Home Blog Page 6

Fundamentals 12. Endurance: ease of production at all levels of fatigue in all ranges

Sometimes I think of batteries when I think about endurance on the horn. Batteries run down with use, and as they deplete the energy level produced is less and less. Similarly, there are only so many notes you can get your chops to produce before they run out of juice. We all know the feeling.

Building chops for endurance

As I’ve done now several times in this series, I’ll start with a story to illustrate the topic.

I started taking professional auditions in earnest after finishing my MM, and made finals for several jobs. Which was great, but I was not winning a job. One of my personal conclusions was I felt my chops were running out of gas in the finals.

I went back to school to work on my Doctorate at IU, and my first semester there I did my second major embouchure change (having also changed my embouchure as an undergrad). This time, my goal was to get the mouthpiece a bit higher so that it was better supported by the skin above my upper lip, rather than resting only on my fairly heavy upper lip. It was with that embouchure setting that I eventually won the Third Horn position in Nashville.

Fast forward, in Nashville I still felt my endurance could be better, and I stared doing some Caruso studies. It was like “weight lifting” for my chops, and it was helpful. I had some strong chops going.

Fast forward a few more years, and I’m teaching at Arizona State. I’m still feeling OK about my endurance and chops, but then I made a trip back to Bloomington and my teacher, Mike Hatfield, had photos of my IU embouchure that had been taken by Farkas in one of my very few lessons with him. I was kind of shocked, my embouchure had slipped lower over many years to between embouchure #2 and #3 (the IU change being #3). I briefly tried to change it further, back to the #3 embouchure in the photo, and realized that was just a terrible idea and left things as they were. To this day I still play on embouchure #2.5.

There are things you can change

Which is all to say, you can alter several things with a goal of building endurance. Mouthpiece placement and equipment choices can be part of it, but also how you train your lips and how smart you are about how you manage your playing from day to day.

Ease of production at all levels of fatigue, or, playing smarter not harder

Returning to the prompt from the Hill book (this series is based on a list of fundamentals from Hill), playing mostly third horn for a number of years is a taxing thing. I leaned on maintaining healthy routines and I knew the value of rest and pacing.

Pro players think in terms of the number of services per day or per week. You will never have more than two services a day in a full-time playing position, and there are days off built into the schedule. But sometimes, especially in the busy time before Christmas, you will have a number of three service days to contend with. It can be done, but you really have to plan and be careful with your chops.

One bottom line being that there are only so many notes you can play in a day, and you need to be fresh enough to play the important ones well. Plan ahead. Be smart. If it hurts, you have pushed things too far, and will need some recovery time. Build lighter days into your schedule, and take a day off sometimes.

But sometimes there is no way around being tired at the end of a long concert. I recall one series in Nashville in particular, the final work was Brahms 3. If you know the third horn part, on the final chords you are holding an E on the top space for ages. I remember so vividly the thought I had playing it — “I’m not falling off the last note!!” I was using extra pressure and willpower to hold it up. Fortunately, I never fell off it, having paced myself carefully enough during the week.

An assistant can really help

Related, I’ve also played plenty of first horn, and an assistant is so helpful.

If you are not very up on the topic, I have a print article on the topic, published in The Horn Call 34, no. 2 (February, 2004). Be sure to talk with your teachers and observe other players, but the following excerpt gives some basic guidelines most would agree with.

In general there are four types of passages that I look to give to the assistant horn when I am playing principal horn:

  • Passages closely aligned with the trumpets. This is especially common in Classical literature where the first horn and first trumpet are in octaves.
  • Passages where the first and third horns are doubled. Unison tutti passages are great places to lay off on first for a moment or longer.
  • Passages before major solos. The classic example is the end of movement one of Tchaikovsky, Symphony No. 5, where the first horn should rest for most of the page before movement two. Even for less extended solos I personally find it of great help to insert even a very short rest before exposed passages.
  • “Footballs,” long strings of whole notes (or similar) when not overly exposed. Some “pass offs” from the first horn to the assistant can be of great help.

In all of these situations it is essential for the principal and assistant to match in terms of volume and general style. It is also very important for the principal horn to have a clear sense of where the first part is doubled down the section.

