly regarded three CD’s for the Summit Label. He also held the Principal Horn positions of the Oklahoma City Symphony, the Madison (WI) Symphony, and the forty piece American Sinfonietta. He has also performed with the Kansas City Symphony, and as Assistant Principal Horn of the Rochester Philharmonic. His summer festival activities include the American Institute of Musical Studies in Graz, Austria, Brevard Music Festival, the Bay View (MI) Music Festival and the Bellingham (WA) Music Festival. He has been a frequent soloist and lecturer at regional and international conferences of the International Horn Society and hosted three regional conferences for the society in 1991, 1996, and 2006. Publishing includes several articles in music education journals as well as a historical contribution to the Horn Society’s former juried publication, The Horn Call Journal. His book “Don’t Miss!” was written to help improve accuracy on the horn and has had world-wide sales. Dr. Smith’s former students occupy positions in many orchestras and military bands throughout the US, Europe, and the orient. Several former students occupy teaching positions at the university level including the editor of Horn Matters/Horn Notes, John Ericson. In recognition of his teaching accomplishments, Wichita State University named Dr. Smith to its Academy of Effective Teaching in May of 2004. He also served WSU in several administrative positions including a five year stint as the Associate Dean for the College of Fine Arts. A native Kansan, he earned degrees at Pittsburg State University (BM) and the Eastman School of Music (MM, DMA, and Performer’s Certificate). Principal teachers include Verne Reynolds, Philip Farkas, and Roland Berger. Smith shares his retirement with his wife Cheryl in mid-Michigan where they continue to serve music performance and teaching as members of several area musical ensembles.

Return to Part I of Lessons in Vienna series.

Lessons in Vienna, part VIII: Playing the Vienna horn

This series of articles expands on notes taken by Nicholas Smith in lessons with Roland Berger in 1977.

The Conn 8D (K series) I was playing on then was a good horn as far as having a good sound and was relatively easy to play until you went above the staff where it would make you suffer to get out the really high register notes (the written high b” and especially the high c’”. After working on this excerpt with him for maybe an hour, he pulled his Vienna Horn out of its case and played a few “warm-up” notes. In less than a minute, any fuzz or scratchiness in his sound was gone replaced by one of the two best horn “sounds” I have ever heard (the other was Vincent DeRosa). Berger looked over at me, didn’t say anything, put his “game face” on and proceeded to play the entire excerpt. I was awe struck after he finished and gave him a “Bravo.” He smiled and put the horn back up to his face and played the whole excerpt two more times in a row. He barely “chipped” one note on the third playing, otherwise his three renditions of the solo were perfect. To this day (2020) I have never heard anything like his playing. Not only was it technically perfect but the sound he got out of the horn was amazing: so flexible in the ability to have a full, ringing sound for the lyric parts, great dynamic contrast, and the ability to add brightness (edge) to the sound when needed. Even though we were on the empty stage of the Salzburg Festspielhaus, I could hear that he had no problem filling that hall.

Then he surprised me even more by asking if I would like to play his horn? I jumped at that opportunity and as he was handing the instrument to me, I mentioned that it had been a long time since I had played a single F Horn. He said he would give me the fingerings that worked for the Vienna F Horn which I have kept all these years along with the notes which I have used for the writing of this article. The fingerings are directly below:

Fingerings for the Vienna Horn
As given by Prof. Roland Berger

After exchanging messages with Eldon Matlick about Berger’s fingering chart, Eldon was kind enough to send me a set of fingerings given to him by Vienna hornists while he was in Austria several years ago. There are only two notes which vary from Professor Berger’s fingerings, the f#” and high b flat which are to the side in parentheses of the regular fingerings. Eldon warned that these fingerings may not work for every Vienna Horn.

