Home Blog Page 35

So how about that horn/French horn meme?

A number of memes have been posted on Horn Matters over the years but the one posted last weekend on Facebok by Bruce Hembd touched a nerve, with as of now more than 80,000 people reached, well over 500 likes, and more than 350 shares! It is by far the highest traffic thing Horn Matters has ever posted there.

French-hornWhy so much interest? Besides all the “war” over many years between those that support “horn” over “French horn,” the comments on Facebook begin to point to the answer. One person in particular kind of hit on it best, in that the Internet is actually reinforcing the use of French horn today, as search results are often not real useful unless you add the word “French.”

Horn by itself leads to all sorts of random stuff. Animal horns, car horns, and any musical instrument with a mouthpiece for example fall in the category of being horns.

Adding to the problem of course is the fact that the term horn is just used so loosely outside of classical music. For example especially in jazz, they refer to all blown instruments as “horns.”

I find myself using the word French horn more and more these days, and I would mention also the world of Twitter has influenced me on this. The hashtag #Frenchhorn brings up completely relevant results, but #horn is mostly unrelated to (French) horn.

But then, of course,

The International Horn Society recommends that HORN be recognized as the correct name for our instrument in the English language. [From the Minutes of the First General Meeting, June 15, 1971, Tallahassee, Florida USA]

So there we are. It is not a huge battle over a huge issue, but it is one that will continue!

On the single F horn, part VII: Progress!

When I last posted about my current CD project in September (here), things seemed to be moving along well and actually they were. Then things got busy professionally and personally, various things slowed me down. But progress was being made slowly and finally the project is nearing completion.

IMG_0931This photo was taken during mastering the project and I must say I am very happy with how the project has turned out. Everyone needs to hear it!

For those curious, the project now has a title, Rescued! Which relates to the theme of the CD, I have recorded a group of forgotten works for horn and piano (but all are on ISMLP) that I feel really deserve to be performed today, and I recorded them on a period instrument. The sound is distinctive I think in a very good way, I do hope you will check it out when it is finally released. The program notes begin:

Rescued! celebrates the forgotten works of a group of 19th-century hornists and composers. The music included in this recording was composed between roughly 1860 and 1910 and are quality works aimed primarily at low horn players of the late 19th century who still used single F horns.

I still have some loose ends to tie up (such as finalize the cover) but finally will have time to do this after the semester ends. It won’t be long! Be watching for this to be out soon.

UPDATE: And … I am such an optimist. Originally I was going to self-release this, but then went looking at options for CD labels and finally went “home” to Summit, who I am confident will do a great job! Won’t be long now ….

Continue to conclusion of series

Some notes on the art of Geyer (and Knopf) style horns

0

In the past month I have had the luxury of visits to my studio by two excellent horn makers (Atkinson and Patterson) and a lengthy E-mail conversation with yet another (Medlin). Those experiences have pointed out to me even more the black art of making Geyer (and Knopf) style horns.

Black art? It really seems like some kind of magic to experience how apparently small differences of design will make huge differences in how you perceive the playing quality and sound of an instrument. The high Bb is well known as a note to test on Geyer style horns (more here), but there are a lot of other differences obvious ranging from subtle things like perception of “clicks” (more here) to much more audible differences.

IMGP5704For example, production horns don’t tend to have long soldered connections between tubes of the length seen in this photo. Note there is no brace between the tube next to the bell and the bell, with a long soldered connection barely visible (and much easier to see in reality than in a photo). All the custom makers I have had contact with recently make use of this type of connection to varying degrees, which makes for a more connected, solid instrument, but requires more skillful construction and potentially more involved cleanup in soldering. Production horns for those reasons tend to have most or even all connections done with braces.

IMGP5705Speaking of braces, that is another variable and it is hugely eye opening to compare the bracing on several otherwise similar horns. Brace placement is done very intentionally in the hands of a fine maker and certainly impacts how a horn plays. There are choices to be made that are based on often years of slight variations and experimentation. From the perspective of the horn buyer you will see that some makers leave out braces that other horns have, others use styles of brace that are different than others in the same general locations, etc. It is not haphazardly done in any way, it is actually another very critical element of how a horn plays.

Some other major differences between horns I was able to briefly try included visible things such as reduction of the number of joints (especially by Atkinson with their new valve section, but also through the use of long pieces of tubing as well) on down to less visible things such as hollow valves (Atkinson again, which made a rather substantial difference) and of course subtle differences of the taper of the conical sections of the horn. As another example, I believe that you can perceive differences in sound and playing qualities between horns that, while otherwise identical, have brass or have nickel silver slide tubes.

