Home Blog Page 121

News Reports on Two Recent Orchestral Horn Auditions

0

People are always interested in how recent auditions went, and usually the information after the fact is pretty sketchy. However, from the recent Omaha audition we can read a full report at Omaha.com – The Omaha World-Herald: Music – Playing was never such hard work as at an audition. The article begins,

Libby Barnette’s lucky number must be 4.

Last Monday, the veteran French horn player engaged in one of classical music’s most agonizing rituals. She auditioned for a symphony job.

After a grueling eight-hour day of high-stress playing and anxious waiting, Barnette, 39, won the job. It was her fourth audition for the Omaha Symphony in as many years. She beat out 19 musicians to become the orchestra’s newest part-time section player.

“I knew I had it in me,” said Barnette, who looked both relieved and spent after her artistic and emotional ordeal.

After some details on the audition venue and committee they report what was played, and what the conductor wanted to hear.

Candidates were asked to prepare 18 excerpts from the standard orchestral repertory. These were passages from the great symphonies and concertos of such composers as Beethoven, Brahms and Tchaikovsky. It’s music that all French horn players should learn in school.

During the first round, applicants were asked to play five of those excerpts.

They opened with a brisk and tricky passage from Beethoven’s Symphony No. 3 “Eroica” and followed it with a deceptively simple solo horn passage from the first movement of Brahms’ Piano Concerto No. 1.

In the Brahms, the horn solo consists of a short series of undulating notes that seem to float weightlessly above the rest of the accompaniment. A perfect rendition of this brief, 20-second passage can create a magical effect.

But sloppy phrasing or poor intonation can ruin the entire 20-minute movement. When that happens, the horn player leaves the stage like a football player who missed the game-winning field goal.

“You’re either going to walk off stage a hero or a disgrace,” said Music Director Thomas Wilkins, who attended some of the auditions. “The sound of the French horn is extremely exposed, so we need players who won’t crack under pressure.”

Three players (numbers 4, 8 and 15) were advanced to the finals. Of the finals we learn,

The screen came down for this round. Finalists were required to play duos and trios with jurors [Jason] DeWater [Principal Horn] and Ross Snyder, the symphony’s assistant principal French horn player. Anonymity, therefore, was no longer possible.

All gave worthy performances.

But candidate No. 4, Barnette, had a clear advantage over her competitors. (The symphony declined to release the names of the other finalists, citing union privacy rules.)

Among other things, Barnette has experience.

She spent nine years playing for the Air Force’s Heartland of America Band — her husband, Staff Sgt. Mark Barnette, still plays tuba for the group. She also plays with the Lincoln Symphony.

In music from Bach’s Brandenburg Concerto No. 1, Beethoven’s Symphony No. 8 and Dvorak’s Cello Concerto, Barnette blended beautifully with DeWater and Snyder. The strength of her performance won the support of Wilkins and the jury.

There are more details in the full article, which paints the picture pretty fully of the experience of auditioning for a regional orchestra in the United States. Also notable is the photo in the article of Barnette, who plays a Schmid triple. The list had a mixture of high and low horn excerpts, and this horn was obviously the right choice for her.

Not so lucky were the horn players who auditioned for Principal Horn in the Florida Orchestra last May. At TampaBay.com we find that

The Florida Orchestra last week held principal French horn auditions, but in the end, it chose no one to fill the position. Brandon Beck has been acting principal this season, following longtime first horn James Wilson’s departure a year ago to be assistant principal horn with the Utah Symphony.

… More than 20 candidates auditioned for the horn job.

“It’s difficult when we have too many auditions and we never take somebody,” said music director Stefan Sanderling … who heard the three finalists play. “But should we take somebody when we are not convinced it’s the right level? I’m very much opposed to the idea of just taking somebody. It’s like a marriage. If you’re not completely sure, don’t get married.”

There are less details in the article on the Florida audition, but it also answers the question why in some auditions nobody is hired. Words to ponder if you are actively taking auditions.

[Hat tips to Travis Bennett for posting the Omaha article to Facebook and to Bruce Hembd for a link to the Florida audition info.]

Findings from The Institute of Musical Acoustics

0

A recent web site find had me wanting for better skills in the German language. Fortunately, the Institute for Viennese Sound Style IWK (Musical Acoustics) site does have some English translations for most of its pages.

Two specific areas that are fascinating to read present studies on the Viennese horn and in slow-motion embouchure films.