Now to focus on my experience with Berger’s Horn. First, I had to wrap paper around the lower shank of my mouthpiece so it wouldn’t go into the receiver too far. The “bogens” (what we would consider detachable lead pipes) are all too big in diameter for our “American shank” mouthpieces. After solving that issue, I began playing from and middle c’ and gradually working my way up the scale which felt exceptionally secure even as I got to the top of the staff. The initial feel is that of a fair amount of resistance at softer dynamics. Upon pushing the horn to play louder, I felt the resistance fade replaced by the onset of color change (edge). The edge was very progressive; more air developed more edge. This feeling stayed with the instrument the whole time I played it which was such a pleasant change from how hard it was (is) to get the color change on an 8D. By using Berger’s fingerings, the scale on the horn worked really well all the way up to a high c”’ and the note “slots” were very solid and secure. The double piston valves were slow by our rotary standards but were very smooth; great for playing those lyric solos by Tchaikovsky, Brahms, and Bruckner. Articulations could be varied with ease and the horn had no “burrs” on any of the attacks, especially when playing a loud marcato passage. The security on this horn truly astounded me. This was definitely unlike any of the single F horns I had ever played. The smoothness and flexibility of this instrument was incredible. I felt as secure playing it as on my 8D and the range above the staff was frankly easier. Since that experience, I have been looking (in vain) for a horn with that feel. The closest thing to it was the Yamaha 601/801 Vienna Horns I played on at conferences during the 1980’s. The 601 I bought from Siegfried’s Call wasn’t even close to the playing qualities of the earlier Yamahas and I consulted with Eldon Matlick about a fix. He has a Yamaha 601 and had been experimenting with some new “trial” bogens Yamaha sent him. The one he recommended I was only able to get after a four month wait but it was worth it. The H019 bogen is the “go to” pipe and moves the 601/801’s much closer to the feel of the older Yamahas from the 1980’s. My thanks to Yamaha’s Head Engineer Wayne Tanabe for sending me three different bogens to try and to write-up a comparison critique.

Eldon wanted to get interested players together at the 2020 Eugene Conference to organize an American branch of the Vienna Horn Society. He had also hoped to have a Vienna Horn ensemble play some of the works heard on the Vienna Horn Ensemble’s CD’s. Unfortunately, the conference was cancelled due to the Covid 19 virus situation. Eldon (and myself) hope the American branch of the Vienna Horn Society might actually become a reality with organization taking place at a future regional or international conference.

The series concludes in the next installment, looking at the impact of these lessons on a career.

Lessons in Vienna, part VII: The Long Call

This series of articles expands on notes taken by Nicholas Smith in lessons with Roland Berger in 1977.

Then he asked if I had ever worked on Siegfried’s “Long Call” to which I told him no, because most American auditions use the so called “short call” since most orchestras only play the various excerpts from Wagner’s operas. However, I told him I would really love to work with him on it and related that I felt his rendition of the solo was absolutely the best and that is what encouraged me to see if I could get some lessons with him. This brought a warm smile to his face. I played the first phrase and he promptly stopped me. He explained that the dotted rhythm of the first beat should still have a triplet feel and that most players (including those from Vienna) spend too much time on the top-line g” and too little on the following 16th (written e”). This makes the top g” stick out too much. He had me play just the first beat over and over without the dotted rhythm in straight eighths, at first slowly and then gradually faster. Then, he told me to do the rhythm as written, starting slowly and then getting faster. I did this for several minutes and when he was satisfied, he told me to go back and start the passage again. He said the rhythm should feel like you are using the c” as a spring to jump to the top g” each time. He commented that the first three bar phrase doesn’t need to be real loud but should be clear and with a good sound (not “edgy”). Hold the high g” about 5 – 7beats. Wait approximately 8 beats and begin the second phrase (bar 4) softly with just a slight crescendo and accelerando. The holds over the dotted quarters d” and g’ should be 2 and 3 beats long. Wait approximately 5 – 6 beats before starting the third phrase in bar 9 which starts at a piano dynamic but crescendos to a forte at bar 14. Again, the dotted quarter notes in bar 14 (written e” to e’ octave) should each be held 2 beats with an extra beat for the lower e’ tied from bar 13 into bar 14. Wait approximately 9 beats (feels like an eternity), to let the previous sound clear and to prepare for the contrasting material starting with the pick-up to bar 16. This is the only real contrast in the whole call and must be played soft and sweetly from bars 20 through 22. Take a quick breath at the end of bar 22 and accelerate and crescendo to a forte in bars 23 through 26. Play the sustained e”s proportionally while getting softer and slowing just a bit to the last sustained e” in bars 27 – 28 which are traditionally played gestopft. Wait approximately 7 – 9 beats before starting from bar 30 to the end of the solo. The start of this part of the solo (bar 30) should not feel hurried although it must be played with authority. Berger warned that the crescendo starting in bar 30 is too soon and shouldn’t start until bar 34 and to be careful to not accelerate too quickly. However, the tempo can begin to pick-up starting in bar 34 but should be very gradual all the way through bars 43 and 44. Theoretically, the passage should only have a huge breath before the start of the passage at bar 30 to the end of bar 44. Take a “snatch” breath before the g’ in bar 44 and do not change tempo (get faster) at this point where your dynamic is fortissimo. At this point Berger said he would always shorten the g’ in bars 44-46 (3 beats instead of 5) for a bit more rest before playing the pick-up to bar 47. This motif is “Siegfried’s Sword” and must be played with abandon but deliberately. Again, Berger takes away two beats of the g” in bar 49 – 50 to allow for a little extra rest and a good breath before beginning the last passage up to the High c”’ starting at a piano dynamic. Make sure you have enough air to make it to the end (the tempo will need to accelerate) and let the rising line to the high c”’ govern your crescendo. While it is nice to hold out the high c”’ beyond the written quarter note, just getting it to speak is the most important thing.

