Home Blog Page 36

Developing a daily routine to enhance pitch placement

Last weekend I played a recital using four different horns (more here, all not my normal horn) and on three different mouthpieces (all not my normal mouthpiece, but mostly with my rim). It was very fun, bucket list type stuff, but there is a consequence to it (and the struggle to play in tune on those four different horns), as subsequently as the week began I could not play in tune on any modern horn!

I have had this experience several times before, developing the topic in fact into a full scale article that was published in The Horn Call 33, no. 3 (May, 2003). The title of that article was “Placing Pitch ‘in the Pocket'”

Pocket?

Before getting to how to apply this to your warmup, the following is how I began the 2003 article.

Proper pitch placement is certainly an issue of concern for horn players. Many less experienced players play high on the pitch, and as a result need to pull their main tuning slides out a great deal. Most fine players, however, don’t need to pull their horns down nearly so far. In reflection I realize that over the course of my own studies my pitch certainly dropped; I needed to pull my horn out less as I advanced in my playing abilities. This was not something that I intentionally set out to do and no teacher told me that I needed to pull out less, but I did over the years learn how to place the pitch better. To play well with the best possible tone you need to place pitch correctly. Two keys to learning how to describe and achieve proper pitch placement recently fell into place for me while working on a recital.

The first key was realized when performing a sonata (Danzi, E-flat) on the natural horn, my first performance with fortepiano at A=435. I came to realize that when I practiced on the natural horn without the fortepiano reinforcing the low pitch I had a very, very difficult time keeping the pitch down. My ears wanted to hear pitch at A=440 and were, despite the horn being tuned correctly for A=435, guiding my embouchure back up to A=440. As a result, I was playing very high on the pitch on the natural horn and this transferred over to the valved horn as well; I was not keeping the pitch down where it needed to be. Thus, I had to consciously re-learn how to place the pitch again, something that had previously happened for me in a very natural way during my studies.

The second key involved a realization about practicing with a practice mute frequently. We have small children and these past few years, during which I have been teaching full time, I have frequently had to practice in the evenings with a practice mute. I finally realized that I was playing very high on the pitch on the mute and I also discovered that my personal sense of pitch placement is very much tied up with tonal color. The feedback of tone I was used to relying upon was basically lost on the practice mute. (I now practice inside our walk-in closet when the kids are asleep, to avoid using the mute).

On any horn, you have some freedom to bend the pitch, some horns more, some horns less. There is a range of motion over which you can bend the pitch sharp or flat without it breaking or jumping to another note. The upper limit is somewhat firm; on the downward side you can normally bend the pitch somewhat further, especially in the lower range. Within the range that you can bend each pitch there is a central portion of the range of motion that is more stable, that is to say, there is a boundary at which you cannot bend the pitch easily down or up but you can pass this point if you force the pitch hard. The location you want to place the pitch in is at the lower end of this central, more stable area of the pitch for any given note on the horn. This location can be found either by “feel” or by listening to the tone. There is a “sweet spot” where the tone is the most resonant and beautiful that is a stable location you can place any note in. It feels to me the most like a “pocket.”

The type of exercises I use to find and define this pocket are pitch-bending exercises. These can take many forms; I currently frequently use “The first beautiful tones on the horn” exercise found in Frøydis Ree Wekre, Thoughts on Playing the Horn Well (2nd ed., 1994), which works the downward bend well, and I then follow this with several pitches played in the manner of the exercise on page 16 [“Sustained tones with pitch variation”] of William C. Robinson, An Illustrated Advanced Method for French Horn Playing (Wind Music, 1971), which calls for upward and downward bends of a held long tone. There are many possibilities for what to play. I am not really looking at playing in tune the upper or lower neighbor notes in these bending exercises. The point is that you bend the note beyond the pocket in both directions and end up in the pocket. Don’t use a tuner; rely on feel and tone alone. Pitches must be bent with a muscular movement of the embouchure, not by air support variation or by mouthpiece pressure. I now practice these bending exercises at the beginning of my practice sessions to reinforce the memory of where the pocket is, after an initial buzzing routine which I will describe shortly.

Application: develop a modified warmup to aid pitch placement.

At that time a central thing I did (only partially described in the article) was develop a personal warm-up routine that was geared specifically toward setting my pitch placement, a topic I am sure some readers will benefit from thinking over and one I personally returned to this week.

Essentially the routine is in four parts. The first step is to warmup briefly on virtually any easy exercise. The point being that your pitch will likely actually be off as you start, and don’t even worry about it. Don’t try to tune, just get gently warmed up. This step will take maybe 3-4 minutes maximum.

