Home Blog Page 22

Lessons in Vienna, part II: Till Eulenspiegel

This series of articles expands on notes taken by Nicholas Smith in lessons with Roland Berger in 1977.

He told me to pull out Till for our first excerpt. I played the usual first two calls and he stopped me. He said that both of the first two calls must be played in the haupt tempo with no big accelerando on the second call. All notes should be the same with none emphasized as most Americans do. Berger felt that it is only a “show-off” thing to play with the acceleration and when Solti asked him to do it, he refused!!! I guess you can do that if you are the first horn of one of the world’s great orchestras.

Opening Solo to Strauss’ Till Eulenspiegel

As this is the shortest installment in the series it is a good one which to append this brief biography of Roland Berger, supplied by Nicholas Smith.

Roland Berger
A Brief Biography

Roland Berger was born June 16, 1937 and is the son of horn player Hans Berger. His family emigrated in 1943 from Berlin to the resort area of Portschach am Worthersee in the south of Austria and then to Vienna in 1946. He became a member of the famed Vienna Boys’ Choir and also received lessons on the piano. From 1951 (age 14) he studied with the then 1st horn of the Vienna Philharmonic, Gottfried von Freiberg. As early as 1953 (age 16) Berger joined the Vienna Volksoper as a substitute 3rd and 4th horn. In 1955, he got a position at the Vienna State Opera and in 1961 (age 24) was accepted as a member of the Vienna Philharmonic. He was the solo hornist of that orchestra from 1961 until his switch to 3rd horn in 1984. He retired from the orchestra in 1993. From 1984 until 2005 Berger was Professor of Horn at the University of Music and Performing Arts, Vienna. His students include present members of the Philharmonic/State Opera orchestras Ronald Janezic, Thomas Jobstl, Sebastian Mayr, Josef Reif, Martin Brambock, Lars Michael Stransky, and Wolfgang Vlader. Berger has almost countless recordings to his name but he will probably be most remembered for his superbly powerful rendition of Siegfried’s “Long Call” from Wagner’s Opera Siegfried. In his later role as teacher/pedagogue, Professor Berger lent his support to the Vienna Horn Ensemble as a production manager for their first CD, Lebenszeichen (Alive and Well), which was released in 2012.

The series continues next with Brahms 2 in depth.

Lessons in Vienna, part I: Setting up Lessons with Roland Berger

American hornist and pedagogue Nicholas Smith was able to briefly study in 1977 with Roland Berger (b. 1937), longtime solo hornist of the Vienna Philharmonic, with a focus on correct interpretation of orchestral excerpts. Smith has converted his lesson notes into what we are able to present now as a series of nine articles for Horn Matters readers.

To begin the series, Smith sets up his personal road that brought him to Vienna for lessons with Berger. In subsequent installments, the focus will be on the excerpts he studied with Berger, the Vienna horn, and the impact this study had on his career.

THE VIENNA HORN,
Studying with a Master of the Instrument
By Nicholas Smith

Last Fall (2019) Eldon Matlick, the long-time Professor of Horn at the University of Oklahoma, sent a request to the members of the International Horn Society to announce that he was interested in forming an American branch of the Vienna Horn Society. In the replies he got was one from Scott Bacon who owns Siegfried’s Call which sells a wide range of new and used horns. Scott mentioned that he had a good Yamaha Model 601 Vienna Horn for sale. The price was reasonable so I bought it remembering how good the Yamaha horns were when I tried them at conferences back in the late 70’s and early 80’s. I had also played on several of the horns made by independent makers in Vienna which gave me a real comparison. Most of them were very tight and had a lot of resistance (back pressure) which was unlike the Yamaha horns and one other incredible instrument owned by Roland Berger, the famed first horn of the Vienna Philharmonic.