The most eye opening differences I experienced when trying these horns recently related to a pair of otherwise identical Patterson horns, their Geyer and Knopf pattern horns. Most would consider them to be very similar designs, which they are (more here). The horns he had were made with exactly the same tapers and materials, and it was extremely interesting how different they felt and sounded. The only physical differences were the slightly different wrap and brace placements, yet those differences were easily felt and heard. It was not like one was actually better either, but clearly they were different horns — even though from the shop of the same maker and made with the same materials and tapers. But with that being said, I want to emphasize again that both instruments were fine instruments; the differences will mainly make them “speak” to different buyers who are coming at their testing of the instruments from different perspectives.

There are many fine horn makers out there, try all the horns you can and take a look at the small differences you can observe between different horns of outwardly the same model. It is an interesting study and part of what makes a great horn stand out to you from one that is not set up as ideally for your way of playing the horn.

And to close, thank you again to Atkinson and Patterson for stopping by with your horns, and I hope to develop the conversation with Medlin into an interview article in the near future.

In search of the $7,000 French horn

0

One question raised fairly often is on the topic of what new horns can be purchased for roughly $7,000? Underlying the question is the fact that so many of the horns that really have advanced players interested are in the $9,000 plus range, and horns that sell for less than $5,000 are not what advanced students, good amateurs, and pros are looking for.

What the horn shopper hopes for in the new $7,000 horn is one that has much of the feel and sound of a “custom” or high end professional horn but without quite the big dent in the wallet — with an additional point being the buyer is in fact wanting a new horn, not a used horn, of which there are many to be found in roughly this same price range.

This article will focus on the horn market in the USA (the horns below can all be purchased from dealers in the USA) in the general retail price range (2016) of $6,000-8,000. The below are listed alphabetically by maker and organized by general type of horn wrap.

A brief word about prices

In the big picture all advertised prices, depending on the dealer, are probably negotiable. The article that follows presents no prices, merely noting where the horns discussed generally fit into our target $6,000 to $8,000 retail price range. Contact dealers for quotes. The reasons why they fit in the price range are all in general the same, having to do with some combination of the quality of parts (especially the valves and bell) and overall construction relative to that seen in the typical student model horn.

As links and prices change over time, you will need to search to check availability and prices.

Geyer/Knopf wrap horns

The higher end horn market in recent years has clearly trended in the USA toward horns with a Geyer/Knopf type wrap (more in general on these horn types here), or some closely related wrap that would be perceived, at least at a distance, to be of the same general type. Descriptions tend to call them Geyer style horns, probably due to Geyer being long out of business but Knopf still sells horns.

Briz

First up alphabetically is the Pope Balu Alliance horn, which is a Knopf style horn made in China by Briz. This is their top of line model and features a hand hammered bell tail and first branch. Priced at the lower end of our price range, only about ten of these are made a year at this time.

Finke

German horn maker Finke has for many years produced a large line of horns. The models to note here are their numbers 68 and 69, also known as the Americus and Brendon models, which are upper end of this price range and are what could be described as modified Knopf wrap horns.

Willson-Geyer-300Willson

Probably best known in the USA for Euphoniums and tubas, Swiss maker Willson also makes a line of horns that price out at lower end of this price range. The CS250 series horn, while they describe it as a Geyer style horn, is a classic Knopf wrap instrument. [Disclaimer: I actually bought one of these (but subsequently upgraded into a higher price range), which is part of why this whole topic of the $7,000 horn resonates with me, and why I expect we will see more fine horns in this price range in coming years.]

Yamaha

This is probably the biggest news, as earlier this year it was announced (more here) that Yamaha is discontinuing the 667 horn (Knopf wrap) in favor of the new 671/871 models. A true Geyer style horn, the 871 will end up priced at retail around the middle of our price range. This joins another horn in the Yamaha catalog that is also in this price range, the YHR-667V horn, which prices out toward the top of the range. It would be considered a modified Knopf style horn.

Kruspe and modified Kruspe wrap horns

In common use today the term “Kruspe wrap” refers to any horn made to the same design layout as the Conn 8D (which was based on a Kruspe design — more on the topic of Kruspe or Geyer here), and we use here the term “modified Kruspe” to reference the same general design but with the separate Bb horn tuning slide (such as seen on a Holton Farkas model).

