Home Blog Page 69

University of Horn Matters: The Horn Before 1750

With this article we begin a new feature on Horn Matters, a series under the heading The University of Horn Matters. This series will present resources on horn history and pedagogy topics, with commentary. To begin this series our topic is the horn before 1750.

IMPORTANT NOTE — 2024: The article below could be revised quite a little bit, The Horn (2023) by Meucci and Rocchetti sheds much more light on every topic below. For any student out there doing online research on horn history, track down this new book, reviewed here. As I have time I will update this article, there are a few specific details to revise.  

What is a “horn” anyway?

In its simplest form a horn is a conical tube which when blown makes noise via an air column vibrated by the lips. Human beings figured out pretty quickly that there were many things that when blown on made noise, so the earliest horn-like instruments date from long before recorded history. These include items such as hollowed out animal horns, conch shells from ocean, and hollowed out wooden tubes. As time and technology advanced, metal instruments were developed in several different cultures from the Bronze Age onward.

The breakthrough: bending tubing

Around 1400 trumpet makers began to bend metal tubing, which was a major breakthrough in the development of all brass instruments. It is during the Renaissance that we first see horns that we would recognize as horns. One important development was the trompe, a slender, one note hunting horn constructed in a crescent shape with a single coil in the tubing, which was illustrated in the treatise La vénere (ca. 1561) of Jacques du Fouilloux.

Another important early design was the cor à plusieurs tours, which was longer and more tightly coiled than the trompe. Both instruments were developed for use as signaling instruments for use during the hunt and in both cases this specific use and the coiled tubing is what primarily differentiates these instruments as horns when compared to trumpets of the period.

The hunting horn is born

Between the years 1600 and 1700 the horn continued to develop as an instrument used primarily as a signaling instrument in hunting, the “sport of Kings,” providing a musical commentary on the activities of the hunt. It was in this period that trompes de chasse, fully circular hunting horns, were first constructed and used in France. Instruments of this type were likely used in a production of La Princesse d’Elide by Lully in Versailles in 1664, the score of which makes specific reference to cors du chasse.

As the tube length got longer the hunting horn also received a wider bell which helped the instrument to produce a richer, darker tonal color than that of the trumpet. Single-coiled horns pitched in C alto are generally thought to have been produced by 1680 and horns at lower pitch levels would soon follow.

A hunting horn is illustrated below. The images in this article are all borrowed, with permission, from the website of natural horn maker Richard Seraphinoff.

Hunting horns spread beyond France

Credit for introducing this type of hunting horn to the German-speaking lands has been given to Bohemian Count Franz Anton Sporck (1662-1738), who first heard type of horn in Paris during his grand tour of 1680-82. Fascinated by the instrument, he sent two of his retainers to be trained to play the instrument and to introduce it to Bohemia. Thus, he has been credited with introducing the horn to Germany, although certainly many others had much to do with the spread of the hunting horn and its use in art music in Germany and the world. In fact, sources point to the fact that the “French horn” (i.e., cor de chasse or hunting horn) was known in England at this time as well; this terminology was very correct at the time, as it accurately differentiated the new French instruments from those horns used up to that time in England.

If you are unfamiliar with how a natural horn works, please take a second and read this introductory article on the topic .

Orchestral horns, with crooks

The new instrument was a popular one. The earliest known use of the horn as a member of the orchestra occurred in Vienna in 1700, in Carlo Agostino Badia’s (1672-1738) opera Diana rappacificata [for reference see the excellent article by Thomas Hiebert in Trever Herbert and John Wallace, eds, The Cambridge Companion to Brass Insturments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)], and by 1720 the horn was very well established as a concert instrument. Horns with crooks, pieces of tubing that were inserted between the mouthpiece and the body of the horn and allowed the instrument to be pitched into several different keys, were first constructed no later than 1703, implying that more was required of the horn player by this time than simple hunting fanfares. While hunting fanfares and the inevitable “horn fifths” that are almost automatically generated by a pair of natural horns were a part of the musical language of the horn player at the time, high, florid clarino parts similar to those seen for the trumpet literature were also very common, as displayed in works of Bach, Handel, Telemann, and other contemporaries. The instrument illustrated here is a Baroque horn after J.W. Haas (early 18th century) by Richard Seraphinoff.