In short, if you don’t use the assistant effectively you are setting yourself up for potential failure. They are a very important member of the section and of great value to you if you are principal horn.

For a more specific example, I shared this musical example and text in my Playing High Horn book as well.

While assistant horn markings will always be very individualized, the following is an example of the opening page of Beethoven’s Symphony No. 7 with assistant markings. Try the first horn passages with and without the assistant; the passages covered by the assistant horn will certainly give the principal horn more freedom to play the conclusion of this work with greater abandon and better accuracy.

When the series of fundamentals continues the topic is concentration.

Continue reading the Fundamentals series

Revisiting a Geyer single horn

During my sabbatical in the spring of 2021 I rebuilt four horns of interesting designs, the third of those being a Geyer single F. The basic story on that horn was I was able to buy the body of a Geyer single F with no bell (!) and not the original leadpipe. For more on this story, start here:

Fast forward to early this year. The horn played OK, yes, but (as it came to me with no bell and a very damaged lead pipe) I had used King bell and a Yamaha lead pipe. I wanted to make it better.

I contacted natural horn maker Richard Seraphinoff about getting a blank for a more appropriate lead pipe, and besides that blank, I was extremely lucky to locate something else – an orphan Geyer bell that could complete this horn. It was not in great condition, with many patches, but matched the horn body perfectly.

The finished project is below, but be sure to read on!

Patches, patches, and more patches

It has been said that a much-loved vintage horn will have patches. The horn body and the Geyer bell when they got to me both had holes to deal with and patches from prior repairs. In the original rebuild I had to make several patches, and I do pride myself in making nice, artistic patches. In this second rebuild, I added yet more. Everything that was leaking or looked likely to leak was patched with the horn body apart for better work. You can only see some of them in the photos. Why so many holes?

Seamed tubing

Other than the inner and outer valve slides the horn, which are seamless tubing, the rest of the horn was made with seamed tubing.

While it is pretty universal today, the process of making seamless tubing was not invented until 1885. I’d need to study it more, but it seems that for brass instrument construction seamless tubing was not that common before the 1930s. Most likely anything prewar would more typically have seamed tubing, rolled from flat sheet.

In this horn body, a number of cracks have opened up along the seams. There were patches on the horn before I got to it, and I left those alone, but clearly they have to do with either open seams or damage. Also, the hand guard on the bell is placed oddly more toward the bell than necessary, I suspect hiding some significant dent work or damage.

Other miscellaneous fixes

Besides bending and finishing the lead pipe blank (2″ shorter than the one that came on the horn; the pitch level is great now), a big fix, for me, was I made a close replica of a missing brace between the valve section and the main slide using Yamaha parts. You don’t notice it unless looking closely, which was my goal. In the photo above, with the horn in progress, the new brace is connected to a third valve slide. Witness marks showed me where it needed to be.

The bell brace, lead pipe brace, and pinky ring are not Geyer parts but are vintage and similar to what he would have used.

In all cases, I tried to do my very best work (I’m a hobbyist repairman, not a pro) but also aimed to not over-repair anything. The horn still shows its age, as it should.

How old is it? Who was it made for?

There are people out there with more expertise than me in dating Geyer horns. I’m guessing the body and bell are both 1930s era, pretty certainly pre-WWII. There is no serial number present.

The design is based on a design used by C. F. Schmidt. The “Eb crook” main slide is not an Eb crook, the horn stands in F. I feel that single F horns with this type of main slide tend to play the best.

As to who it was made for, I’m thinking it was a student model, if for no reason other than it was made clearly for a player with small hands. But Geyer being Geyer, he was hard wired to make a good horn no matter the age of the intended player.

How does it play?

It really plays very well, I’m very pleased with the final results. While I’m sure it could benefit from a valve job, even without one the scale is surprisingly even, it’s nicely responsive, and the tone is what you might expect from a Geyer horn.

With the Geyer done, I have more projects planned for when I have time over the break, including work on one of the other Sabbatical project horns. More on that another day.

