Home Blog Page 97

Joy on the Balanced Embouchure

0

Over the summer an interview was posted with hornist Andrew Joy on high-c.com. Joy mentioned The Balanced Embouchure as a factor in his current embouchure approach. In the interview with Robert Douglass “Andrew Joy on Horn, Nerves, and Water Keys” the question begins with an embouchure change and what lead him to his present approach.

RD: You did something that is unthinkable to most established brass players – you completely changed your embouchure. Why did you do that? Was it hard to do? What advantages have you gained? Would you recommend it to others?

AJ: In January of 2006, after a four-week break from playing, I was getting back into shape when a blister developed in the middle of my bottom lip in the area that sits inside the mouthpiece. A tiny hole in the middle caused uncomfortable pain. I played for two and a half months with this handicap before choosing to take a break to allow the injury to heal.

During this time, I asked one of my trumpet colleagues about flexibility exercises that he could recommend that would help me with a performance of Stauss II at the then upcoming IHS Symposium in Cape Town. In addition to recommending the Schlossberg book, he also told me about Jerome Callet and the Tongue Controlled Embouchure (TCE). I bought Jerome’s books and DVDs and had a lesson with him on the phone, as well as one in person when he visited a friend in Düsseldorf in March of 2008. The most immediate and significant change for me was a 70%reduction of embouchure energy expenditure.

One year later, e-mail exchanges with Prof. John Ericson led me further to Jeff Smiley’s BE (The Balanced Embouchure) method. The increases in ease, range, endurance and flexibility that I am still experiencing almost two years later, have more than compensated for the hardships involved. I’m continually recommending both methods to other players. Using the BE exercises on a daily basis leads to a gentle change in and expansion of embouchure function. Most people notice a positive difference already after only two weeks of doing Smiley’s BE exercises on a daily basis.

I find it first very interesting that I was able to point Joy (an Australian player who is principal horn in a German orchestra–website here) to the Balanced Embouchure approach at a time when it was really helpful to him.

The Balanced Embouchure is a book with some very interesting content. I reviewed the book a while back and the note I would add to that is I think one of the things that BE concepts open up is an ability to achieve a greater range of motion in the embouchure. Some of the specific concepts will always be a bit controversial but there is a big picture he gets at, one element being that to play high and to play low you have to get out of your mid-range setting and another being you have to think outside the Farkas box at times.

For more notes on BE check The Balanced Embouchure for Horn and also The Balanced Embouchure website.

A Very French Villanelle

3

One thing not often encountered today are the very different “schools” of horn playing of days gone by, one of the most distinctive of the recent past being the French school with small bore, piston valve horns and a wide vibrato. If you have never heard this school of playing, the following recording of IHS honorary member Lucien Thévet performing Paul Dukas Villanelle with pianist Claude Ambrosi is one that must be heard.

This video is a part of a series recently put up on YouTube by “jorgevalencia1975,” and this photo of  Thévet with his Selmer piston horn is linked from his bio on the IHS website. I love this recording for several reasons but really high on the list is the opening. He performs it with valves and it is so dreamy and melancholy. I think most people I ever hear do this work play it a lot like the Dennis Brain recording but there is something beautiful that is gained with the slower tempo on this old LP.

Another topic that is one people wonder about in terms of performing this work is about the echo horn  passage. For my upcoming recital I have been practicing this work on a very similar piston valve horn, and on it I discovered that not only are legato passages a joy to play on piston valves but also the echo horn is really easy to manage on that small bell. No wonder the French asked for it all the time! Listen to his tone in the echo passage; it sounds very much like stopped horn, as I have also found. It only confirms some of my thinking in this prior article on the topic of echo horn in the Villanelle.

Get past the tone and vibrato if it bothers you, this is a recording with style. It is one every serious performer of the Villanelle should hear with an open mind, classic French playing from a great player.

This one simple trick will make your valves move much faster

Over the years I have any number of times discovered students who had valves on their instrument that, while not actually sticking, were gummy and slow. Some brass players certainly slog along with slow valves for literally years not realizing just how deeply it is holding back their technique.