It was a very popular instrument

When looking at Baroque horn literature a place I like to start is Telemann, with this brief article giving an overview of his works for horn. One sense I get of it all was horn was almost a fad! Telemann wrote a lot of works for the horn in a fairly short timeframe, a surprising number of which are in print and available today. Quite a few works survive by other composers as well, with this article having notes on two more solo works I highly recommend. As to orchestral works, among the most frequently performed is the B-minor mass of Bach, but it would be easy to come up with a fairly long list of works involving the horn in the Baroque period.

High horn, low horn, and hand horn

This exciting, developmental phase of horn playing sees two other major technical advancements. First, in this period we begin to see the lower range specifically cultivated; a distinct division quickly developed between high and low horn players. Secondly, players discovered that by inserting the hand into the bell of the horn they could alter the pitch of the instrument for improved intonation and additional pitches, and that they could also make the tonal color darker and mellower. By gradually closing the hand in the bell one can lower any sounding pitch one half step with moderate stopping, and any pitch may be lowered to a half step above the next open pitch by combining full stopping and “lipping” the note down. This topic will be explored further in the next article in this series.

The hunting horn today

As heard performed today hunting horn has a raw power driven by long traditions. This article by Bruce Hembd gives a nice view of a modern hunting horn in his personal collection. Many videos may be found on YouTube of modern hunting horn performances.

What did Baroque horn really sound like? We don’t know

Which gets us back to an “elephant in the room” topic, what did the Baroque horn sound like? It is really hard to say. One would hope the best players of the time were very artistic, with great intonation and such. But on the other hand they could have played much more like the modern hunting horn is played and audiences just accepted that as what horns sounded like. It is a topic I like to ponder while listening to the video linked in the following article:

Return to Week 4 of Repertoire Course

Continue in University of Horn Matters series

Review: Quick Horn Rinse ESW Device for Cleaning a Horn

0

I must admit that at first I was somewhat skeptical of the Quick Horn Rinse ESW (QHR) cleaning device. I was doubtful of its efficacy above and beyond my current tried-and-true method for cleaning a horn – using a shower hose at the sink.

However after using it now several times to clean out my horn over the past few months, my doubts – like the crud inside the horn – were washed away. This is a great way to keep your horn clean.

To garden hose or not garden hose?

The QHR appears to be a sum of mostly after-market parts, assembled together into a nifty package.

In its default mode it is designed to work in tandem with a standard garden hose. I was not so thrilled about the idea of taking my horn outside in order to clean it, but for those that might have a large utility sink in a basement or a space to work with outside, using a garden hose might be more ideal.

Fortunately, the screw threads on the QHR are of a universal size and I was able to engage some technology from my aquarium cleaning equipment in order to keep the operation inside the house. The sink where I do the usual horn (and aquarium) cleaning already has a screw-thread adapter in place, and so this set up was most ideal for me personally.

The hose for my aquarium tool is much shorter and more flexible than the average outdoor garden hose.

For other readers who might have similar constraints I would recommend the QHR Sudser Tub adapter as an alternative to a garden hose, or if you have similar aquarium cleaning tools like mine, give that a try.

Setting up

The cleaning method and procedure are similar to what was noted previously in “How to use a Sink Hose Adapter to Clean a Horn.” The quickest part of the QHR procedure is the actual flushing of the horn. The set up however, takes some time.

It is always a good idea to remove all the slides when cleaning a French horn. In this case, the intense pressure of the QHR could actually blow out a slide and so they were put aside in a separate container. I used a plastic mixing bowl.

A unique aspect of the QHR device is that the attachable hose actually goes inside the lead pipe. Its rubbery surface is somewhat textured and it sticks inside the lead pipe with a water-tight seal.

The device also comes with a soap attachment, which is another very nice feature.