Step two involves playing exercises that include a pitch bend. I describe a couple of these in the original article, and at this point today would normally use a shortened version of the beginning of the “Shawarma” exercise in the Brass Gym for horn, which was not in print back in 2003 to be mentioned in that article. The idea at this point in the warmup is to end each of the bending exercises with your best, most resonant sound, again with no reference to a tuner. Focus on how it sounds (don’t use a practice mute!) and feels.

Now that you have optimal sound production established, get out a tuner and see where that best resonant sound actually is. Likely it will be lower than “normal” by a bit. Keep that feel of where the pitch is and tune your main slide so you are in tune at that pitch level.

The final step then is to continue tuning up with basically any routine you would use, maintaining that feeling of centering on your most resonant, beautiful tone. I like using a few more Brass Gym for horn exercises such as “beautiful sounds” with the CD to reinforce pitch level, and I have a few other exercises I like to do with a drone. Feel free to use a tuner to hold pitch, and you may find that some exercises you might use are rather more difficult to hold to pitch than you might expect.

Part of what you want to do here is retrain your ear as well, that you really have the feel for the correct pitch level, not some sharp pitch level that seems right/normal to you (due to repetition or lack of a frame of pitch reference) but is not.

Within a few days of starting a routine of this general type you should feel that your pitch is getting more centered and will be more reliably placed. Good luck!

From the Mailbag: Why so many breath marks in Strauss 1?

We get a variety of questions and this one recently is one that I am sure is wondered often.

I have a question that’s been bugging me for decades and that is, why are there so many marked breaths in the standard edition of the Strauss Concerto #1? … Clearly, there no need to breathe nearly every 2 measures or so. Even as phrase markings, it just chops it up unreasonably.

Yes, there are far too many printed breath marks in Strauss 1. There are two theories on this.

Strauss-1-breathsOne would be that it reflects the actual horn playing of Franz Strauss. Early in his career he actually had to stop playing horn for a time that must have been close to two years, after a period of personal tragedy. First a 10-month-old son died of tuberculosis, and then cholera took the lives of his wife and young daughter, leaving him a widower at the age of thirty-two in 1854. He is reported to have performed the viola (!) on the Munich premiere of Tannhauser in 1855.

The exact nature of the problem with his playing which led him to suspend horn performance at that time I don’t believe has been stated. The comprehensive February 1999 article by William Melton in The Horn Call does quote Strauss that his health had been “severely taxed by the terrible blow” and that he needed a time to rest. My assumption has always been that at that time it was at least in part due to asthma. Later in the Melton article, after his actual retirement from playing we see this sentence: “He could stop battling asthma and pack away his horn, but continued to play viola for years in the well-known Mittermayer Quartet.” So I think there is a good case that his asthma issue is reflected in the many breath marks in Strauss 1.

The other reason I put forward to students as to why so many breath marks is simple youthful enthusiasm on the part of Richard Strauss. The work dates to 1883 and Richard was only 19 years old that year! The work is quite an accomplishment and reflects that he had a great ear for the horn having heard his father practicing and performing for his entire life.

So in short the number of breath marks reflects probably a combination of the breathing issues of Franz Strauss and the youthful enthusiasm of Richard Strauss. The work benefits from longer phrases, feel free to ignore many of the marked breaths.

Tired of missing first notes? There’s an app for that

When I was first contacted by the developer of the Quality Tones app I was honestly a bit unsure what it was. Quality tones? My first thought was it had something to do with developing tone quality. But actually it is an app to develop accuracy, with the underlying thought being along the lines of what one of my teachers, Verne Reynolds, stated in his book: “No attack may be considered successful if it is not accurate.” A quality tone has an accurate attack.

The app itself, developed by hornist Spencer Park of the San Antonio Symphony, presents you with a series of notes, generated apparently randomly (within parameters you can define) with also randomly selected dynamics and durations. The idea is that you play the note presented accurately and with the correct duration (relatively – there is no meter or tempo marking given for any note) and dynamic.

Their website describes it further, this quote giving perhaps the best description of what a Quality Tone is:

Above all else, you should go after a clean and clear attack with a beautiful and effortless tone that best matches your sound concept. Avoid any change in pitch, color, or dynamic [unless requested] for the duration of the note.

The app installed easily on my phone and on my iPad, and is available on Google play as well for android devices. I somewhat prefer the iPad display as it is a bit bigger but it still reads easily enough on the phone. It can be used with any brass instrument.

Overall this is a solid tool for developing accuracy. It can be customized in many ways but the default set of notes and pitches will suit an advanced college student well. In the big picture, however, it is but one tool for developing accuracy, to be combined with proper vowel shapes in the mouth, tongue placement, developing your ear further, developing the timing of your breath in relation to the release, good choices of horn and mouthpiece, etc.