One horn player I worked with in particular comes to mind years ago who had been told by a prior teacher (who may have not even have known how to oil rotary valves!) not to over oil their valves. So they never used more than one drop of oil on them! The horn was fairly new, so they did not stick, but were gummy and painfully slow. Seeing the student play was like watching a slow motion video of valves, and to try to actually play on the horn was very frustrating.

The solution is to use valve oil. Lots of it and not too heavy, as in a nice light oil. Pretty much any brand is fine. For my personal use I keep coming back to Hetman (light/thin versions) and Al Cass.

If horn valves are gummy as described the trick is you need to put enough light oil down the slide tubes to cut the old residue and get things moving. There is no danger in using too much valve oil. Some horns may require oil every day, and some older instruments will require oil heavier than standard valve oil on bearings and linkages.

Expanding that thought, higher quality instruments have TIGHT bearing surfaces. Be sure you use oil that is not too thick. Oil marketed as rotor oil tends to be too heavy, I regularly use the thinnest types of valve oil. You really only need the heavy oils if your valves clank like an old sewing machine.

On my recital this semester I used several different horns. Of those a couple had been played very little for some years and required a lot of valve oil as described above to get the valves really going where they needed to be. Don’t be afraid to do what needs done.

In short, insist on fast valve action; don’t put up with slow valves. Even if they don’t stick they are holding you back.

For more on the topic be sure to also check The Mellocast episode 118, just released, on the topic of Oil.

Hornmasters: Robinson on Aperture

Continuing our series from classic horn text the next topic is the aperture or more properly aperture control, which is a key element for high range and tone development. It is a topic on which several wrote but in the case of this topic our focus will be on just one book and author that I believe is not read much at present but should be.

Developing aperture control

William C. Robinson in An Illustrated Advanced Method for French Horn Playing presented several ideas toward developing aperture control. He notes (the bolds are original to the quote) that

A different sized lip aperture is required for the production of each pitch at each different dynamic level, throughout the entire range. A high soft tone requires a smaller aperture than the same tone played at a louder volume. Lower tones require larger apertures than higher ones played at identical volumes. When the speed of the air remains constant, development of accurate control of pitch depends upon subtle and definite control of the lips immediately around the aperture, inside the mouthpiece.

Pitch bending as a tool

Robinson in particular recommends bending of pitches (he calls the exercise “sustained tones with pitch variation”) to focus in on “the tone with the most desirable pitch and quality.” Also on a daily basis to develop aperture control he recommends long tones played with crescendos and diminuendos and harmonic series studies. Of the former he notes

As volume changes, pitch will also change, unless compensation is made by changing the size of the aperture. Control should be “set” in the corners of the lips and should always be maintained in all registers….

Minimum use of the embouchure

As to the harmonic series studies, a central concept of his pedagogy was the “minimum use of the embouchure.” It involved developing the relationship between air speed and the embouchure on any given note.

After adequate aperture control has been established, the next step is the development of air speed control. Using a minimum of aperture change and embouchure effort, concentrate on the use of various speeds of air. This will facilitate development of the subtle coordination between air and embouchure, with the air doing the greater amount of work and the embouchure doing as little as possible.

Exercises are presented which clarify his concepts of aperture control further. The higher notes are louder dynamics than the lower, with the highest the loudest and the lowest the softest. The instruction is to “Use the same sized aperture throughout (as nearly as possible), using varying air speeds to produce different pitches.”

Again, this is a classic book that contains a number of interesting concepts and exercises related to the aperture and aperture control in particular. It is available direct from the publisher Wind Music and according to the current price list online is a great bargain at only $8 a copy.

I also have a few more thoughts related to aperture control in this article, “Developing a daily routine to enhance pitch placement.‘”

UPDATE! See this follow up note from Robinson on his approach to teaching the aperture after the publication of this book.