The Viennese horn study

This Vienna horn found on Flickr has a built in echo/stopping valve.
This Vienna horn found on Flickr has a built in echo/stopping valve. Click for a larger view.

The Viennese Horn study was funded by the Austrian government and was executed over a two-year period between 1985 and 1987. While this is a study from over 20 years ago, it does offer some interesting information that backs up several theories that I have heard over the years about Vienna horns.

The frames-based layout of this web site makes it difficult to provide direct links, but with a little digging I found the study here:

As a byproduct of this work, new scientific ground was broken. It became evident that many of the measurement methods used were simply not precise enough. Previously, only differences between types of instruments were tested, and not different models of the same instrument.

Therefore this work created not only new concepts but also required development of completely new measurement techniques. The following is a short overview of the Viennese F-horn’s special characteristics, which are influential not only to its sound and tone color, but also require specialized playing techniques.

More specifically, the researchers found that…

… Viennese horn players must control their lip tension more exactly than double-hornists to avoid landing on the neighboring peak. Playing in high positions on the Viennese horn requires more concentration and better efficiency of motor skills.

Also, the findings backup up the notion that the double-piston valve produces smoother slurs, while the rotary valve has advantages with faster, technical passages.

Interesting too is that the Viennese horn produces an impression of a loud, fortissimo while at a lesser volume level than a double horn. According to the study, this phenomena is due to the Vienna horn’s greater amount of overtones, which help its sound to project.

The embouchure videos

The embouchure videos of David Wilken on YouTube have been a great education in studying the mechanics of embouchure and how different the mechanics can be from player-to-player.

The IWK site has a few other videos worth looking at. The major difference between these and Mr. Wilken’s videos being that the IWK videos are filmed at a straight, dead-on angle – as opposed to being filmed at a side angle.

nstitute for Viennese Sound Style IWK (Musical Acoustics)

Remembering the FARKAS MODEL Mouthpiece

7

Among all the various classic horn mouthpieces made in the United States one that has had the most lasting interest and impact is the original FARKAS MODEL. This mouthpiece was produced by Schilke before Farkas became associated with Holton and is not to be confused with later imitations.

Farkas first met Renold Schilke when he was a high school student in the Chicago Civic Orchestra and, according to Nancy Jordan Fako in Philip Farkas and His Horn, with Schilke shared an “extreme interest in how various factors of mouthpiece and instrument design affected performance outcome.”

When Farkas returned to Chicago in 1947 he found that Schilke was making trumpet mouthpieces with extreme precision in a workshop in his basement. According to Fako,

…Phil regularly made the long trip to the Schilke home to work with him…. It was not long before they determined that they wanted to go into business and produce mouthpieces for other than their own use. Now they needed a name, and they decided to call their company Music Products, Inc.

The first horn mouthpiece produced and marketed by Music Products, Inc., was a copy of the one that Phil most often used. He was constantly experimenting, as he would do his entire life. Consequently, at any one time he had a number of different mouthpieces that he was using. There were always five or six mouthpieces on his music stand…. However, there was a certain one which was always his favorite and to which he always returned when he found himself in a particularly difficult performance situation, and it was this mouthpiece that he decided to produce as the “Farkas Model.”

Farkas, with his experience in advertising, produced a brochure to market this new product. In it he shared

I have, with my own hands, made over two hundred mouthpieces, each different in some respect…. in 1949 I made a mouthpiece which just seemed to have “everything.” Day after day I tried it and compared it to other good mouthpieces and every time it triumphed. Therefore I feel justified in saying that this is one of the best mouthpieces that has ever been made….

FarkasMPThe mouthpiece in the photo is an example of this mouthpiece. My understanding is they produced 1,000 of these before Farkas became associated with Holton. The block letter stamping FARKAS MODEL is hard to see in photo but is the one way to tell it if is an original.

Holton for many years made and still makes a similar mouthpiece, the MC cup. If the original FARKAS MODEL was the inspiration, the Holton MC has suffered in comparison over the years due to quality control issues. Later in the Fako book she reports of Farkas in 1992 reacting to

…a letter from a horn player who had bought two Farkas mouthpieces which were supposedly the same model he had used for twenty-six years, but were actually “a far departure” from his original. Phil immediately wrote to Larry Ramirez [at Holton]:

…where there is much smoke perhaps there is a fire.

…this seems like an opportune time to make a new cutter for the MC mouthpiece. I will be happy to furnish a Schilke-Farkas for the occasion….

