Home Blog Page 42

Significant work: Schubert, Nachtgesang im Walde

This article is based on materials published in The Horn Call Annual 8 (1996). It was for many years posted on the Horn Articles Online website, presented here with several minor updates. 

The brothers E. C. and J. R. Lewy were among the most active of the very early valved horn performers. Of the pieces performed by the brothers together in this period in their numerous recitals, certainly the most notable work is the Nachtgesang im Walde, D. 913 of Franz Schubert. This work was composed specifically for performance by the Lewy brothers and gives a clear glimpse of their horn technique. Nachtgesang im Walde is for a quartet of men’s voices (TTBB) and four horns. It was composed in 1827 for an April 22nd benefit concert organized by the Lewy brothers. Performing on the premiere were vocalists Eichberger, Ruprecht, Preisinger and Borschitzky, along with hornists Janatka, Leeser and the Lewy brothers [Deutsch, Reader, 631]. As the probable low hornist of the family, it seems likely that E. C. Lewy performed the fourth part on this work (J. R. Lewy made his career as a high horn player and possessed a very wide range). The performance received the following review in the Theaterzeitung on May first, 1827:

Besides, much pleasure was given by a new composition by our ingenious vocal poet Franz Schubert. He set to music a poem by Johann Gabriel Seidl, ‘Night Song in the Forest’ [‘Nachtgesang im Walde’], for four male voices, which he had accompanied by four obbligato horns. The difficulty of this, no doubt, lay in the distribution of effects and in the danger of either letting the vocal parts be drowned or degrading the accompaniment to a superfluous extra. The richly imaginative tone-poet successfully avoided both, and his tone-picture, performed in more suitable surroundings, at a serenade in the open air, should be enchantingly effective [trans. in ibid].

Unfortunately no contemporary concert review makes any mention of the valved horn being used in early performances of Nachtgesang im Walde. The major source to consider then are the horn parts themselves.

The four horn parts of Nachtgesang im Walde are in E and are physically taxing. The opening is as follows:

Example 1. Schubert, Nachtgesang im Walde, mm. 1-11.

What type of horn is it for?

On the basis of technical considerations it would appear that Schubert called for a combination of natural and valved horns in this work. The opening section is typical of the writing and will serve as a representative example. The first three parts are easily playable on the natural horn, requiring the use of some hand-horn technique, but the fourth part is very awkward, requiring far too many heavily stopped notes to sustain the bass line. The low D on the downbeat of measure 10 would be particularly awkward, as this note would be very weak and unstable on the natural horn, and the note must be played very solidly as it is the root of the chord. This pitch is required numerous times of the fourth horn in this work.

While all the notes requested in this work, even in the fourth horn, were possible on the natural horn and would have been practiced by every low horn player, these low range pitches were not typically used in this manner. It is highly unlikely that Schubert would have requested written D used in this manner of the natural horn. Nevertheless, it does seem likely from the writing that several of the other parts are intended for performance on the natural horn. Supporting this view is the following example from later in the work:

Example 2. Schubert, Nachtgesang im Walde, mm. 182-190.

Note that in measures 185-187 (and again when the phrase is repeated in measures 193-196) the third and fourth horn parts cross, and the fourth horn jumps to a written e-flat’ and d’. These two pitches were never requested from the higher horns, but were asked of the fourth horn several times (the third and fourth parts also cross in measure 75, with the fourth horn again jumping up to d’). The d’ in particular would be performed fully stopped on the natural horn, and thus would not be easily heard in the chord due to the decreased projection. Played on the valved horn, however, this pitch would lack nothing in terms of projection as it could be played as an open tone using the first valve. This voice crossing probably indicates that the third horn was not a valved horn.

There is one low E (old notation) to be found in the third horn part in measure 199. While certainly a weak pitch, this note doubles the fourth horn and would thus create no problems in the voicing of the chord if taken on a natural horn. In fact, Schubert requested the same written E of the natural horn previously in his Symphony in B minor (“Unfinished”) in 1822, showing that he felt the note was possible on the instrument [Blandford, 31].