Continue in Hornmasters Series

An Old Hüttl Horn

Not long ago over on Facebook there were a series of comments on a photo of a roughly 1950s high school horn section along the lines of “what is that odd horn?”

It was a horn of this design, another example of which may be found on the cover of the Anton Horner Primary Studies, published in 1939.

This most interesting single F horn is by A. K. Hüttl. Note that the main slide is on “top” and the valve section is placed lower than we see today. Also note the big loop in the main tuning slide. This is not an E-flat crook, it is actually the F tuning slide. Why they did this I am not sure but it does make for a striking look and the horn with valve section set this way is pretty comfortable to hold.

As to Huttl the brass instrument maker, according to Horn-U-Copia, Hüttl was of Graslitz, Czech Rep.

Anton Konrad Huttl started his company in 1877. The company advertised in 1913 that they had the largest most modern factory in Austria-Hungary and Germany.

In 1945, the company was Nationalized, and they relocated in South Wales. Huttl, had a factory one in Canada that closed down in the 1970s. Those horns, said Western Germany presumably Baiersdorf, Germany.

Three more Hüttl horns may be seen at Horn-U-Copia.

Going back to the horn at hand, it plays but is pretty borderline. So it sits on display in my office, an interesting horn I do hope to hang onto for a while.

UPDATE: See this article for more on this horn

From the Mailbag: Big Horn, Big Mouthpiece? [Updated]

A question came in about mouthpieces, as in should you use a big mouthpiece on a big horn and a small mouthpiece on a small horn?

In the 1950s? Yes.

If you go way back to Farkas and Chambers in the 50s this was a pretty true statement for players in the United States. Their individual setups were quite different, Farkas on a Geyer with a FARKAS MODEL mouthpiece and Chambers on a Conn 8D with a big Giardinelli mouthpiece such as the C-1. Students and pros in their individual spheres of influence followed these same general setups — back then.

And today? No.

Older players may still repeat that generalization, but it is not holding up today. And even back then it probably did not hold up perfectly. For example, is a C-10 a big mouthpiece? In terms of internal dimensions it is closer to the Farkas mouthpiece than a C-1 really.

What is big, what is small?

The market as I perceive it of late has redefined what large and small mouthpieces are.

Confusing the issue further is the fact that a mouthpiece that might traditionally be considered “small” in terms of cup depth and bore, but made with a wide inner diameter, feels large to the player. And this is the direction that many players seem to be going, along with using in general a cup shape and depth that promotes easy, efficient playing.

Shallower cups — small cups — tend to feel more efficient and have more “ring” to the sound. And this is good for everyone.

A brighter, ringing sound is a good thing

A final point to note in relation to that is that for listeners such as conductors especially I am sure that all things equal they will tend to have their ear drawn to players who have a slightly brighter, more ringing sound. A traditional, very deep large bore mouthpiece on a very large horn in the hands of the wrong player can sound tubby and unfocused instead of big and dark. It is a big topic to consider carefully for sure.

In the end if you are in doubt choose the mouthpiece that plays better and has a bit more color in the tone, it will be the best overall choice.

UPDATED 2021

More on the Embouchure Break

1

Among the articles here few have generated so much discussion as the the recent ones that addressed the topic of the embouchure break. It is topic that some horn teachers talk about a lot, but there is almost nothing online about it and little in print. Part of the reason why this is so is because breaking the embouchure is in general considered a bad thing in other brass instruments so hornists have stayed a bit underground on the topic.

I believe that most advanced horn players would agree changes are required in jaw position as you approach the lowest octave of the range of the horn. Thus in terms of horn I personally would define the embouchure break as any planned and distinct change of jaw position into the low range, ideally with no general change of placement. Some horn players and teachers advocate making this change gradually with no distinct break, and some advocate for a more distinct break or breaks, usually at or just below written C below the staff. I make use of both approaches in my teaching, it really depends on the student and the results obtained.

Still, I don’t think the above understanding of “the break” lines up with everyone out there and one could of course extend this discussion of a break to changes of general placement and more.