As to negatives, for me personally the current version of the auto advance feature runs a bit too quickly. I suppose preferences on this will vary. I would prefer to generally go maybe 10% slower from note to note to conceptualize new tempos, and then take a breath in that tempo and play the note in one motion, treating each note as a first note. At the current default tempo I feel for the shorter duration notes at least it is training me attack notes too quickly in sort of an unprepared manner – which, in fairness, does occur sometimes in the real world, but would not be a normal or default approach to train in depth. You can of course turn the auto advance feature off and swipe to the next note, but perhaps in a future version there would be an alternate slower “tempo” to the auto advance, along with actual tempo markings and time signatures to enhance the ability to train the timing of your breath in relation to the attack.

Overall though, again, this app really is worth checking out by anyone wanting to miss fewer notes, and the developer has various updates in the works which should improve the usefulness of the app even further. For another perspective see also this brief review by James Boldin.

To close, there are actually other options for apps out there that can be used to meet the same goal of developing accuracy. One that was suggested to me that I have now tried is the PlayByEar app. Intended for training for jazz playing, it can be set to display music for horn in F and can be utilized in several ways. The way that appeals to me the most is it will play a series of four notes (a short melody!) and will give you the first note notated in music. The idea is you match the melody by ear. It will register the successive notes in green if you are accurate to the melody and in red if you miss. From their description:

Play By Ear is a musical ear training app for iPhones and other iOS devices that helps you develop the ability to hear pitches and play them back on your instrument by ear. Rather than force you to press buttons to indicate the notes you’ve heard, Play By Ear uses pitch recognition so you can play the notes back on your instrument….

It is yet another way to develop your ear which is a key to accuracy — either of these apps can be useful tools in that important toolbox.

From the Mailbag: What to do when there is No Time for a Mute Change

A question came in regarding a specific work that had sections marked muted but there was no time allowed to put in or take out a mute, even hanging it on a string. It was a specific work but the answer relates to lots of works where this same thing occurs.

Mutes.jpgMy general rule of thumb on this is:

  1. Don’t ask the conductor! They have no idea what to tell you and
  2. If there is no time to make the mute change then play it stopped (with the hand).

Most likely that is what the composer actually had in mind. Words get thrown around pretty loosely at times. My general working theory is that the composer was thinking the hand to be a type of “damper” that modifies to the sound. So yes, it may be marked “mit dampfer” for example, but just play it stopped, it gets at the effect.

And, seriously, don’t ask the conductor! There is a pretty good chance that they won’t give you the answer you are looking for, and also most likely they won’t even notice you are playing stopped rather than muted.

Ideally you should agree as a section on how to approach the problematic passage, and it is worth noting as a final point that you should always individually feel free to use a stop mute instead of hand stopping if time allows or if the most important notes really require it for intonation or to be heard at all. My introduction to hand stopping is here. 

Rome Wasn’t Built in a Day: Thoughts on Writing 1,000 Articles

Something my father used to often say, of big projects, was that “Rome wasn’t built in a day.” That is a very appropriate thought, as I today arrive for a second time at a personal milestone at Horn Matters: 1,000 articles! [But see UPDATE at end.]

A second time? Well, actually in July of 2012 I originally passed this milestone, but then later we rebuilt and tightened up Horn Matters and cut something like 300 older articles. Either way it is a milestone, there is certainly no other horn player with more than 1,000 articles online. And it is more than 1,000, as there are over 50 other articles of mine online elsewhere, in my original Horn Articles Online site and on the IHS site. My nearest “competitor” is Bruce Hembd, who has over 700 articles; anyone else I am aware of being far behind that number.

When Bruce and I developed Horn Matters in August of 2009, we were excited about the new platform for our existing online writings. If it was not obvious enough already, I do enjoy the creative side of transforming notes and ideas into finished products. I actually have little starts of drafts of hundreds more potential articles. But that being said, I am very aware of blogger burn-out, which is part of why I have slowed down actual article production in recent years. At one point I was posting three articles a week! My goal now is 3-4 a month. And I do go back to older articles in the site and fix things periodically as well; I know they keep getting read. The archive at Horn Matters is immense; we have no shortage of content.

As a online writer my goal has been to be in general positive and encouraging, with a focus on news and topics of help to horn players. We get pushback occasionally, and of course elements of the older generation of horn playing still barely know that Horn Matters exists! But the negatives are minor and the stats continue to show that a lot of people are out there reading us — plus we are still enjoying what we are doing.