Staying dry

Getting a water-tight seal all-around was a concern before turning on the water. I did not want to have a geyser splashing water all over the bathroom, and so all the connections were both checked and doubled-checked.

I was able to get a fairly high flow of water pressure going before springing a leak. Next time I might use some thread-seal tape on the sink’s screw threads in order to prevent this one from returning.

That aside, I was able to get a good flush without any major incidents.

Final thoughts

As a method to keep your horn clean between annual or semi-annual professional cleanings, the Quick Horn Rinse ESW (QHR) is a superb device. I plan to use mine on a monthly basis.

Kudos to inventor Bill Ricker for creating the QHR and for making it available to all brass players at such a reasonable price.

* * *

For another review, see “New Model of a Great Cleaning Device: QHR Sudser” on the Tuba-Euphonium Blog.

A Look at Howard Hanson’s Symphony No. 2, ‘Romantic’

In the relative scope of Western music history, composer Howard Hanson is a bit of an unknown, a throwback to a bygone era. His music represents a school of American composition whose roots were tied to the 19th century European traditions of melody and harmony. A true neo-Romanticist at heart, Hanson spent his student years in Europe and his musical language never veered far from these European Romantic roots.

In my own opinion, Hanson’s greatest contribution to the American classical music tradition was not his composition but rather his leadership at the Eastman School of Music. For 40 years, Hanson was that school’s director, having been appointed to the position by the school’s founder George Eastman, a philanthropist and founder of the (now-bankrupt) Eastman Kodak company.

Symphony No. 2

Probably his most known work is the Symphony No. 2 (“Romantic”). The work was premiered on November 28, 1930 as a commission to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Boston Symphony Orchestra.

It is a work that is not often performed in the United States and I imagine that outside of the United States it is rarely, if not not ever, performed. The score and music is only available as a rental through the Theodore Presser Company.

One of its main themes is regularly performed to this day at the conclusion of all concerts at a summer camp in Northern Michigan, the Interlochen National Music Camp. This theme has become known as the “Interlochen Theme” and it is traditionally conducted by the concertmaster after the featured conductor has left the stage.

At its conclusion, there is no applause.

The theme

This theme is comprised of a simple string melody and a prominent horn counter-melody. On its first iteration it is a lento horn solo line – the length of which rivals even the Mendelssohn Nocturne and Tchiakovsky 5th solos in its duration.

(This theme also appears in the end credits of the 1979 Ridley Scott film Alien, just as the monster gets blasted away into outer space.)

It returns several times throughout the three movements of the composition – both as solos and section tuttis. In a sense, it functions as sort of a “thematic glue” that holds the entire piece together.

Star Wars, ca. 1930?

To my own eyes and ears, this composition looks forward to the Hollywood sound that we are accustomed to hearing at the movies today. If a young John Williams had been mistakenly transported back in time to this era, he might have written very similar passages.

Splashes of heroic, swashbuckling melodies are present throughout.

The melody below is for a unison horn section – from rehearsal letter G to rehearsal letter I.

Horn I part, complete

All-in-all, the style of writing feels almost more like a band composition than one for orchestra. To a certain degree, the winds and brass take precedence over the strings as the center of attention. There is plenty for the principal horn to do and if you are ever engaged to perform this piece, it would be a good idea to get the part ahead of time and to be prepared.

Under the auspices of fair, educational use and that offering a single part for download does not affect the performance rights and profits of this composition as a whole, here is a complete PDF of the Horn I part for study purposes.

Vandalism of rental music

As a final note – a comment on excessive pencil markings in regards to rental music.

When my own part arrived, it was in miserable shape. An extraordinary amount of vertical hashes, fingerings and repetitive, dark circles made the part very difficult to read. My first task in preparing this part then, was to erase everything and start over with a clean part.

This is a strong pet peeve of mine. If one must make marks in rental music:

  • Use a standard #2 pencil. Ink and red pencil do not erase.
  • If you make a mistake in rehearsal, try not to take it out on the music by repeatedly circling that passage.
  • Use fingering indications modestly and sparingly.
  • Avoid the use of large-letter warnings with multiple exclamation points (such as WATCH THE CONDUCTOR! or SING HERE!! or EMPTY SLIDES HERE!!!).