Back to the mouthpiece in the photo, I actually won my job in Nashville playing on this very mouthpiece. I was given it as a Doctoral student, and really liked it for a good while, to the extent that I even made a backbore reamer that matched the backbore and could be used to modify other mouthpieces to this same backbore.

This gets at what the differences are between the classic Schilke FARKAS MODEL and their later Holton cousins. Start with any dimension you wish, the Holton version varied considerably over the years due to reasons hinted at by Farkas himself above.

One other note would be I recall when I was a Doctoral student at Indiana University that Farkas was playing on that original mouthpiece again, which he had Rick Seraphinoff do some restoration work on so that it was still usable.

There are a number of mouthpieces made today that are similar but probably the magic Farkas found with his original prototype is not to be found. If you run across one of these classic mouthpieces give it a try, it may have a bit of magic left in it.

UPDATE: A fine copy of this mouthpiece is now available from Houghton Horns.

The Four B’s of Music

Last night we were treated to a great orchestral concert at Arizona State that featured the four B’s of music. Wait, aren’t there three B’s?

I remember the first time I heard the term. A grad student at my undergrad school was telling about another student that on an oral exam for their MM they had been asked to name the three B’s of music and they were so nervous they only got two of them correct.

Traditionally the three B’s of music are Bach, Beethoven, and Brahms, although according to the Wikipedia article on the topic the original three B’s were Bach, Beethoven, and Berlioz. The great conductor Hans von Bülow changed it to Brahms, writing in the 1880s “I believe in Bach, the Father, Beethoven, the Son, and Brahms, the Holy Ghost of music.”

Our concert featured music of Bach, Beethoven, Brahms, and Bruckner. Bruckner would be an excellent choice as a fourth B of music. In our case the work featured was the Finale of his Symphony No. 4, which was performed beautifully. Bravo!

I love hearing these big works, they are a big reason why I wanted to play the horn in an orchestra, but I know not all love hearing Bruckner. I remember an orchestral colleague referring to the week we performed Bruckner as the longest week of the year, and I can understand especially string players not being wild about Bruckner. We have plenty of great passages in the brass though, and for sure this is a type of music that audiences love to hear live; a recording just can’t do it justice.

Son of Clam; A Twist on René Magritte

Artist René Magritte has been quoted on his work Son of Man, saying:

Everything we see hides another thing, we always want to see what is hidden by what we see.

son_of_clam2

Remembering The Neill Sanders Mouthpiece

8

One unique and classic line of mouthpieces was produced into the late 1980s by hornist Neill Sanders. Perhaps most remembered for giving a bit more comfort to students with SandersMPbraces, this wide rim horn mouthpiece is one that if you have ever seen one you will remember it. This photo is of an example that I have, a 17M.

When it comes to horn information I have long been a saver. I actually still have the Neill Sanders flyer sent to me postmarked in October of 1984. It contains a complete list of the models available, which included five horn models, five trumpet models, a Flugel model, four cornet models, five trombone models, two baritone models, and four tuba models. The unique thing about the whole line is the rim, which was for all the instruments actually on the wide end of the spectrum and of a reverse peak design. That is, the high point of the rim is at the outside edge so it visually tips inward to the cup. Trumpet soloist David Hickman was at the time an endorsing artist and he explains why he prefers this rim in the flyer.

I prefer the NEILL SANDERS Mouthpiece because of the CONTOUR of the rim.NeillSandersFlyer It seems to fit the curvature of the teeth better than other mouthpieces. The angle of the rim creates a smoother connection between rim, cup, and bite of the mouthpiece, improving COMFORT, FLEXIBILITY and ENDURANCE.

The second photo is the front of the flyer, which highlights the main selling points of the mouthpiece. Neill Sanders (1923—1992) was a British player who among other things performed with Dennis Brain and was a very active player in London. In 1970 he came to the United States and he served for a number of years on the faculty of Western Michigan University.

According to the flyer Sanders started selling mouthpieces of this design in 1966. The photo below shows how radical the rim is compared to standard horn mouthpieces.

SandersRimI used a Sanders mouthpiece for several months in 1983. It was in the period where I was still working out my first embouchure change. To this day I don’t know what really happened but I had what I will just call an event. My perception was it was a slight tear in the lower lip, maybe it was just a bruise. Something happened so that I was in pain when I played. A bass trombone playing brass teaching assistant at my undergraduate school had a Neill Sanders horn mouthpiece, and I borrowed it and used it to try to bridge the painful area. After a few months it healed to the point I could use a standard rim. For this reason alone a Sanders mouthpiece would remain a useful item for any teacher to have around.