Among my writings here, I am most proud overall of the University of Horn Matters (series starts here), which is slated actually for some revisions, probably over the summer. My goal is to focus it down a bit more, tighten up each article a bit, there is too much content in it to really take it all in. As part of the same project, too, I want to be even more critical and aware to point readers in the text toward points that are physiologically accurate over visualizations.

In the original 2012 version of this article I mentioned that I was really itching to do more performance based projects. Getting a little more personal for a moment, my friends, colleagues, and former students know that I am a parent of a handicapped child who is now 22 years old. This fact has altered my trajectory a bit these past few years in terms of performance toward more of a focus on publications and recordings. The general idea being to focus on doing things I can do rather than things I can’t. So I have been able to recently record another solo CD (to be released in 2016) and I have several publications on the way very soon, with more in the pipeline.

As to ongoing goals for Horn Matters, I hope in the next year to add a short series of articles on musical enterprise as another course under the University of Horn Matters banner. And maybe add a volume IV to the PDF Excerpt E-Book series.

To close, a sincere note of thanks to Bruce Hembd for his support (Horn Matters is really not possible without his expertise behind the scenes) and also to my wife who supports me so much, making it possible to do all that I do. Finally, a note of thanks to all of you out there for reading and seeking horn information on Horn Matters, the online magazine and Open Educational Resource on the horn.

UPDATE 2021. And actually — currently I have exactly 866 articles on Horn Matters. This is a function of several things, I moved some articles to my new “small blog” in my personal website, and a lot were low traffic or dated in various ways and moved to the trash. Summer 2021 was another a big reset for the site. At this point I doubt I’ll ever have over 1,000 articles of my own on Horn Matters again, but you never know … as they say, Rome wasn’t built in a day.

From the Mailbag: On that 1860 onwards CD project

Received recently was a message with questions on my CD project that I mentioned in the summer/fall. It is coming! The articles on this project start here. Only a little more editing, just have not had time to get in the studio to do it yet this year. A reader had a few questions, which I will try to answer below.

Interesting project, from the photo of instrument and mouthpiece, I guess your using a modern mouthpiece. This would contribute to the intonation problems, after all the mouthpiece your [sic] using is not historically correct. Besides performers of that era would have been used to correcting the pitch with hand and lips. It is only modern players who seem to complain about out of tune instruments, back then you just got on with it.

In part II of my series on developing this CD project (here) I mentioned that I was trying several mouthpieces on the horn but to clarify I settled on the Moosewood LGC model which is a copy of a historic mouthpiece (now out of production) based on I recall a Courtois mouthpiece. Just I would never use that mouthpiece on a modern horn, I would never use a modern mouthpiece on the Seraphinoff horn either — a modern mouthpiece is not a good acoustical match.

IMG_0265I think the reader has a point about tuning though, natural horn has out of tune notes and if you started on it, correcting those notes always, then when you switched to a valve horn back in the day (late 19th century) that would seem pretty normal. Horns just had bad notes and you dealt with them. For for modern horn though, really, a good horn certainly has very good intonation.

But back to the photo in question (also seen in part III, here), that day that moment I was playing the modified Atkinson mouthpiece which is a bit more like a modern mouthpiece, I will grant you that. But it was not used on the actual recordings.

Continuing,

Look forward to hearing the completed project. I do have one question. What criteria did you use to decide whether the solo was intended for natural horn or valve horn? Or could some of the solos have been intended for either instrument?

They are defiantly all valved horn solos. Some say Ventilhorn right on the music, but the from gamut of notes used in every piece it is also very evident they are valved horn solos. The requested written pitches being the main criteria to know if a work is for the valved horn or the natural horn.

I will be swamped for a few weeks but hope to get the final edits done and the CD mastered by the end of February and released not too long after that. More then.

From the Mailbag: How to Play Solos Better

In the Horn Matters inbox this past week was this brief question:

Hi!

I’m performing these two pieces for a [music school name] exam next week. Any final artistic or technical tips for either in my last week of preparation?

Thanks!

Hi as well! I love the friendly tone, but actually the message had a critical error, it did not specify what two pieces were on the exam. I prefer the question as it is though, it is really open-ended and allows an answer that applies very broadly. For this kind of exam, focus on the basics which are:

  • Accuracy
  • Intonation
  • Rhythm
  • Musicality

Hit all those things and it does not matter what the piece is, for an exam the faculty should be pretty happy.

How to improve those all those things is a big topic, with Accuracy being the biggest. If you are fairly advanced accuracy is related to your chops and preparation. I plan to post something more specific to accuracy soon.