Also notable in example 2, measure 186, is the crossing of the first and second horn parts; this could indicate that the first horn part was also written for the valved horn, avoiding placing the requested fully stopped f’ in the second horn, which would appear to be for the natural horn. The first part was likely intended for performance by J. R. Lewy, and although the f’ in question is easily playable on the natural horn, it would lie better on the valved horn and could be taken as a open tone with the first valve.

Schubert wrote it to use at least one valved horn

From these representative passages it seems possible that Schubert conceived the work for at least one valved horn on the fourth part and three natural horns, and very likely two valved horns and two natural horns. In a sense, the idea that he wrote the work for a combination of valved horns and natural horns is only speculation, as all of the parts would lie better on valved horns, if four valved horns were available. The exact composition of the group would likely have depended on the instruments available to the performers; certainly at least both of the Lewy brothers did have valved horns available to them.

Given that this work was written by Schubert for the Lewy brothers, this work most likely reflects their ideas with regard to the technique of the valved horn in 1827. The instrument is used primarily as a fully chromatic instrument, with special advantages in both the low range and in avoiding stopped tones in general. The choice of the E crook is also significant, as this shows that this crook was used on the valved horn by the Lewy brothers. It is significant as well that in this work one can find no trace of evidence to suggest that the valves were intended to be used as crooking devices, as would later be seen in a few of the etudes of J. R. Lewy, published circa 1850. [see the article on the topic Works By J. R. Lewy, coming soon.]

But what kind?

An important question which can not fully be answered from the valved horn writing seen in Nachtgesang im Walde is that of what kind of valved horns E. C. and J. R. Lewy were playing upon in 1827. It is known that many early valved horns only had two valves. The only pitch in this work which would require the third valve to perform it as an open tone is the written low D which occurs many times. The third valve would also be very useful in performing the numerous written a-flat/g-sharp’s found in the fourth part, although this pitch can be performed as an open pitch by raising the g with the hand (this practice was clearly noted on the natural horn in the Domnich Méthode). Due to the structural nature of these pitches, it would certainly be better to play both pitches using a three-valved instrument. It is known that J. R. Lewy used a three-valved instrument by 1835 at the latest [Weber, 104-105], but for a skilled natural horn player such as E. C. Lewy it would have been of no great difficulty to obtain either of these pitches on a two-valved instrument, combining the valves with the lip and the hand in the bell. While this work probably does actually call for the use of an instrument with three valves, it is difficult to say this with a certainty from the music alone in any work of this period.

Finally, while certainly not the first work ever written for the valved horn, Nachtgesang im Walde is probably the first work by a major composer to use the valved horn and is certainly remarkable among the works of Schubert.

SOURCES

W. F. H. Blandford, “Studies on the Horn. III. The Fourth Horn in the ‘Choral Symphony,'” part 1, The Musical Times 66 (January 1, 1925), 29-32.

Otto Erich Deutsch, The Schubert Reader (New York: W. W. Norton, 1947), translated by Eric Bloom.

________, Schubert: Thematic Catalogue of all His Works (London: J. M. Dent & Sons, 1951).

Gottfried Weber, “Ueber Ventilhorn und Ventiltrompete mit drei Ventilen” [Valved Horn and Valved Trumpet with Three Valves], Cäcilia 17 (1835), 73-105.

[ALSO: It should be noted that in addition to the original version discussed here several very effective arrangements of this work are available for eight part horn ensemble. I was introduced to the work first though by Verne Reynolds and his great arrangement of the work for horn choir. Comparing his version to the bonus video below, you can hear that Reynolds lowered the key a half step in the horn ensemble version and that one half of the ensemble plays the choir parts and half plays the horn parts.]

BONUS: Looking around YouTube, this performance below is a good one of the work in its original form, by a group in Germany (direct link here). The horns are the Westfälischen Hornquartett.

8 Signs That it Might Be Time to Change Teachers

old-man-hornPrivate music lessons are a time-honored tradition for learning how to play an instrument. The experience is really hard to beat in terms of hands-on, focused learning.

That being said, private lessons are private. They are a one-on-one teacher/student relationship and not all relationships are made in heaven. Some relationships do not mesh.

For a period of many years, I pursued private teachers as often as possible. I ended up studying with a good number of horn teachers, some of which are very well-known personalities in the horn world. It was almost like a hobby.