From the time I first heard Berger’s playing and his incredible rendition of Siegfried’s “Long Call” I had hoped to be able to study with him even though I had no idea if he took “outside” students. The opportunity came during the summer of 1977 when our Lieurance Woodwind Quintet was in residence at the American Institute of Musical Studies in Graz, Austria. I thought I could somehow make it to Salzburg from Graz on the train and so I wrote Professor Berger in care of the Vienna Philharmonic. I was prepared for rejection or no correspondence at all but received a really nice reply from one of the Philharmonic staff that he would be willing to take me during the summer. I was to meet him at the stage door of the Salzburg Festspielhaus where we had the lessons on stage where the horn section sat. While I had seen a few pictures of Berger, in real life he was a rather imposing figure. First, he was a big man by Austrian standards at over 6 feet in height and probably weighed over 200 lbs. At that time he had a short-cropped black beard, longish swept back hair, and was wearing a black leather flite (or motorcycle) type short jacket. He mentioned that he had just finished a football game and he was definitely in great physical shape (always a big help in playing the horn!) We both sat down and made a little “small talk” (his English was quite good) as I pulled my horn out of its case and put my mouthpiece in the receiver.

The first thing he did was look at my horn (Conn 8D) which actually drew no response from him. I asked him what he would like for me to play for him. He replied that he was most comfortable working on orchestral excerpts since that was what he had been working on his whole professional career. During the six hours total that I spent with him, he never wanted to work on any solos and especially no etudes. I did ask him what etudes he had studied and he mentioned the Karl Stiegler studies but seemed uninterested in showing me what they were about.

The series will be posted here on a Monday/Wednesday/Friday schedule. Part II will continue with Till Eulenspiegel.

Remembering my teacher, Mike Hatfield

Who was your most influential teacher? It took me years to realize it, but my most influential teacher was F. Michael Hatfield (1936-2020), my major professor for my Doctoral studies at Indiana University.

This statement is likely to surprise some of my former students, as I mention Verne Reynolds far more often in lessons. Reynolds was my teacher for my MM and one semester of DMA studies at Eastman. I worked very hard with him, learned a lot (detailed further in this article), made progress to the point of advancing in auditions and winning a slot in the National Repertory Orchestra, but also at the end of those studies I really needed a break from his style of teaching.

After Eastman, I was out of school for a year and a half, and for a year of that lived in Rochester, taking private lessons and auditions (as I recently described further here). I made finals several times, but I was in fact interested to teach at the college level and felt that I needed to go back to school to complete that Doctorate.

Another thing I rarely mention to my students is that I applied only to IU to continue my Doctoral studies. Hatfield was not my teacher in Aspen, but I had contact with him first through studies at the Aspen Music festival (1982, 83, 85), and in particular in the later summers worked with him in ensembles several times (a 1985 performance of Carmina Burana with Sergiu Comissiona conducting being particularly memorable, he was on first, I was on fourth). Besides buzzing around Aspen in his jeep, he was also a fine performer, (having served among other positions as Principal Horn of the Cincinnati Symphony for 23 seasons), and I liked how he interacted with his students.

Looking back, I realize also that Hatfield must have looked at me as someone he could work with, and that I was someone with a work ethic and potential. That acceptance was also one of those big moments that created what my life has become. I would have never met my wife of now 30 years without going to IU, etc.

At IU I studied with Hatfield for seven semesters, plus I was his teaching assistant for three of those years (1988-91–the official IU terminology was either Associate Instructor or Graduate Assistant, depending on my actual load any given semester). I changed my embouchure with him the first semester of my studies, and learned so much beyond what I knew with just the MM. What literature didn’t I study with him? In addition to that, I taught horn lessons for up to three students a semester, assisted with the horn studio in general, conducted horn ensemble readings, taught horn techniques (methods) for music education students, and ran a course for brass chamber music ensembles. Those years were an incredible experience for me in many ways.

Still, it is rare for me to mention Hatfield when I teach lessons today. Perhaps that is as it should be. There is the occasional story related to some excerpt. My students would not know it, but my system of note taking in lessons is based on his, and my general scheme of teaching is similar, although I think with a bit more structure.