They are long out of production but if you want to buy a Neill Sanders horn mouthpiece you are not out of luck, Moosewood for example can make you a copy of their rim to fit his cups [UPDATE: They are out of business now, but Osmun can still make you one, see the comments below]. Also ASU Regents Professor of trumpet David Hickman, my colleague, to this day uses a mouthpiece faced with a rim inspired by the Neill Sanders mouthpiece he endorsed years ago; his signature model mouthpiece currently sold by Giddings and Webster has a very similar rim. The design does live on for high brass.

Who Wrote Mozart’s Horn Concerto K. 412?

This may seem a bit like the old joke, “who’s buried in Grant’s tomb?” but an article in the 2004 issue of the Historic Brass Society Journal casts doubt on this being a work actually by Mozart. Cutting to the chase, in his article “The Doubtful Authenticity of Mozart’s Horn Concerto K 412” Benjamin Perl concludes,

…the autograph of the first movement and the Rondo fragment known as the “Horn Concerto K 412+514” are probably not original compositions by Mozart, but a result of brushing up an earlier work by another composer, who may well have been the horn player Joseph Leutgeb. The blatant stylistic divergences from Mozart’s practice, the anomalous two-movement structure, and the curious layout of the autograph permit such an interpretation.

Mozart-1-2-snipAnd of the rondo movement, which is known in versions by Mozart and Süssmayr, he concludes,

The many dissimilarities … suggest that the second was not an elaboration of the first, but that both were based on an earlier version, which, again, may have been Leutgeb’s, his involvement having left footprints in both manuscripts.

The evidence presented by Perl is compelling. The article itself is based on a paper presented at the meeting of the Mozart Society of America in Columbus, Ohio in 2002, and is certainly must reading for anyone seriously interested in the history of the Mozart horn concertos. He notes at the beginning of the article that he

…approached this research with awe and even some hesitation: the autographs of the Horn Concerto K 412 … exist … and there is no reason to doubt the authenticity of the handwriting.… The very first time I listened to it, however, I had serious doubts that Mozart was its author…. These doubts were reinforced by Alan Tyson’s discovery that the concerto was written late in Mozart’s career, most probably in the last year of his life. Its curious style might be acceptable to a certain degree in an “early” work, but it seemed altogether incompatible with Mozart’s late works.

This article is very worth tracking down in full, he analyzes the topic in depth, including an analysis of both versions of the Rondo movement. That these movements are all reworking a composition by another composer such as Leutgeb is presented convincingly and adds greatly to our knowledge of Mozart and his works for horn.

UPDATE: See this article for more on the “alternate” second movement, with the insulting comments from Mozart.

Lip Trills

The Mozart horn concertos absolutely require elegant, controlled trills. The most tasteful and elegant musicianship cannot make up for a clumsy or coarse sounding lip trill.

A very funny example from the Hilarious Trumpet Bloopers page illustrates the point at the comical extreme:

[dewplayer:/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Hummel.mp3]

I have heard a few very fine performances — live and recorded — marred by lip trills that sounded more like a machine-gunner having an epileptic seizure rather than as elegant, Classical-era ornaments. The pursuit of a beautifully controlled lip trill should be a major technical and musical concern when working on a Mozart horn concerto.

This video (now sadly removed by the user) demonstrates demonstrated one approach to lip trills, using a trilling tongue motion. For myself, this technique works beautifully on fast trills above middle space C.

This is was a great video. A few points I would add:

  • For some players this technique may work very well but for a minority that cannot whistle, it may not be as simple to learn as is suggested. Also too I am not so sure with this whistling technique that the tongue moves up and down so much as back and forth, in a rocking motion resembling double tongue technique.
  • Someday I would love to see a slow motion video with a transparent mouthpiece to actually see if the lip muscles move or not when trilling. I believe that there is some motion involved, but without the benefit of x-ray eyes one cannot be sure.
  • I would add also that there is much more to an elegant Mozartean trill than a quiver of fast notes wobbling up and down. The beginning and end of a trill especially can define the difference between a good technique and fine artistry.

    Displayed graphically:

    trill-v-shake2

For more information on lip trills, please see “My Lip Trills Stink!”

signatureBRUCE

The Top Ten Orchestral Works for Horn (the last one might surprise you!)