Most of those experiences were very good. At the very least, there was always something positive to be learned, a kernel of truth that could be gleaned and absorbed.

Occasionally however, the chemistry was just not right between myself and the teacher, and it became apparent that I needed to move on to a different teacher, for one reason or another.

Time is money and music lessons, in most cases, cost money. All money concerns aside, it is just no fun to be studying with a teacher who does not connect, support and encourage.

There is no need to stay with a teacher that is not a right fit – either from false devotion or simply because taking lessons is the “right thing” to do. If any of the items below ring true in any way, it might be time for you to move on.

1. You do not feel challenged enough.
An ambitious student relies on their teacher in the same manner that a medical patient relies on a doctor for a clean bill of health. If the patient is overweight or otherwise unhealthy, the doctor should say something about that problem to the patient. As your caretaker, it is the doctor’s responsibility to monitor your health and to push you towards a healthier lifestyle. They should be prescribing treatments for improvement.

Metaphorically speaking, the same holds true for a private music teacher. If he/she does not push you enough, you might end up at a level that is not marketable or competitive.

Additional reading:

2. You feel overworked, tired, and/or confused.
On the opposite end of the scale from the previous point, I once studied with a teacher whose dogma for lesson materials was fairly fixed and strict. It was like a trial-by-fire; you either worked with his set regimen “as is” or you failed. Period.

During that time I always felt tired and overworked. My chops felt terrible. I felt like my playing was getting worse and not better. I got nervous for lessons and stayed that way.

After one year, I switched teachers. Hindsight being 20/20 I probably should have done it sooner rather than later. The first 6 months with the new teacher basically amounted to a detoxification process – repairing and mending the damage done to both my chops and mental state.

Additional reading:

3. Your horn teacher never plays in lessons. Or, if they do play, he/she does not sound good.
A music student needs a strong example to follow and emulate. While listening to recordings and attending concerts has its benefits, having a teacher that can both explain and demonstrate the techniques being talked about is crucial.

This is arguably one of the main benefits of private music lessons – being able to hear someone better than you, up close and personal, in order to see how it is done. If your teacher does not play at all in lessons, or sounds terrible when they do, this may be a sign to move on.

The bottom line – it is hard to trust a teacher as being competent if they are not also a competent player.

4. Lessons feel rushed.
A teacher that is active in the field, for example performing concerts on a regular basis, is a good thing. This kind of activity keeps the teacher mentally engaged and in-tune with what it is like in the “real world.” Ideally, this love of performing is then transferred on to the students through that teacher’s teaching method.

That being said, if your teacher is away from the studio more often than being present, it might be time to move on to a teacher that is more present and attentive. Music lessons work best when the teacher is able to take the time to listen and understand your needs.

If your teacher seems to not have the time for making considerate and informed prescriptions, it might be time to pursue a new one.

Additional reading:

5. Your teacher is not listening to you. He/she keeps you in the dark. 
Effective teachers have a specific pedagogy and method in mind for their students, consisting of standard studies, etudes, and solos. Yet, however staid this method is it does not preclude a proper evaluation of the student and where they will fit in with regard to that method.

Private lessons work best when time is taken to listen and understand, much like how a doctor listens to a patient when prescribing a new drug or important lab test.

The adage “one size fits all” does not apply when it comes to music lessons and the methods being used.

6. Your teacher is mean-spirited.
Some of the best lessons I have ever had were ones where I felt a bit horse-whipped, yet at the same time, inspired to move on and work even harder. A good teacher, after getting to know you and how far you can be pushed, knows where this tipping point lies.

If your teacher gets defensive or angry however, when challenging questions or situations arise, or leaves you feeling humiliated rather than inspired, it may be time to make a change.

Additional reading:

7. Your future goals are unclear.
If you are a serious student looking to make a livelihood from music, it is important to start thinking about your career sooner rather than later.

Most careers are planned and built out over time. It is not something that just happens by magic or osmosis. A private lesson teacher should be instrumental in helping a serious student develop and fine-tune these future plans.

Additional reading:

8. Your teacher seems more concerned about discussing him/herself more than you and what you need.
A teacher that spends more time in lessons talking about themselves and their accomplishments is one to be wary of. While it can be interesting and perhaps even entertaining to listen to personal stories and anecdotes, lesson-time is not about story-telling, or worse, hero-worship.