In any event, if you go to Google and type in the phrase “Embouchure Break” right now your number one hit is an article on the website of hornist Pip Eastop. It is actually an extended extract (with no additional commentary) from chapter 14 of The Cambridge Companion to Brass Instruments. The chapter by Ralph T. Dudgeon, Phillip Eastop, Trevor Herbert and John Wallace is titled “Playing, learning and teaching brass” and the selection in the Eastop site covers several topics but the main text there on the break  is as follows.

Ideally, a good embouchure should be able to produce any note at any dynamic. It should then be able to change to any other note without compromising its structure. And ideal embouchure has minimal visible movement. On instruments with larger mouthpieces, trombone and tuba especially, producing deeper notes requires the jaw to be lowered to vibrate at lower frequencies. This action also helps the lower register by increasing the resonating space inside the mouth. Jaw position and more obviously visible adjustments between registers are more evident on the larger brass. In general, however, the embouchure should allow the player to roam from high to low without pausing to re-seat in an embouchure ‘break’.

An embouchure break occurs when, for example, the beginner who has established a foothold in the middle register establishes another in the upper register, with a different embouchure seating, and perhaps yet another in the lower. And experienced teaching will guard against this, encouraging the gradual development of range by incremental degrees – perhaps a semitone at a time – to slowly build up strength and to ensure that the entire range is integrated under one well-formed embouchure. Most methods follow this incremental approach, building strength in the facial muscles through a cycle of play-rest-play-rest.

The text, while posted in a horn website, seems to me to be more directed to brass players in general. Certainly the break as potentially a positive thing for some players is not given a place in the spectrum of successful approaches to the low register of the horn.

My three recent articles Hornmasters on Mouthpiece Placement,  On Embouchure Changes, and Breaking the Embouchure generated so much discussion in fact that we felt the need to close discussion on all three. If you want to weigh in on the above text from the Cambridge Companion or on the embouchure break as it is understood in the horn world feel free to chime in below, this is your chance to open the discussion up again. Or, better still, for those commentators who have their own websites and blogs, please develop your thoughts out further in your sites as this is a topic that really needs to not be in the category of  topics on which there is very little to be found about online.

Tenure and the Hornist

Julia Rose posted to her site recently a very interesting article on “Audition Fads.” In it she touched on several topics but I would like to focus in on just one portion of it, on the topic of tenure.

Tenure is a form of guaranteed employment and as Julia notes usually orchestra contracts in the United States address the topic of tenure in the first year of employment. Tenure is a big deal in the orchestral and academic worlds.

The week I received tenure at Arizona State I put up a short article where I stated that “gaining tenure in my former position in the Nashville Symphony was not nearly as stressful.” Expanding on that thought a bit, really in my experience it was much easier to get tenure in the orchestra. Looking back to that first season (it was granted my first season) it was mostly just doing my job, playing in tune, and being a good colleague. The hard part was winning the job.

I have heard college administrators say something to the effect that the tenure decision is the most important decision that is ever made by the university. Because of that it is a brutal, long process. And now the brutal part of the process as Julia notes in her article is spreading into the orchestral world.

There is a horn audition that will be happening in a few months for principal horn of a chamber orchestra that has most of the usual requirements….

However, one thing that I do NOT like about this audition is that the information sent to the candidates states that the orchestra has a tenure process lasting “no less than 3 years.” In most orchestras, a musician can only be granted a leave of absence for one year, MAYBE two, without being forced to make the decision to either return to the orchestra or resign from their position. A 3 year tenure process deters candidates currently under contract with an orchestra from taking the audition. Most tenured musicians are not willing to take a risk of unemployment, and because of this it’s very certain that the musicians who show up will not be under contract with an orchestra. Perhaps this is what they want, but the position is for principal horn, and most orchestras like to get someone seasoned with lots of orchestral experience (i.e. previous years of employment in an orchestra) for that position.

Reading this it makes me reflect a bit on things yet again.  I am one of the handful of horn professors at any school in the United States that has had tenure in a full time orchestral position and currently has tenure at a research one university.