I recently had a question come in on what were the most important horn excerpts. Back when I was first at Arizona State I decided to sort this out once and for all, the results of which were published as “A New ICSOM Audition List Survey” in the October, 2002 issue of The Horn Call. It was a survey of 88 audition lists from major orchestras, ICSOM being the International Conference of Symphony and Opera Musicians, a player conference in the American Federation of Musicians, which at that time included the top 49 orchestras in the United States (but currently represents the performers of the top 51 orchestras, their website is here). In alphabetical order the ten works requested the most frequently on their audition lists were:

  • Beethoven: Symphony No. 3
  • Beethoven: Symphony No. 7
  • Beethoven: Symphony No. 9
  • Brahms: Symphony No. 4
  • Shostakovich: Symphony No. 5
  • Strauss: Don Juan
  • Strauss: Ein Heldenleben
  • Strauss: Till Eulenspiegel
  • Tchaikovsky: Symphony No. 5
  • Wagner: Das Rheingold Prelude

Till-snipYou may be asking yourself, what about Brahms 1, 2, and 3, Mahler 5, the Short Call, and many other works? Of course, there are many other great orchestral works than those listed above; these ten just showed up the most often on major orchestra audition lists in my sample.

I have a pair of longer versions of the results of the survey in my studio site which lay things in a bit more detail for those learning excerpts. The long version has suggested locations to learn in these and many other works,

and the short version is more of a checklist of excerpts to learn.

It is divided into excerpts for Basic and Intermediate level study, based on audition lists for top level music schools. Check them both out, and for sure get familiar with these works if you are a fan of orchestral horn music.

AND for the best online horn excerpt resource see our Horn Matters PDF library.

Seven Tips for Cadenzas

A long orchestral tutti builds and builds, leading towards an inevitable resolution and long fermata. The conductor signals a cut-off and after a few seconds, there is nothing but silence in the hall.

All eyes are focused on you, the soloist.

This is the moment — the cadenza. What are you going to do?

Here are a few suggestions:

1.) Borrow ideas from a master.
Last January, my colleague John Ericson pointed out the SoyTrompatista site, where a number of cadenzas from the 3rd and 4th concertos are online.

Another source would be listening to various recordings and transcribing the cadenzas. Give your aural dictation skills a test and see if you can listen to, then write down the notes. This is an excellent ear-training exercise that crosses over into other skill sets.

For a written hard-copy resource, consult the Hans Pizka book mentioned previously in this series, Das Horn bei Mozart. It has a nice collection of Mozart cadenzas to peruse.

2.) Use a theme from the opening orchestral tutti.
This is technique that many horn soloists use. It is a nice way to aurally tie in the opening of the movement to the end of the movement.

3.) Strut your stuff, but avoid the kitchen sink.
It is better to leave the audience wanting for more rather than wanting less. Too much of a good thing can be too much.

4.) Quote an outside piece or add a quick gimmick for fun.
Inject a small dose of humor if you feel so motivated. Quote a popular tune or another Mozart piece. Try some multi-phonics.

Why not? It is your moment.

5.) Pace yourself.
Don’t be in a hurry — allow for some breathing space. A captivating cadenza, like a skillfully improvised jazz solo, has peaks and valleys.

6.) Improvise on the spot.
The violin soloist Nigel Kennedy is widely known for doing this. While you may not be the next Miles Davis, adding a grace note, an extra trill or even improvising an extra phrase might be fun to try.

7.) Play the main themes in a relative major or minor, or as an altered variation.
Sometimes coloring outside the lines can be interesting. That being said, try not to stray out too far into the woods.

Additional opportunities

One final thought worth mentioning is that there are a few small spots beyond the more obvious cadenza points where little extra ditty might be an option as a “mini-cadenza.”

From K. 495 the final rondo movement for example, a quick “mini-cadenza” that is a few bars long can work nicely here.

m4cad

From K. 417:

moz2cad

In the Romanza of K. 447, I have seen a version (possibly the Chambers edition?) where an ascending and descending written C major arpeggio replaces what is printed here.

Moz3romnza

As mentioned yesterday, I like to add an ornamental turn in the 14th measure of this excerpt from K. 495:

MOzart4-devo

[dewplayer:/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Mozart-K495aexcerpt.mp3]

This kind of personalized performance was not unheard of in the Classical era and perhaps may have been expected from a soloist. Why not have a little fun and take a chance?

Other thoughts from John Ericson:

Next week, the final chapter of this series – trills.

signatureBRUCE