Fundamentals 11. Accuracy: initial attacks at all dynamics, consistency hearing entrance notes and intervals

0

The proverbial elephant in the room in horn playing is accuracy. In the prompt from Douglas Hill (this series is based on a list of fundamentals found in his book) wisely focuses on two aspects of a huge topic: initial attacks and also hearing intervals.

48 Ways to Miss Lots of Notes

Actually, there are many more than 48** ways to miss notes (**the reference is of course to the 48 Etudes of Verne Reynolds, which contain many accuracy challenges – his seemingly favorite phrase to say in my lessons was “one more time for accuracy.”).

Not long ago I was working on a series of articles on accuracy – it starts here – and I’ll get back to that series sometime, after this fundamentals series is done. But a premise of that series was that there are hundreds of things that impact accuracy to varying degrees. So many things that you can’t (and should not) focus on all of them – reality being you have to pick a couple things as your personal points of focus, and attacks and hearing intervals are very good choices for focus.

Initial attacks

There is a lot to be said for having a consistent way of setting up your attacks. Having a method of breathing/setting/playing that happens all in one motion is essential.

One of the most recently completed articles in the accuracy series was “Accuracy Encyclopedia: F is for First Note Accuracy.” In it I lay out several important points, but the main one is to have a smooth and continuous motion that goes from your inhale to when you start the note. There can’t be a hitch in this cycle, as illustrated below (from the Gunther Schuller book).

Hearing entrance notes and intervals

Mentally hearing what you want to play is also extremely important, although you can hear exactly what you want to play and still miss it. Still, it sets you up better if you can hear it, and I touched on that in another of my articles from the accuracy series, “Accuracy Encyclopedia: Audiation and Autopilot.”

What about teaching accuracy?

To close this installment, if you have a copy of the Hill book of Collected Thoughts, turn to chapter 9, “High Expectations.” For me this is a fascinating (but short) chapter that gets at the challenges of teaching accuracy.

It is a topic complicated by the expectations of composers and conductors, which can be both low and high. A consequence of all this is the development, for the player, of “a mindset of fear,” one that “turns on itself and becomes a greater problem than the inherent idiosyncrasies of the horn.”

Where the horn teacher comes in is that we have a lot of power to create accuracy problems if we don’t teach the topic wisely. Hill states it this way: “Do not pass on your prejudices or your own problems to your students.” Reynolds hammered away on accuracy in my lessons back in the day, but I don’t think it a very effective teaching technique. Horn students typically have a harsh inner critic anyway — and, as teacher you can, as Hill says, “block out the joy of making music” by how you approach this topic. Teaching accuracy has no one correct approach, but it is one of the very most important ones to address, worthy of careful thought.

When the series continues the topic is Endurance.

Continue reading the Fundamentals series

Review: Two Gig Bags

0

Among my activities I like to work on horns, continuing the type of projects I was doing during my sabbatical (more here). I enjoy especially bringing horns back to life, not heavily restored but certainly playable and in much better shape.

Recent projects I’ve been working on include three vintage horns (I’ll post about them in a few weeks) that won’t fit in any conventional, modern case. I have cases I can use with them but they are smelly, and my wife (wisely) banished them from the house. What to do? Eventually I went shopping for gig bags.

It is also helpful to me, with multiple horns in the house, if horn cases look different. I settled in on these two gig bags.

Don’t you mean “dent bags?”

Yes, gig bags have a deserved bad reputation, and really you should use a hard case of some type. Also, for sure you should not fly with a fixed bell gig bag, the risk of damage to your horn is much too high. But for some out there they still make sense in relation to unusual horns, storage situations, etc.

The Gard Gig Bag

I ordered the two gig bags the same day from different vendors, and the first to arrive was the Gard bag. I want to compliment Houghton Horns for the quick shipping and that it came in a very substantial box with no damage at all!

This case has several big positives

  • Similar look and feel to vintage Giardinelli
  • Metal clips and reinforcements on the bag
  • Straps with metal parts
  • Plenty of padding
  • Feels very substantial; could be used on a daily basis if necessary

On the negative side, if it is a negative, the case has “…Gard’s patented mid-bag suspension system to provide ultimate protection for your horn.” This became a negative as I could not get a horn in the case with the system in place, so I had to take it out. The three project horns I needed cases for are all large wrap and “fat” due to their design. I believe for a smaller horn it would work well. For me another “negative” was the pouch on the side was too small for the Eb crook which I needed to store with a particular horn. So that horn went in this next case.