A central and primary tenet of private music lessons is the welfare of the student, not the other way around. If your lessons seem to be more about the teacher and their ego and less about you and what you need, it may be time to find a new teacher.

Windmills of the Mind

roy-lichtenstein-parody34

Noise pollution
A new study indicates that French horn players are in danger of developing noise-induced hearing loss. This risk for horn players is reported as the highest among professional orchestral musicians.

Where are those ear plugs I bought a few years ago?

Cornerstones of creativity
While this study dates from 1968, there are some contemporary lessons to be gleaned. The basic idea to this reader is that creativity is something that we are all born with, and if we are not careful, it can be lost.

Practice make perfect?
In a related study, the term perfectionist is taken to task.

Many famous artists have run into this problem and have been so bothered with it, that they decided to take their own lives. While playing the horn and aiming for perfect results may not drive you to do the same, there is something to take to heart when reading this article.

There is perhaps a difference between playing something perfectly and aiming for excellence and high standards.

Everyone is a critic
Taking this train-of-thought further, when studying music and preparing for a career in music, a student may experience a lot of criticism. In some cases harsh criticism can be motivating, but in other cases it can deliver injury if given in extreme or if taken too personally.

Speaking for myself, I once had a well-known teacher tell me to give up on music and to do something else. At the time, this news was harsh and heartbreaking. I stopped studying with that teacher and moved on to another teacher who was more supportive and positive. Fast forward to today and here I am, with a day-job outside of music.

What are your thoughts on mean teachers? Should you do yourself a favor and take it in stride, or should you move on (or even fight back)?

(While you are at it, take a look a some of the articles here at Horn Matters on the topic of narcissism.)

[Extracted from a “Random Monday” post, 2021, JE]

Classic Recording: Meir Rimon, Nigunim (Hassidic Melodies)

0

Thinking about my faculty recital this year I knew I would be using my triple horn and my mind went to a classic horn recording and a set of Nigunim I had performed about ten years ago.

Rimon-NigunimFirst, the recording featuring hornist Meir Rimon. It was released originally way back in 1980, and in ways very much sounds like something recorded back in that day. The audio quality could be higher, the (upright) piano sounds a bit out of tune, etc. However, for me this CD is still a real treat. The piano, bass, and drums give everything a good “positive groove,” and I like melodies and phrase shapes and such a lot. Noting also that the CD might not sound quite as good in fact if the piano was not an upright and was tuned better. I believe he is using a triple horn, he was an early adopter and the arrangements are well suited to the triple.

A few years ago I posted a review of another of his recordings, Horn of Plenty. These recordings are both not too hard to buy still and are worth the effort to track down.

Back to the recital this year (shared with colleague Douglas Yeo), I am doing four of these tunes as a set, half of the works in the horn/piano version of these as composed/arranged by Lev Kogan that was published in 1982 by Israel Brass Woodwind Publications. . These are really effective recital works, but best suited as a solo set or part of a shared recital, they won’t fit in a full solo recital as well as you might wish due to the somewhat high range.

I performed these at a couple horn workshops about ten years ago, where they were received really well. I don’t know why these are performed so rarely but, again, this recording and these tunes are well worth tracking down.

A Busby Mouthpiece like Dennis Brain Used

Many years ago, at the home of Philip Farkas, I held in my hands a copy of the mouthpiece of Dennis Brain. Farkas was actually at one point (before his association with Holton) working with Schilke and Brain to potentially market a copy of his mouthpiece. My main memory is the small inner diameter and the thin rim. These two elements are parts of the puzzle of all that made his playing great.

Hawkes-MP-sideFarquharson Cousins was a student at the Royal Academy of Music at the same time as Dennis Brain, playing alongside Brain a number of times. In the second edition of On Playing the Horn he recalls,

Dennis Brain’s mouthpiece was, by modern comparison, a small affair. The old silver threepenny bit (which hornplayers used to carry as a measuring device) would not even lie in the cup, but stood, so to speak, half out of it. This I verified on several occasions as Dennis sometimes experimented with different mouthpieces, but (let me hasten to add!) always the same rim. (The type that used to be known as the ‘Busby’ mouthpiece – named after Tom Busby, a well known London horplayer of the 1920s).