Siegfried’s “Long Call” from Wagner’s Opera Siegfried
Numbers in parenthesis denote number of beats held for notes with holds or rests.

The recording of Berger playing the “Long Call” is available from DECCA records
#478 8370 of the entire “Ring Cycle” operas and the “call” is on CD 9, the 3rd track.

The series will continue next with a look at playing on a Vienna horn.

Lessons in Vienna, part VI: Ein Heldenleben

This series of articles expands on notes taken by Nicholas Smith in lessons with Roland Berger in 1977. To this point, the notes are all from the first lesson! This article continues in his second lesson.

Throughout the second lesson I noticed there was a horn case behind Prof. Berger’s chair and I wondered if it was his and if he might actually play during this last lesson. We began by spending about 20 – 25 minutes working on a few of the more important passages of Ein Heldenleben. I was very interested in how much and where he would use an assistant in this piece since it was so long. He said he would use an assistant mostly when his part was doubled in other parts. Below are two examples where all eight horns are in unison or at the octave.

Examples where using an assistant would be prudent in Strauss’ Ein Heldenleben
(Reh. Nos. 10 & 30)

He seemed satisfied with my rendition of the opening passage and, since I had never played 1st horn in a performance, I asked him to show me where he used his assistant at the end of the piece. Below is his recommended areas of using an assistant from number 107 to the end of the piece.

Horn “solo” passage from Number 107 from Ein Heldenleben
Bracketed notes of the passage are to be performed by the Assistant

As an aside, Smith pointed out those same locations to me in my lessons with him, and I used those concepts when I performed first on Heldenleben at the Brevard Music center, at the end of a long all-Strauss concert that included Don Juan and excerpts from Salome! The series continues next time with The Long Call

Lessons in Vienna, part V: Tchaikovsky 5 (and Beethoven)

This series of articles expands on notes taken by Nicholas Smith in lessons with Roland Berger in 1977.

After having worked on several slower, lyric solos I thought I would see if he was interested in hearing some Beethoven excerpts. His facial expression showed his distaste for that composer’s music. He scoffed at Beethoven and said “there was nothing to phrase in Beethoven” except for maybe the Sixth Symphony. He went on to say that Beethoven really didn’t understand our instrument and that his writing for us was unidiomatic. He said he used a Paxman F, hi f descant for most of Beethoven’s works because that horn had rotary valves which have a faster action and, with the security of the Hi F Horn, makes Beethoven much less of a worry.

Berger seemed pleased when I turned to the Tschaikowsky 5th slow movement solo and commented that the tempo at the beginning of the solo shouldn’t be too slow and that the third eighth note of each fourth beat should be tongued throughout the solo. The first four bars of the solo shouldn’t have a whole lot of shape. However, pressure should be given to the downbeats, but with a very legato tongue. Bar 11 is more detached in articulation with an emphasis on the eighth notes in beats 2 and 4. Starting in bar 13, the tempo picks up and should be played a little louder than the opening in a way that says “Here I am!” In measure 15, the first two beats should be very quick with beats 3 and 4 much slower and you can take a breath before the last eighth note of the bar with the retard going into the first two beats of bar 16. He felt that the first two beats of bar 16 need to be louder than how most Americans play it. The pick-up to bar 17 is then played much softer and in tempo. Also there should be no breath in bar 17 unless it is absolutely needed. You should take a breath in bar 18 before the fourth beat (a big one) to prepare for an “enormously louder down-beat and somewhat marcato accents on the duple in bar 20. Then play the eighth notes of the second and third beats slower, picking up the speed to A tempo by the 4th beat. On this upward run Berger wanted the dynamic to be mezzo forte and not piano as is the more American style. Bars 21 and 22 are played like bars 17 and 18 with bar 23 played like bar 11. The con moto should be played much softer and in a slightly faster tempo. There should be no retard or sostenuto on the last two measures and only a slight crescendo.