I had tenure in Nashville but we had faith that it was time to move on in a new direction when I accepted the horn professor position at the Crane School of Music. And I was well into the tenure process there when I joined the faculty at Arizona State. With each change of job I  was told things by administrators that did not necessarily mesh with reality as I later experienced it, in fairness to them at least in part because the academic world is changing. Would I do it again? Yes, but if I knew then what I know now it would have given me more to think about at the least.

Julia is absolutely correct that the long process (seven years in academia) “deters candidates currently under contract with an orchestra” from applying. In particular not too many people are willing to leave a tenured orchestral position for a university position. It is a different world and there are no guarantees of tenure and potentially not a lot of help in the process. In many respects you are on your own in a system full of heavy-duty academics in other fields.

Tenure is difficult to achieve and can be lost. To lose tenure in an academic setting the primary reason would be just cause of some type. This is also true in an orchestral setting; for some final thoughts on this topic please read the final article of my original Orchestra 101 series.

UPDATE: That article is off the site, but the same materials are updated and are a part of my Orchestra 101 book/ebook, for more information visit Horn Notes Edition. 

Gaze into the Dark Opera Pit

Many times when I am in the orchestra pit audience members will stop by and look inside.

Sometimes – from the musician perspective – it can feel a little bit like being a monkey in a zoo. Musicians accustomed to staged performance can practice in peace, without being stared or waved at. In a pit, it is not that way. People are looking at and watching you from higher ground.

From the audience perspective, visiting the pit is an inside look into the makings of the production. It is a peek behind-the-curtain, a backstage pass.

Whoa! What’s that instrument? Look at that guy…

From a new article I posted over at the Arizona Opera Orchestra Musicians Association (AZOOMA) site, Why is it so dark down there?

Upon first approach a visitor looking in will see a hot-bed of activity and lots of musical instruments. It can be an intimidating sight, something like a black hole full of busy bees.

The musicians are dressed all in black. They look serious and focused. Like an orchestra full of ninja.

Opera is different

At a symphony orchestra concert – where the orchestra is onstage and elevated – audience members tend to find their seats and stay put.

OK… maybe some wine in the lobby, but just one.

At the opera the orchestra is contained in a sunken black box, like a diorama on display. The audience wants to and can look inside.

At AZOOMA we are asking people to come on down.

Anatomy of a Practice Space

The room where I practice at home is also where do design and development work. This is the music wing of my desk. I like to use online tools or my iPhone for metronome work.

(Click on any image for a larger view.)

My new Patterson/Yahama occupies the left side of the desk.

This is Day 13 since it arrived and I am watching its newly unlaquered skin gradually acquire a more rustic patina. A French press of coffee and an air flow measuring device are nearby, with pictures of Max Pottag and Milan Yancich in the back.

Like Random Mondays, random stuff builds up back here. Some of it will get mounted on a wall someday – a signed Farkas photo, a John Lennon photo and my original Horndog logo.

This is my personal mouthpiece wheel of doom. With the new horn I am trying a change.

The 3 front-runners are:

  • a Moosewood D6 Cartouche – heavy-wall and annealed
  • a Stork c12W – a slightly wider diameter rim
  • a Moosewood RB12Y

I just hope that the RB stands for Roland Berger or Really Brilliant and not Really Bad.

All kidding aside, it is the current favorite that I am using most frequently. It has a raw brass underpart (no plating) with a gold-plated screw rim. With the Patterson / Yamaha horn it has a nice feel and it has a consistent warmth and depth in all ranges.

Below are the necessary items for lubrication.

For the horn I use a homemade concoction in two flavors – thick and thin.  I use the thicker stuff on the spindles and exterior rotor end points – under the caps and next to the stop arm. The thinner stuff gets used inside when needed.

For the internal lubricants – coffee in the morning, soda and water in the afternoon and beer at night. The yeast, wheat and barley are good for the chops, I tell myself.

Due to my work schedule I tend to average more practice at night during the week. Like I said, it’s good for your chops.