Over-marking a part in rehearsal only draws attention to your mistakes and poor preparation.

Play nice

Vandalizing a part is highly disrespectful to the music and it may adversely affect the next person that will be performing from the same part. That person may not appreciate the personal dramas that might have been played out and inflicted upon the page.

Please be kind – use a pencil on rental music sparingly and when finished, erase your markings!

 

Review: Bohemian Horn Concertos

0

Continuing with reviews of a few CDs that came in recently we turn to Steven Gross and Bohemian Horn Concertos, a 2010 release from Summit Records. Three works are featured:

  • Jirí Havlík: Concerto for Horn and Strings
  • Jan Václav Stich-Punto: Concerto for Horn and Orchestra no. 5 in F Major
  • Antonio Rosetti: Concerto for Horn and Orchestra no. 2 in E-flat Major

Of them, the only one I was very familiar with was the Rosetti. I love this concerto and this is a very fine performance and recording. As I have noted in a prior article, Rosetti wrote a lot of music for the horn and the best of it is not performed nearly often enough. As to this performance, it is one very worth listening to! Steven Gross brings a great touch to this work with a musical and light style.

Punto was the leading horn soloist of his time (Beethoven wrote his Sonata for him) but was not a professional composer. Thus, what I expected just seeing the title on the CD was something a bit generic and classical. Which the work is generally but this spirited performance helps this work out a great deal and the last movement, a “Rondeau en chasse,” in particular is an attractive movement.

The first work on the recording is the one I really did not know what to expect when I first put in the CD, the Concerto for Horn and Strings by Jirí Havlík. For me just seeing in the liner notes that it is by a hornist/composer I don’t recognize and was written in 1976 don’t necessarily mean I will find it interesting. However this work really is one that deserves to be performed more often, with some of the colors and melodic style of other better known concertos for horn and strings (such as the Larsson Concertino) but in a more modern style. It is exactly the type of work that needs to be featured on a CD such as this, so that it may be easily heard and become more widely known. Thank you Steven Gross for beautifully recording this work! I hope his recording inspires others to perform this very attractive recent concerto.

The CD is available on iTunes now and was reviewed in The Horn Call last year as well. I was somewhat surprised to learn that the full content of a number of recent issues of The Horn Call are online in a third party website that can be accessed for free. Somehow the IHS contract with ProQuest must allow this content to be reproduced in full online in the ReadPeriodicals website. The link is here to the review of this CD by the late Calvin Smith, who also has a very positive take on this recording. And much more from recent issues of The Horn Call may be found there as well.

Hornmasters: Fox on Tone Production

One of the things I enjoy in working on this series of quotes from classic horn method books is seeing different perspectives on topics. With respect to the topic of tone production Fred Fox in Essentials of Brass Playing presents several tactics toward finding the best tone quality.

Vowel shapes and tone color

One first area he explores is that of finding the best vowel shape that will produce the best sound.

The tone of a brass instrument can be pleasant, or it can be unpleasant—either too dull or too edgy….

Play a note in the middle register of your instrument using an extreme “ee” (as in the word “see”) tongue position. The note will sound thin. Play the same note again using an extreme “aw” (as in the word “law”) tongue position. The note will now sound dull, like a foghorn. Play the note a third time with the tongue midway between both extremes. The sound is now more satisfactory because you have both the highs and lows present in the tone. Some players may prefer a few more highs or lows…, but there should never be an extreme imbalance in either direction.

Start the same note again. As you sustain the note vary the tongue position from “ee” to “aw” and find the position midway between the extremes that sounds best to you. The note is now in focus.

What he is saying is true, to a point, on any specific note. However, do remember that by range your tongue position will be different, high notes require an “ee” formation and low require an “aw” formation, that insight is completely confirmed by the recent MRI horn studies.

Improving loud dynamics

Fox addresses as well another source of a poor loud tone quality.