I think the biggest musical thing I gained from my studies with Hatfield was a better ability to interpret music. Let me explain. With Reynolds especially, he dictated how I was to play things. They sounded good that way, his approach was solidly thought out, but I was playing music that way because he said to play it that way. With Hatfield, that was not his approach at all. We looked at the music, and he made me think about phrase structures and such and derive an interpretation from that. He did not dictate an interpretation; he facilitated the development of critical thinking skills in relation to making music. It was exactly what I needed at that point in my studies to grow as a player and teacher.

Another technique I picked up from Hatfield that I use in my teaching frequently is a recording setup. He had microphones and a cassette tape system in his office that he used frequently. Prior to that, none of my teachers had made use of this in lessons, and hearing things back in real time in a lesson situation enabled me to hear my own problems and further develop interpretations and critical thinking skills.

I would be remiss not to mention that Rick Serapinoff helped me much more on my dissertation than anyone actually on my IU Doctoral committee. But, playing wise, ultimately it was Hatfield that helped me prepare the auditions I won in Evansville and Nashville, and several others that I made finals and advanced in. He was my final horn teacher, and he mentored me through a critical period of my life.

When you are the teaching assistant for someone for three years, you also know much of his or her life, their strengths, and their weaknesses. At the time, I knew Hatfield certainly was a humble and very hard worker, a very dedicated teacher. He regularly had over 20 students at IU and probably 5 or 6 more of them at CCM (where he then still taught one day a week!), and he went to very close to every concert that involved his students. He taught hours and hours of lessons in a row without breaks every week, and was incredibly supportive and giving of his time. With my own years of teaching, looking back at him now, he was clearly working much too hard, in what was in reality a rather difficult and likely stressful horn teaching situation. His actual teaching load at the time was always close to twice as heavy as that of Myron Bloom, who had his office just two doors down the hallway. Hatfield kept a positive attitude, I do not recall a complaint from him (other than maybe health related, especially when he had the broken ribs**), but this is all to say college teaching is not the easy gig some might think it to be.

Speaking of working with Myron, there are stories. One I will share is that it was an honor to perform, and then record with IU faculty, the Dvorak Serenade for Wind Instruments, Op.44, with this horn section:

  1. Myron Bloom
  2. John Ericson
  3. Mike Hatfield

The recording was, to my knowledge, never released. Two specific stories. One is that Bloom played on three (!) different horns during the course of the recording sessions; some takes on an early Elkhart 8D (I’m thinking 300,000 series), some on an Eastlake 8D (borrowed from one of his current IU students!), and some on an Alexander 103 (which he just loved looking at). The other story is that on the very last section of the end of the work, there was only one take, and it seemed clear to me that Bloom did not get a clean one. The conductor asked if everyone was happy and Bloom said nothing and I said nothing and Hatfield said nothing. Probably was a smart move for me and Hatfield. Oh, and Bloom told me during the sessions that my 500,000 series 8D, while it sounded great, was unusable, he had played horns like it and I needed a different horn. I was not in a position to get one though, and ultimately I played that very horn most of the time for many years. Hatfield was using, of course, his Lawson-upgraded brass Holton Farkas.

I saw Hatfield the year he retired (2004), and was glad to further reconnect with him several times in his retirement, such as in 2012 at the Denton IHS symposium where this photo was taken at breakfast. He always spoke to me with such genuine care and concern, and was so enthused about my family and where my career had taken me, our later conversations are such a warm memory. At the same time, he was also willing to share with me the realities of his life, I think to a further degree than he might have if I had not worked with him so closely. It was a very special experience, and a reminder that horn professors have their own sets of individual life challenges to face.

Returning to his teaching, he preferred to treat each student individually. I do not recall an obvious, specific pattern of materials that he used with everyone, although I do remember being impressed that he had literally a photographic memory of everything in Maxime-Alphonse, clearly it was a favorite teaching material. Besides the development of interpretations mentioned already, he was great at solving problems. I worked out many of them with him, and to my mind, that is the essence of good teaching. For another example of something I use from him, the “thumb on the chin” technique I described in the recent article on the low range was from Hatfield, I use that all the time with students — it is great for exploring and solving low range issues.