ProTec “Explorer” Gig Bag

This is my fourth ProTec case, and I’ve been happy with the previous three.

The gig bag is set up so the horn fits in the opposite direction (up and down) as the Gard case. The mouthpiece receiver is “up” on this case, and “down” on the Gard.

I’ll go to the positives first; this bag has plenty of room for that Eb crook I needed to store with a horn. Tons of room for music storage, mutes, etc. And the horn I needed a case to store it in is really light, so some of the negatives below are mitigated, but you might want to consider them carefully. Chief among them,

  • Plastic clips on the gig bag
  • Straps with plastic parts

It is some years ago now, but I had a plastic part on a case strap fail, and a pretty valuable horn hit the ground. (It was, for disclosure, a different brand and it was literally 20 years ago). The price for this gig bag is really nice but the presence of plastic parts (no matter how solid they may be), combined with the tendency that people have to load cases up with too much music and stuff, I’d be very hesitant to recommend the use of this case as your main case.

Since I mentioned shipping on the Gard case, I’ll share that this case came from a different vendor in a plastic bag rather than a box. It was not damaged in transit, but was at more risk for sure.

Bottom line

I’m happy with both cases overall. It’s great having those horns in the house in these nice gig bags instead of the garage in their old smelly cases. If a gig bag makes sense for you, do check these options out.

Fundamentals 10. Dynamics: response, control, intonation at all extremes in all ranges

Elsewhere in this site I have shared (probably several times) a story involving my Master’s degree studies with Verne Reynolds. He had a thing he would say along the lines of “you never know how loud some idiot, I mean conductor, will ask you to play.” This was varied to the situation – soft, fast, slow, short, etc. It was part of a plan for students to master playing extremes of all kinds.

Extremes!

To the tenth item in our list of Fundamentals from the Douglas hill book, a central point that I believe Hill would agree with is that while you should not default to very extreme dynamics, you do need to be capable of playing extremely loud and extremely soft.

Conductors sometimes want extremes for reasons of balance

Another story comes to mind. When I was in the Nashville Symphony we recorded the Dvorak New World Symphony. There is a passage in the last movement, the offbeat passage after rehearsal letter 2, that the conductor wanted to be very loud and aggressive. At the time I was like really? Well OK then! It seemed like too much for sure. But listening to the actual recording later, it worked, it was not out of balance, just has presence. It’s part of the craft of horn playing to do what conductors ask, trusting that they have a good result in mind.

Sometimes also, their ears are shot, and they don’t hear balances correctly due to the quirks of how hearing loss progresses. I’ve experienced this too. But still they are your boss in the situation so you need be able to play softer/louder/shorter/etc. than any reasonable person would want.

Intonation in extreme ranges

I was taught to play in such a way that if your horn was in tune and you were playing it right that all the ranges would be equally in tune. However, I know there are players that close their hand more in the upper range to bring it down and also players that open the hand in the bell in the low range to bring it up. Especially in the low range I tend personally to see this approach as a bit flawed, that they are just sagging flat on the pitch, but I can recognize that the hand position variation approach is valid. Mainly, you just need to be in tune and have a way to do it consistently in all registers. If it sounds good, it is good.

Adding though, that if for example the three central octaves of G in our range (below the staff, second line, and above the staff) are not in tune with each other, I think that is a big flaw in either your horn or how you have it set up. Horn makers make horns that should play those three notes at the same pitch level.

For a podcast looking at the topics included in articles 7-10, see Hornnotes Episode 62 everywhere you can get podcasts, with a direct link here. 

When the series returns the topic is a biggie: Accuracy.

Continue reading the Fundamentals series

Fundamentals 9. Ranges: extremes, clear controlled sounds (high, middle, mid-low, low)

Ranges are fundamental. This prompt from the Douglas Hill book is pretty broad, but focuses on two elements; extreme ranges and good control in every range.