This mouthpiece above would appear to have that same rim. It is possible it either came to Arizona associated with the Hawkes piston valve horn owned by Arizona State University, or was a find of the horn professor at the time that horn came to ASU, Ralph Lockwood. I’m happy to have it for sure.

About that Hawkes horn …

This short section is based on materials formerly posted in Horn Articles Online, moved here with the 2025 demise of the site, as the information was linked from this article and is relevant to the topic. And for sure I talked about the below in the presentation that the rest of the text is extracted from, as I had this horn there for demonstration purposes. 

This Hawkes horn has been dated to have been made around 1916. This horn takes crooks just like an orchestral natural horn and has crooks with it for E-flat, F, G, A-flat, and A with a short, 1/2 step coupler and short and long tuning slides. This is the type of valved horn used widely in England (and France) up until around W.W.II. It is in great shape. The bell and bore are very much like that found on the typical natural horn. The bell has a garland, and the tone is much more like that of the natural horn than that of a modern horn.

While it is fun to test, without a strap to assist in holding it I can’t play this instrument for more than five or ten minutes at a time as a valved horn. The left hand position is quite uncomfortable; it has to do with the angle of the action of the pistons. On the plus side it plays well as a natural horn and the crooks work on both of my other natural horns. Crooked in F it sounds very much like a natural horn and in B-flat it has a sound that begins to get over toward the sound of a classic mellophone, which it also resembles.

[I’ll also mention that the 3rd valve slide is not on correctly in the photo, it should be reversed, tucking in under the 2nd valve.]

Back to the mouthpiece …

It is marked Hawkes & Son London with the letter B stamped on side. The inner diameter is very small and would only suit someone with quite thin lips. It fits the crooks on the Hawkes horn well and tightens up sound production, but does not fit a modern horn, especially not one made for a European shank mouthpiece such as the Alexander horn later used by Brain.

Hawkes-MP-rimThe second photo shows the rim compared to the more modern rim of a Holton XDC [chosen because it was handy, and has a representative modern rim]. Where the differences come in has to do with sound and sensitivity. It has a small sound but is at the same time very sensitive and must have fit his unconventional embouchure very well.

The above is a portion of the text of a lecture-recital presented at the 2011 International Horn Symposium in San Francisco. The reference on the information that Farkas/Schilke planned to sell a copy of his mouthpiece is from the Nancy Jordan Fako book on Farkas. For more on the horns Dennis Brain played and on the IHS session I presented see this article.

UPDATE: A longer article was published several years later as “Dennis Brain’s Horns,” The Horn Call 46, No. 2 (February, 2016), 31-34. Also, it is my understanding now that the mouthpiece with the “B” is certainly a Busby mouthpiece like Dennis Brain used. They were somewhat variable in terms of dimensions, but all with that very small inner diameter.

Updates to the Horn Matters Web Site (2014)

Regular visitors may have noticed some changes here at Horn Matters. The overall look-and-feel of the site has changed significantly over the past few weeks, including:

  • a new logo and title style
  • updated navigation
  • a revamped home page
  • a new, “responsive” design

Drupal or WordPress?

logoHMBehind-the-scenes I have been busy planning out an updated layout and design for some months. The process began with a failed experiment to migrate the site from WordPress to Drupal. WordPress and Drupal are platforms that help making web sites like this easier to create, manage and maintain.

In a nutshell, the experiment with Drupal did not work out. With over 1,500 articles, the database of content was simply too large to import into Drupal without major effort.

This setback did, however, lead to greater things.

Responsive Design

mobileFor me (as a guy whose day job is in web design and development), the most notable and exciting feature of the updated Horn Matters site is how it looks on all the different types of technologies that people own these days: desktop computers, tablets and mobile phones. 

Through diligent and careful coding, the new design “responds” differently to each technology so that the content and layout looks good no matter what device is being used.

Fortunately, with advances in web coding, this challenge has gotten much easier since I started making web sites back in 1995. Rather than having to create completely different web sites in order to accommodate desktop computers, tablets and mobile technology, I can rely on the site recognizing the differences by itself, and re-adjusting itself accordingly.

Pictured at right is an example of how the site looks on mobile platforms.