Mr. Hatfield (he will always be Mr. Hatfield to me) passed on July 4, 2020 at the age of 84. I have no idea how many students he would have worked with over the years, but it is no small number. Personally I took well over 100 lessons with him, and that number of hours working together is enough to be highly, if quietly, influential on any life. He was my final horn teacher and has a special place in my life to be sure. May he rest in peace and my sincere condolences to his family and friends. His obituary may be found here.

**Sometime during my work with/for Hatfield, he was hit by a bicyclist while walking on a sidewalk near the school of music. The accident broke as I recall three ribs, and he could not play horn at all for a while. He was very stoic by nature but clearly, it was painful for him. To this day, I am nervous when I see anyone coming toward me riding a bicycle on a sidewalk.

Bad Conventional Wisdom, part 5: The mouthpiece

If there is one single piece of advice that has held back more players, it might be this quote from the Farkas book: “If the truth be told, no one mouthpiece or change of mouthpiece is going to revolutionize anyone’s playing ability.” In truth, a change of mouthpiece can absolutely change your life!

Besides quality control issues and design issues of common, standard mouthpieces that might hold you back, another underlying big issue is that traditional mouthpieces are designed to work best for people with thin lips.

Before elaborating on that topic, a few quick points:

  • Of all the mouthpieces in the Farkas book lineup, only the FARKAS MODEL is all that good
  • You can get fantastic mouthpieces today relative to in the 20th century due to CNC lathes
  • You do need at least five of them, if you have at least five one of them should stick out as being better than the others
  • For those curious, I am currently using a stainless steel Houghton (Houser) H-4 cup with a Houghton H3 rim in black H-Kote on my Patterson Geyer, and versions of the Houser San Francisco cup on other horns I play frequently. Among my students, most can find a mouthpiece they really like among these four: Houser San Francisco cup or Houghton (Houser) H-1, H-2, or H-4.

Returning to the topic of relatively heavy or thin lips, I have relatively full lips for my ethnicity. This has given me some level of insight that other teachers might not have. In addition, an important point to highlight is that good teaching involves problem-solving skills. You should be able as a teacher to recognize when the issue is a mouthpiece issue and not a playing issue.

I have had students with heavier lips than mine and for sure, many will benefit from a mouthpiece with an inner diameter of 18 MM or more, the right rim choice can clear up every playing issue you are dealing with. For a general idea of how big that is, in that size range a US dime should fit down into the top of the mouthpiece rather than sitting on the rim.

Traditional mouthpieces, such as described by Farkas, typically have an inner diameter of around 17.25 MM. If you have heavy lips at all, this is really too small. You might have been told by some teacher to roll the lips in to compensate, but that is really not good advice. The correct solution is to use a rim with a larger inner diameter.

Modern screw rim mouthpieces have made trying rims and cups so much easier than 50 years ago. It is expensive — my current mouthpiece sells for $220! — but it is money well worth spending, and every higher-level horn teacher should have a collection of good mouthpieces and rims for you to try. For larger diameter rims, the Houghton H-1 mouthpieces come in a variety of sizes, and the Houser E rim does as well and is an excellent choice to consider.

Speaking of rims, you will also find that different rim shapes can drastically alter the clarity of articulations and the color of the overall sound. If you have never experimented, you owe it to yourself to do so.

I also mentioned earlier in this series something about endurance and mouthpiece rim contour (in relation to mouthpiece pressure). I find a very rounded rim contour focuses pressure onto a point rather than spreading it out, and of course, a very narrow rim focuses pressure to a smaller area. Experimentation is very important toward finding a balance between all the factors on an individual basis.

Above all, do not use a generic mouthpiece! A switch to a more contemporary design could absolutely revolutionize your playing. As a teacher I have observed too many good students slogging along on some obviously brand X not good mouthpiece, and that is all they have. Ignorance can be bliss, but it is not a good thing when it comes to your horn playing and equipment. You really need several mouthpieces, more on that topic here:

One other important note for teachers, I have had students who had odd playing problems, but were using what I thought to be good mouthpieces. I have found it incredibly helpful to have a variety of mouthpieces, as I can try their horn with the same type of mouthpiece. In one specific case, I discovered that a Lawson mouthpiece was terrible on their horn! Not every mouthpiece works on every horn. That is why you must do some comparisons.