By the way, check his book

I have mentioned elsewhere that this semester I have switched things up at ASU in our pedagogy class. Instead of following the University of Horn Matters series, we are focusing on the Farkas book and the Hill Collected Thoughts book. His section on range development (high and low) on pages 31-37 really is quite a bit better than the discussion of the same topics in the Farkas book. This was the topic in our pedagogy class last week, and I suggest anyone working on range development would benefit from reading his discussion.

Extremes

Returning however to the prompt for this week and the context of the prompt, what Hill is asking is for you to reflect on your current status in terms of extreme ranges and your horn playing.

A related question worth considering would be how high and low do you need to be able to play? In terms of standard orchestral literature, there is a definite answer.

  • The lowest note seen in standard orchestral works (Mahler 3 and 6, and Shost. 5) is the low E two octaves below treble clef
  • The highest note seen in standard works – too numerous to mention!—is high C

Of course we know we should practice lower and higher than that. Myself, I know I’m warmed up when I can comfortably play a low D below that low E, but I can only barely hit the double low C. As to high notes, honestly, I rarely practice above high C, and many/most advanced players really hit a wall at high C. But facts are you need to be able to play up to around high E or F, those higher notes do come up more often than you would like. Skillsets vary from player to player; I can hit a high D relatively comfortably if really needed. But I’d rather not play above high C.

Clear controlled sounds (high, middle, mid-low, low)

In the previous article of this series we touched on tone color, but here Hill is looking beyond that. There is an entire package that involves tone and articulations, leading toward a tone that sounds controlled and easy. Like you are not straining and grasping at high or low notes that are really not in your comfortable range.

This goes beyond keeping the same tone color. There is kind of an “X Factor” that you develop over years of practice that contributes to clear and controlled sounds. There may or may not be quick fixes that can help; hopefully an experienced teacher can help with insights in this area.

When the series continues the topic is dynamics

Continue reading the Fundamentals series

Fundamentals 8. Tone quality: centered resonance, consistency in all registers, varieties of timbre

Tone quality is a very important fundamental! If you have a good tone, you are likely doing a lot of things correctly. Strive for tone!

But tone can sometimes be a huge challenge to work on with a student due to many other issues impacting tone negatively. The prompt that is the title of this post (taken from a list in the Douglas Hill book) gives a couple of key areas to focus on.

Centered resonance

The wording Hill uses is very interesting to me. I’ve long used a term I heard in trumpet lessons that I was observing as a Doctoral student. That teacher was very concerned that his students play at the “resonant center” of the pitch.

But backing up a step, part of the issue can be your horn and mouthpiece. I’ve taught long enough to see how, at times, equipment can make a dramatic difference.

Still, I like the idea of focusing on centering and resonance. If you are too low or too high on the pitch the tone will not be optimal. This is where pitch bending can be very helpful, intentionally bending the pitch above and below the resonant center for the purpose of finding and playing at that center consistently.

Consistent tone color in all registers

While the upper range can get pinched, for a much larger number of players the issue is the low range. Specifically, the tone color gets “reedy” in the range below written middle C. And it is something you may not notice unless it is pointed out, as you are just used to sounding like that in the low register.

The solution is easy to say – you need to drop your jaw! But it is not easy to do. The low range is very individualistic. I can tell you this – the tone color change is due to some interference of the lips with each other. Things are not open enough at the lips. The solution can be very challenging to find, but well worth the effort.

Timbre variations?

Can you alter your timbre? Timbre has been defined as “the character or quality of a musical sound or voice as distinct from its pitch and intensity.”

I tend to think that on the horn you just want to focus on always having a good sound, with good control of dynamics. One good sound at all dynamics will get you a long ways.

A real-world example would be what would you do if the conductor asks you some ridiculous thing like “play with a more burnished bronze tone color.” What? In this situation, just play softer.

I’ve had this come up in woodwind quintet a few times. I think some woodwinds really can alter their actual timbre significantly (especially the flute), but, again, I think on horn our options are more limited. Maybe you can adjust hand position a bit and achieve a bit of a difference in some situations, but, again, just focus on producing a good tone.