Next up, Intonation. In final preparation practicing with a tuner is vital, you have to line up your playing with reality and you may need to define a new reality! As you may be so used to being slightly out of tune that it sounds normal to you, but the faculty on your exam won’t miss this obvious a problem.

wrong-rhythmFor Rhythm you have to record yourself and be critical (recording can also be a good way to check tuning). An important thing to remember is the rhythm is either right or wrong, it is really easy to judge, so be sure it is correct.

Impressions of Musicality for listeners are above all driven by dynamic control, make sure you don’t sound bland, all the same dynamic. What happens is in a pressure situation some will forget to play dynamics. Be sure you do!

These are the key elements to hit, good luck!

Is it a Reality Show? Tips on Auditions

This article of tips on taking auditions was originally posted to the site in early 2009, but was later cut (along with a large group of articles), and saved for possible revision. Looking at it again, I think it needs mostly just set up a little bit better. The article is based on notes taken at several audition days (not during horn auditions), and was not at all meant to disrespect those that came to audition! The general idea I had was to share a few tips in a creative format, encouraging students especially to look at auditions from a different perspective. Auditions are a reality show, and you create perceptions about yourself based on how you present yourself in the situation. If you have auditions coming up, good luck!

first-world-problems-tchiak5Reality shows are very popular now days, and there are a couple shows that I watch somewhat regularly. I have a concept for a new one; I will call it “Brass Audition.”

Here is the idea. You set up say two to four world class brass teachers in a room and offer a prize, say at the least acceptance to a great brass program and at best an offer of a good scholarship or Teaching Assistant position! OK, then the potential students sign up and make travel plans and get to the site. Presumably they prepare the materials with their current teachers, but not always! That is part of the entertainment value, to hear those that really can play mixed in with dreamers who don’t have their acts together or at least together enough that day.

in-EAt the site they are greeted by the teachers who then have them play. No ambush to the audition either; the committee starts them out playing something of their own choice, and goes on based on what materials they have brought to offer at the audition. So those things could include their high and low range (including extremes), ability to multiple tongue, scales, control of dynamics, of course sight reading, transposition (combine sight reading and transposition for variety) and for sure also check their ability to match pitches. Points off for excuses, especially from grad applicants with a weak knowledge of excerpts or transposition (always makes you wonder what their teachers had them work on!), and also points off for blasting! No blasters win the prize, but musicality with good tone, rhythm, and intonation gets extra credit, they have potential to really go places. And no “hesitation attacks” please, those are the kiss of death.

Today as you might have guessed is the end of our little reality show for this year, brass auditions at Arizona State University. Except it is not a reality show, it is reality….

New Publication: 12 Modern Preparatory Etudes

Available now from Horn Notes Edition is the first of several publications for 2016, a group of twelve etudes I have composed in a modern style.

Ericson-etude-8-snip

These new etudes are intended to fill a gap in the horn etude literature, functioning as a concise, modern version of the classic Schantl/Pottag book of Preparatory Melodies.

What I had noticed after years of teaching horn at the college level was that the jump from the typical 19th-century technical etude to those of Reynolds and Schuller was too large. Clearly there was a need for a short group of etudes to bridge that gap, etudes that were easier and shorter than the typical modern studies. Years of looking told me that there was no material available that could provide the bridge that was needed, and I took on the challenge to create the needed materials.

The etudes are by design short and can be learned relatively quickly. Various technical issues are a focus, but the goals overall are accuracy and to prepare students toward playing more difficult 20th-century etudes and musical works of a similar character.

This group of etudes are a concise, ten page E publication and may be purchased directly through the Horn Notes Edition website, where you can also view sample pages:

  • 12 Modern Preparatory Etudes for Horn

UPDATE: These went off the market, but are now back in print in a much revised and expanded publication,

Check it out, it is part of the series of print and Kindle publications from Horn Notes Edition.

2016 Update: Advertising at Horn Matters

thumbs-resourcesSales-e1414302307455With the 2016 New Year we are offering a new format and pricing structure for our banner ads.

We have had banner ads at Horn Matters for several years now, and after much thought and deliberation we have decided to open up all spots to multiple advertisers and cut prices accordingly.

Flexible locations & prices

In the past, we limited advertising locations to one, single advertiser. If an advertiser happened to acquire the best location, that spot was exclusively reserved for that single advertiser.

This year, we are opening things up and are switching over to a rotating system. Now, ad locations can house multiple ads from different companies. Each ad will display one-at-a-time, in a random order, in a rotation along with other banners.

Since we are taking away the old exclusivity feature, we have also cut prices significantly – roughly 20% overall.

For more information, please take a look at our Advertising page. Look for the big green button to download a PDF of our rates and ad locations.