To close this series on a high note, I feel like I am finally coming out of a long tunnel of mouthpiece issues. The tunnel started in 2014, when I developed metal contact allergies and could no longer use a gold rim. I finally settled on a plastic rim and got used to it, with the very “dry” feel it has. However, I was always struck by how if any of my students ever tried that rim, they hated it. And, if I were honest, I was not liking it that well either, but it was better than not playing!

With the COVID pandemic and just practicing at home, I decided to push myself, knowing that I really should physically be able on a rim in stainless steel or with H-Kote. It took weeks, but I could! Then my intonation got wonky, with a very flat high range! Which led to more good changes. The result was I switched to using versions of the San Francisco cup on my other horns and the H4 on my Patterson Geyer. In addition, the rim is essentially the same as the rim I used when I won my job in Nashville, feels like home. I cannot wait to get back to some real playing in the fall.

Especially if you are in a dark tunnel with your playing, try changing mouthpiece. It really can help everything; do not mindlessly believe it is you instead of the mouthpiece, the bad conventional wisdom is wrong.

Thank you for following this series, expanded from a Zoom presentation made to Horns-United Cor Camp in June 2020. If you are associated with a school or organization that would like to see more, I am happy to do virtual presentations on a variety of topics, feel free to contact me for details.

Return to beginning of “Bad Conventional Wisdom” series.

Bad Conventional Wisdom, part 4: “Dropping the jaw” in the low range?

Some players seem to think this is bad conventional wisdom at least, as they found that “dropping the jaw” did not work for them. However, I must start with a spoiler alert. Dropping the jaw into the low range is not a myth, this conventional wisdom is correct. The issue is do you actually drop your jaw? Do you just imagine that you are dropping your jaw?

If you want to see it for yourself, there are MRI and X-ray videos online that confirm the motion of the jaw going into the low range of the horn. In summary,

  • The jaw drops markedly below middle C among elite horn players
  • Students often have to be convinced to make this “break,” but it is essential
  • In the Willis videos you will see her jaw goes down and forward, which is typical of the motion involved
  • Say “taw,” this type of motion will be helpful
  • You can see this in MRI, but it is easier to see jaw motion in the X-ray videos, as MRI focuses on soft tissues
  • The Eli Epstein book (3rd edition) has great illustrations as well.

What I have seen repeated in many horn lessons is students have heard that they need to drop their jaw, they think they are dropping their jaw, but actually they are not doing it! In this case, the conventional wisdom is correct. Of course, it is just one element of many in relation to improving the low range. The low range is highly individualistic, but dropping the jaw ends up being among the most critical elements, along with not being overly relaxed and keeping good contact with the mouthpiece.

In my publication The Low Horn Boot Camp I present a technique for self-study of your jaw motion. It involves taking your hand out of the bell, putting your thumb on your chin, and playing into the low range. Try it! You may be surprised to learn you are not doing what you thought you were. For more on this and many other low range tips see the book.

When the series concludes the topic is mouthpieces

Bad Conventional Wisdom, part 3: The dreaded topic of too much mouthpiece pressure

Another topic I want to address in this series is mouthpiece pressure. We have all seen the page in the Farkas book where he has the horn on the shelf in an exercise to reduce mouthpiece pressure.

First, I would mention that I personally heard Farkas himself in masterclasses more than once state that he regretted putting that photo in the book. Partially a safety issue, you could lose the horn on the floor (!), but also he I think realized that this exercise, while perhaps creating extra awareness, was advocating for too little pressure.

I have concluded after years of teaching that good students trying to play with too little pressure is the bigger problem. As mentioned earlier in this series, there are different setups, and certainly, some players need differing basic amounts of mouthpiece pressure. Remember the story of Goldilocks and her porridge. The ideal mouthpiece pressure is not too little, not too much, but “just right.”

It is not just a range thing either. You will find that at different dynamics you will need differing amounts of pressure to produce a good tone. Do what you need to do! Focus on the good sound, and you will be in an OK place for pressure.