When the series continues the topic is ranges.

Continue in the Fundamentals Series

Revisiting the Moosewoods

I’ve made some equipment changes recently. As I noted in this article, I recently found a particular passage I was recording to be VERY challenging on my main setup. The passage in question was a low slurred passage, it was unusually difficult to smoothly transition from note to note. However, when I changed horns and mouthpieces it suddenly became much more playable. That was a good thing, really, as it gave me a new metric to use in rethinking my setup.

Tom Greer of Moosewood tries out a Kuhn.

The “Wheel of Doom” theory of mouthpiece testing

Way back in 2009(!!, Horn Matters has been around a while) I posted an article about the Mouthpiece Wheel of Doom. The term is from jazz hornist Mark Taylor, who I knew then from The Mellocast podcast. The basic idea is that when you start testing mouthpieces you will end up, at some point, back where you started – all the way around the wheel of doom.

At that time in 2009 I had come back from larger Laskey mouthpieces to the Conn 5BN I used on my solo recordings. But going further back to my first year at ASU and just before that, I was mainly playing Moosewood mouthpieces. They were made here locally (out in Sun City) by the late Tom Greer. That’s him in the photo from 2012, taken by my Horn Matters partner Bruce Hembd.

I did use one of these on my triple horn on the Table for Three CD as well, so it is not my first time back around to Moosewood.

Happiness is a mouthpiece that works well

The favored combo right now on my Patterson Geyer is a Moosewood B-13 from about 1999 with what he then called a Yamaha shank – with a favorite Houghton H-3 rim. As a bonus, I have several other Moosewood cups that are very near to the same dimensions (either B or BV cups) that I can spread around with the various horns I use for practice at home, etc. Although trying to primarily play on that B-13.

Embrace the past

My final note would be, even you fall out of love with a mouthpiece, try to hang onto it if it was ever your main mouthpiece, especially if it is not easily replaceable. At some point it may be the solution that future you really needs — for a horn you don’t yet own, and with a rim you don’t yet have.

Fundamentals 7. Slurring: various intervals, various dynamics, register changes

Slurring can be a problem, even a major problem. The question you should be asking is this — is the problem you, or is it your horn?

Slurring fact: The issue may be your equipment

I do realize that to a point you just have to learn how to do things on the horn that you have. And most typically teachers (Farkas for example) frame the discussion of slurs around tips for better slurring. Airspeed, stable embouchure, movements of the tongue, etc.

However, I’d like to start this discussion today from a completely different angle. Your equipment setup can hugely impact your ability to make slurs.

Equipment? How so?

You have to try a few horns/mouthpieces and listen carefully to other players quite a bit before you begin to see how the equipment enforces on you a way that your slurs will sound. There is a way that your horn/mouthpiece will allow you to go from note to note, baked into the design of your horn.

In short, the transitions from note to note have to be smooth enough or you will have rough slurs. Slow arpeggio figures should be easy, but if they are not, it’s a big warning sign about your setup.

Some slurred passages will show you that don’t have the right setup

Story time. I was recently recording the first three of the Arizona Regional Band etudes. The first two, no problem. Did both in two takes. The third one, maybe 20 takes in, I knew I needed to reevaluate things. A couple bars of slurred passages centering around middle C were really not happening. I ended up switching horn and mouthpiece for the recording, and since then I’ve had a multi week project to figure out what a better setup is for that one passage.

Changing mouthpiece helped a great deal. Sometimes you need this kind of very specific playing challenge like that to clarify your metrics.

(For more on the etude illustrated above, Maxime-Alphonse 4:12, read more here)

Teaching in lessons I often hear the same issues. I know the student is doing as well as they can with the setup they are using – and that they need to change some equipment things to reach their real potential.

What causes the slurring issue with some equipment?

A term used sometimes is “acoustical transients.” These issues, which arise from design issues such as tapers and bracing, manifest as bumps, clicks, things that get in your way. Sometimes a different mouthpiece will help a lot, but sometimes the issue has more to do with your horn and how it was made – no mouthpiece will really fix the issue and allow easy slurs. And easy music really should sound easy!