8Ddraw1956.jpgConn

The Vintage 8D (V8D) model is the top of the line from Conn and prices out in the lower end of our target price range. One advertised feature is “custom stress free assembly,” which is a clue as to why this is priced where it is rather than with the standard 8D models — and also a general clue as to what is driving the price higher on all the horns in this article.

Holton

Holton is part of Conn-Selmer as well, and also has a top of the line model available, the H105. This horn is a modified Kruspe type with a special bronze bell, and prices out in the middle of this price range.

Hoyer

German maker Hoyer has a large line of horns that are available widely in the USA. Two of their Kruspe style horns price out at the upper end of our target price range, their 7801 and 7802 models.

Willson

Joining their Geyer/Knopf wrap horn (described earlier) in this price range are three more models that all price out at lower end of the spectrum. The CS240 is a modified Kruspe wrap and the CS260 and CS263 are both Kruspe style horns.

“Other” wrap horns

At least one more horn is out there in this price range that is not a Geyer or a Kruspe (for a bit more info on this general topic see here).

Hoyer

The Hoyer C-12 double horn has much of the look of a triple horn at a glance – the design is clearly related to their triple horn models — and is at the upper end of this price range.

To close…

The big news in this price range for 2016 is certainly the Yamaha 871, it puts a major maker right there with a product that is going to get a lot of serious looks. But don’t overlook the other models in the range, they are all there for distinct reasons related to the cost of manufacture and quality of parts, and are yet another reason to go to a good horn workshop to try some new horns! For more on trying horns in general see this article.

The Bordogni-Gumbert-Ericson Collection, and a special “Low Horn Boot Camp” edition

Update: The Low Horn Boot Camp is now out in an affordable second edition in print and Kindle versions through Horn Notes Edition. The other versions described below were out of print for a time but are now back in a second edition, more information here or search on Amazon, they are available worldwide in print and Kindle versions.

====

Back in 2011 I released a collection of low horn etudes, the first section being based on the famous Bordogni (“Rochut”) etudes that are so beloved by low brass players. The first half of the Bordogni etudes in particular, as published in that publication, they worked great for the initial development of horn low range, proven after use with quite a number of students. More on that in a moment.

Talking with colleagues I realized there was clearly a larger market for a new version of the Bordogni etudes, so the past several months I have gone back and developed seven (!) new publications, basing my new edition of these classic etudes on the version by Ferdinand Gumbert, gaining in the process extra musical variety compared to the commonly used Rochut (trombone) version.

The graphic visually tells the story of the range of the new publications, but to explain it more directly let’s start with the standard bass clef version. It is at the same pitch level (noting that Rochut changed a few keys) as the standard version used widely on the trombone. As to the other versions, the standard treble clef version is an octave higher, the low treble clef is down a fourth from the standard treble version, the low bass clef is down a fourth from the standard bass clef, the extra low bass clef is down an octave from the standard version, and ultra low bass clef is down an octave and a fourth from standard bass clef. Simple as that!

Each version will be of interest to different brass players – trumpet, horn, trombone, Euphonium, bass trombone, tuba — not to mention players of other instruments. Tell your friends! This publication is one that will be useful to a great number of players, and will be available inexpensively in a convenient E-book format which prints easily or may be read directly on any E-reader device (iPad, etc.).

Boot-CampBack to the “Low Horn Boot Camp” version, this is actually where the subsequent Bordogni editions all began for me. Some horn teachers use the standard Bordogni Rochut trombone etudes to try to teach low horn, but I found that they really are not low enough to work on the low range effectively. I then stumbled upon a version (no longer available) that had been transposed down a fourth, and that pitch level was right for low horn — but I also found it was so low that horn players initially had difficulty hearing/playing the music. So I began in my teaching to pair those low bass clef etudes with what became the low treble clef version, an octave higher, to kick start the low horn learning process. These are much more playable by most any player, but still have their own challenges, including especially playing across the break and playing in tune.

The pairs of etudes, combined with the suggestions included for low range development, make the “Boot Camp” version ideal for any player or teacher looking for effective materials for initial low horn study! And I believe that having this new variety choices of ranges for these classic studies will be of great use to teachers of all brass instruments.

Topic: “Clicks” and valve changes

0

I have been working on final editing of a series of new Bordogni publications (more soon!) and have been playing as a result a lot of slurs and legato. Also, coming off the period instrument recital recently performed, I am looking at my modern horns with fresh eyes so to speak, and the topic of “clicks” came to mind.

So what are clicks?