In short, looking at the big picture of all of this, some mouthpiece pressure is certainly appropriate. I suspect many fine players use heavier pressure without being aware of it or admitting it in print.

Speaking personally, my embouchure formation with my slightly heavy lips seems to require more mouthpiece pressure than what Farkas advocated, and my guess is that the very light pressure described might only work for people with very thin lips. It would be interesting to see this aspect studied specifically.

There have been a few studies on mouthpiece pressure by the way. Most notably, I like to point people to the study of trumpet players by Joe Barbenel, John Booth Davies, and Patrick Kenny, “Science proves musical myths wrong,” published in New Scientist, April 3, 1986. It is an interesting case study. From the article,

From these experiments, we can make several guarded statements. First, it is simply not true that professional players of the highest calibre use low levels of force on the mouthpiece. We could not differentiate amateur players from professionals in terms of the amount of force they used to perform a given task. Secondly, skilled players were no better than other groups at ranking photographs of players for the amount of force the subjects were using on the mouthpiece. The experts appeared to base their judgments of force on the general appearance of effort rather than on any specific cues. When asked to judge between different players, experts could not reliably tell who used the most force and who used the least.

The bad conventional wisdom result they expected was that professionals used less pressure and amateurs used more, but that was not the case at all. There was also little ability to look at a photo and tell if a player was using heavy or light pressure. One take away is that some fine professional players, while looking all relaxed, are actually using vastly more pressure than you would ever guess.

Where you actually fit in the spectrum of mouthpiece pressure will become clear as you above all listen and look for the very best sound. Pressure takes care of itself, especially if you have a friendly mouthpiece rim that is not too round or narrow.

When the series continues the topic is the low range.

Bad Conventional Wisdom, part 2: Tonguing misconceptions

0

Returning to the story of 2008 and my teaching and playing, I faced a reality that I did not do what I thought I was doing in the tonguing department. That fall (like every fall), I was working with students on a common problem, making shorter articulations. Every student comes in having studied with other people, and a common instruction, stated very clearly in the Farkas book, is to not tongue on the lips, with an exception for only one situation. To review Farkas on this,

  • For a sforzando the tongue is “placed very near the lip opening, perhaps even touching the lips, but not protruding between them”
  • As to tonguing on the teeth/gums, “Generally, better definition is obtained by attacking progressively farther forward on the teeth …”
  • “… conversely, tonguing higher onto the gums and farther back will produce softer attacks.”
  • “… never stop the air column abruptly by using the tongue …”

I knew – for years! – that I was actually tonguing on my lips for short notes, which I could very much feel in the middle and lower range in particular. What I did not know was that in most other situations I also tongued at least lightly on my lips. Which was wrong by the way I thought of things.

Consulting with some trusted sources, I learned that many people had figured this out, but it was not very reported, or known. In my own case, I was especially reassured by this passage from chapter V of A Practical Guide to French Horn Playing by Milan Yancich on the topic of articulation. After a discussion of first teaching a student how to start notes, Yancich makes it clear that you have to develop a wide range of articulations on the horn,

I then demonstrate different kinds of articulation: placing the tongue out very far between the teeth for heavy, marcato or hammered playing; placing it behind the upper teeth for legato playing; putting the tongue to the roof of the mouth to give an even more legato articulation; and finally placing the tip of the tongue against the lower teeth, using the flat of the tongue against the roof of the mouth to produce even another attack. The student then understands that the tongue, very much like the bow on a stringed instrument, can be used for many different types of articulation.

I certainly tongue differently in different situations. Returning to the Farkas book, he describes tonguing itself in a manner that is not physiologically accurate or possible really. The MRI horn studies have been very important to our understanding how things really work. In my recent podcast interview with Peter Iltis (MRI horn studies) he describes the motion of the tongue in tonguing as being oblique. It really is neither up and down or forward and backward.

Furthermore, if you look at the MRI studies of for example Sarah Willis online, you can see clearly the tongue motion into the lip opening which is not at all as Farkas described.