Site Traffic

In spite of the fact that I have not been writing much in the last year, site traffic has been trucking along without me. In creating and fashioning this recent update I was inspired at the level of web traffic that hits on Horn Matters on a daily basis.

Here is an example from the past week. These are the rough numbers of unique, daily visitors.

HM-traffic

 

As my partner-in-crime John Ericson noted on the Horn Matters Facebook page:

..we are constantly humbled by the stats for this site. Hundreds and hundreds of different people are reading articles in Horn Matters on a wide variety of topics every day. We both deeply appreciate your support for the site and we do plan to keep it running for years to come, with the desire for it to continue to be the leading online resource on the French horn.

I can only echo this sentiment. While I cannot guarantee that I will be writing articles at the same frequency as in the past, I am certainly inspired to reach out and resume writing.

This begs the question then, “why did Bruce not write any articles for so long?”

That is a good question that, over time, will be addressed in new articles. In the meantime, thank you for your continued support and readership of this web site, a project that I hold near and dear to my heart.

This, by the way, is one reason why I incorporated a heart into the new logo. Not only do I love playing the horn and performing music, but I love working on this web site and providing it as a reliable resource for others to read and learn from.

PSA on Horn Sections Sitting “Backwards”

We all know that the standard arrangement of horn sections has the players blowing down the section from the first horn. In other words, from the audience, the section would look 4-3-2-1-A (A being the assistant, if utilized). The second horn is to the right of the first horn player, in other words.

If in two rows the seating is similar. Visualizing as if the section is riding in a car, the first horn is in the driver’s seat, the second in the passenger seat, the third behind the driver, fourth behind the passenger.

ny_phil.jpgHorn players can become targets in the game of seating of ensembles, and in particular some band conductors have the big idea to seat horns in the other direction.

I think the thinking is somehow related to the notion that the section needs to “tune from the bottom.” This is actually a terrible idea though, in reality we always tune in the other direction, the second needs to gauge pitch in relation to the first horn, and on down the section. This is very standard in the horn world.

Of course, the intended audience for this article is conductors, and they will probably not often read this article. But this post is to say this is a pet peeve of hornists in general. Please don’t make us sit in backwards sections!

UPDATE: An early Facebook comment pointed out that the Vienna Philharmonic sits backwards in relation to the article above. There is always an exception that proves the rule….

On Mastering a Brass Trio CD

Back in the Spring I recorded a brass trio CD with ASU colleagues Douglas Yeo and Deanna Swoboda. After editing the project thoroughly (more here) the next step is mastering.

The last project I was involved with mastering was my Canto CD back in 2005. My main take-away from mastering that and my other solo CD Les Adieux (2003) was that many recordings that I used to enjoy I realized either were not mastered or were not mastered very well. It makes a huge difference in the quality of the final product, a difference you really hear when you know well the audio quality before audio mastering and after.

What is Mastering?

So then you might ask, what is this “mastering” you speak of? It involves in simplest terms processing the sound. The mastering engineer uses different programs and tools than the recording engineer that open up the sound generally and can address other specific problems, such as equalizing the sound of tracks recorded at slightly different times and eliminating noises that originated in the production of the CD.

01cc6afb8a756654ee25cdeffe5e5f7e1b6e4bfcd4There is more to it than that but this was in fact something I was really looking forward to. This photo is from the end of the session, the engineer being David Shirk of Sonorous Mastering. You get some sense of his setup, and we are extremely happy to have had his experience in the field contribute to the quality of the final product, which will go to production soon!

The end result is I believe this project will be one of the very best brass trio recordings ever made! It will be in the hands of Summit Records soon; be watching for more as Table for Three is released.

UPDATE: The CD is out now, more here.

Unboxing the Houghton H3, and Initial Impressions

0

If you follow the horn and use Facebook you probably have noted that Houghton Horns has a new line of horn mouthpieces coming out soon (more here). While they are a Horn Matters advertiser, I was following the development of this line for other reasons and was very interested to see the H3 model as I did help (in a small way) with the development of this mouthpiece.