I don’t believe this topic has been addressed directly in any horn publication actually. I first heard of noted the term used this way by Gunther Schuller when he gave a master class here at ASU in 2004 (more here). I wrote about it at the time,

…“clicks” (his term–I would say “bumps”) in slurs are harder to remove. To a point they can be the result of valve changes but even without valve changes they are hard to not have. Blowing through the notes helps but even on a horn with leaky valves and a very deep mouthpiece I find that clicks are more or less inevitable. On a modern horn with an efficient mouthpiece it is very hard to not have clicks, especially if you are listening closely for them.

valves-snipWhat is interesting is I can certainly tell a difference between different horns in terms of clicks (disruption of the airstream) and valve changes in slurs. One of my horns in particular, it is the best by far and my assumption is it has to do with the way the valves were made, that the valve section of that horn is the best. It is a joy to play on the Bordogni editing compared to for example the 19th century style F horn I used on the recital, that valve section clicks much more in valve changes. One might guess a leaky valve section would be the least “clicky” in the valve changes, but of those available to me the best horn in fact has very tight valves, they are not at all leaky or old.

Of course you can rate horns many ways but with the topic briefly explained I just throw it out to the horn world. Give it a try; it is something you can feel easily if you focus in on it as part of AB testing of multiple horns.

UPDATE: For more on the topic, including a brief look at the underlying cause of clicks, see this recently (2016) updated article in the Hornmasters series:

Developing a daily routine to enhance pitch placement

Last weekend I played a recital using four different horns (more here, all not my normal horn) and on three different mouthpieces (all not my normal mouthpiece, but mostly with my rim). It was very fun, bucket list type stuff, but there is a consequence to it (and the struggle to play in tune on those four different horns), as subsequently as the week began I could not play in tune on any modern horn!

I have had this experience several times before, developing the topic in fact into a full scale article that was published in The Horn Call 33, no. 3 (May, 2003). The title of that article was “Placing Pitch ‘in the Pocket'”

Pocket?

Before getting to how to apply this to your warmup, the following is how I began the 2003 article.

Proper pitch placement is certainly an issue of concern for horn players. Many less experienced players play high on the pitch, and as a result need to pull their main tuning slides out a great deal. Most fine players, however, don’t need to pull their horns down nearly so far. In reflection I realize that over the course of my own studies my pitch certainly dropped; I needed to pull my horn out less as I advanced in my playing abilities. This was not something that I intentionally set out to do and no teacher told me that I needed to pull out less, but I did over the years learn how to place the pitch better. To play well with the best possible tone you need to place pitch correctly. Two keys to learning how to describe and achieve proper pitch placement recently fell into place for me while working on a recital.

The first key was realized when performing a sonata (Danzi, E-flat) on the natural horn, my first performance with fortepiano at A=435. I came to realize that when I practiced on the natural horn without the fortepiano reinforcing the low pitch I had a very, very difficult time keeping the pitch down. My ears wanted to hear pitch at A=440 and were, despite the horn being tuned correctly for A=435, guiding my embouchure back up to A=440. As a result, I was playing very high on the pitch on the natural horn and this transferred over to the valved horn as well; I was not keeping the pitch down where it needed to be. Thus, I had to consciously re-learn how to place the pitch again, something that had previously happened for me in a very natural way during my studies.

The second key involved a realization about practicing with a practice mute frequently. We have small children and these past few years, during which I have been teaching full time, I have frequently had to practice in the evenings with a practice mute. I finally realized that I was playing very high on the pitch on the mute and I also discovered that my personal sense of pitch placement is very much tied up with tonal color. The feedback of tone I was used to relying upon was basically lost on the practice mute. (I now practice inside our walk-in closet when the kids are asleep, to avoid using the mute).

On any horn, you have some freedom to bend the pitch, some horns more, some horns less. There is a range of motion over which you can bend the pitch sharp or flat without it breaking or jumping to another note. The upper limit is somewhat firm; on the downward side you can normally bend the pitch somewhat further, especially in the lower range. Within the range that you can bend each pitch there is a central portion of the range of motion that is more stable, that is to say, there is a boundary at which you cannot bend the pitch easily down or up but you can pass this point if you force the pitch hard. The location you want to place the pitch in is at the lower end of this central, more stable area of the pitch for any given note on the horn. This location can be found either by “feel” or by listening to the tone. There is a “sweet spot” where the tone is the most resonant and beautiful that is a stable location you can place any note in. It feels to me the most like a “pocket.”