Horn 1 Solo from the 2nd Mvt. of the 5th Symphony, by Tschaikowsky

The series continues, with the next installment focusing on Ein Heldenleben

Continue to Part VI

Lessons in Vienna, part IV: Brahms 3

This series of articles expands on notes taken by Nicholas Smith in lessons with Roland Berger in 1977.

After finishing with the solos in the Brahms 2nd Symphony, Professor Berger turned the page of my Max Pottag 1st Book of French Horn Passages (many of us still used this 3 volume set at this time – mid 1970’s) to the Brahms 3rd Symphony and pointed to the solo in the 3rd movement. I played the solo and though he seemed satisfied, he said, “Now let’s do it the way we do it here in Vienna.” First, he told me to always play the written c” hold before beginning the solo on the pick-up to the first full bar of the solo. He said that the dotted rhythm pick-ups didn’t need to be as strict rhythmically as how we Americans play them. He told me not to use my tongue on the down-beat articulations in bars 5,6, and 7 but to slur into those down beats. Breaths are taken in bars 2 and 4 but then, no breath is to be taken until after the first beat of measure 8 and that should be the last one until the end of the solo. The small printed “hairpins” in the first four bars are just for phrasing and should not be exaggerated as most Americans do. Although you “go” or crescendo slightly, the crescendos should not “jump out” to the listener but should be smooth. You should play a nice big, but full sounding crescendo starting on M. 8 with a slight decrescendo on beats two and three of measure 10. Then the downbeat of bar 11 is to be more important and emphasized than the second beat and the “Turn” is given more time than most Americans allow for it. You make a slight crescendo on beats 2 and 3 of bar 11 to bar 12 and then make a gradual decrescendo to end the solo.

Horn 1 solo, from the 3rd Mvt. of the Third Symphony by Brahms

The series continues, with the next installment focusing on Tchaikovsky 5.

Lessons in Vienna, part III: Brahms 2 in depth

This series of articles expands on notes taken by Nicholas Smith in lessons with Roland Berger in 1977.

Next he wanted to hear the Brahms 2nd Symphony excerpts. He explained that the opening solo should be played soloisticly although basically at a piano dynamic. He didn’t want an obvious crescendo into the 3rd bar of the solo as most Americans have been taught. Berger certainly does not agree with the American approach which has a very gradual crescendo to the third bar of the solo and then a decrescendo to pianissimo.

Opening solo, Brahms 2nd Symphony

At this point, he commented on my use of a vibrato and seemed very surprised that I used it a little. He said he had previously thought that Americans never used vibrato and that he sometimes liked to use it for lyric passages. We moved on to the 1st movement coda solo.

Coda Solo from Mvt. 1 of the Brahms 2nd Symphony

He feels the solo should start from “no-where” or as soft/characterless as can be played for the first four bars so that the following set of crescendos and diminuendos in bars 4 – 6 (just a little), bars 9 – 10 (more cresc. with just a little stringendo) then much more crescendo and stringendo until bar 14 where you must play the second and third beat quarters in the slower tempo you will use to the end of the solo. Diminuendo from bar 17 to 20. Then a final crescendo with retard from the quarter note pick-up in bar 20 to bar 21 and a gradual diminuendo with an optional retard to the end of the solo. Breaths are taken in bar 7 before the second beat, the downbeat of bar 11, and a giant breath on the downbeat of bar 14 with a breath after the second beat of bar 18 and a final big breath before the third beat of bar 20 to be able to play to the end of the solo. A retard in the last three bars is optional.

The solo in the 2nd movement he said must be played very straight with no “schmaltz” and he grinned when he emphasized the word schmaltz. The beginning should be very soft like an elegy and without expression. A good breath is taken at the end of bar 3 and then a very small crescendo to bar 5 and back down in measure 6 with no breath before the last eighth note as we usually do. Do a gradual crescendo to the 4th beat of bar 7 and take a big breath before the eighth note on the “and” of the second beat syncopation followed by a very liquid slur on the written octave B flats. Then a decrescendo with the falling line in bars 8 and 9 followed by a smaller crescendo to the second beat of bar 10 and a gradual diminuendo to pianissimo on the last note.

Solo from 2nd Mvt. of the Brahms 2nd Symphony

The series continues next with Brahms 3.