Excessive brassiness can be caused by overblowing, that is, using more air than deeded for a given dynamic. In earlier discussions it has been shown that the purpose of the air stream is merely to vibrate the lips. True, more air is needed to get a larger vibration, but only the smallest possible amount of additional air pressure should be added for the louder dynamic. The instrument will amplify the larger vibration, thus producing a louder tone. The instrument should fill with vibration and the sound should float out, not be pushed out. If more air than necessary is used on any given dynamic level, the note will sound forced and will not float effortlessly as it should. Check it out. Overblow a note; then, as the note is sustained, ease off slightly on the air pressure, but remember to keep the diaphragm as firm as if you are still blowing hard. Notice that the sound floats more and has a singing quality.

It is true that on a fortissimo a brassy sound is sometimes desired. That brassy sound can always be gotten by simply blowing hard. Overblowing does not have to be practiced too much.

The singing position?

A final suggestion from Fred Fox, one that worries me a bit but horn teachers should be aware of, relates to what he calls “the singing position.” It relates to opening the throat as you play in the same manner you would keep it open if singing with a full, resonant voice.

In my teaching experience over the past few years I find ‘the singing position’ one of the most important essentials….

The throat can be set in a talking or a singing position at will. In other words when talking one does not attempt to get the same throat resonances as when singing. There is a change in the vocal production between the two.

…The throat can be set in singing position or talking position at will when playing a wind instrument. One must consciously set the throat in the singing position when playing, and keep it in that position at all times in any register and/or dynamic. By doing this, it seems as if you are virtually singing through the instrument, rather than blowing through it.

That last section worries me a little, as in it can lead you to worry too much about artificially maintaining some position that is not really correct. Still, though, it is a visualization that it may be helpful to explore if tone production is of concern.

Continue Reading in Hornmasters Series

Anatomy of an Orchestra Gig: Getting Out-of-Town and Staying Overnight

When working in Chicago as a freelancer many years ago, a portion of my work involved commuting very long distances. For a few jobs this meant travelling out-of-state, to northern Indiana, southern Wisconsin or as far as southern Michigan.

While the hidden travel costs took a big chunk of money out from the final paycheck the experience was, at the time, worth the effort. Back in those days, when offered any job to play I would usually say “yes” – even if the pay was not huge or even if I was, in actual fact, losing money.

I needed professional experience and for that, these long-distance gigs offered a significant long-term value that went beyond the immediate cash reward. They had a time and place.

On the road again

These days I no longer need to pursue this kind of experience, but I still regularly travel long distances as a veteran member of the Arizona Opera Orchestra.

For each opera, two sets of performance cycles are engaged: a set in Phoenix and another in Tucson. I live in Phoenix and for the performances in Tucson (pronounced as TOO-sän), I travel by car and stay overnight in a hotel provided by the company.

It is not a terribly long commute. The trip adds up to about 120 miles one-way; it takes around 2 hours driving at a reasonable speed. Still, I prefer to camp out in a hotel rather than to drive back and forth for each performance.

It saves time, money and (most important), energy.

For this trip, the trunk (a.k.a. the boot) is packed with my horn, a book bag of miscellaneous stuff (more on that later) and a suitcase with clothes and overnight supplies.

I should also mention that underneath all of the luggage is a portable music stand. This stand is a permanent fixture in this car, one that gets used for other gigs and for emergency situations where an extra stand might be useful.

The car for this trip is a Honda Fit. It was purchased a few years ago with the notion to save a little money on gas. The mileage has been about as good as it gets and I am quite happy with it.

Sometimes I will drive the whole trip in one session without a break, but on this occasion I made a quick stop at a state-provided rest stop. In the winter, Arizona is a beautiful place and sometimes it is nice to take a break and stretch out a little at this rest stop.

(See this video for another look at this rest stop and its desert scenery.)

A room with a view

At the hotel in Tucson, my room this time had a view of the back end of the hall. The Tucson Music Hall, which is part of the Tucson Convention Center, is at left in the picture below.

It is certainly very nice to be able to walk to performances and not worry about commuting or parking. I am literally yards away from the backstage entrance and this convenience provides for a very relaxed and stress-free arrival at the hall.