The type of exercises I use to find and define this pocket are pitch-bending exercises. These can take many forms; I currently frequently use “The first beautiful tones on the horn” exercise found in Frøydis Ree Wekre, Thoughts on Playing the Horn Well (2nd ed., 1994), which works the downward bend well, and I then follow this with several pitches played in the manner of the exercise on page 16 [“Sustained tones with pitch variation”] of William C. Robinson, An Illustrated Advanced Method for French Horn Playing (Wind Music, 1971), which calls for upward and downward bends of a held long tone. There are many possibilities for what to play. I am not really looking at playing in tune the upper or lower neighbor notes in these bending exercises. The point is that you bend the note beyond the pocket in both directions and end up in the pocket. Don’t use a tuner; rely on feel and tone alone. Pitches must be bent with a muscular movement of the embouchure, not by air support variation or by mouthpiece pressure. I now practice these bending exercises at the beginning of my practice sessions to reinforce the memory of where the pocket is, after an initial buzzing routine which I will describe shortly.

Application: develop a modified warmup to aid pitch placement.

At that time a central thing I did (only partially described in the article) was develop a personal warm-up routine that was geared specifically toward setting my pitch placement, a topic I am sure some readers will benefit from thinking over and one I personally returned to this week.

Essentially the routine is in four parts. The first step is to warmup briefly on virtually any easy exercise. The point being that your pitch will likely actually be off as you start, and don’t even worry about it. Don’t try to tune, just get gently warmed up. This step will take maybe 3-4 minutes maximum.

Step two involves playing exercises that include a pitch bend. I describe a couple of these in the original article, and at this point today would normally use a shortened version of the beginning of the “Shawarma” exercise in the Brass Gym for horn, which was not in print back in 2003 to be mentioned in that article. The idea at this point in the warmup is to end each of the bending exercises with your best, most resonant sound, again with no reference to a tuner. Focus on how it sounds (don’t use a practice mute!) and feels.

Now that you have optimal sound production established, get out a tuner and see where that best resonant sound actually is. Likely it will be lower than “normal” by a bit. Keep that feel of where the pitch is and tune your main slide so you are in tune at that pitch level.

The final step then is to continue tuning up with basically any routine you would use, maintaining that feeling of centering on your most resonant, beautiful tone. I like using a few more Brass Gym for horn exercises such as “beautiful sounds” with the CD to reinforce pitch level, and I have a few other exercises I like to do with a drone. Feel free to use a tuner to hold pitch, and you may find that some exercises you might use are rather more difficult to hold to pitch than you might expect.

Part of what you want to do here is retrain your ear as well, that you really have the feel for the correct pitch level, not some sharp pitch level that seems right/normal to you (due to repetition or lack of a frame of pitch reference) but is not.

Within a few days of starting a routine of this general type you should feel that your pitch is getting more centered and will be more reliably placed. Good luck!

From the Mailbag: Why so many breath marks in Strauss 1?

We get a variety of questions and this one recently is one that I am sure is wondered often.

I have a question that’s been bugging me for decades and that is, why are there so many marked breaths in the standard edition of the Strauss Concerto #1? … Clearly, there no need to breathe nearly every 2 measures or so. Even as phrase markings, it just chops it up unreasonably.

Yes, there are far too many printed breath marks in Strauss 1. There are two theories on this.

Strauss-1-breathsOne would be that it reflects the actual horn playing of Franz Strauss. Early in his career he actually had to stop playing horn for a time that must have been close to two years, after a period of personal tragedy. First a 10-month-old son died of tuberculosis, and then cholera took the lives of his wife and young daughter, leaving him a widower at the age of thirty-two in 1854. He is reported to have performed the viola (!) on the Munich premiere of Tannhauser in 1855.

The exact nature of the problem with his playing which led him to suspend horn performance at that time I don’t believe has been stated. The comprehensive February 1999 article by William Melton in The Horn Call does quote Strauss that his health had been “severely taxed by the terrible blow” and that he needed a time to rest. My assumption has always been that at that time it was at least in part due to asthma. Later in the Melton article, after his actual retirement from playing we see this sentence: “He could stop battling asthma and pack away his horn, but continued to play viola for years in the well-known Mittermayer Quartet.” So I think there is a good case that his asthma issue is reflected in the many breath marks in Strauss 1.

The other reason I put forward to students as to why so many breath marks is simple youthful enthusiasm on the part of Richard Strauss. The work dates to 1883 and Richard was only 19 years old that year! The work is quite an accomplishment and reflects that he had a great ear for the horn having heard his father practicing and performing for his entire life.