Keeping up with Internet trends is one of the things we strive to do with Horn Matters, so first up is my “unboxing” video (direct link here), which if you know me you will I think find humorous as well. It was not in any way a paid endorsement, just was a fun way to check out the new mouthpiece. More details and impressions follow the video. [UPDATE: And, proving that it was not a paid endorsement, I managed to mispronounce Houghton, they say it as “how-ton.” Sigh.]

The Houghton H3 is inspired/based on a classic design, the old Schilke FARKAS MODEL, produced before Farkas became associated with Holton. I am a fan of the design and posted an article on the original FARKAS MODEL mouthpieces (here) a few years ago. In short, Farkas arrived at this design through intensive, hands on trial and error.

Thousandths of an inch matter in mouthpieces, so while the old “block letter” mouthpieces are similar to the Holton MC, it is a lot better mouthpiece. At least some of them!

IMGP4973 (2)The original mouthpiece varied a bit over the production run which is said to have been only about 1,000 units. I own two of these. The example on the left in the photo is the one I mention in the video, that I won Third Horn in Nashville playing on it, so it is special to me. Sadly, it never really fit any successive horn well as the shank is somewhat undersized, which seems to have been the standard size made of this. The example on the right is one I picked up later. It never felt as good, and I suspect the main culprit was the rim which is wider with a narrower inner diameter (and too doughnut-like for me), but undoubtedly other dimensions are out of spec as well if examined very closely.

Derek Wright was much more intimately involved with the development of this model. A DMA grad from the horn studio here at Arizona State, he knew of my interest and that I had examples, so I loaned both of them. What I hoped was having both they could figure out what was better and worse between the two examples and, combined with other examples and experimentation they could arrive at a design that exceeded the original.

My initial impressions of the new H3 are extremely favorable. It has a big sound and they corrected the shank size issue, it fits standard, modern horns much better than the originals. The H3 certainly plays better than the originals I supplied.

IMGP4977 (2)The rim is based on the rim of the example I favored of the two and feels great. The only difference is the inner diameter is just a bit larger on the H3. I am very interested to try this rim again after the years, the initial impression is very good and I believe I can play successfully on stainless steel. I have been playing on Delrin most of the past year, as I seem to have developed an allergy to silver and gold rims (more here). 

The biggest change and “X-factor” element is the mouthpiece itself being stainless steel. Materials impact things and I suspect the bigger sound I notice is directly related to the use of stainless steel (and possibly also the difference of outer shape and weighting).

In the even bigger news category, besides being offered with a screw rim (you can use any Houser rim, and really most any screw rim made in the USA on this cup) you can also purchase it at a more affordable price as a one piece model.

I like the sound it produces on initial impression quite a lot. You will have to hear it in a room to decide but this is a very fine mouthpiece.

The bad news is these have not yet shipped to the general public. I know I have students interested to try it but sorry, I am busy trying it! But they will be shipping out by the end of October and this model I think is an extremely interesting one that will generate some sales.

UPDATE 2021: As to my own use of this mouthpiece, it is my standard one as a “compromise” mouthpiece on historic valved horns and natural horns. On modern horn I use the H4, which is based on the H3 cup but made a bit shallower.

On Editing a Brass Trio CD

Back a few months ago I recorded with my colleagues Douglas Yeo and Deanna Swoboda (more here) a brass trio CD. Jumping forward to today we are near the end of the editing process.

trio-recording-sessionThis is my third project where I have been involved at this level and it is such an interesting process, worth briefly describing for those not familiar with it.

After recording the first step is to review all the markings from the producer at the time of recording (Rose French for most tracks) in conjunction with listening again to all the takes. From that a roadmap is developed to bring to the first edit. I mapped out about 2/3 of the tracks and Deanna Swoboda about 1/3 of the tracks.

After the digital editing magic was done with the recording engineer (Clarke Rigsby–Tempest Recording) then we all listened back closely to the first edits. From that I for example have a three page list of things to fix in the second edit which will occur in the next few days. Deanna has her list to address as well.

From there we will listen again (!) to see if there is any new problem that has been created. If so, back for a third edit to fix those.

After the project is to that point there will still be small things we hope can be tweaked in mastering, which will be the topic of a future article. [UPDATE: Read more on this here.]

The other side project for now has been working on the program order and liner notes, which are now done, as is the cover. Things are moving along! Be watching for more details soon.

UPDATE: The CD is out now, more here.