Book bag

Like my horn, my book bag is a regular appendage at gigs. For this trip I packed a number of items, to execute this specific job, to prepare for future jobs, and also to work on other projects.

Some of its contents on this trip included:

* These particular items will be the topic of future articles at Horn Matters.

Other equipment

Being a technology-oriented guy, I come equipped with a number of electronics.

I am not a watcher of live or cable television and instead prefer to read my eBook tablet or to watch movies online for entertainment. I always bring a laptop to get some work done, and on this trip a scanner was also brought along in order to make and send a few PDFs.

Oil spill containment

There is a slight difference in altitude between Phoenix and Tucson – about 1,000 feet –  and the shifting air pressure occasionally causes valve oil bottles to leak.

For this Phoenix-to-Tucson trip, I put all lubricants in a plastic bag to help keep spills contained.

Also, to help prevent “burping” – a pressurized spray of oil when opening containers at the lower elevation after returning home – I loosen the caps a little on each bottle, before each trip. This seems to help with the changing air pressure and oil leaks.

An excellent mute

The opera on this trip was Puccini’s Madame ButterflyIt has a number of extended passages with mute (as do many of Puccini’s operas) and the shining star in this venture was my new straight mute from Ion Balu.

It is feels to be about twice the weight of my previous mute and the opening at top looks to be about twice as large. It has a great sound, one that blows evenly in all ranges. I bought this mute at the Southwest Horn Conference, and it is quite possibly the best mute I have ever owned.

And too, with Ms. Butterfly looking over my shoulder, the timing of this new purchase could not have been better.

In the pit, two-by-two

This final picture comes from the rear of the orchestra pit where I sit. In this production I was seated in my designated position as third horn, but otherwise for the rest of the season I have been and will be playing principal. It has been a lot of fun.

The Arizona Opera horn section seats itself in two rows, at stage left.

Below, is a diagram I made a few years ago of our pit seating. It illustrates the two-by-two seating of the horns.

Our pit areas are partially-covered and in this graphic, the gray area represents the area that falls underneath the stage.

Click on this image for a closer look.

This two-by-two formation allows the horn section to hear each other much better than when situated in one long row and placed in front of the trumpets and low brass. Under the roof of a stage pit, this can get way too loud and uncomfortable for everyone concerned.

Fortunately, the trumpets and low brass did not like having a horn section in front of them either, so rallying support for a move to stage left and to be set up in two rows was not incredibly difficult.

Practicing in the hotel

Myself, I have no apprehensions about practicing at a reasonable dynamic and at a reasonable hour in the hotel room. Any time after 10am or before 6pm is fair game in my book, and at least for the time being, I have received no major complaints.

* * *

Related to this topic and to close out this article, here is a video that features members of the New York Philharmonic in a hotel scenario.

It illustrates – with tongue-in-cheek humor – the dangers of practicing in a building full of musicians.

* * *

What your Mozart Concerto needs to Sound Like for an Audition

0

Recently I was pointed to the blog of Barry Stees, Assistant Principal bassoon of the Cleveland Orchestra and a former colleague of mine at the Brevard Music Center. Two very recent articles caught my attention, related to the second bassoon auditions in the Cleveland Orchestra. A specific topic area that caught my attention was on the solo portion of the audition.

When I played in the Nashville Symphony I observed the same thing: the solo portion of many professional auditions is not often what it needs to be. The way I usually word it is the solo needs to sound magical, but what happens way too often is that the solo drops back into some deep “default mode” that sounds like the player has not worked on it seriously since high school. At the very least too much effort was taken to master the excerpts but not enough to master the solo, as it too often sounds mechanical and etude-like.

Along those same lines, in the first article Sees notes 

In addition, there were a number of players who exhibited a rough, percussive style in the Mozart Concerto. Accenting every downbeat, emphasizing bar lines, and using explosive articulation in a piece that has a nobility and grace made the bassoonists on the committee embarrassed at times for the way our instrument was being treated.

In the second article he offers this useful thought.