So in short the number of breath marks reflects probably a combination of the breathing issues of Franz Strauss and the youthful enthusiasm of Richard Strauss. The work benefits from longer phrases, feel free to ignore many of the marked breaths.

Tired of missing first notes? There’s an app for that

When I was first contacted by the developer of the Quality Tones app I was honestly a bit unsure what it was. Quality tones? My first thought was it had something to do with developing tone quality. But actually it is an app to develop accuracy, with the underlying thought being along the lines of what one of my teachers, Verne Reynolds, stated in his book: “No attack may be considered successful if it is not accurate.” A quality tone has an accurate attack.

The app itself, developed by hornist Spencer Park of the San Antonio Symphony, presents you with a series of notes, generated apparently randomly (within parameters you can define) with also randomly selected dynamics and durations. The idea is that you play the note presented accurately and with the correct duration (relatively – there is no meter or tempo marking given for any note) and dynamic.

Their website describes it further, this quote giving perhaps the best description of what a Quality Tone is:

Above all else, you should go after a clean and clear attack with a beautiful and effortless tone that best matches your sound concept. Avoid any change in pitch, color, or dynamic [unless requested] for the duration of the note.

The app installed easily on my phone and on my iPad, and is available on Google play as well for android devices. I somewhat prefer the iPad display as it is a bit bigger but it still reads easily enough on the phone. It can be used with any brass instrument.

Overall this is a solid tool for developing accuracy. It can be customized in many ways but the default set of notes and pitches will suit an advanced college student well. In the big picture, however, it is but one tool for developing accuracy, to be combined with proper vowel shapes in the mouth, tongue placement, developing your ear further, developing the timing of your breath in relation to the release, good choices of horn and mouthpiece, etc.

As to negatives, for me personally the current version of the auto advance feature runs a bit too quickly. I suppose preferences on this will vary. I would prefer to generally go maybe 10% slower from note to note to conceptualize new tempos, and then take a breath in that tempo and play the note in one motion, treating each note as a first note. At the current default tempo I feel for the shorter duration notes at least it is training me attack notes too quickly in sort of an unprepared manner – which, in fairness, does occur sometimes in the real world, but would not be a normal or default approach to train in depth. You can of course turn the auto advance feature off and swipe to the next note, but perhaps in a future version there would be an alternate slower “tempo” to the auto advance, along with actual tempo markings and time signatures to enhance the ability to train the timing of your breath in relation to the attack.

Overall though, again, this app really is worth checking out by anyone wanting to miss fewer notes, and the developer has various updates in the works which should improve the usefulness of the app even further. For another perspective see also this brief review by James Boldin.

To close, there are actually other options for apps out there that can be used to meet the same goal of developing accuracy. One that was suggested to me that I have now tried is the PlayByEar app. Intended for training for jazz playing, it can be set to display music for horn in F and can be utilized in several ways. The way that appeals to me the most is it will play a series of four notes (a short melody!) and will give you the first note notated in music. The idea is you match the melody by ear. It will register the successive notes in green if you are accurate to the melody and in red if you miss. From their description:

Play By Ear is a musical ear training app for iPhones and other iOS devices that helps you develop the ability to hear pitches and play them back on your instrument by ear. Rather than force you to press buttons to indicate the notes you’ve heard, Play By Ear uses pitch recognition so you can play the notes back on your instrument….

It is yet another way to develop your ear which is a key to accuracy — either of these apps can be useful tools in that important toolbox.

From the Mailbag: What to do when there is No Time for a Mute Change

A question came in regarding a specific work that had sections marked muted but there was no time allowed to put in or take out a mute, even hanging it on a string. It was a specific work but the answer relates to lots of works where this same thing occurs.

Mutes.jpgMy general rule of thumb on this is:

  1. Don’t ask the conductor! They have no idea what to tell you and
  2. If there is no time to make the mute change then play it stopped (with the hand).

Most likely that is what the composer actually had in mind. Words get thrown around pretty loosely at times. My general working theory is that the composer was thinking the hand to be a type of “damper” that modifies to the sound. So yes, it may be marked “mit dampfer” for example, but just play it stopped, it gets at the effect.

And, seriously, don’t ask the conductor! There is a pretty good chance that they won’t give you the answer you are looking for, and also most likely they won’t even notice you are playing stopped rather than muted.

Ideally you should agree as a section on how to approach the problematic passage, and it is worth noting as a final point that you should always individually feel free to use a stop mute instead of hand stopping if time allows or if the most important notes really require it for intonation or to be heard at all. My introduction to hand stopping is here.