On various dynamics and ranges

Returning to the title of this article (a prompt from the Doug Hill book, as are all of the articles in this series), it may be simplistic on my part, but I think if slurs feel fine at lower dynamics in comfortable ranges on the horn, they should also be good at more vigorous dynamics and in more extended ranges. At least with practice. In my teaching I don’t tend to see problems of this type.

When the series continues the topic is tone quality

Continue reading the fundamentals series

Fundamentals 6. Tonguing: clarity, fluency, variety, double, triple, flutter

And now we have another very big fundamental topic: everything about tonguing. Hill, in his list that we are following for this series, combines tonguing basics and advanced extended techniques in his prompt.

Clarity, fluency, and variety

Right or wrong, most beginners get hardly any instruction on tonguing. Then later, students of the horn tend to get instruction on it when there are problems (which there will be), and the instructions given may just make the problems worse.

In my teaching I think the biggest “problem” is that students tend to tongue too far back in the mouth too much of the time, because they were told to tongue up on their gums or roof of the mouth by some early teacher (probably their band director). This is not to knock band directors either, they have many fires to put out, and tonguing in this manner works well enough as a general suggestion. But when it comes to musical situations where you need to play with more clarity, you will need to tongue further forward in the mouth, towards the point of the teeth.

In terms of clarity, one thing to know is that there is a perception out there in the conducting world that horn players might drag. I think this often has to do with clarity of the fronts of notes. This is why some teachers are so hard core about Kopprasch, you can use those etudes pretty effectively to improve clarity of articulation.

This also leads us to the issues of fluency and variety. You legato tongue differently than staccato, and in either case the movements of your tongue are small. For legato they will be gentle small movements (like doo doo doo) and for staccato the movements are more aggressive (think dut dut dut).

Clarity, part II. An important aid to clarity

I want to mention one more thing that hugely affects your clarity; choice of mouthpiece and horn.

It pains me as a teacher to see online comments that basically say it does not matter what horn or mouthpiece you use, it won’t make a difference on how you sound. I saw one of these topics go by recently on Horn People. This is such poor advice!! You really owe it to yourself to try some different equipment. There is a reason why professional players don’t play cheap horns and mouthpieces made in China! It really can make a huge difference.

Double, triple, flutter

Then we get to double and triple tonguing, which are certainly fundamentals the more advanced horn player must have mastered.

If I had to right now today pick the two syllables closest to how I actually double tongue I’d pick “doo goo.” For sure the traditional syllables suggested, “tu ku” don’t work that well. There is a reason. Those syllables are from the Arban trumpet method, and Arban was not an English speaker, he spoke French. We in America see “tu ku” and say words that are too explosive and harsh, with the tongue in the wrong position. Instead, imagine them said in French; they were much less aggressive syllables for Arban.

Triple tonguing is similar, but with most commonly a t-t-k motion.

Honestly, I don’t like to multiple tongue and avoid it whenever possible, partially because many passages sound better with fast single tonguing. But some passages must be multiple tongued.

I hate to blame anyone other than myself on this lack of liking to multiple tongue, but I could extend some blame to my teachers. In their defense, I’m sure they knew that I could single tongue very fast, so I did not much need to learn to double tongue — until I did! I did not learn to multiple tongue until after my Masters degree, and that was way too late. You should be learning to multiple tongue as early as possible in your studies.

OK, learn to double tongue! And what about flutter tonguing?

I talk about this elsewhere in Horn Matters, but will just say here that in general it is a skill that either you can do or you can’t. I’m in the “can’t do it” category. I can plausibly fake it at higher dynamics, but I know I’m doing it wrong. My technique is to force my tongue against the roof of my mouth and blow. I can’t roll my “R’s.”

Fortunately, I think composers realize that there is a large subset of players that can’t flutter tongue that well and they don’t request it too much. Whew! Because the plain fact is that some players can flutter tongue, and some can’t.

Bonus Podcast?!

Episode 61 of the Horn Notes Podcast reviews and goes into more detail on topics related to Fundamentals 4-6. Direct link here, or check wherever you get your podcasts.

When the series returns the topic is slurs.

Continue in Fundamentals Series