Even more important, imagine yourself as an ambassador for the music you are playing. You are playing some of the greatest music ever written and it’s your job to show the listeners (even if they are really jaded orchestral musicians) the wonders of what you’ve brought to play.

Thus, the Mozart Concerto becomes a wonderful display of the nobility and grace of the instrument and not a grim minefield of mistakes waiting to be checked off by the committee.

There is much more to be gleaned from each of the articles linked above but I would close again by noting that the concerto must be very well prepared. Besides being completely accurate (if you can’t lay down an entire Mozart exposition with no chips you are not ready for a professional audition) make it musically magic! The Mozart horn concertos are great music and must be prepared to a high default mode in any audition you perform them on.

Raise your personal bar. Memorize the Mozart horn concertos, and perform them often.

Reflections on my vintage descant and updates to “Playing High Horn”

Last week I was able to post a video of my performance last year of the Bach B minor mass on descant horn. Randomly in another search I also stumbled upon a very interesting 2011 University of Miami dissertation, “An Equipment Guide to Performing Baroque Horn Music” by Joseph T. Falvey. The full text is online and it is well worth checking out if it is a topic of interest to you.

My vintage descant

Besides that dissertation quoting and citing several of my publications, I was very interested to actually learn something new about my descant horn! It is the one I was playing in the video, an early Paxman that in my contact with Paxman I had learned was made in 1959 by Robert Paxman himself, before Richard Merewether joined the firm. What new thing I learned from the dissertation was that, according to Paxman, my descant was a new model introduced in that year, 1959. I don’t believe a lot of these were made, with this layout and the double change valve set this way, but really it is a very fine descant. The only note being it does need a mouthpiece with a larger than standard shank diameter.

This past twelve months I have had three works come up in fact that I could have chosen to play on this vintage descant or on my triple. I did back to back tests and every time the descant has won out. If I were to cut it all down to just two horns at this point in my life I would keep this descant and my current double horn.

A topic I am enthusiastic about

Descant and triple horns are a topic that I am enthusiastic about in general. They are tools that every serious horn player needs to be familiar with on at least a basic level. As I often tell people, a descant horn can save your life! I had a short, general article on the topic in Horn Articles Online for years, which has been updated and moved to Horn Matters (here). 

That became the topic of a book

Seeing it as a topic that had not been covered in much depth in any existing source, I set out to in fact write a book on the topic, which expanded on materials that had originally been online in Horn Articles Online and then later in an article in The Horn Call. It was one of my first four publications at Horn Notes Edition, and was initially the best seller!

A book that went out of print

Dedicated to the memory of my father, parts of the book I really like still but honestly I tried to do too much in this book. Part of the problem was it was a little hard to categorize in a way as it was a combination method and excerpt book with solos and more! And I did not make that much money from it, in the end. It had some real overhead to cover in particular with paying for the rights to publish the Shostakovich and Ravel excerpts.

UPDATE: A book that is back

A helpful thing to me was the recent dissertation helped confirm in my mind which sections had the most value in the original high horn book. A short article with a video on the topic of this new version may be found here.

And a few years later Playing Descant and Triple Horns was updated further in a new, affordable second edition in print and Kindle versions. For more information please visit hornnotes.com or search for it on Amazon.

On Playing the B-Minor Mass (on YouTube)

This past week was my week to become a YouTube star, as in addition to the Konzertstuck from the Southwest Horn Conference my performance of the Bach B-Minor mass from January of 2011 was uploaded to YouTube as well. It is below, with a few more comments to follow. (Direct link to video here).

This was performed as a part of the Arizona Bach Festival. I really enjoyed this event and the opportunity to perform this great work.

For those equipment junkies out there, it was performed on a vintage (1959) Paxman descant. In my opinion a descant is certainly the way to go on this rather than a standard double horn or a triple.

The big challenge of this work is the long wait to play the movement, about an hour with nothing to play. What I did was bring a silent brass mute on stage and play along nearly silently with the choir on several of the movements. I doubt anyone actually noticed but it really helped in keeping things fresh and ready to go.