The reality is that some teachers have advocated for tonguing into the lip opening for many years. The most notable old source is from Anton Horner (1877-1971). If you have heard of him, you might think of him as the designer of the Horner model Kruspe, the horn that Conn copied to make their 8D horn. However, he was a very notable player, principal horn in Philadelphia and longtime professor at Curtis (1924-42). The following quote is from page 4 of his Primary Studies for the French Horn, where it may be found right before study No. 1.

Attack each note with your tongue as though you had a small hair or tiny piece of thread on the end of your tongue and wanted to force it out of your mouth.

Try it! The tongue is incredibly facile. Tonguing is simple; many teachers have made it difficult by using too many words and by using those words to describe things that are not possible.

In my own teaching, I am very concerned that students are able to achieve everything from the most connected legato to the most crisp staccato possible, and at all dynamics. Pick any one note, you will actually be tonguing differently at either end of that spectrum, there is no possible way to tongue everything the same and get the best results loud/soft/short/long. The shortest articulations in say Kopprasch require a “dut dut dut” attack that touches the lips (and stops the air column with the tongue), which really conflicts with the instructions found in Farkas.

You do not want to overthink it, but especially if you are a horn teacher you cannot just tell a student to imagine a result, you need to be able to give some specific instructions that are physiologically accurate. Instructions that do not simply repeat bad conventional wisdom.

When the series returns the topic will be mouthpiece pressure.

Bad Conventional Wisdom, part 1: Background, and a breathing story

0

As I shared in a workshop presentation back in 2010, I became a better teacher in 2008. I generated an article for Horn Matters related to that, Beyond Farkas: A Workshop Presentation (Update: no longer on the site), but that article only went so far, and did not get as directly as I should have at the topic of the dangers of conventional wisdom. I gave the topic another try on June 24 this summer, with a presentation to the Horns-United camp on the topic “Is ‘Conventional Wisdom’ holding back your horn playing?,” which got closer, but in this series this week my hope is to dig even deeper into the issues.

In the big picture, some of the issues are the result of lack of knowledge and repeating things told you by teachers or read in books. Where this is especially bad today in our world of horn teaching is that conventional wisdom comes from horn teaching that grew from a time when most horn players were mostly of one gender and ethnicity.

I studied with a number of good teachers. After finishing my Masters at Eastman with Verne Reynolds, I was playing well, but was helped greatly while taking professional auditions by private lessons with Becky Root, Peter Kurau, Milan Yancich, and especially Eli Epstein, all of the Rochester Philharmonic at the time. He was still developing his pedagogy (in comparison to that seen in his method, Horn Playing from the Inside Out), but his overall pedagogy was a big influence at the time in my audition preparation.

However, backing up a step, there was a group of very memorable lessons with Becky Root, Principal Horn of the Rochester Philharmonic at the time, where she talked to me about breathing. None of my teachers to that point that I can recall had ever taken time to work directly with me on the mechanics of breathing, and it was extremely helpful at the time. I later came to realize that 6’ tall male horn players can sound fine breathing OK only, and I sounded fine breathing OK only. For Root, almost a foot shorter than me, she needed to breathe very well all the time, and she had more awareness of the issue. I have taken this to heart in my playing and teaching over years, and this is just one of many issues that the modern horn teacher needs to be aware of in relation to gender and ethnicity and playing the horn at the highest level.

When I went back to school to work on my Doctorate, I chose the Doctor of Music in Brass Pedagogy program at Indiana University, working with Michael Hatfield, as I was especially interested in pedagogy. Part of any effective pedagogy is an understanding of the actual mechanics of brass playing. In that period, it became more and more clear to me that people were very hesitant to be critical of the Farkas book. Let me state clearly, I have no personal axe to grind against Prof. Farkas, I treasure the memory of several lessons with him and being part of the horn quintet that played at his 50th Wedding Anniversary reception. Not to mention that the Farkas book was a revolution to my horn playing when I first read it in High School. However, in that period I began to really question elements of his published pedagogy.

After IU, I won the position of Third Horn in the Nashville Symphony. Over time with that full time playing experience and then teaching at the college level (since 2001 at Arizona State), what became more and more clear to me was there is a spectrum of ways to play the horn. Stated more clearly, I began to see how Farkas in 1957 in The Art of French Horn Playing was toward one end of the spectrum, and the approach presented by Gunther Schuller in his 1962 publication Horn Technique was toward the other end. They are interesting publications to compare directly, as you get the sense that Schuller probably thought everything in the Farkas book was wrong, but he never says the approach is wrong, he just presents a completely different approach in his own book.

What has happened in the horn world over time is that even today (!), some 60 years after the book was published (!!), teachers and students are hesitant to be critical of the Farkas book. The result is the continuation of a conventional wisdom approach that is in some ways on one end of a spectrum, and other ways very dated or applicable only to a subset of players. It is really time to move on from dated sources, bad conventional wisdom approaches do not lead to the best results for a horn world full of diversity.

When the series continues we will start with the topic of tonguing.

Mailbag: How to hold a Concert Mellophone

Getting back to the mailbag, a question came in a while ago on how to hold a traditional, concert mellophone.

The short answer is I have seen concert mellophone resources from the 1930s/40s that show the left hand holding either the rim of the bell or the valve section (fingering, of course, with the right hand). It was/is not normal to put a hand in the bell of a traditional mellophone.

However, backing up for those confused by the above, what is a concert mellophone? They are those horns that look like compact, right handed piston valve horns. They were still popular 100 years ago for young players and community bands and such. They take a different type of mouthpiece than the modern mellophone. I have a longer resource on these instruments here:

For a visual look at the topic, just this week a great video was posted by Robert Levine, a part of his “Week With a Horn” series, which reminded me of this question. He describes how to hold it and much more.

This is part of a series he has been posting on his YouTube channel and on his website, REL Brassworks. Check it out the website for even more here:

https://relbrassworks.com/media/

New: 30 Modern Preparatory Etudes and Solos

Stuck in Kopprasch? Tired of the same-old-same-old? Looking for a group of short, contemporary etudes and solo horn works?

Just in time to brighten up a long summer of practice is a new publication, 30 Modern Preparatory Etudes and Solos for French Horn. An expansion of a shorter publication I brought out in 2016, you will find these etudes and solos to be incredibly useful in your teaching, study, or personal practice. Affordably priced at $9.99 in print or $4.49 as Kindle, search for these on Amazon or follow the links from http://hornnotes.com/

Here’s the blurb, and I have a bit more to add after it.

These new etudes and solos, composed in a modern style, bridge a gap in the horn etude literature and function as a concise, modern version of the classic Schantl/Pottag book of Preparatory Melodies. The 26 short etudes focus primarily on technical issues, but the goals overall are accuracy and preparing students for performance of more difficult 20th-century etudes and works of a similar character which present a variety of challenges. The book concludes with a set of four new works that review the melodic materials of the etudes, formatted as solo horn works suitable for jury or studio class performance.

The solos are a special feature of this publication. The Cugnot Thirty Etudes for Horn, a 19th century etude publication, divided their etudes into groups and had a “recapitulation” etude that covered those materials as a review. Taking that idea as an inspiration, I used melodic elements from each of the etudes to create “solo horn works” patterned (in form and character) on the most popular of those for horn, to serve as a review of the etudes and to challenge students toward a higher level musical performance. Laudation is based the Krol Laudatio, Fantasia for Horn is based on the Arnold Fantasy, Allegory for Solo Horn is based on the Persichetti Parable, and Intergalactic Corona is based on the Messiaen Appel interstellaire. If the resulting solo works of mine are worthy of recital performance I will let you decide, but I think you will at least find them an interesting feature to explore.

Finally, I return to the topic of Kopprasch. It is an effective study and teaching material, but also overused, and maybe emblematic of lazy teaching if it is the main or only material used. TRY SOME NEW MATERIALS! Especially right now, as so much playing time is being devoted to individual practice, time to play something new. For these new etudes and more check http://hornnotes.com/

UPDATE: Two sample etudes to try from the publication may be found in this article