It is great to now have a couple of quality performances on YouTube that I can point people toward, and I hope to have a few more things out there in the near future.

The Cabbage Speaks on ‘Wolf Notes’

0

In response to a question about bad notes on a natural horn crook, both John and Dave have taken a crack at an answer.

Behind-the-scenes we also heard from Brian Holmes a.k.a. the “Cabbage.”

The initial question:

My question is why a natural horn instrument with a certain crook might have a bad note. What is the explanation, the physic behind it? … For example, on my Courtois horn, the top G on the C-crook is terribly sharp in pitch, and has a very poor tone quality.

My first thought was that it might not be clean inside (after all, it’s more than 200 years old!), or maybe a dent was interfering with the vibrations. But I got both the crook cleaned and the dents removed, and the “wolf” note is still there.

Mr. Holmes has been a member of the Physics Department of San Jose State University for fourteen years. His interests include the physics of music and sports, and physics education. A sought-after speaker, his topics include musical acoustics and sports physics.

Mr. Holmes offered his own opinion on this topic and given his background and expertise, we thought that it would be interesting to pass it on to our readers. It is reproduced here with permission.

In response, Brian Holmes

* * *
I’m not sure I understand what Dave means by “equalizing.” And I do not understand the physics whereby such equalization would produce a shortening of the air column. Let me offer another explanation.

Sound consists of oscillating pressure. Without sound, the pressure in the horn would be one atmosphere. With sound, the pressure in the air oscillates, sometimes above atmospheric pressure, sometimes below. When I play concert A, these oscillations occur 440 times a second (different on a natural horn played at “authentic” pitch.)

I buzz my lips in the mouthpiece. The resulting sound travels down the horn and reaches the bell. At the bell, the pressure wave inverts (that is, high pressures are converted to low pressures, and vice versa) and reflects back up the horn toward the mouthpiece. (Only 1% of the sound actually leaves the bells and goes into the room.)

Notice that I didn’t explain why the pressure inverts. But let me point out that if there were a wall at the end of the horn (you can simulate this by closing the bell with your hand) then the reflected pressure wave would not invert.

(Let me know if you crave a detailed explanation of the inverting/noninverting of the reflected waves.)

Imagine that you are a tiny insect living inside the horn. (There may be plentiful green goo to dine on.) You will be in the presence of an outgoing and a returning sound wave. At certain locations, the high pressure regions of an outgoing wave exactly line up with low pressure regions of the returning wave. In these locations, the two waves cancel, and the insect will hear little sound. These locations are called pressure nodes. In other locations, the high pressure regions of the outgoing and returning waves will line up, as will the low pressure regions. In these regions, the two waves reinforce, making the sound louder; these spots are called anti-nodes.

When you play a note on your horn, there is a standing wave inside. As the insect walks from the mouthpiece to the bell, it will notice a succession of nodes and antinodes.

Now suppose that there is a tiny leak in the side of the horn. This makes it more difficult for pressure to oscillate there: if the pressure rises above one atmosphere, the air rushes out the hole. And if the pressure falls below one atmosphere, the air rushes in from outside the hole.

Here is the result. Suppose you have a standing wave in the horn, and you open a hole in the side. If the standing wave has a pressure node where the hole is, the hole will have no effect on the pitch of the note. If the standing wave has a pressure node near where the hole is, then opening the hole causes the node to move toward the hole, changing the pitch of the note.

(I have a trumpet on which I demonstrate this effect. If I open the spit valve, the note G is unaltered. This means the standing wave for G has a node at the location of the hole. Meanwhile, the note A flat gets flatter, and the note F sharp gets sharper. )

Suppose, instead of a hole, you have a tiny dent. Then the tendency will be for pressure nodes to move away from the dent. And once again, the effect will be different for different notes.

My guess, therefore, is to look for some imperfection in the tubing of the crook that is causing the mischief. Since the other crooks behave acceptably, I suspect either a small obstruction (a dent, blob of solder, or a joint between tubing of different diameters) or a small leak. But it’s easy enough to test a crook for a leak.